Matchmaker going hard

[SilentKiller_2014]

Fix this crap already.

[SV_Kompresor]

Seen much worse

[SilentKiller_2014]

At least give us the chance to win a SC container at any amount of t10 battles. If you like to [edited]us at least pay for it

[DFens_666]

Be glad that over half the ships are T8...

Imagine u being the Edinburgh and everyting else it T9/T10, except for maybe one other T8 on the enemy team.

[Aschwell]

I crap you not when I say that at least 15 of my last games in Shokaku was quite heavy T10  (Year of the CV)

[Juanx]

What seems to be the issue?

T8s can go to TX matches, is that it?

[Shirakami_Kon]

Only problem I see this morning is the 5 DDs per side on each team.

 

Because of the torp spam you ask? I'd gladly deal with that all day long. What I can't stand is when the 5 DDs on your team are yolo kamikazes that automatically lose you the battle in the first three minutes. Please reduce the DD hard cap on battles and end this [edited], please.

[pra3y]

Looks fine to me. More exp and credit is always good.

 

On the other hand I had an exciting MM this morning: 

 

I'm proud to say we won and I was not sunk by any DDs despite the best effort of the enemy shima.

[Favuz]

Never seen 6 dd per side, Always thought there is a soft cap of 5 per side like BBs (i Always play in peak hours i admit).

 

 

As for OP, i have seen way worse MM than this, in your screen i'd better be in Bismarck than Benson (i hate 5 dd per side when i'm driving a dd).

 

[Asakka]

Where is the problem ? Improvise. Adapt. Overcome. 

 

Stop crying and start helping your team win

[Altsak]

5 DDs per side? No problem. 5 times the radars in one side? One sided battle.

 

[_Teob_]

I am not being facetious here but that's near perfect MM.

 

The cruisers are easy enough to deal with, 4 DDs, which isn't too bad, Yam can overmatch the armor but conq can't so angling is viable (unless he HE spams).

 

It seems like a decent match.

[Nordavindr]

1 hour ago, Juanx said:

What seems to be the issue?

T8s can go to TX matches, is that it?

The issue is not that T8 ships go to T10 matches. 

The issue is that they go to T10 more than to T9 or T8.

If every second game on my T8 ships I have T10 players what does it mean to you? Is it evenly spread out?  

[Egoleter]

I fail to see a problem here.

• Not even half the ships on both sides are T-X. The other team has a T-IX where the OPs team only has a T-VIII but that's not much of a difference.
• Ship classes are as perfectly balanced as it could be, considering that there is a carrier in the mix. (4-3-4 plus CV)
• There are no massive collections of radar on either sides.
• There is no clan doing sync-drops in random matches.

So is the OP just telling us that he can't play well if he is low tier? Because that is all I could read from the picture.

[ForlornSailor]

@Altsak that one is horrible. Just wrong.

[WeGreedy]

2 hours ago, SilentKiller_2014 said:

At least give us the chance to win a SC container at any amount of t10 battles.

IIRC every whiny post or salty tear will increase chance of dropping by 0.1%

[rvfharrier]

This thread provides absolutely nothing new, but to the people saying 'nothing wrong', really? T8 MM is broken and has been for some time now. OP may be complaining about something that's been brought up many, many times before but if WG is yet to fix it perhaps it's good that people keep bringing it up.

[YukiEiriKun]

Oh the days when MM often placed you in 10 vs 12 battles. Those were fun. And still you could win even when you started with two ships down..

[ColonelPete]

And our daily thread of people who do not understand the MM.

[Sander93]

2 hours ago, Teob_VG said:

I am not being facetious here but that's near perfect MM.

 

The cruisers are easy enough to deal with, 4 DDs, which isn't too bad, Yam can overmatch the armor but conq can't so angling is viable (unless he HE spams).

 

It seems like a decent match.

 

Except for when the T10 CV looks at you and you instantly die without any chance of defending yourself.

Casting the ever increasing doom matchmaking of tier 8s aside for a moment, CV's should only get T+1/-1 matchmaking. 

 

I stopped playing tier 8 (anything under tier 9 really) completely because I don't see the point of playing them for fun when they get T+2 MM almost every match. 

[_Teob_]

25 minutes ago, Sander93 said:

 

Except for when the T10 CV looks at you and you instantly die without any chance of defending yourself.

Casting the ever increasing doom matchmaking of tier 8s aside for a moment, CV's should only get T+1/-1 matchmaking. 

 

I stopped playing tier 8 (anything under tier 9 really) completely because I don't see the point of playing them for fun when they get T+2 MM almost every match. 

 

To be fair, if a t10 CV wants you dead, you are dead regardless of what ship you are in. Maybe like a full AA spec Des Moines or Mino could survive. And even then you'd have a hard time.

 

I mostly play at t10 as well but I really enjoy the Akizuki and that's t8 :(

[ColonelPete]

Or one could just stay with teammates with strong AA...

 

I know, a very outlandish suggestion. Who would dare to play with his team in a teamgame?

[RUSSIANBlAS]

I have a screenshot of a CV, ELEVEN BBs and a single Cruiser each side...

[juanxmar]

10 minutes ago, Negativvv said:

I have a screenshot of a CV, ELEVEN BBs and a single Cruiser each side...

 

13 vs 13?

[DFens_666]

2 hours ago, rvfharrier said:

This thread provides absolutely nothing new, but to the people saying 'nothing wrong', really? T8 MM is broken and has been for some time now. OP may be complaining about something that's been brought up many, many times before but if WG is yet to fix it perhaps it's good that people keep bringing it up.

 

Unfurtunately not the best example... Ofc T8 MM is horrible, but there are way worse matches than this one.