Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Darth_Glorious

Algérie, Henri IV and Duca d'Aosta preliminary stats

748 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
2,780 posts
17,292 battles

Tier 6 La Galissonnìère 152 mm turret

180 deg turn time = 15s  (!):popcorn:

ROF = 8 rpm

 

152 mm shells :

AP dmg = 3300

HE dmg = 2200

Fire chance 12%

 

Looks good. :great:

 

 

Um... Sorry, but I can't find that comment. What did he say? Did he imply that it would have some tricks up its sleeve?

 

Just grasping at straws, they've got to balance out that 7% fire chance somewhere. :hiding:

 

historically the guns were built for 1,000 mps with fairly heavy dhells, but both the muzzle velocity and shell weight were reduced in an attempt to bring down an atrocious dispersion - in WWII, they would be pretty similar to British 6-inch guns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
130 posts
6,587 battles

 

Yeah, except there wasn't, it was debunked that Algerie always had the standard /50 guns.

 

 

I found a source in french stating that they were 3 post ww1 models of french naval 203mm guns:

  • 203mm /50 1924 
  • 203mm /50 1931 mounted only on Algerie, said in the source to be almost identical to 1924 model
  • 203mm /55 1940 produced for the St Louis and of which at least 3 pieces where finished

 

Now the source is far from reliable and could even be totally fake but this seem to fit quite well with navweaps version. I did not manage to find any other reference to this 1940 /55...

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,464 posts

 

I found a source in french stating that they were 3 post ww1 models of french naval 203mm guns:

  • 203mm /50 1924 
  • 203mm /50 1931 mounted only on Algerie, said in the source to be almost identical to 1924 model
  • 203mm /55 1940 produced for the St Louis and of which at least 3 pieces where finished

 

Now the source is far from reliable and could even be totally fake but this seem to fit quite well with navweaps version. I did not manage to find any other reference to this 1940 /55...

 

 

Those are French 203 mm guns Lesta used :

 

203 mm L/50 Modèle 1931 for Algérie, Charles Martel (stock gun) :

5 rpm

AP dmg 4800, 820 m/s

HE dmg 2800, 850 m/s, 15% fire chance

 

203 mm L/55 Modèle 1934 for Charles Martel (upgraded gun) and Saint Louis

5 rpm

Ap dmg  4900, 845 m/s

HE dmg 2800, 876 m/s, 15% fire chance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sailing Hamster
3,124 posts
1,275 battles

 

aren't they 155mm?

 

French earlier guns were 155 mm but later adopted 152 mm ones

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TAK3N]
Players
96 posts
9,452 battles

ahem... i don't know, but if a shell flies at 845m/s it can reacht 18,3km in 21,66 seconds... if it flies in a straight line and doesn't loses velocity on the way... or there is something in the calculations i don't understan  d

mfg

 

Ciao

Seisset

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OM-S]
Players
1,878 posts
13,186 battles

You forget to include that ingame speed isnt the same as in reallife. :)

 

Ships and torpedos move round about 5 times faster and shells 2,6 times faster.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,928 posts
6,549 battles

ahem... i don't know, but if a shell flies at 845m/s it can reacht 18,3km in 21,66 seconds... if it flies in a straight line and doesn't loses velocity on the way... or there is something in the calculations i don't understan  d

mfg

 

Ciao

Seisset

 

The game has time compression. The shells follow the arc as if they were flying at 845m/s but they fly faster than that along that arc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTTX]
[TTTX]
Players
4,608 posts
8,139 battles

So overall do you think that French cruisers will be worth grinding till the end?

 

impossible to say.

a) We have no idea whether these stats are final - most likely they aren't, and I sure hope the T10 gets some love. Needs it quite badly imho.

b) no one else can tell you whether it's worth it - there are people that love the oddest ships to death, and even if the T10 stays as it is I'm sure some people will really enjoy it. So to them it's worth it...

