Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
ThinCool

Match Making: how does it works?

33 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[CRM5]
[CRM5]
Players
15 posts
23,569 battles

How do you think the match making works? are you satisfied about this? I think that the image attached speaks alone... take a look and try to explain... Best Regards

07-02-17.jpg

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,234 posts
20,517 battles

What is your point? Cant see anything wrong

 

His T6 buddy in a T9 match, caused by T6/T7 division. This was OPs fault, no issue with MM.

 

OP: If you have mixed tier division (AKA "fail division") MM considers only the top tier ship(s) of the division.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Players
160 posts
20,580 battles

It looks fine.

 

Your division has a split of tiers which is your choice to do. As you made that choice the Graf Spee is treated tier wise, as the same as the highest tier ship within the division. As the highest tier in that division is 7 and tier 7 ships can see up to tier 9 ships in battle nothing is wrong here other than your choice to play in a mix tier division.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,868 posts
5,014 battles

take a look and try to explain... Best Regards

I`ll try: you can take screenshot of any moment in game by pressing prtscr button, no need to take photos of your screen with cell phone. Your sreenshots will be saved in worldofwarships/screenshots folder.

You are welcome. :)

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

How do you think the match making works? are you satisfied about this? I think that the image attached speaks alone... take a look and try to explain... Best Regards

 

Excellent MM, there are more cruisers then BB's!

 

Divisioning with GS with tier 7's = your fault, not the MM. Or did you think that by divisioning with tier lower you would be top tier more often :popcorn:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WGB]
Community Contributor
2,171 posts
30,929 battles

What is your point? Cant see anything wrong

 

I think the OP whats to know how WG base the balance of both teams, do they use an algorithm so both teams are near equal based on Player skills and ships used,  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[72]
Beta Tester
453 posts
14,842 battles

are you satisfied about this?

 

Yes, i am satisfied with the matchmaker.

 

what i am unsatisfied with is fail divisions which cant be bothered to agree on which tier they want to play.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[GOUF]
Beta Tester
337 posts
7,140 battles

I`ll try: you can take screenshot of any moment in game by pressing prtscr button, no need to take photos of your screen with cell phone. Your sreenshots will be saved in worldofwarships/screenshots folder.

 

You are welcome. :)

 

This

 

It looks fine.

 

Your division has a split of tiers which is your choice to do. As you made that choice the Graf Spee is treated tier wise, as the same as the highest tier ship within the division. As the highest tier in that division is 7 and tier 7 ships can see up to tier 9 ships in battle nothing is wrong here other than your choice to play in a mix tier division.

 

And this

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CRM5]
[CRM5]
Players
15 posts
23,569 battles

My question isn't offensive or sarcastic, while some answers yes, so I don't want to be offensive or sarcastic like someonelse here, but please reserve your sarcasm for your friends or home or whoever permits it. Thank you.

Kind regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HALON]
Players
4 posts
27,241 battles

Of course considering the game mechanics, you are right and the MM is working as intended.

 

I think the question here is; why, at this stage of the game, with a higher number of players on the servers, Wargaming doesnt make an effort to design the MM in order to allow maximum one level difference between ships in game ?

 

Whether I can understand that at the beginning WG tried to avoid too long waiting time to set up the teams, my experience is that now you dont wait more than few seconds to have the match set, therefore a MM with only one level difference between ships would grant a more balanced gameplay for everybody, including lower tier ships without penalizing the community for too long waiting time.

 

Of course I think this is something WG should look at because even in normal situation, it is not fun for a level 8 ship deal and fight level 10 opponents. It is demotivating at least, and nowaday, when you play Level 8 ships, 8 matches over 10 you play with Level 10s.

 

To be considered and eventually submitted via a Poll to the Community to understand what they think.

 

 

Edited by seaghost

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
385 posts
20,233 battles

This is how mm need to work If you are in a tripple division you always need to get +2 tier battles Because you need to show some skill not to only perform tripple left clicking on single or 2 enemy ships

If you want division advantage - show some skill

Today we have silly 3x Scharn divisions in tier VII battles! Total pay-to-win crap! This division can wipe floor in tier 8 battles and be sucessful in tier 9 battles if they are skilled enough Thx

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,928 posts
6,549 battles

Short answer, in division, MM only takes highest ship. If you don't want this to happen, do not go division with different tier ships.

