[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,140 battles Report post #51 Posted October 19, 2018 1 hour ago, RAMJB said: Stock is an awful ship and I can't predict her being any better when researched. Because just one thing. AP bombers. The second there's an american carrier in the opposing team you're as good as dead and there's NOTHING you can do to prevent it. Nope, not even sailing next to a DM, because if the CV knows to add 1+1 he'll take his planes away when DFAA goes up, wait a minute, come back and send you back to port in one go. And if that doesn't work, you'll die in his second wave. It is a Tirpitz, but she has the same problems: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SOCKS] RAMJB Players 790 posts 5,620 battles Report post #52 Posted October 19, 2018 1 minute ago, ColonelPete said: It is a Tirpitz, but she has the same problems: It's not a tirpitz... Tirpitz (and Bismarck) can turn... XD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NAN0] HaachamaShipping Players 8,474 posts 10,052 battles Report post #53 Posted October 19, 2018 9 hours ago, ColonelPete said: It is a Tirpitz, but she has the same problems: Tirpitz and Bismarck have better maneuverability and better turret angles. And a higher chance of meeting ships where secondaries matter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KillSlim Beta Tester 174 posts 3,539 battles Report post #54 Posted October 22, 2018 FDG is just a weird ship that doesn't work. Too big and cumbersome for close quarters, where it's inaccurate guns should flourish. Too inaccurate for any long range work paired with bad firing angles, and no gimmicks like a powerful HE. Secondary build is fun but rather ineffective at high tiers. AA is decent but as others have pointed out, it's not useful in 75% of games. It's a bizarre support (?) brawler (?) AA (?) hybrid ... thing? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-TFD-] Furius_Marius Players 268 posts 12,333 battles Report post #55 Posted April 15, 2020 I really need help. With Bismarck and Gness was fun and good. With this i just get melted every single time. I need to be at 15 km range to hit something . True that 2 of the battles was a triple Kleber Super Unicum division that focus on me. But this ship is a worst Bismarck one tier more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,140 battles Report post #56 Posted April 15, 2020 6 hours ago, Furius_Marius said: I really need help. With Bismarck and Gness was fun and good. With this i just get melted every single time. I need to be at 15 km range to hit something . True that 2 of the battles was a triple Kleber Super Unicum division that focus on me. But this ship is a worst Bismarck one tier more. High Tier is not easy for secondaries 15km range is a good starting point for FDG, but not necessary to hit something, work on your aim get the hull upgrade, FDG is too sluggish before that 7 games are not enough to judge a ship, especially when you play it stock stop being so aggressive, you need to survive longer 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HMA] pissBoiler Players 216 posts Report post #57 Posted April 15, 2020 I won't grind on from Bismarck, everyone seem to agree that FdG and GK are really poor ships compared to their peers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-TFD-] Furius_Marius Players 268 posts 12,333 battles Report post #58 Posted April 16, 2020 well... after i got Hull B, things improved quite a lot. Hull A( 0 wins 8 defeats) Hull B(7 wins 2 defeats). I still think Bismarck is far superior. But with hull B at least you can play it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites