New american CV...another indecent gift for Premium CV

[OOAndreasOO]

WG is more and more indecent day by day

 

Tell me how a Ranger with only one fighter squad of seven tier 7 can face a Saipan with 2 or 3 squads of four tier 9

 

Tell me how a Lexiton with one fighter squad of seven tier 8 can face Enterprise with 2 squad of seven tier 7

 

Before update, american CVs had a way of play with air-superiority config., now american CV tier 5-6-7-8 are useless trash.

 

...is better use japs (Hiryu can still set 3 squads of five tier 7)

[22cm]

7 minutes ago, OOAndreasOO said:

Before update, american CVs had a way of play with air-superiority config., now american CV tier 5-6-7-8 are useless trash.

 

...is better use japs (Hiryu can still set 3 squads of five tier 7)

 

Tier 5-6 can still be OK , but 7-8 have now no chance at map control at all, and map control in domination mode is what wins games.

If strafe was removed, then killiing 6 US fighters with 10 JP fighters would result in big losses for JP fighters too, but like it is now...

[veslingr]

12 minutes ago, OOAndreasOO said:

WG is more and more indecent day by day

 

Tell me how a Ranger with only one fighter squad of seven tier 7 can face a Saipan with 2 or 3 squads of four tier 9

 

Tell me how a Lexiton with one fighter squad of seven tier 8 can face Enterprise with 2 squad of seven tier 7

 

Before update, american CVs had a way of play with air-superiority config., now american CV tier 5-6-7-8 are useless trash.

 

...is better use japs (Hiryu can still set 3 squads of five tier 7)

USA AS setup is worst setup ever and reason why WR of USA is so freaking low and why your stats in CV are very very bad.

 

This update in fact strenghten USA CV-s......

[wilkatis_LV]

Is this another thread crying "Give me back my AS CV, me too bad to play an actual CV setup!!1!!11!", hmm? At least seems like it is.

 

Also:

 

23 minutes ago, OOAndreasOO said:

Hiryu can still set 3 squads of five tier 7

 

[DanottiTR]

26 minutes ago, OOAndreasOO said:

WG is more and more indecent day by day

 

Tell me how a Ranger with only one fighter squad of seven tier 7 can face a Saipan with 2 or 3 squads of four tier 9

 

Tell me how a Lexiton with one fighter squad of seven tier 8 can face Enterprise with 2 squad of seven tier 7

 

Before update, american CVs had a way of play with air-superiority config., now american CV tier 5-6-7-8 are useless trash.

 

...is better use japs (Hiryu can still set 3 squads of five tier 7)

Saipan is another leauge but yet 10 of 9 saipan players are not experienced .

I liked the current ranger . Now I am not captive to 2 bombers only but can give a punch with torps also :D

Not a super experienced CV player I am but after playing like 4-5 matches today ,even at T9 MM I was able to give damage and kill planes and have fun .I feel  my ranger like more useful now :D

 

With proper captain and modules and strafe knowledge you can  still do good .

 

Also  hoping there will be a change in Japanes CVs in a same way .

 

Well a hiryu with 3 fighters lacks damage alot btw .

[22cm]

He has a point though, tier 7-8 UC carriers still have no chance against the premium ones or the Jap ones.

[SmartassNoob]

Oh no, every single ship in that tree is nolonger a guaranteed win and you might have to play ships of other trees at a few tiers?!

[Shirakami_Kon]

36 minutes ago, OOAndreasOO said:

WG is more and more indecent day by day

 

 

[El2aZeR]

You honestly thought using AS gave you a chance against Saipan?

 

[blanc091]

5 hours ago, El2aZeR said:

You honestly thought using AS gave you a chance against Saipan?

 

My strategy against Saipan in a Ranger is just wait for most of his planes to die, with the occasional strafe; nothing else I can do really.

[Spellfire40]

5 hours ago, 22cm said:

He has a point though, tier 7-8 UC carriers still have no chance against the premium ones or the Jap ones.

Well the 1 Rangerfighter roflstomps kagas 2 squads anytime question is what do the 12 Kaga TBs do in that time your fighting fighters......

[Nechrom]

Working as intended. (no sarcasm)

 

You're the reason they made this change.

[Trakhan]

11 hours ago, OOAndreasOO said:

 

I'd say much better than the strike loadout, I played till now. Because AA loadout, was rather dumb and with less rewards.

[veslingr]

*edited*:)  did he really expect that somebody will agree with him?

 

*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to disrespectful comments.

[Malim0o]

12 hours ago, 22cm said:

He has a point though, tier 7-8 UC carriers still have no chance against the premium ones or the Jap ones.

Rly ? 

Now Ranger and Lex are border line OP.

You have more strike power than the IJN one and more strafe power with your solo squadron.

So no chance against IJN ? Not rly ...

[pra3y]

In a 1v1 click fighter, Ranger's fighters will dominate Saipan's. Plus if you bother to learn to strafe it's manageable. 

 

8 hours ago, veslingr said:

Why OP noob left this thread?:)  did he really expect that somebody will agree with him?

 

OP enjoys leaving complain threads all over the forums and not coming back to them. *edited*

 

*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to disrespectful comments.

 

[LOZFFVII]

4 hours ago, pra3y said:

OP enjoys leaving complain threads all over the forums and not coming back to them. A way to de-stress for him I guess, as potato as he is.

To be fair to TC, he's not as potato as you think when taking a quick look at his stats...

