[DC_DK] hgbn_dk Players 3,370 posts 44,373 battles Report post #1 Posted September 3, 2017 Simply loves this camo 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] AgarwaenME Beta Tester 4,811 posts 13,808 battles Report post #2 Posted September 3, 2017 That would be nice if ships fought in forests or on mountains. 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DC_DK] hgbn_dk Players 3,370 posts 44,373 battles Report post #3 Posted September 3, 2017 Sometimes it is when you're moored you'll need the camo most 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drunken_Jedi Players 849 posts 2,954 battles Report post #4 Posted September 3, 2017 Just beach next to an island... they'll never see you! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thracen Players 525 posts 8,871 battles Report post #5 Posted September 3, 2017 With the added bonus of looking like you meant too, it's like shame camo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
procrastinatingStudent Beta Tester 506 posts 6,411 battles Report post #6 Posted September 3, 2017 2 hours ago, AgarwaenME said: That would be nice if ships fought in forests or on mountains. 2 hours ago, hgbn_dk said: Sometimes it is when you're moored you'll need the camo most Wasn't the whole reason behind the forest camo for ijn, it hide the ships when docked Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] AgarwaenME Beta Tester 4,811 posts 13,808 battles Report post #7 Posted September 3, 2017 6 minutes ago, procrastinatingStudent said: Wasn't the whole reason behind the forest camo for ijn, it hide the ships when docked While that mostly was a little joke.. If you look at some of the cammos used in the Pacific then certainly they have a jungle theme about them (the above is more an european style colour scheme though, very similar to some uniform patterns). Not sure if the RN ever really hid their ships much like that, though the german ships stationed in Norway certainly did. Just a random pic of a model on GIS (ye it's a bit big). Can't find any good image of the actual ship quickly, but it looks similar to some book illustrations. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WGP2W] Namolis Players 751 posts 18,410 battles Report post #8 Posted September 4, 2017 I missed a shot on an IJN cruiser on the old (really old) version of Two Brothers once because of the camo. It confused my senses for some reason and I led completely wrong. I felt silly afterwards, but at least that one time it worked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ONE2] RAHJAILARI Players 3,160 posts 31,670 battles Report post #9 Posted September 4, 2017 6 hours ago, procrastinatingStudent said: Wasn't the whole reason behind the forest camo for ijn, it hide the ships when docked Ahhh. I always suspected as much. Otherwise the green camo would not make any sense... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SteDorff Players 684 posts 5,190 battles Report post #10 Posted September 4, 2017 Meanwhile in the America's Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
procrastinatingStudent Beta Tester 506 posts 6,411 battles Report post #11 Posted September 4, 2017 1 hour ago, RAHJAILARI said: Ahhh. I always suspected as much. Otherwise the green camo would not make any sense... I seem to remember wg talking about this in one of ther video, though that was some time ago I think. Edit: found this video skip to 4 minutes https://youtu.be/E7FkiQDrCvU Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ONE2] RAHJAILARI Players 3,160 posts 31,670 battles Report post #12 Posted September 4, 2017 I feel that WG could actually have more fun with special camos overall, why not get a little bit creative? Examples... OR OR You know, just to have some more fun alternatives. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
puxflacet Players 1,694 posts 3,784 battles Report post #13 Posted September 5, 2017 On 4. 9. 2017 at 0:30 AM, procrastinatingStudent said: Wasn't the whole reason behind the forest camo for ijn, it hide the ships when docked japanese didnt even use any other type of camo (or very sparsely). they camouflaged just harbored ships (therefore the green camos). they didnt believe that dazzle patterns have any effect btw, speaking about weird camos 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jss78 Players 1,292 posts 12,866 battles Report post #14 Posted September 5, 2017 All or most of the modern Finnish navy uses green camo similar to that. This is because the most probable combat scenario is the defense of the heavily forested coastline. I wonder though why so many of the IJN capital vessels in this game have the green camo. Did they expect to be attacked while at port and not at sea? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ONE2] RAHJAILARI Players 3,160 posts 31,670 battles Report post #15 Posted September 5, 2017 Well, you know... Being anchored at Truk or anywhere near Rabaul while the Americans were bombing and strafing you to h*ll was no picnic. Might quickly make one to wish they could rather blend into the jungle where it's quiet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[B0TS] philjd Beta Tester 1,806 posts 7,738 battles Report post #16 Posted September 5, 2017 Are you guys forgetting that some waters can look green? :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TOXIC] Kartoffelmos Alpha Tester 2,237 posts 8,884 battles Report post #17 Posted September 5, 2017 33 minutes ago, jss78 said: I wonder though why so many of the IJN capital vessels in this game have the green camo. Did they expect to be attacked while at port and not at sea? No, the green camouflage was (according to WG at least) applied in order to conceal the ships when anchored near islands. Tirpitz received the same treatment when she was "hiding" in the various fjords of Norway. The "house-camouflage" (as seen above) is one example of this, while tree/vegetation usage and "IJN-treatment" are other examples: Note that the port side of the hull is not painted since that side was facing the shore . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ONE2] RAHJAILARI Players 3,160 posts 31,670 battles Report post #18 Posted September 5, 2017 Not really forgotten as such philjd, but those waters mostly tend to be on the shallow side, hence seldom hosting any significant naval battles. Though admittedly, you could easily hide smaller ships anchored there with a cunning seaweed camo, for instance. So WG, when are we going to see those? My Hashidate could totally use one. It already has the bamboo-thingys attached anyways. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shockinhockin Beta Tester 449 posts 3,291 battles Report post #19 Posted September 5, 2017 I recently constructed a model of the KGV and by pure chance have painted it with the exact camo that wargaming used for the prem camo. So that was nice. I mean it's nice if you ignore the fact that the camo was from 1945 and the ships model in game is probably 1940.... but hey ho details I guess 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[MUMMY] rage1750 Players 824 posts 11,400 battles Report post #20 Posted September 5, 2017 Hmmm Mean green and unseen. Nobody here but us trees. Looking natural. Replanting. Now you see me, soon you wont. It's a ship, not a mirage tank 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
puxflacet Players 1,694 posts 3,784 battles Report post #21 Posted September 5, 2017 2 hours ago, jss78 said: I wonder though why so many of the IJN capital vessels in this game have the green camo. Did they expect to be attacked while at port and not at sea? i stated the reason right above your post it doesnt matter which colors are on the camo. what matters are shades of the colors. there has to be dark shades contrasting with very bright shades which creates the optical illusion which distorts the silhouette of the ship and thus impede proper targetting. therefore black and white patterns were used mostly. this camo isnt trying to hide the ship at all but just confuse the enemy's eyes... on the other hand if the camo has some green shades it has an advantage because it can also work for harbored ship because it can obviously mask ship's silhoutte on some natural background, but thats completele different principle than the "dazzling". this camo is hiding the ship what i would like to see however are finally proper looking regular camos Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] T0byJug Quality Poster 5,358 posts 25,533 battles Report post #22 Posted September 5, 2017 On 03/09/2017 at 9:48 PM, hgbn_dk said: Simply loves this camo I think you do not realise what camo was for on ships.. Apart from late war IJN Ships camo was not to hide the ship, The paint schemes were to brake up the outline of the ship to make identification more difficult or confuse the viewer as to the Speed/direction of the ship (Example false Bow and stern waves). Other Populer Ideas were to do things like on Ships like Bismark paint 1 rear Turret a Different Color so it blends in to background so the ship may be miss identified as a Scharnhorst for example. same was very often done with Multi Funnel ships. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] T0byJug Quality Poster 5,358 posts 25,533 battles Report post #23 Posted September 5, 2017 39 minutes ago, puxflacet said: i stated the reason right above your post it doesnt matter which colors are on the camo. what matters are shades of the colors. there has to be dark shades contrasting with very bright shades which creates the optical illusion which distorts the silhouette of the ship and thus impede proper targetting. therefore black and white patterns were used mostly. this camo isnt trying to hide the ship at all but just confuse the enemy's eyes... on the other hand if the camo has some green shades it has an advantage because it can also work for harbored ship because it can obviously mask ship's silhoutte on some natural background, but thats completele different principle than the "dazzling". this camo is hiding the ship what i would like to see however are finally proper looking regular camos Imperial Japaneses Navy Did indeed give ships green camo late war to hid the ships in Port. The complete Air Superiority if the USN men' t the IJN needed to try and hide there ships when in there ports Like Truk. However apart from IJN late war you are Completely correct in you statement Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tubit101 Players 1,189 posts 4,745 battles Report post #24 Posted September 5, 2017 I think that an underestimated effect of camouflage is how it affects crew morale. Decorating ships is an ancient tradition and crew morale on ships is incredibly important. Some examples: The painted eyes of a trireme The dragon heads of viking ships The decorations on age-of-sail warships The shark teeth of torpedo boats I think that even traditional camouflage reinforces a lot of the same effects on crew and enemies. In fact it might even rival the "official" motive of obfuscation. It motivates and makes an impression. That's why I'm totally onboard with the idea of ships in WoWs having more creative and untraditional paintjobs. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
puxflacet Players 1,694 posts 3,784 battles Report post #25 Posted September 5, 2017 ships still had a lot of this stuff even during 20th century: bow crests, even stern crests, mottos on turrets, names for turrets...the new italian battleship even has a roman relief on the turret...navy still had strong tradition and was in almost every country matter of national pride there were paintjobs for peace time but camouflage had first and foremost practical use. strictly speaking i had nothing against creative camouflages in the game if they look plausible and dont offend good taste or common sense...but wg tends to go into extremes sometimes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites