Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Bartleby74

No fun, no money

154 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[2CMF]
Players
129 posts
9,801 battles

I will keep this simple. Either my ingame experience improves, and improves a lot, or WG will not see a single cent more from me.

 

No fun, no money.

 

No good teams, no money.

 

No good DD captains, no money

 

No good cruiser captains, no money.

 

No good BB captains, no money.

 

Enough is enough. I don't want crap teams no more. Never, ever.

 

My team DDs don't cap -no money

My team cruisers don't assist - no money

My team BBs don't push - no money.

 

Make it as you wish WG. I'm not paying for having my precious leisure time ruined by bots and selfish idiots. Look at the picture and if you WG can't spot something wrong with it, you deserve not being in the entertainment business.

 

I don't ask WG to do impossibles and improve player quality. But certainly they could do a better job measuring player behavior and pairing them with other players who behave similarly. Aggressive captains with aggressive captains and pussies with pussies. Pushers with pushers and ""snipers"" with ""snipers"".

 

Because if I have no fun, WG will have no no money.

 

No kidding shit team.png

  • Cool 7
  • Funny 3
  • Boring 7
  • Bad 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[UNICS]
Players
4,506 posts
15,942 battles

All bbs alive at the end of the battle?

 

What's wrong with the picture? Your team got stomped... happens.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,046 posts
20,418 battles
2 minutes ago, loppantorkel said:

All bbs alive at the end of the battle?

 

Just a coincidence.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
90 posts
8,106 battles

So what 0 ships sunk by your team that seems to be a huge potatoes bag.

At least sunk more than one before posting cause you were part of the problem

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
182 posts
3,092 battles

Yeah doesn't seem like you helped either, kill securing one ship and being in the bottom of the list.

 

Face rolls happen at times, just have to deal with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THROW]
[THROW]
Players
5,061 posts
10,702 battles
14 minutes ago, Bartleby74 said:

Either my ingame experience improves, and improves a lot, or WG will not see a single cent more from me.

Excuse me Mr. CenterOfTheUniverse, did you know that WG doesn't directly affect any single players gameplay experience?

 

14 minutes ago, Bartleby74 said:

No good teams, no money.

 

No good DD captains, no money

 

No good cruiser captains, no money.

 

No good BB captains, no money.

 

Enough is enough.

I'd suggest to start with - stop being crap yourself. That would be a good first step :cap_like:

 

And yes, you are terrible. Especially in BBs - in them you seem to be garbage, for the lack of a better word to use with that same meaning

 

 

  • Cool 6
  • Funny 3
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles
19 minutes ago, Bartleby74 said:

I will keep this simple. Either my ingame experience improves, and improves a lot, or WG will not see a single cent more from me.

 

No fun, no money.

 

No good teams, no money.

 

No good DD captains, no money

 

No good cruiser captains, no money.

 

No good BB captains, no money.

 

Enough is enough. I don't want crap teams no more. Never, ever.

 

My team DDs don't cap -no money

My team cruisers don't assist - no money

My team BBs don't push - no money.

 

Make it as you wish WG. I'm not paying for having my precious leisure time ruined by bots and selfish idiots. Look at the picture and if you WG can't spot something wrong with it, you deserve not being in the entertainment business.

 

I don't ask WG to do impossibles and improve player quality. But certainly they could do a better job measuring player behavior and pairing them with other players who behave similarly. Aggressive captains with aggressive captains and pussies with pussies. Pushers with pushers and ""snipers"" with ""snipers"".

 

Because if I have no fun, WG will have no no money.

 

No kidding shit team.png

Basicly you demand to be carried by your team or you do not spend money on the game? :Smile_facepalm:

  • Funny 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[2CMF]
Players
129 posts
9,801 battles
10 minutes ago, Naesil said:

Yeah doesn't seem like you helped either, kill securing one ship and being in the bottom of the list.

 

Face rolls happen at times, just have to deal with it.

Kill securing? I was capping C and the Tirpitz was firing at me. Plus a Gearing that just capped D and moved to C, and a Hindenburg camping behind the rocks, which eventually killed me with fire damage while I avoided the Gearing.

 

I am not a good player. But jesus, at least I do my job. I push when I must push, support when I must support and cap when I must cap. I always play to win, not to avoid having my precious paintjob scratched 20 km away frorm the nearest enemy.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
182 posts
3,092 battles

Well killing enemy and getting 300 xp just seems like minimal damage dealt..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[2CMF]
Players
129 posts
9,801 battles
14 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

Basicly you demand to be carried by your team or you do not spend money on the game? :Smile_facepalm:

I expect to be teamed with players who play like me. BBs that push, cruisers that provide support and DDs that try to cap. It doesn't matters if they're elite or potatoes as long as they at least try to play correctly.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4,392 posts
12,107 battles

OP. There's a difference between pushing and rushing in like an idiot. You play FdG: that's not the first ship of choice to go cap with in early match. Even secondary specced you'll be focussed out in no time.

Seeing the XP line up I see your team had the DD disadvantage. I'm guessing the reds quickly capped 3 or 4 caps, dug in and farmed you all.

We all have those landslide matches. Both on receiving or delivering end. Boring AF I totally agree with you there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KLUNJ]
Players
2,870 posts
10 minutes ago, Bartleby74 said:

I expect to be teamed with players who play like me. 

So you want an even lower win rate? :Smile_teethhappy:

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[2DSF]
Beta Tester
1,541 posts
7,511 battles
9 minutes ago, Bartleby74 said:

I expect to be teamed with players who play like me. BBs that push, cruisers that provide support and DDs that try to cap. It doesn't matters if they're elite or potatoes as long as they at least try to play correctly.

 

This shows that you don't know that some ships are different to others in their class!

With a shima you don't cap at all cost because you are have poor guns, and there are BB which should not always push, etc!

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THROW]
[THROW]
Players
5,061 posts
10,702 battles
15 minutes ago, Bartleby74 said:

I expect to be teamed with players who play like me.

But that already happens, isn't that exactly what you are complaining about? You, a potato, being matched together with other potatoes not with unicorns. Literally that's what you made this post about

 

 

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 2
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
891 posts
20,781 battles
16 minutes ago, Bartleby74 said:

I expect to be teamed with players who play like me. 

 

Sorry to pull the stats card, but judging by your performance I sure don't want to be teamed up with you..

You demand being put up with good teammates so you can "have fun". What is fun to you? Winning? Getting a lot of damage? A lot of XP?

 

 

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[2CMF]
Players
129 posts
9,801 battles
16 minutes ago, Freyr_90 said:

 

Sorry to pull the stats card, but judging by your performance I sure don't want to be teamed up with you..

You demand being put up with good teammates so you can "have fun". What is fun to you? Winning? Getting a lot of damage? A lot of XP?

 

 

Maybe you should read before posting. I am asking for good behavior, not good performance. I am a bad performing player but I play the game correctly. There's a difference between being the worst shooter in the squad and being that guy who always runs away from the enemy.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,177 posts
23,318 battles
1 hour ago, Bartleby74 said:

I will keep this simple. Either my ingame experience improves, and improves a lot, or WG will not see a single cent more from me.

 

No fun, no money.

 

No good teams, no money.

 

No good DD captains, no money

 

No good cruiser captains, no money.

 

No good BB captains, no money.

 

Enough is enough. I don't want crap teams no more. Never, ever.

 

My team DDs don't cap -no money

My team cruisers don't assist - no money

My team BBs don't push - no money.

 

Make it as you wish WG. I'm not paying for having my precious leisure time ruined by bots and selfish idiots. Look at the picture and if you WG can't spot something wrong with it, you deserve not being in the entertainment business.

 

I don't ask WG to do impossibles and improve player quality. But certainly they could do a better job measuring player behavior and pairing them with other players who behave similarly. Aggressive captains with aggressive captains and pussies with pussies. Pushers with pushers and ""snipers"" with ""snipers"".

 

Because if I have no fun, WG will have no no money.

 

No kidding shit team.png

Wargaming aims for the lowest possible common denominator so what you are, rightfully so, demanding from that company is simply not possible to fulfill; there are just too many very bad players playing the game for it to be possible to have good teams on a regular basis. Bad teams are the inevitable norm of Wargaming's games so you can either accept that or quit playing - there really isn't a golden middle path I'm sorry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THROW]
[THROW]
Players
5,061 posts
10,702 battles
4 minutes ago, Bartleby74 said:

I play the game correctly

No you don't, clearly evidenced by your performance. As I said - that's where you should start.

 

You think you're great and doing everything correctly - but (sorry not sorry to burst your bubble) you probably are doing way more wrong than right.

 

4 minutes ago, TheComedian1983 said:

Why these posts come allways with these numbers?

Dunning-Kruger effect if I remember correctly :Smile_teethhappy:

  • Funny 1
  • Bad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
5,868 posts
1 minute ago, Freyr_90 said:

... you know what .. I'd love for OP to upload some replays of his games. I'd watch that 

Agreed...I'm up for a laugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×