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[COMFY]
Players
1,649 posts
9,828 battles

 

impossible to say.

a) We have no idea whether these stats are final - most likely they aren't, and I sure hope the T10 gets some love. Needs it quite badly imho.

b) no one else can tell you whether it's worth it - there are people that love the oddest ships to death, and even if the T10 stays as it is I'm sure some people will really enjoy it. So to them it's worth it...

 

About b)

I know what you mean. This will happen with me and Italian line. I'm sure. It won't be about stats or performance but about commanding an Italian ship.

Anyway still awaiting eagerly for the line and more details.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Players, Players, Sailing Hamster
3,462 posts
5,363 battles

La Galissonnìère 152 mm shells hit max range (16 km) in 12 s (velocity =  870 m/s).

 

That is simlpy not possible mathematically. 870m/s, with no loss of velocity would be 18.3 seconds. 

 

 

aren't they 155mm?

 

No, the 155 mm rifles are on Duguay-Trouin only.

 

http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNFR_Main.php

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,249 posts
848 battles

If I'm not mistaken, the French use of the 155 mm caliber was enough to ensure that at the London Naval Conference the limit for light cruisers' guns would be the same, instead of the widespread 152 mm. And this indirectly meant that the Japanese went and designed their own 155 mm gun, to get the most out of the treaties for their ships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,249 posts
848 battles

 

 

Sorry for the double post, but I just noticed...

...Even though the reference site for the stats has "Henry IV", maybe you could change the title for the topic to the correct French form of "Henri IV"...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SICK]
Weekend Tester
5,151 posts
11,809 battles

No judgment yet on the Duca. 

I'm waiting for more hardstats and gameplay videos to get a grasp of its softstats.

 

 

The Henri IV just looks bad though.

Too little armor for something that has the worst maneuverability of the bunch, with by far the worse guns, tied for last for the least amount of them.

 

 

Had you given me the stats sheet a week ago, I would have said that it was some sort of tier 6 or 7 battlecruiser.

Faster than the Shiny Horse, sure, but why sacrifice armor, guns, AA, longer damage control and even torpedo protection for all of that?

Then it turns out it's a tierX cruiser?

 

lulz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,464 posts

Updated with Algérie stats :

https://sea-group.org/?p=2451&lang=en

 

Algérie

 

Spoiler

 

Edited by Darth_Glorious

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
390 posts
7,502 battles

 Anti-Torpedo Protection 16%

 

Oh come on, go [edited]yourself WG. Algérie had the world's best torpedo protection of all treaty cruisers and you give her a damn 16%? That's [edited]ridiculous.

 

And again that engine boost useless module for whatever reason? (Bkoz frenchies are supposed to go faster in reverse?! lolol1!1!1!) 

Edited by Psychocouac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTTX]
[TTTX]
Players
4,608 posts
8,139 battles

 

Oh come on, go [edited]yourself WG. Algérie had the world's best torpedo protection of all treaty cruisers and you give her a damn 16%? That's [edited]ridiculous.

 

should still be far and away the best torp protection of all cruisers right? what else do you want? It's still a cruiser...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,249 posts
848 battles

Well, Jordan in his book says that the system was 4.35 m deep and was designed to resist a 300 kg warhead explosion.

 

Anyway, doesn't WG use torpedo reduction values as balancing factors? That might have been the factor, perhaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORAZ]
Beta Tester
15,786 posts
26,801 battles

Oh come on, go [edited]yourself WG. Algérie had the world's best torpedo protection of all treaty cruisers and you give her a damn 16%? That's [edited]ridiculous.

 

Well, that's actually a lot better than her contemporaries, so...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
390 posts
7,502 battles

Come on:

 

Nurnberg torp protection: 7%

Algérie: 16%

 

Yeah it's more than the double. That won't make any difference when you take a torp hit but yeah...

If the ship isn't good at sniping, then make it a brawler. It has the armor to do it, and torp protection should be on par with it.

Edited by Psychocouac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×