matalanfighter Players 19 posts 5,060 battles Report post #1 Posted August 3, 2017 We all know that Campbeltown is pretty awful and needs more luck than skill. It should be buffed - at least make the 76mm as secondary too with reasonable 5km range and 10+ % fire chance? Ideally it should have one more 105mm but it won't happen, so having at least a secondary that is useful would be better than nothing. Also a 30+ second torpedo reload maybe the other good option. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The_Tyke Players 456 posts 10,463 battles Report post #2 Posted August 3, 2017 1 minute ago, matalanfighter said: We all know that Campbeltown is pretty awful and needs more luck than skill. No it is not. I like it immensely It just needs the player to get their head around its unusual little traits 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[QUAK] KS1975 [QUAK] Beta Tester 698 posts 12,455 battles Report post #3 Posted August 3, 2017 I can't see any battle that you fought with the Campbeltown, so how can you judge it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The_Tyke Players 456 posts 10,463 battles Report post #4 Posted August 3, 2017 17 minutes ago, matalanfighter said: We all know that Campbeltown is pretty awful and needs more luck than skill. No it is not. I like it immensely It just needs the player to get their head around its unusual little traits [EDIT] Double post, sorry Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[EXNOM] Spuggy Players 557 posts 6,203 battles Report post #5 Posted August 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, KS1975 said: I can't see any battle that you fought with the Campbeltown, so how can you judge it? ........ "because there are no bad ships, just bad players" - Anonymous 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[H_FAN] Gnirf Players 3,293 posts 67,377 battles Report post #6 Posted August 3, 2017 No the torps angles are great (7,5 range) and she is a premium do not need to be a OP premium. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[B0TS] philjd Beta Tester 1,806 posts 7,738 battles Report post #7 Posted August 3, 2017 It is obviously in need of a buff.....being the best performing DD in it's tier... (and yes, I do not know how to drive her properly before anyone feels like being a turd :) ). Name Tier Type Nation Battles WR ▼ Dmg XP K/D Sh☠ Pl☠ Srv MBH TH Campbeltown 3 DD UK 645,166 53.11% 21,746 746 1.1 0.9 0 24% 45% 12% G-101 3 DD Germany 406,744 52.57% 19,122 616 1.1 0.9 0 22% 39% 10% Wakatake 3 DD Japan 1,857,874 50.29% 16,900 570 0.9 0.7 0 21% 41% 10% Derzki 3 DD USSR 1,049,157 50.11% 14,189 525 0.8 0.7 0 15% 41% 9% Wickes 3 DD USA 1,763,651 48.65% 13,979 538 0.7 0.6 0 13% 41% 8% 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PKTZS] JapLance Weekend Tester 2,567 posts 18,265 battles Report post #8 Posted August 3, 2017 25 minutes ago, matalanfighter said: at least make the 76mm as secondary too with reasonable 5km range and 10+ % fire chance? Yes. a 76mm secondary at tier 3 with more range than tier 6 BBs secondaries, and higher fire chance than a Russian 130mm. Seems balanced . 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[N-L-L] peoplescavalry Players 531 posts 13,011 battles Report post #9 Posted August 3, 2017 It's a lovely tier 3 ship with super accurate pop guns and probably OP torps, but she does need looking after and pick her fights carefully ( my normal fail!) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[H_FAN] Gnirf Players 3,293 posts 67,377 battles Report post #10 Posted August 3, 2017 5 minutes ago, peoplescavalry said: It's a lovely tier 3 ship with super accurate pop guns and probably OP torps, but she does need looking after and pick her fights carefully ( my normal fail!) Yes the stats above shows that 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jss78 Players 1,292 posts 12,866 battles Report post #11 Posted August 3, 2017 I'd actually argue the Campbelltown is the polar opposite of a "luck" ship. You have small spreads of torps which are extremely powerful for T3. With no "walls of skill" to rely on, it's very much a high skill -> high reward ship to me. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BAD-F] Sams_Baneblade Beta Tester, Players 299 posts 10,751 battles Report post #12 Posted August 3, 2017 30s reload would make it OPAF. And that secondary gun would be stupidly good for its size+Tier.IF the CampbellSoup had to receive any buff, I would vote for single torp launch option. And/or a minimal reload buff, like 6 seconds or so. But it seems good enough for me as it is now. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CAIN] Jethro_Grey Players 5,207 posts 25,733 battles Report post #13 Posted August 3, 2017 I have to agree with OP, Campbelltown is so weak and completely underpowered when compared directly to her peers i.e. the Gearing and Khaba. Another major eff up by WGs balancing department. #MakeTierIIIGreatAgain! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HatsuzukiKaiNi Beta Tester 215 posts 6,656 battles Report post #14 Posted August 3, 2017 If it gets anything i'd go with the option to single launch torps, Campbeltown herself is doing well enough though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BLAST] Armorin [BLAST] Players 763 posts 13,067 battles Report post #15 Posted August 3, 2017 I do very well in the Campbeltown. IJN style torps, nice 7.5km range triple torpedo launchers, and USN style rapid firing guns. Best T3 DD I have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TOXIC] Strapps [TOXIC] Players 1,135 posts 5,968 battles Report post #16 Posted August 3, 2017 Second or third (or whatever it's up to) the motion for single-launch torpedoes. While the Campbeltown is basically a Wickes with a missing gun, the torpedoes appear to be British so it'd make sense to give her that characteristic and keep the British DD line consistent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BLAST] Armorin [BLAST] Players 763 posts 13,067 battles Report post #17 Posted August 3, 2017 The Campbeltown was actually a US lend-lease ship. It was packed with explosives and rammed into a dry dock during a commando raid on the west coast of France. Dry dock wasn't back in action until well after the war! I think we need a British DD line after we get the BB line, and then some CV's. During the time period the RN was a major naval power on par with the USN. I think the Washington/London naval capital ship treaties allowed for 5:5:3:2:1 ratio of US,UK,JP,FR,IT capital ships. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SLAPP] lameoll Players 1,792 posts 10,834 battles Report post #18 Posted August 3, 2017 i cant win games today and i blame!!!...... the campbeltown Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DREAD] 1MajorKoenig Players 13,110 posts 7,885 battles Report post #19 Posted August 3, 2017 Campletown...buff? Ha ahaha? seriously... but no. Won her in some event but think she's boring and sold her. Her torps are OP though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[H_FAN] Gnirf Players 3,293 posts 67,377 battles Report post #20 Posted August 3, 2017 32 minutes ago, Armorin said: The Campbeltown was actually a US lend-lease ship. It was packed with explosives and rammed into a dry dock during a commando raid on the west coast of France. Dry dock wasn't back in action until well after the war! I think we need a British DD line after we get the BB line, and then some CV's. During the time period the RN was a major naval power on par with the USN. I think the Washington/London naval capital ship treaties allowed for 5:5:3:2:1 ratio of US,UK,JP,FR,IT capital ships. FR IT had the same quota 1,75 corresponding to 5x35000T ships =175000 T. Thats WNT - All nations did not sign London treaty Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NWP] Gojuadorai Players 2,832 posts 21,712 battles Report post #21 Posted August 3, 2017 5 hours ago, Spuggy said: ........ "because there are no bad ships, just bad players" - Anonymous A Bad Player FTFY Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[EXNOM] Spuggy Players 557 posts 6,203 battles Report post #22 Posted August 3, 2017 23 minutes ago, Gojuadorai said: 6 hours ago, Spuggy said: ........ "because there are no bad ships, just bad players" - Anonymous A Bad Player FTFY A bad workman always blames........... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Acetessigester Beta Tester 237 posts 19,475 battles Report post #23 Posted August 3, 2017 it is lucky that people still remember this little ship Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TOXIC] Strapps [TOXIC] Players 1,135 posts 5,968 battles Report post #24 Posted August 3, 2017 12 minutes ago, Spuggy said: A bad workman always blames........... ... the tools who make up the rest of his team? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BAD-F] Sams_Baneblade Beta Tester, Players 299 posts 10,751 battles Report post #25 Posted August 3, 2017 I have some very good memories with her. It includes a double kill with a single torp set and a single hit detonating an Arkansas. In both case, the ennemies was full hp, sailing in a straight line, was hit from the front and died after two minutes in the game. I juste unlocked CE, I'm curious to see the result. :D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites