Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
DutchDelightsNL

New Additions to Pan- Asian Tech Tree

17 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
173 posts
4,146 battles

so new additions to the Pan-Asian Tech Tree.

From China, Thailand, Indonesia, Taiwan and South Korea

 

 

Fu Shun Tier VI (China) destroyer.

The Anshan-class destroyers were the People's Liberation Army Navy's (PLAN) first destroyers. They were ex-Soviet Gnevny-class destroyers purchased in the 1950s. The Chinese later added HY-2 anti-ship missiles and removed some of the torpedo tubes, and redesignated as Type 6607.


 


 

Pra Huang Tier III (Thailand)
HMS Radiant was a Royal Navy and Royal Thai Navy R-class destroyer constructed and then operational in the First World War.She was renamed Phra Ruang. It is believed that in order to finance her acquisition King Rama VI and other senior figures donated personally to the finance fund, making this the first publication donation of money to procure a warship in Thailand


 


 

Gadja Mada TierVII (Indonesia)
Four ships of the Royal Navy have borne the name HMS Nonpareil, from the French meaning 'without equal':

HMS Nonpareil was a 56-gun galleon, launched in 1556 as the 44-gun HMS Philip and Mary. She was rebuilt in 1584 and renamed Nonpareil. She was again rebuilt in 1603 and renamed Nonsuch. She was sold in 1645.
HMS Nonpareil was a 14-gun schooner captured from the Americans in 1807. She was damaged in a storm in 1812 and sold the following year.
HMS Nonpareil was an Admiralty M class destroyer launched in 1916 and sold in 1921.
HMS Nonpareil was an N-class destroyer launched in 1941. She was transferred to the Royal Netherlands Navy in 1942 and renamed Tjerk Hiddes. She was transferred to Indonesia in 1951 and renamed Gadjah Mada. She was broken up in 1961.
The destroyer HNLMS Tjerk Hiddes was a British built, Dutch warship of World War II. She was laid down on 22 May 1940 as a British N-class destroyer, HMS Nonpareil, but on 27 May 1942, she was transferred to the Royal Dutch Navy. The ship was commissioned in 1942[1][3] as HNMLS Tjerk Hiddes, named after the 17th-century Dutch admiral, Tjerk Hiddes de Vries. Much of her war service was with the Royal Navy and the United States Navy in the Indian Ocean and Australia. Following the war, the destroyer was sold to Indonesia and renamed KRI Gadjah Mada. She was scrapped in 1957.



 

Shen Yang Tier IV (Taiwan or Republic of China Navy, ROCS)
Namikaze (波風 Wave Wind) was the second ship of the Nokaze sub-class, an improvement to the Minekaze-class 1st class destroyers built for the Imperial Japanese Navy following World War I. Advanced for their time, these ships served as first-line destroyers through the 1930s, but were considered obsolescent by the start of the Pacific War. Following the war, the ship was transferred to the Republic of China as a prize of war and renamed Shen Yang.



 

Hsien Yang Tier VII,

Reclassified DD-456 on 15 January 1955, she decommissioned 28 July 1955 and was transferred the same day to the Republic of China to serve as RCS Hsien Yang (DD-16). After she ran aground c. 1969, her ROCN name and ROCN pennant number were reassigned to the former USS Macomb, which was acquired in 1970.
USS Rodman (DD-456/DMS-21), a Gleaves-class destroyer, is the first ship of the United States Navy to be named for Admiral Hugh Rodman.

Rodman was laid down on 16 December 1940 by the Federal Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., Kearny, New Jersey and launched on 26 September 1941; sponsored by Mrs. Albert K. Stebbins, Jr., grandniece of Admiral Rodman. The destroyer was commissioned on 27 January 1942, Commander William Giers Michelet in command



 

Hsiang Yang Tier X, 
USS Brush (DD-745), an Allen M. Sumner-class destroyer, is the only ship of the United States Navy to be named for Charles Brush, an American inventor and philanthropist.

Brush (DD-745) was launched on 28 December 1943 by Bethlehem Steel Co., Staten Island, New York; sponsored by Miss Virginia Perkins, great-granddaughter of Charles Brush; and commissioned on 17 April 1944, Commander J. E. Edwards in command.
Brush was decommissioned and stricken from the register on 27 October 1969. She was subsequently sold to Taiwan 9 December 1969 and renamed Hsiang Yang, which was later stricken in 1984 and transferred to Naval Weapons School and then broken up for scrap.

Brush received five battle stars for World War II service and four battle stars for her Korean operations.



 

Long Jiang Tier II, Jian Wei Tier V, Cheng An Tier I (Taiwan)
The Shimushu-class escort ships (占守型海防艦 Shimushu-gata kaibōkan) were a quartet of ships built for the Imperial Japanese Navy just prior to World War II.

Background and description
The Japanese called these ships Kaibōkan, "ocean defense ships", (Kai = sea, ocean, Bo = defense, Kan = ship), to denote a multi-purpose vessel. They were initially intended for patrol and fishery protection, minesweeping and as convoy escorts. The ships measured 77.72 meters (255 ft 0 in) overall, with a beam of 9.1 meters (29 ft 10 in) and a draft of 3.05 meters (10 ft 0 in).[1] They displaced 870 metric tons (860 long tons) at standard load and 1,040 metric tons (1,020 long tons) at deep load. The ships had two diesel engines, each driving one propeller shaft, which was rated at a total of 4,200 brake horsepower (3,100 kW) for a speed of 19.7 knots (36.5 km/h; 22.7 mph). The ships had a range of 8,000 nautical miles (15,000 km; 9,200 mi) at a speed of 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph)




Chung Mu Tier IX (South Korea)ROKS (DD-91)
USS Erben (DD-631), a Fletcher-class destroyer, was a ship of the United States Navy named for Rear Admiral Henry Erben (1832–1909).

Erben (DD-631) was launched 21 March 1943 by Bath Iron Works Corp., Bath, Maine; sponsored by Mrs. C. B. G. Gaillard, daughter of Rear Admiral Erben; and commissioned 28 May 1943, Commander J. H. Nevins, Jr., in command.

Erben was transferred to South Korea 16 May 1963, where she was renamed ROKS Chung Mu (DD-91). In 1979, the Republic of Korea Navy changed her Hull Number to 911. Since 1983, she served as a stationary training vessel. The ex-Erben is reported to have been broken up



TechTree


Spoiler

 

panasia.thumb.jpg.82af950eb7fd71c3bd3175048a476c5c.jpg

 
 
 

Spoiler

 

 

dutch.jpg20626605_1425257304223961_1002593902752875288_o (1).jpg

 

 
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PNAVY]
Players
1,207 posts
40,391 battles

This line seem to be copy paste from U.S & IJN DDs which is not good and I might skip this line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
173 posts
4,146 battles

Anshan-class destroyer

The Anshan-class destroyers were the People's Liberation Army Navy's (PLAN) first destroyers. They were ex-Soviet Gnevny-class destroyers purchased in the 1950s. The Chinese later added HY-2 anti-ship missiles and removed some of the torpedo tubes, and redesignated as Type 6607.

 

After 1949 the PLAN negotiated with Britain through Hong Kong to buy some second-hand ships and boats but unable to do so due to the Korean War. As a result, the PLAN turned to the USSR to buy four worn-out destroyers with 17 tons of gold.

The Anshan-class ships were withdrawn from active service by the 1990s, but retained as training (# 104) and museum ships (# 101). The PLAN retains ownership through PLAN funded institutions.

  • Anshan (# 101) ex-Rekordny,
Museum ship in Qingdao from 1992.
Scrapped 1980s
Decommissioned 1990, museum ship in Rushan.
  • Taiyuan (#104) ex-Chin Lin, ex-Retivy,
Stationary training ship for the Dalian Naval Academy.
 