[OOAndreasOO]

7 hours ago, veslingr said:

Why OP noob left this thread?:)  did he really expect that somebody will agree with him?

I'm a noob and a lot of ppl in game are noobs

Are noobs because they think to play a free game and fair game.

When noobs like me will understand there is no fair play between normal ships and premium ships, they will leave and go play a better game....and bye bye WOWS.

I refuse to play an unfair game.

 

And day by day i see WG spam premium ships more and more unbalanced respect free ships.

And day by day i see free ships more and more nerfed.

Same week ago Americans CV under tier 8 had normally 3 opions in game....Now they have only one...the basic one.

And WG tell us "American ships now have more various gameplay!!!"...I'm laughing

They are jocking?

They think we are stupids?

 

P.S. I have only one american CV in my port between tier 5 and tier 8: a Indipendence

My Bogue is sold time ago...Now I play Zuhio

My Ranger is sold time ago....Now I play Hyriu

My Lexinton is sold time ago....Now I play Shokaku

 

I dont speak for me: I speak for all players.

Bye

 

 

 

 

 

6 hours ago, malimoo said:

Rly ? 

Now Ranger and Lex are border line OP.

You have more strike power than the IJN one and more strafe power with your solo squadron.

So no chance against IJN ? Not rly ...

Are ur sure?

When i see Ranger against Saipan or a Kaga i know at start who lose.

 

 

Reading the answers i understand in this forum there are ppl who dont know differences between have a single large fighter group and 2 small fighter groups....Probably because they never play a carrier.

 

This post has been edited by the moderation team due to merging two posts.

[pra3y]

18 hours ago, Captain_LOZFFVII said:

To be fair to TC, he's not as potato as you think when taking a quick look at his stats...

 

Well if you look at his CV stats he is a *edited*. Not that I'm not one myself. There is always a place to improve as a player. If you can't improve as a player and blame the game mechanic all the time for your own incompetence then the problem is you as a player. Look at his avg damage, then look at his avg winrate and finally avg planes destroyed as a CV player. Even before this USN CV change, OP is only good at shooting down planes. But his contribution towards the team? Poor damage and poor winrate. And it's WG's fault? So can we blame him for making his team lose? Afterall it's also partially his fault that his team lost isn't it? People like him have to realize that they themselves are the problem. Blaming the game or other people all the time when they refuse to improve or find ways to improve is just plain bad.

 

*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to disrespectful comments.

[OOAndreasOO]

20 minutes ago, pra3y said:

 

Poor damage

Using AS carrier is normal...or not?

 

Just for all ppl information (nothing to hide by me)

WR CVs in my port:

 

HOSHO 63%

ZUHIO 54%

HYRIU 53%

LANGLEY 52%

SHOKAKU 48%

INDIPENDENCE (not skilled cpt) 44%

ESSEX (Just taken: few battles, not skiled cpt) 37%

 

The others are all sold because only passage-ships with unskilled captains

 

[LOZFFVII]

1 minute ago, pra3y said:

Well if you look at his CV stats he is a potato. Not that I'm not one myself. There is always a place to improve as a player. If you can't improve as a player and blame the game mechanic all the time for your own incompetence then the problem is you as a player. Look at his avg damage, then look at his avg winrate and finally avg planes destroyed as a CV player. Even before this USN CV change, OP is only good at shooting down planes. But his contribution towards the team? Poor damage and poor winrate. And it's WG's fault? So can we blame him for making his team lose? Afterall it's also partially his fault that his team lost isn't it? People like him have to realize that they themselves are the problem. Blaming the game or other people all the time when they refuse to improve or find ways to improve is just plain bad.

Fair enough.

I didn't really bother to look up stats limited to certain ship types, just took an overview of his Random Battle stats.

If I'm honest, an air superiority load out for USN CVs initially attracted me to them over the IJN CVs when I decided I wanted to try CV gameplay out. After having my aft handed to me by bots in co-op multiple times I decided that CVs weren't for me.

[LOZFFVII]

6 minutes ago, OOAndreasOO said:

Using AS carrier is normal...or not?

Apparently not. I think it has something to do with low ship-damage being a deciding factor with games in CVs.

(Sorry for double-post)

[pra3y]

5 minutes ago, Captain_LOZFFVII said:

Fair enough.

I didn't really bother to look up stats limited to certain ship types, just took an overview of his Random Battle stats.

If I'm honest, an air superiority load out for USN CVs initially attracted me to them over the IJN CVs when I decided I wanted to try CV gameplay out. After having my aft handed to me by bots in co-op multiple times I decided that CVs weren't for me.

 

Well, it's a learning and practice experience I guess. The learning curve for CV is just more demanding. Why not give it a try again. If you have any problems or question just pop by the CV sub forum. There is a CV tavern there if you need help.

[pra3y]

10 minutes ago, OOAndreasOO said:

Using AS carrier is normal...or not?

 

Really good AS players can deal decent damage as well as taking down planes. 

[LOZFFVII]

2 minutes ago, pra3y said:

Well, it's a learning and practice experience I guess. The learning curve for CV is just more demanding. Why not give it a try again. If you have any problems or question just pop by the CV sub forum. There is a CV tavern there if you need help.

Thanks for the offer, but I'm alright.

I'm just generally bad at RTS games - I can play SRPGs like Disgaea just fine, but the added "everything moving at the same time" doesn't give my brain time to think.