 

To be honest, now divisions can only be +/- 1, they should make MM take the tier of all ships so you don't get this. Or just force same tier division so there is no confusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ODIUM]
Players
551 posts
15,194 battles

uld grant a more balanced gameplay for everybody, including lower tier ships without penalizing the community for too long waiting time.

 

 

 

Of course I think this is something WG should look at because even in normal situation, it is not fun for a level 8 ship deal and fight level 10 opponents. It is demotivating at least, and nowaday, when you play Level 8 ships, 8 matches over 10 you play with Level 10s.

 

 

 

To be considered and eventually submitted via a Poll to the Community to understand what they thin

 

Because being the lower tier in a 2 tier mm system can provide for a challenging and fun experience

I want to occasionally be able to take on Bismark's andTirpitz's in my Warspite because it's a challenge, am I good enough to at least do more damage to them than they do to me 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

I think the question here is; why, at this stage of the game, with a higher number of players on the servers, Wargaming doesnt make an effort to design the MM in order to allow maximum one level difference between ships in game ?

 

Because being -2 isn't that big of a deal, it teaches people also how to play tactical when they are not all equal ( like, ganging up on someone stronger then you which would beat you in fair fight 1v1 ). 

 

My question isn't offensive or sarcastic, while some answers yes, so I don't want to be offensive or sarcastic like someonelse here, but please reserve your sarcasm for your friends or home or whoever permits it. Thank you.

 

Kind regards

 

Wasn't really clear from your first post, since this isn't a 'new topic'. Using search would have given you the exact same answers so either live with some sarcasm or use that next time :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,928 posts
6,549 battles

I think the question here is; why, at this stage of the game, with a higher number of players on the servers, Wargaming doesnt make an effort to design the MM in order to allow maximum one level difference between ships in game ?

 

 

 

Because it actually creates interesting variety of ships in game in each battle. The only thing I would change is tier weighting, so the top tier ships in a battle are always the fewest as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CRM5]
[CRM5]
Players
15 posts
23,569 battles

And to all nice guys TESTERS, professors of all and nothing: Akitsuki (tier 8) hit 123 times Shimakaze (tier 10) with HE shells.... damage dealt: 9214! Which better way for a fun & challenging experience..... oh yeah, I was in mistake, must have used AP, blah blah blah

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

And to all nice guys TESTERS, professors of all and nothing: Akitsuki (tier 8) hit 123 times Shimakaze (tier 10) with HE shells.... damage dealt: 9214! Which better way for a fun & challenging experience..... oh yeah, I was in mistake, must have used AP, blah blah blah

 

1. There is no ship called Akitsuki

 

2. You probably mean Akizuki 

 

3. Learn game mechanics ( it's probably damage saturation, since without IFHE you wouldn't have damaged a tier X DD at all with HE as you don't have enough pen to penetrate the armor... though with 123 shell hits that 9k dmg could have been fire damage as well.... 

 

Much complain, nothing substantial in the sense of actual information or even better, a replay. 

 

/case closed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CRM5]
[CRM5]
Players
15 posts
23,569 battles

Certainly you are right because of game mechanics, and here returns my first sentence about mm for equal tier ships. You don't have to take it as a personal thing, and remember that a paying client (like he who is writing) is not ever in right, but have to be respected...

Now case closed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

Certainly you are right because of game mechanics, and here returns my first sentence about mm for equal tier ships. You don't have to take it as a personal thing, and remember that a paying client (like he who is writing) is not ever in right, but have to be respected...

Now case closed.

 

Akizuki needs IFHE if people angle towards it, you're not a bad player so I would expect you to research what special 'needs' some ships have. Akizuki is one of those special needs ships, it does not play like any other DD right now ( 700m turning circle for one... ). And the gun's only being 100m which gives 16mm of HE penetration, which is just not enough for a lot of armor plating it can meet. 

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
128 posts
24,602 battles

My question isn't offensive or sarcastic, while some answers yes, so I don't want to be offensive or sarcastic like someonelse here, but please reserve your sarcasm for your friends or home or whoever permits it. Thank you.

Kind regards

 

Man, you are walking on thin ice... ;)

Talking about how MM works IS STRICTLY FORBBIDDEN!! :playing:

As you try you will be immediately trolled and eventually censored.

Look at the attachments to have an example...

Remember that this forum is under censorship.:red_button:

A buon intenditor... ;)

 

topic.JPG

trolling.JPG

censorship.JPG

Edited by WinningSpike010
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×