[TEPES] VeteranGamer84 Players 1,314 posts 52,321 battles Report post #1 Posted July 24, 2017 After nerfing and ruining certain ships like the Khabarovsk I strongly suggest that WG give us back the XP of the ship so we can buy something else. If we are talking about fairness then we should get 250,000 free xp to compensate the mess WG has done to our T10 ships. I've put so much time in grinding T10 ships and it's not acceptable to ruin them under any excuse! I'm really pissed off!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BYOB] Aragathor Players 7,047 posts 32,326 battles Report post #2 Posted July 24, 2017 23 minutes ago, ABED1984 said: After nerfing and ruining certain ships like the Khabarovsk 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,178 battles Report post #3 Posted July 24, 2017 I just got 30k free XP... 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BABBY] StringWitch Beta Tester 1,608 posts Report post #4 Posted July 24, 2017 "Not acceptable" and yet you accepted the EULA. Your problem, no one else's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KaLeuWillenbrock Players 2,632 posts 3,455 battles Report post #5 Posted July 24, 2017 well no. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TEPES] VeteranGamer84 Players 1,314 posts 52,321 battles Report post #6 Posted July 24, 2017 48 minutes ago, Aragathor said: A bait for what?!! 44 minutes ago, ColonelPete said: I just got 30k free XP... Me too but WG made the Khaba a shitty DD now that I would rather have the whole XP and credits of the ship back. 42 minutes ago, StringWitch said: "Not acceptable" and yet you accepted the EULA. Your problem, no one else's. Are you talking about the forums rules? If so then what this has got to do with game?!! 34 minutes ago, KaLeuWillenbrock said: well no. Are you a WG employee to say "NO"??!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,178 battles Report post #7 Posted July 24, 2017 Did you take a look at the stats? Shitty looks much different. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZzaiH Players 47 posts 2,009 battles Report post #8 Posted July 24, 2017 yeah right: the khaba is not wtf-broken-op but just omg-op and now of course unplayable.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bladezfist Players 349 posts 2,320 battles Report post #9 Posted July 24, 2017 Next thread will be on Belfast and Fiji being under-powered. Where are all of these coming from Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PANEU] kfa Beta Tester 1,975 posts 13,875 battles Report post #10 Posted July 24, 2017 A game in some chillboats like Gearing or Z-52: A game in Khabarovsk: 13 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HABIT] Tungstonid Beta Tester 1,568 posts Report post #11 Posted July 24, 2017 1 hour ago, ABED1984 said: A bait for what?!! Me too but WG made the Khaba a shitty DD now that I would rather have the whole XP and credits of the ship back. Are you talking about the forums rules? If so then what this has got to do with game?!! Are you a WG employee to say "NO"??!! EULA is the End User Licence Agreement that you have to agree with after every (major) update of the game. Without this agreement you can't/are not allowed to play. Quote 5. Using the Game 5.1 In return for your acceptance of this EULA, we give you the personal right (known as a 'licence') during the time this EULA is in force between you and us to download, install and play the Game. 5.2 This licence is: (a) 'non-exclusive' (meaning that we can grant the same and similar licences to other people as well); (b) 'revocable' (meaning that we can terminate this licence in certain circumstances, which are explained further below); (c) 'personal' (meaning that you may not use the Game for any commercial purpose); (d) 'non-transferable' (meaning that the licence is only for your benefit and you may not transfer or sub-licence any of the rights that we grant to you to any other person); and (e) 'limited' (meaning that you can only use the Game for the purposes we set out in this EULA); and (f) conditional on your compliance with this EULA. 7. Patches, Updates and Changes From time to time, we may need to deploy or provide patches, updates, additional content or other modifications to the Game (for example to enhance online gameplay, to add new or update features or to resolve software bugs). You hereby accept, recognize and understand that we constantly work on further development of the Game and Services, we improve, upgrade and update graphics, features, gameplay and any other Content of the Game in order to make the gameplay enjoyable for you. And then you have the Terms of Service which you also accepted: Quote 7. Content 7.1 The Services contain a lot of content, including, but not limited to software, technology, text, forum posts, chat posts, profiles, widgets, messages, links, e-mails, music, sound, graphics, pictures or video materials, as well as the design and appearance of our Sites and the Games (the "Content"). Some parts of the Content may only be accessible online and/or require using keys or codes, serial codes and/or online authentication of any kind and in-game achievements in order to be unlocked. 7.4 Wargaming will do its best to make the Content available to you as a part of your enjoyment of the Services, but this is subject to some rules which we need in order to ensure efficient running of the Services: e) the Content you have access to is not returnable, exchangeable, or refundable for other Content or for cash, or other goods or services, unless otherwise provided in the present Terms of Service or as permitted in the Services; and f) we may have to change or update the Content from time to time, but we will post details of any changes in the news section of the relevant Site(s). What this means? WG has to do nothing. They don't even have to give you free exp for changing the torpedoes. So either deal with it or play something else. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PKTZS] JapLance Weekend Tester 2,567 posts 18,265 battles Report post #12 Posted July 24, 2017 2 hours ago, ABED1984 said: After nerfing and ruining certain ships like the Khabarovsk No need to read any further. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WGB] iJoby Community Contributor 2,171 posts 30,925 battles Report post #13 Posted July 24, 2017 2 hours ago, ABED1984 said: we should get 250,000 free xp to compensate Will the same apply to every ship ever nerfed in the history of WOWS? somehow, I think you are asking for a miracle. Hence, It will never happen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guillotine ∞ Players 401 posts 7,897 battles Report post #14 Posted July 24, 2017 Becouse best tier 10 with ( if i recall right ) 3% higher avrage win than rest of the lot, should stay un-changed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] T0byJug Quality Poster 5,358 posts 25,539 battles Report post #15 Posted July 24, 2017 3 hours ago, ABED1984 said: After nerfing and ruining certain ships like the Khabarovsk I strongly suggest that WG give us back the XP of the ship so we can buy something else. If we are talking about fairness then we should get 250,000 free xp to compensate the mess WG has done to our T10 ships. I've put so much time in grinding T10 ships and it's not acceptable to ruin them under any excuse! I'm really pissed off!! How about they work out how much EXTRA XP you got by playing 484 games in what is agreed by just about everybody to be an OP ship and taking that amount of Free XP BALANCE AWAY from your account. Also the 3% hit ratio on you have on Khabarovsk Torpedoes would suggest Torpedoes was was not a major part of your Khabarovsk game play. So please stop whining and GROW UP. Patch came out 4 days ago and here is the stats for the last week.. Looks like the changes to the torpedoes has had no major impact on the power of this ship You come across as a Petulant child.. Looking at your Profile you have played a Huge amount of games in what are regarded as the most Powerfull and Many cases OP ships of there class and tier. Imperator Nikolai I/Bismark/Kamikaze R Most of us are guilty of that but we just accept it when they get balanced. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CAIN] Jethro_Grey Players 5,207 posts 25,733 battles Report post #16 Posted July 24, 2017 1 hour ago, kfa said: A game in some chillboats like Gearing or Z-52: A game in Khabarovsk: This sums it up nicely. Z52 could really use some love, tho it should be applied carefully, as we do not want a German Khaba, now do we? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GSPDibbler Players 70 posts 11,255 battles Report post #17 Posted July 24, 2017 Dude... Khaba is worst off with reduced rutter shift and 6km torps but shes not that worst off. Shes still powerful. Situational torps? If u played her correctly torps were situational in the first place = minimum nerf. Rutter prevents you from brawling succesfully with gearings? Bollocks. Before now gearings and such had no chances with khaba even in CQ (unless Khaba was crippled to sh*t). Now they do. And you know what? U can still reduce this rutter nerf by installing the steering mod in place of concealment mod (if you constantly shoot and you keep between 10-13 km from BBs and such, you dont concealment anyways). Thats also a minimum impact nerf. Both of this nerfs, not that influencial to Khaba, made other DDs more relevant. And thats a good thing. TL;DR Dude, sober up BTW, You have 17k+ battles but still claim Kaba was nerfed to oblivion and need a refund... thats just LOL as heck Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POI--] dasCKD Quality Poster 2,376 posts 19,148 battles Report post #18 Posted July 24, 2017 12 minutes ago, Jethro_Grey said: Z52 could really use some love, tho it should be applied carefully, as we do not want a German Khaba, now do we? Well, she just soaks up too much damage. It makes sense, considering how lethal that ship is in the correct position. She just seems like one of those ships that are just about impossible to balance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POI--] dasCKD Quality Poster 2,376 posts 19,148 battles Report post #19 Posted July 24, 2017 3 hours ago, ABED1984 said: I've put so much time in grinding T10 ships and it's not acceptable to ruin them under any excuse! What about that ship being completely unbalanced? You have a lot of games in your Khabarovsk, OP. 485 to be exact at time of reading. In your games, I'm sure you've gunned down countless enemy destroyers from full or nearly full health to nothing with negligible to no damage to your own ship. You've also probably burned countless other cruisers and battleships without them being able to do any significant damage in return. You have spent a lot of time to get your tier X ships, but the other players have also probably spent just as much time to get theirs. It is not fair to them that, with similar time expended, you get to faceroll them with them having little to no chance of fighting back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[KOKOS] MaxxyNL [KOKOS] Beta Tester, Players 3,418 posts 11,878 battles Report post #20 Posted July 24, 2017 4 hours ago, ABED1984 said: After nerfing and ruining certain ships like the Khabarovsk I strongly suggest that WG give us back the XP of the ship so we can buy something else. If we are talking about fairness then we should get 250,000 free xp to compensate the mess WG has done to our T10 ships. I've put so much time in grinding T10 ships and it's not acceptable to ruin them under any excuse! I'm really pissed off!! Really? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POI--] dasCKD Quality Poster 2,376 posts 19,148 battles Report post #21 Posted July 24, 2017 4 hours ago, ABED1984 said: After nerfing and ruining certain ships like the Khabarovsk I strongly suggest that WG give us back the XP of the ship so we can buy something else. Though to be honest I'm not objecting to WG giving us free XP for all of the tier X ships we own. I like to hoard after all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrk421 Players 430 posts 4,269 battles Report post #22 Posted July 24, 2017 I like that we have this kind of troll threads ever so often. Reminds us not to have too much faith in the forum in terms of bringing about positive changes/adjustments to the game. After all, the forums are meant to be a medium for people to vent their emotions rather than for game developers to get ideas on how to improve the game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DMOK] Drake847 [DMOK] Players 506 posts 38,443 battles Report post #23 Posted July 24, 2017 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KaLeuWillenbrock Players 2,632 posts 3,455 battles Report post #24 Posted July 24, 2017 2 hours ago, ABED1984 said: ... Are you a WG employee to say "NO"??!! no. but i have common sense and i have faced the chaba a few times. Balancing is one of the most important aspects of a multiplayer game. The chaba was too strong and possible still is. making her perform right, should be your concern as well, if you did not level her on the premise that she is hilariously op. why give out free xp? You have a strong tier x ship. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[N-L-L] peoplescavalry Players 531 posts 13,011 battles Report post #25 Posted July 24, 2017 ? the smallest violin sympathy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
