Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Boris_MNE

Clan wars tier X discussion

57 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[RJCTS]
Players
1,568 posts
10,303 battles

Hello guys!


For start, let me  to point out that I expected clan wars to be tier VIII, like in WoT and so on. But since we have informations that currently they are testing tier X for clan battles I have few questions:

 

Which ships will be most used?

Why?


Consider this as guide for new players as well. It is not easy to reach tier X and imagine if someone take ship what will not be played. That person would be heavy disappointed I guess...

So..


BB?  Why?
Crusier? Why?

DD? Why?

CV? Why?




Thank you
 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
285 posts
3,249 battles

BB - Conqueror (most say best BB now)

DD - Gearing (for smoke for team, decent concealment, good torps)
Cruiser - Zao (Overall very good T10 cruiser, good armor, good firechance), Moskva for radar. Minotaur maybe for smoke again.

CV - no idea. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[T-N-T]
Weekend Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
6,566 posts
16,011 battles

It also depends on number of ships in team and also limitations of ship class (to prevent for example full CV team etc.)

 

BB - Yamato because lol pen guns and Conqueror because I can heal everything

DD - Schima because torpedo soup and Z-52 because caping base need sonar 

CA - Moskva because radar

CV - Hakuryu because "I can sink anything"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
394 posts
12,229 battles

BB- Yamato and Conqueror

CA- Moskva

DD- Gearing and Z-52, maybe shima for the 15 torps in the smoke

 

The only way WG has to make us consider others is a very strong ships limitation like only 1 ship of each type

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-5D-]
Players
498 posts
5,250 battles

Minotaur all the way. Hell even a radar Minotaur working very closely with a DD is a viable strategy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

Idk really, considering we don't know the maps and other game mode restrictions. 

 

I would hope every ship is kinda viable, even outliers as CurryWurst.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
4,528 posts

It'll depend on the strategies as well. I don't see much use for minotaur tho ( spotter planes on BB will be kinda mandatory anyways )( and radar will be used a lot as well I think ).

In general maybe Henri might do okay as well? Kinda hard to predict

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4,371 posts
15,295 battles

Tier X? Wow.

 

BB - Montana and Yam.  Montana for bow on AA bubble and Yam for penning said bow on.

DD - Schima for the torp soup, but will be unstuck when spotted by a 2-3-3 CV.  i think a mix of Schima and Gearing (defensive AA) to be honest.

CA - Moskva (radar) and Mino (8.4 km AA with good concealment)

CV - Hakuryu hands down.  But Clan battles in CV's are something completely different when the whole team builds around being against one. 

 

Alot more possibilities than tier 8.  Looking forward to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
401 posts
7,897 battles

BB:Conquerror and Yamato

Cruisers: Minotaur, Moskva and Hindenburg.

DD: Z52 or Gearing.

CV: Haku.

 

Bow in meta is meaningless since conquerror release and HE spamm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DC_DK]
Players
3,370 posts
44,373 battles

Everything will be turned upside down when the new smoke mechanics will be permanent

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester
1,677 posts
20,280 battles
25 minutes ago, hgbn_dk said:

Everything will be turned upside down when the new smoke mechanics will be permanent

 

What exactly?

 

Unless you are referring to more teamwork needed and new tactical opportunities - which is a good thing imho

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DC_DK]
Players
3,370 posts
44,373 battles

What I mean is that the camping in smoke meta for the BB's and some ships will be gone forever, which is good don't get me wrong. some new tactics will have to come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
394 posts
12,229 battles
2 minutes ago, hgbn_dk said:

What I mean is that the camping in smoke meta for the BB's and some ships will be gone forever, which is good don't get me wrong. some new tactics will have to come.

Probably BBs will still camp in smoke just farther away

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DC_DK]
Players
3,370 posts
44,373 battles

I don't think so, not in clan battles. optimal effective range on most battleships is between 8-12 km. So you need to have your battleships close enough to have a impact on the match.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OCTO]
Players
1,268 posts
36,636 battles

I have a question - would it be possible to have a clan battle without a CV? Will MM take that into the consideration when matching clans? Will it ever be possible to have a battle with one team having a CV and other not?

 

Sorry for a noobish question, but I have never played WoT or any other game with clan battles... 

 

Regards!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
64 posts
5,712 battles

I heard it ll be in 7 vs 7

CA: team needs Des so much in this situation. Because nothing can stop Hakuryu except Des, especially if the number of ships are limited in combat like this. So if you have two Des in your team, you can completely counter CV. Maybe one Des and Moskva can be nice too for additional radar range. Otherwise if enemy has Midway, it changes.

DD: Gearing!

BB: Yamato?

CV: Dont know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTTX]
[TTTX]
Players
4,608 posts
8,139 battles

also depends on the level we're talking about. At the top level, I'm pretty sure one (or maybe a few) specific "cookie cutter" meta builds will establish themselves in rather short order. But at the level that most clans play? Nothing is unviable. We've seen the oddest ship comps in KotS, simply because newer players are limited in the ships they have and are comfortable with. Personally, I dont see what a Zao that will be permaspotted by a 4-2-2 Hakuryu could possibly bring to the table that a Hindenburg doesn't do better - but that doesn't mean the Zao is a bad ship, especially in the hands of someone that's got a feel for her but not for the Hindenburg.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
401 posts
7,897 battles

Theres no need for 2 des moines since CV will be almost every time AS, they spot for early game and strikes begin at mid to late game.

 

 

I bet WG will test sevral ways to balance and limit ship types in Clan Wars like current competive tournaments do.

 

Most likely they will test it carriers allowed and not allowed too, but long as theres limit on ship X and nation Y it could bring some intresting tactics. I dont wanna see 3-4 conq or yamatos on 1 team every game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
949 posts
4,642 battles

My 2 cents about TX clanwars:
BB: Yamato in the role of tanky NCs, Conquerer maybe in Amagi's harasser role, thanks to amazing concealment +reload.
CA/CL: DM (Radar+AA-Bubble+HE-Spam out of this world), maaaybe 1 Zao to accompany harassers. (minotaur for smoke?)
DD: Z-52 for Hydro and insane torpspam every minute (can even threaten Gearing with guns at 7km+). Quite possibly 1 Gearing for smoke.

CV: Hakuryu all the way, amount of planes available to spot is just too good.

Disclaimer:

Don't own any TX, only know them from fighting them or videos, and only took part in T8 clanbattles. Just going through the roles I know, and what they should be capable of.
Not sure how the smoke-changes will switch the favor in non-US-DDs.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×