Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
_KEANO_

Russian DD tree split

158 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

22m credits gained by buying tier VI to tier IX, along with the new ships, thank you WG :D

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OCTO]
Players
1,268 posts
36,508 battles

Must say, very happy with how this split was done. New ships, captains and 12m credits..... 

 

Thank you WG, you can get things done right when you want it.... :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PISTN]
[PISTN]
Players
282 posts
5,160 battles

Yeah decided to spend some of my DBL to freexp the to the Tashkent, so I'm pleased to get the 12m credits as well! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[GWDYS]
Beta Tester
223 posts
5,540 battles

any reason to keep those t5-7 ? 

minsk is crap i assume (that guns ... )

what about t5-6 ?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

minsk is crap i assume (that guns ... )

 

So... Leningrad is crap to? Rofl 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[GWDYS]
Beta Tester
223 posts
5,540 battles

 

So... Leningrad is crap to? Rofl 

 

 

 

leningrad has far better torps, and is better overall (small differences but still - rudder time, camo, range, traverse...)

i dont have it and i will always prefer (old) Kiev solution 3x2 over 5x1 of Minsk (and yes Minsk IS (much) worse than Leningrad, what a surprise  ... if Lenigrad will be ingame for some discount i will go for it to be honest, just hate those 4km torps on DD with spot range 7km+ ) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
122 posts
8,992 battles

Is Trashkan being buffed in any way? 

 

I couldn't wait to get out of it, pretty bad ship compared to the Udaloi...

 

The gun range got buffed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

 

leningrad has far better torps, and is better overall (small differences but still - rudder time, camo, range, traverse...)

i dont have it and i will always prefer (old) Kiev solution 3x2 over 5x1 of Minsk (and yes Minsk IS (much) worse than Leningrad, what a surprise  ... if Lenigrad will be ingame for some discount i will go for it to be honest, just hate those 4km torps on DD with spot range 7km+ ) 

 

I never said Leni was 'bad' ;)

 

But you said GUNS, and Leni and Minsk have the same gun setup. So if those are bad on Minsk, they are bad on Leni ( and their not ). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[GWDYS]
Beta Tester
223 posts
5,540 battles

 

I never said Leni was 'bad' ;)

 

But you said GUNS, and Leni and Minsk have the same gun setup. So if those are bad on Minsk, they are bad on Leni ( and their not ). 

 

asi i said i prefer (old) Kiev gun layout over Minsk/Leningrad

i little exaggerated that i admit :)  maybe thaye are not "bad" at all, but they are worse (range, traverse, layout (!)) and that was my point

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[GWDYS]
Beta Tester
223 posts
5,540 battles

So the Minsk is just a Leningrad with short range torps?

 

and a little bit worse turret rotation and rudder and firerange and camo and .....  and no XP bonus :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CUPID]
Community Contributor
310 posts
31,868 battles

 

and a little bit worse turret rotation and rudder and firerange and camo and .....  and no XP bonus :)

 

Thought so, it's now sold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTTX]
Players
1,841 posts
7,432 battles

any reason to keep those t5-7 ? 

minsk is crap i assume (that guns ... )

what about t5-6 ?

 

 

 

T5-6 I don't see any reason to keep as you're just getting some extra speed over the old Gnevny at t5 but loose out on a lot of DPM compared to old Gnevny. At t6 you basically just get the old Gnevny without it having any real buffs over when she was at t5. Minsk I did really like, but you have to be able to cope with the turret traverse to enjoy her. And sadly there is a premium that does everything she does just as well or better(Leningrad).
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

T5-6 I don't see any reason to keep as you're just getting some extra speed over the old Gnevny at t5 but loose out on a lot of DPM compared to old Gnevny. At t6 you basically just get the old Gnevny without it having any real buffs over when she was at t5. Minsk I did really like, but you have to be able to cope with the turret traverse to enjoy her. And sadly there is a premium that does everything she does just as well or better(Leningrad).

 

At least this gives us the chance of a balanced tier IV tech tree BB at some time in the future :hiding:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PISTN]
[PISTN]
Players
282 posts
5,160 battles

 

And price is smoke... No thx

 

Agreed, but may as well try it, along with SE I guess. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TEAM_]
Players
1,367 posts
11,386 battles

I now have premium camo for Minsk which I will never use. This ship is a joke for T VII :(:facepalm:

New Kiev is good though and I like new Udaloi. Very NICE! :medal::great:

 

 

shot-17.03.07_22.15.44-0086.jpg

shot-17.03.07_22.15.41-0803.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NIKE]
Beta Tester
3,412 posts
7,888 battles

New kiev is lots of fun.

 

Actually quite like the ognevoi theres a lot of interesting options - can get the detection down to around 6km while having long range good arc guns, huge AA umbrella if you spec for it, 10km torps that have 1.1km detection (but are very slow). Lots of variety there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×