 
So there all over from other countries that do not mean I love those ships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
173 posts
4,146 battles

The Daily Bounce – Wargaming Universe News Blog

Pan-Asia Destroyers: Deep Water Torpedoes

c196ff20ecb5d575147b9e1ba5ba9f01?s=96&d=
BY HARKONNEN     August 9, 2017     
 
With the introduction of Pan-Asia Destroyers, Wargaming plans to make the newly branch unique by giving it deep water torpedoes.
 Of course, this is still just a test, and then this isn’t set in stone.
 
The idea is to make the line unique with specific torpedo armament. After testing the Pan-Asians with the normal loadout, Wargaming plans to test deep water torpedoes. Deep water torpedoes interact with the draught of the target: they can easily pass underneath a light ship without any damage. As a trade-off, such torpedoes can boast improved concealment, so catching those Battleships by surprise would be easier.
 

But will it work? Does the game need such torpedoes? It certainly is a better alternative than the usual unique consumable Wargaming has been using for a while now

For the more distracted readers, Wargaming announced the introduction of the Pan-Asia Destroyer line, made up of ships from giving different Countries: Great Britain, USA, USSR, Japan and Germany. 


 


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
173 posts
4,146 battles

PAN ASIA TIER DESTROYERS  II-X

 

PAN ASIA TIER II DESTROYER LONG JIANG

The destroyer was ordered in Germany in 1913 to replenish the fleet of the Republic of China with modern ships. She has never been built, but she served as a prototype for V-25-class German destroyers. Long Jiang carries V-25's top config as her stock config(105mm guns and G/6 AV** torpedoes), but it requires XP and Credits to unlock her deep water torpedo armament. Similar to Enterprise's dive bombers, Pan Asian DDs can only carry either regular torpedo or deep water torpedo into battle.



PAN ASIA TIER III DESTROYER PRA HUANG

ex-Radiant, a Thornycroft R-class destroyer. She was transferred to the Royal Thai Navy in 1920. She was well armed and maintained very high speed. For almost the entire service life she was the most powerful torpedo ship of the Thai Navy. The maximum damage of Phra Ruang's 102mm HE and AP shells are same.



PAN ASIA TIER IV DESTROYER SHEN YANG

ex-Namikaze, a Minekaze-class destroyer, she was transferred to Republic of China Navy in October 1947. Shen Yang's armament is completely different from what Namikaze used to be. She is refitted with triple torpedo tubes. Starting from Tier IV Pan-Asian DD no longer use the German-DD-alike smoke generator.



PAN ASIA TIER V DESTROYER JIAN WEI

The flotilla leader project was developed in Great Britain and offered to the Republic of China government in 1929 (T.306 project), but it has never been implemented. The ship's armament consisted of five main caliber guns and two three-tube torpedo tubes.



PAN ASIA TIER VI DESTROYER FU SHUN

ex-Rezkiy, a Gnevny-class destroyer. She was transferred to the People Republic of China Navy in 1954. She maintained high speed and had a powerful artillery of the main caliber for her ship type.



PAN ASIA TIER VII DESTROYER GADJA MADA

ex-Nonpareil and ex-Tjerk Hiddes, a British-built N-class destroyer for Netherlands Navy, she was transferred to Indonesia in 1951. N-class destroyers originally had only one set of torpedo tubes, but she has two in WoWS.



PAN ASIA TIER VIII DESTROYER HSIEN YIANG

ex-Macomb, a US Gleaves-class destroyer. In October 1954, Macomb was transferred to the JMSDF and was renamed to Hatakaze. Later in 1970 she was again transferred to Taiwan Navy. Starting from Hsien Yang, Pan-Asian destroyers will all equip US-DD-alike smoke generator.


Spoiler

https://sea-group.org/?p=3411&lang=en

 

HULL

Hit Points 15500

Armored Extremities 19mm

Maximum Speed 37.5

Turning Radius 570 m

Rudder Shifting Time 3.49 sec

Surface Detectability 7.38 km

Aerial Detectability 3.63 km

 

GUN SYSTEMS

127mm/38 Mk30 mod.0

Layout 4×1, AB-XY

Reload Time 3.34 sec

180° Rotation Time 5.29 sec

Sector of Fire A ±154°, B ±140°, X ±155°, Y ±152°

Firing Range 12.51 km

Maximum H-Dispersion 109 m

σ 2.0

 

127mm HE Mk32

Damage 1800

Muzzle Velocity 792 m/s

Chance of Fire 5%

 

127mm AP/SC Mk38

Damage 2100

Muzzle Velocity 792 m/s

 

TORPEDO SYSTEMS

533mm Mk14 Layout 2×5

Reload Time 122 sec

Torpedo Firing Arc 45° – 135°

 

533mm Mk15 mod.3

Torpedo Damage 16633

Torpedo Speed 55 knots

Torpedo Range 9.15 km

Detectability 1.1 km

 

533mm Mk15 mod. 3 DW

Torpedo Damage 21267

Torpedo Speed 55 knots

Torpedo Range 9.15 km

Torpedo Depth 5.85 m

Detectability 0.7 km

 

PAN ASIA TIER IX DESTROYER CHUNG MU

ex-Erben, a Fletcher-class destroyer. She was transferred to South Korea in May 1963.


Spoiler

https://sea-group.org/?p=3414&lang=en

 

HULL

Hit Points 17100

Armored Extremities 19mm

Maximum Speed 38 knots

Turning Radius 620 m

Rudder Shifting Time 3.92 sec

Surface Detectability 7.2 km

Aerial Detectability 4.05 km

 

GUN SYSTEMS

127mm/38 Mk30 mod.0

Layout 5 × 1, AB-XYZ

Reload Time 3.34 sec 180°

Rotation Time 5.29 sec

Sector of Fire A ±151°, B ±150°, X ±148°, Y ±153°, Z ±154°

Firing Range 12.14 km

Maximum H-Dispersion 106 m

σ 2.0

 

127mm HE Mk32

Damage 1800

Muzzle Velocity 792 m/s

Chance of Fire 5%

 

127mm AP/SC Mk38

Damage 2100

Muzzle Velocity 792 m/s

 

TORPEDO SYSTEMS

533mm Mk14

Layout 2×5

Reload Time 106 sec

Torpedo Firing Arc 41° – 1654

 

533mm Mk16 mod.1

Torpedo Damage 19033

Torpedo Speed 66 knots

Torpedo Range 10.5 km

Detectability 1.4 km

 

533mm Mk16 mod.1 DW

Torpedo Damage 24400

Torpedo Speed 66 knots

Torpedo Range 10.5 km

Torpedo Depth 6.0 m

Detectability 0.8 km

 

 

PAN ASIA TIER X DESTROYER HSIANG YANG

ex-Brush, an Allen M Sumner-class destroyer, she was sold to Taiwan Navy in December 1969.


Spoiler

https://sea-group.org/?p=3418&lang=en

 

HULL

Hit Points 18500

Armored Extremities 19mm

Maximum Speed 36.5 knots

Turning Radius 620 m

Rudder Shifting Time 3.11 sec

Surface Detectability 7.02 km

Aerial Detectability 4.2 km 

 

GUN SYSTEMS

127mm/38 Mk38 mod.0

Layout 3×2, AB-X

Reload Time 3 sec

180° Rotation Time 7.2 sec

Sector of Fire A ±151°, B ±152°, X ±153°

Firing Range 11.94 km

Maximum H-Dispersion 103 m

σ 2.0

 

127mm HE Mk32

Damage 1800

Muzzle Velocity 792 m/s

Chance of Fire 5%

 

127mm AP/SC Mk38

Damage 2100

Muzzle Velocity 792 m/s

 

TORPEDO SYSTEMS

533mm Mk15

Layout 2×5

Reload Time 136 sec

Torpedo Firing Arc 46° – 137°

 

533mm Mk17

Torpedo Damage 17900

Torpedo Speed 68 knots

Torpedo Range 13.5 km

Detectability 1.4 km

 

533mm Mk17 DW

Torpedo Damage 22900

Torpedo Speed 68 knots

Torpedo Range 13.5 km

Torpedo Depth 6.15 m

Detectability 0.8 km

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORAZ]
Beta Tester
13,898 posts
19,720 battles

So basically T8+ PA DDs are basically just copies of existing USN DDs (with Chung Mu being straight up copy + paste), only trading DFAA for DW torps.

I mean, not that it's something to really complain about, USN DDs T8+ are hella good, but no DFAA limits their utility and DW torps are of questionable use in the first place and may come to other DD lines anyway. E.g. not sure why you'd ever want to play a Chung Mu over a Fletcher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PNAVY]
Players
1,207 posts
40,391 battles
16 hours ago, El2aZeR said:

So basically T8+ PA DDs are basically just copies of existing USN DDs (with Chung Mu being straight up copy + paste), only trading DFAA for DW torps.

I mean, not that it's something to really complain about, USN DDs T8+ are hella good, but no DFAA limits their utility and DW torps that are of questionable use in the first place and may come to other DD lines anyway. E.g. not sure why you'd ever want to play a Chung Mu over a Fletcher.

 

The "Deep Water" tops could've been put into another nation that has more historical values, But a copy paste DDs?? That's lazy and lame.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,199 posts
14,266 battles
16 minutes ago, ABED1984 said:

 

The "Deep Water" tops could've been put into another nation that has more historical values, But a copy paste DDs?? That's lazy and lame.

Milking money from Asian market?:).....bigest of the bigest do that. Anybody remember kung fu Pandas in World of Warcraft?:)......panda...really......so of Blizzard can pull that kind of crap who is gigant in game industry to break to Asian market......:)

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PNAVY]
Players
1,207 posts
40,391 battles
Just now, 15JG52Adler said:

Milking money from Asian market?:).....bigest of the bigest do that. Anybody remember king :-\ Pandas in World of Warcraft?:)......panda...really......do of Blizzard can pull that kind of crap who is gigant in game industry to break to Asian market......:)

 

Logical explanation, And the worse part ( At least for me ) that they're copy paste from U.S DDs which I don't like. If the T10 P.A DD were similar to the Khaba then it would be interesting with those DW torps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BONI]
Players
1,257 posts
12,064 battles

I hope the existing PA prems get the DW torps too.

On 11/08/2017 at 11:04 PM, 15JG52Adler said:

Milking money from Asian market?:).....bigest of the bigest do that. Anybody remember kung fu Pandas in World of Warcraft?:)......panda...really......so of Blizzard can pull that kind of crap who is gigant in game industry to break to Asian market......:)

 

It may or may not have been pand-ering to the Chinese market, but for the record, Warcraft had martial arts pandas (in WC3) before Kung Fu Panda came out.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PNAVY]
Players
1,207 posts
40,391 battles
20 hours ago, Strappster said:

Does anyone know if Anshan and Lo Yang are going to get deep water torpedoes?

 

I'm also asking the same question and waiting to see what will happen to my anshan.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertester
2,842 posts
4,770 battles

The most exciting part of this news?

 

The model for the RN T7... :Smile_izmena: bring on that N-class!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BONI]
Players
1,257 posts
12,064 battles

I'm looking forward to this line. I think the much-improved detection will be more than worth sacrificing the rare occasion when you incidentally hit a DD. Especially on those slow-reloading launchers. It's really disheartening watching a BB slip through your accurate salvo without even having hydro, or being parallel to the torps. These DW torps should be nigh-undodgeable to BBs if they appear perpendicular to the ship, unless they get detected early.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×