Jump to content
NameChangingIsToExpensiv

Tier 8 Russian Battleship Kronstadt leak

84 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
260 posts
2,994 battles

CONFIRMED FAKE:

 

xtP02oK.jpg

 

Stats:

Deck armor|30-90mm

Citadel armor | 230-330mm

Torpedo defense | 16%

Max Speed| 32 knots

Turning circle | 800m

rudder shift | 12.5s

surface detection| 15.7km

Air detection| 13.8km

consumable 1| repair party(BB)

consumable 2 | damage control party(BB)

consumable 3 | Spotter Plane(KOR-2)/Radar(Soviet T10=Moskva Radar 11.7km range/25s duration)

Gun Stats

305mm/L50 B-50

Placement | 3x3 in AB-Y turrets

Reload | 20s

180 degree rotation | 36s

Firing Angle | 150 degree

Range | 19.1 km

sigma | 2.0

305 mm HE-36

damage | 4400

muzzle velo | 1020 m/s

305mm AP-36

damage | 8200

muzzle velo | 900m/s

penetration(5/10/15km) | 522/365/275

 

Thanks to /u/AOSPrevails for translation.

 

Key Elements. It has worse AP Pen than the Moskva and it has Moskva RADAR!

 

2.png

Edited by SCFighterr
  • Cool 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
842 posts
8,386 battles

Look better than the Hood. But, it's russian so who will doubt it? :trollface:

 

You must be kidding. Hood will eat this 4 breakfast and then proceeds to feast on Bismarck. :izmena: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHATS]
WoWs Wiki Team
12,082 posts
7,662 battles

You must be kidding. Hood will eat this 4 breakfast and then proceeds to feast on Bismarck. :izmena: 

 

If only... If only...

 

:panic_fish:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[UNICS]
Beta Tester
437 posts
2,980 battles

I am glad WG are keeping to their promise of Radar will be a cruiser only thing and the Missouri is a one off. Thanks WG, your word is absolute. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BRIT6]
Beta Tester
69 posts
9,947 battles

Is Russian balans,

 

Oh and for all those saying KGV cant be tier 8 with 14"s, I'm pretty sure if the Kronstadt can have 12"s the KGV 14"s will be OK, don't you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
108 posts
8,627 battles

Very similar to Scharnhorst...slightly inferior on protection but with better guns.Not sure if radar would make her viable for tier 8 tho.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BRIT6]
Beta Tester
69 posts
9,947 battles

I don't know about you guys, but maybe this sort of ridiculous Russian Bias should just be on the RU server , and we could just have sensible stuff on the other 3. Although saying that

I can't wait for the Tier 10 Russian BB because quite frankly I need a really really good laugh.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
108 posts
8,627 battles

Is Russian balans,

 

Oh and for all those saying KGV cant be tier 8 with 14"s, I'm pretty sure if the Kronstadt can have 12"s the KGV 14"s will be OK, don't you think?

 

I think you can get away with worse guns if they have a quick reload, and your ship is fast.

KGV isnt particuarly fast( by tier 8 standards) and i imagine the guns wont reload any faster then say the Bismarck's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ST-EU]
Supertester
2,835 posts
4,190 battles

The ship is absolutely gorgeous. The cancelled Russian battlecruiser projects are among the most awesome, interesting and best looking "what if" ships. I wouldn't have expected her at T8 frankly but if it means she gets really comfortable soft stats to compensate then I'll be even happier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BUSHI]
Players
352 posts
3,872 battles

11.7km surface detection with CE and module :teethhappy::teethhappy::teethhappy::teethhappy::teethhappy::teethhappy:

 

*edit: and camo ofc

Edited by CuddlyPanda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
444 posts
6,046 battles

11.7km surface detection with CE and module :teethhappy::teethhappy::teethhappy::teethhappy::teethhappy::teethhappy:

 

*edit: and camo ofc

 

that's weird, the same as the radar range .....

 

Well, at least we know the next ranked season will be T8.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Alpha Tester
17,384 posts
5,400 battles

Omg is the BBaby here already defending radar on a BB line :child:

 

WG, if you really want to ruin your game and drive away your core player ( well the one's you haven't either converted into BBabies or those who already left ) please do implement a full BB line with radar. Will be 'balanced' Comrade :great:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CHATS]
WoWs Wiki Team
12,082 posts
7,662 battles

WG, if you really want to ruin your game and drive away your core player ( well the one's you haven't either converted into BBabies or those who already left ) please do implement a full BB line with radar. Will be 'balanced' Comrade :great:

 

Yeah.... A line full of BB with radar is the best idea ever!

 

And of course, the ship has a russian radar (11.7km), of course...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[UNICS]
Beta Tester
437 posts
2,980 battles

 

Yeah.... A line full of BB with radar is the best idea ever!

 

And of course, the ship has a russian radar (11.7km), of course...

 

And people were crying over the Hood having defensive fire 

 

large.jpg

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Alpha Tester
17,384 posts
5,400 battles

WG: Whut you talking about, making BB's stronger with every patch? That is nonsense comrade, we just buffed flooding damage!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BRTD]
Players
67 posts
5,192 battles

 

And people were crying over the Hood having defensive fire 

Seriously? Did they even look at the AA that the Hood has? It's nothing to write home about. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-T-O-]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
2,141 posts
5,915 battles

The guns are really inferior compering to the others (tier VIII BBs).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×