WG pls, save our time.

[OOAndreasOO]

Like a lot of players know, we can see who win or lose in 90% of random battles till start.

Just looking players in both squads and anyone can predict what squad win.

When you see 3-4 rank 1 in a squad and totally unranked ppl the other one...it's easy.

 

No one effort is done by MM and server to balance battles. Server decided (and know) at start the winner.

Personal or captain skills, tactics....it's all useless when you are put in a loser squad.

 

Then, dear WG, when stupid MM prepare such unbalanced squads in random, why not assign directly who win and lose?.

 

It's easy: You press button "BATTLE" and MM answer "you win" or "you lose"...And we save a lot of time!

 

Ty

[Igarigen]

LOL must be tinfoil monday.

[dCK_Ad_Hominem]

Please don't Play the game if you are unwilling to put in any effort for your team. 

 

Ranked results are meaningless for random. People like you who are folding at the first obstacle are not. 

[bushwacker001]

Another, 'the higher the rank, the better the player' garbage post.

[WashedandDeceased]

1. It's called random battles for a reason 

2. Stop trying to make skill based MM happen. WG have said it's not going to happen 

3. Even the mightiest of potatoes can reach rank 1 if they grind enough 

4. I don't have a single ranked game last season. Would you like me on your team or for example an HE spamming rank 1 Fuso? 

[Asakka]

Interesting, i won 10 battles in a row yesterday and everytime i looked on MM i thought we are gonna loose. Hmmmmmmm

 

Have you thought about not playing like gargabe and helping your team instead of whining and crying about MM ?

 

It helps

[ColonelPete]

Well, if you play badly, it is no surprise that the battle does not go your way.

[bushwacker001]

Just now, Freyr_90 said:

1. It's called random battles for a reason 

2. Stop trying to make skill based MM happen. WG have said it's not going to happen 

3. Even the mightiest of potatoes can reach rank 1 if they grind enough 

4. I don't have a single ranked game last season. Would you like me on your team or for example an HE spamming rank 1 Fuso? 

Ha, now you say you have no rank you must be complete rubbish, I have seen rank 23 players who must be better than you Freyr. 

[Klopirat]

another reason why those 'mm tools' should be banned... and perhaps you shouldn't see the real player names in the opposite team until the end of the game...

[xXx_Blogis_xXx]

like , there was 45%+ bots  with rank 1 ohh no he will win game in random :P

[Quetak]

32 minutes ago, OOAndreasOO said:

When you see 3-4 rank 1 in a squad and totally unranked ppl the other one

sry I cant see that in game... maybe try to turn such crap mode off and your life become better.

Spoiler

I like stats....50k avg Zao....

 

[Fat_Maniac]

OP - look at this - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-fulfilling_prophecy

 

 

[Nechrom]

Or, you know, you could just play the battle without looking at ranks and WRs.

 

I might get a laugh out of checking some guy's stats if he performs exceptionally badly in battle. But that's for my own enjoyment.

If you end up feeling worse by checking out other people's stats/rank, then don't. Just do your best and reap the rewards of a successful carry every once in a while. 

[BeauNidl3]

I know several really good players that didn't bother with Ranked last season or the one before come to that so they will appear "unranked!".

 

Had a game the other day where some clown running matchmaker monitor said "They have 55% win rate our team is 42% this is a loss", went he/she/it went afk and didn't take part in the faceroll win.

 

Ranks and stats collection tools are no indicator, just play or don't press the Battle button.

[159Hunter]

If only people would mind their own stats as much as they care for the stats of others...

[Egoleter]

2 hours ago, OOAndreasOO said:

And we save a lot of time!

Why didn't you save us the time we wasted reading your tinfoil hat thread?

[ClappingLollies]

Oh no the rank 1's! Run away! 

 

Spoiler

Rank has nothing to do with skill in this game, just shows how patient and persistent the player is. 

 

[IamTroublemaker]

You do realize being rank 1 means nothing, like, absolutely nothing? I've seen people play 1000-2000 ranked battles in 1 season just to reach rank 1, and the reason they needed so many battles its because they are below average players. On the other hand I've seen unicum and some really good players who haven't reached rank 1 because they were sick of it (or any other reason). Being rank means nothing except that the person who reached it is persistent.

 

 

As for the MM. Sometimes you get good days, sometimes its bad, sometimes its really bad aka weekend.

[Shaka_D]

The mm randomly assigns players to teams. At this point much of the randomness stops and it can thereafter often loosely be predicted who will win if the team skills are imbalanced - but we do know at times the opposite occurs, and the worst skilled team overall wins.

 

So, random as much as WG says it is random at the start, teams set up and can thereafter roughly be determined how the game could play out in all probability. RNG and luck play a part, but it's definitely not all random.

 

That said, OP is on drugs, and bushwhacker (bless his old soul) is still a canoeist to my powerboat!

[Prospect_b]

2 hours ago, BeauNidl3 said:

Had a game the other day where some clown running matchmaker monitor said "They have 55% win rate our team is 42% this is a loss", went he/she/it went afk and didn't take part in the faceroll win.

Euh. AFAIK a tool that "predicts" winning chances doesn't exist for this game.

[BeauNidl3]

8 minutes ago, PzychoPanzer said:

Euh. AFAIK a tool that "predicts" winning chances doesn't exist for this game.

In Aslains modpack there's the Matchmaking Monitor, it queries the stats sites (possibly the WG main game stats) and lists the stats of all the players in the game, or at least those that don't hide their stats. It does this in real time and if you've a second screen or alt-tab you can see them even before the countdown finishes.

It doesn't predict winning chances, that's something you're reading into my post, but it does summarise past performances, hence that idiot making the prediction from his reading the stats and going afk.

[cro_pwr]

how can I farm my flags then?

[Prospect_b]

3 minutes ago, BeauNidl3 said:

In Aslains modpack there's the Matchmaking Monitor, it queries the stats sites (possibly the WG main game stats) and lists the stats of all the players in the game, or at least those that don't hide their stats. It does this in real time and if you've a second screen or alt-tab you can see them even before the countdown finishes.

It doesn't predict winning chances, that's something you're reading into my post, but it does summarise past performances, hence that idiot making the prediction from his reading the stats and going afk.

Lol

Stupid me, I read your post too quickly. I thought it said the guy had seen smt like 'our team has 55% to win'

 

If he based his chances on a generized wr for both teams, that is indeed stupid.

 

But I've used a similar tool myself (stopped, because too depressing), and if you take a proper look at both teams, you can quite accurately predict the outcome tbh.

 

(Most importantly the stats of the dds)

[EmilyFara]

I tend to like matchmaking that seems stacked against me. My allies are more scared and play carefully while my enemies get overconfident and yolo to kill my noob team. 

[Culiacan_Mexico]

34 minutes ago, BeauNidl3 said:

In Aslains modpack there's the Matchmaking Monitor, it queries the stats sites (possibly the WG main game stats) and lists the stats of all the players in the game, or at least those that don't hide their stats. It does this in real time and if you've a second screen or alt-tab you can see them even before the countdown finishes.

I am truly curious, do you use this mod and if so, does it effect your game play in anyway?