Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
purpletrain0000

British Battleship line for 2017?

British BB's for 2017?  

284 members have voted

  1. 1. British BB's for 2017?

    • Yes
      233
    • No
      20
    • They might add them
      37

820 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
1,139 posts

 

 

The population has been spiked by the hunt the Bismarck campaign, it will settle down again once it's over. Some bonus missions which reward CC players should help as well.

 

​BB population has been high for a good while longer than the Bismarck campaign.

 

If the BB queue is way high waiting for random's, just give us a few 12 v 12 BB games. It will be a blast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
283 posts
3,035 battles

 

​BB population has been high for a good while longer than the Bismarck campaign.

 

If the BB queue is way high waiting for random's, just give us a few 12 v 12 BB games. It will be a blast.

 

True, but I can't remember 14+BB games before it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[110]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters, Weekend Tester
4,379 posts

DBk97tqW0AENr33.jpg

I'll just leave this here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[110]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters, Weekend Tester
4,379 posts

 

:teethhappy:

 

How did I guess this was coming

 

How did I guess it would be tier 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[110]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters, Weekend Tester
4,379 posts

 

No i knew you'd be in this thread like a shot upon finding out. 

 

Well that was kind of obvious really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[110]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters, Weekend Tester
4,379 posts

 

I laughed when I saw the BR. Time to run things over in my battle bunker

 

I better do the same, pack up food before things go Nuclear on the forums.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
74 posts

Oh, don't worry, NA general discussion did everything short of go up in literal flames when these pictures came out. Should KGV be tier VII, or VIII? Nelson is sea-sawing between tier VI and VIII depending on who you ask, and everyone thinks the Conqueror will be UP. Lion, meanwhile, has been relatively ignored...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[110]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters, Weekend Tester
4,379 posts

Oh, don't worry, NA general discussion did everything short of go up in literal flames when these pictures came out. Should KGV be tier VII, or VIII? Nelson is sea-sawing between tier VI and VIII depending on who you ask, and everyone thinks the Conqueror will be UP. Lion, meanwhile, has been relatively ignored...

 

Just like the Yanks to lose their marbles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Modder, Alpha Tester
1,879 posts
1,162 battles

DBk97tqW0AENr33.jpg

I'll just leave this here

 

You're going to be doing your nut when you read the latest datamined information from Reddit then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[110]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters, Weekend Tester
4,379 posts

 

You're going to be doing your nut when you read the latest datamined information from Reddit then.

 

You mean it is tier 8 with 381mm/45 for the top guns? I already said it wouldn't tier 8 without the 15" guns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
74 posts

 

You mean it is tier 8 with 381mm/45 for the top guns? I already said it wouldn't tier 8 without the 15" guns.

 

It's tier 8, yes. But the guns are listed as 14"... Although in performance they're 15" guns. 18.15 km range, 27.77 second reload, 1.8 sigma. AP does 11900 damage (high for a 15" gun, nevermind a 14" gun), HE rated at 6300 damage, with 95mm of penetration (a 15" gun with German penetration boost would get you that).

 

I assume they obey the same overmatch rules as 15" guns, but I don't know for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[110]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters, Weekend Tester
4,379 posts

 

It's tier 8, yes. But the guns are listed as 14"... Although in performance they're 15" guns. 18.15 km range, 27.77 second reload, 1.8 sigma. AP does 11900 damage (high for a 15" gun, nevermind a 14" gun), HE rated at 6300 damage, with 95mm of penetration (a 15" gun with German penetration boost would get you that).

 

I assume they obey the same overmatch rules as 15" guns, but I don't know for sure.

 

14" guns as stock and 15" when upgraded, though Wargaming.net need to work on making the 15" guns detached from the B hull and making them the 3x3 and not the unrealistic 2x4, 1x2 set up, but we can expect WG to make bad decisions time and again as is with the L2 when the Lion 1945, equipped with 3x3 16" and 12x2 4.5" RP10 guns, would be a better fit.
Edited by Chipmunk_of_Vengeance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
367 posts
14,179 battles

 

Here are the full datamined modules, armour schemes, and 3D models for these 4 ships here:

 

Nelson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rFMZukNGFE&feature=youtu.be

King George V: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNsiMyK23_w&feature=youtu.be

Lion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a4iZIPQIlE&feature=youtu.be

Conqueror: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxP61EU4kRs&feature=youtu.be

 

And SEA Group are reporting the rest of the line to be confirmed as: "Roster for low-tier British battleships was finalized. They are Bellerophon (1909) at Tier III, Orion (1912) at Tier IV, Iron Duke (1914) at Tier V, and Queen Elizabeth (1915) at Tier VI."

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[110]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters, Weekend Tester
4,379 posts

Here are the full datamined modules, armour schemes, and 3D models for these 4 ships here:

 

Nelson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rFMZukNGFE&feature=youtu.be

King George V: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNsiMyK23_w&feature=youtu.be

Lion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a4iZIPQIlE&feature=youtu.be

Conqueror: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxP61EU4kRs&feature=youtu.be

 

And SEA Group are reporting the rest of the line to be confirmed as: "Roster for low-tier British battleships was finalized. They are Bellerophon (1909) at Tier III, Orion (1912) at Tier IV, Iron Duke (1914) at Tier V, and Queen Elizabeth (1915) at Tier VI."

 

And we'll get Dreadnought eventually as the Tier 3 Premium.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WG Staff
260 posts
32,026 battles

Here are the full datamined modules, armour schemes, and 3D models for these 4 ships here:

 

Nelson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rFMZukNGFE&feature=youtu.be

King George V: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNsiMyK23_w&feature=youtu.be

Lion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a4iZIPQIlE&feature=youtu.be

Conqueror: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxP61EU4kRs&feature=youtu.be

 

And SEA Group are reporting the rest of the line to be confirmed as: "Roster for low-tier British battleships was finalized. They are Bellerophon (1909) at Tier III, Orion (1912) at Tier IV, Iron Duke (1914) at Tier V, and Queen Elizabeth (1915) at Tier VI."

Nice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
45 posts

Orion at T4 seems a bit too powerful tbh.

 

I see Orion as a T4.3, but the alternative Colossus is a T3.3, easier to nerf 0.3 than buff 0.7 IMO.

 

Oh, don't worry, NA general discussion did everything short of go up in literal flames when these pictures came out. Should KGV be tier VII, or VIII? Nelson is sea-sawing between tier VI and VIII depending on who you ask, and everyone thinks the Conqueror will be UP. Lion, meanwhile, has been relatively ignored...

 

Holy moly, you're right - need to put Lion under the microscope!

 

KGV/Nelson unending debate is part of it.

 

I'm not sure on Conqueror, reckon she's either UP or gimmick-cruiser-line 2.0. Kinda hoped cruisers would be the gimmick limit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[110]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters, Weekend Tester
4,379 posts

I'm not sure on Conqueror, reckon she's either UP or gimmick-cruiser-line 2.0. Kinda hoped cruisers would be the gimmick limit.

L2 though, with Vanguard style Modernisation, is a very interesting choice anyway, most people, even if we disagree over the placement of the KGV, can probably agree that the L3 would have been a better choice.

 

N_4_8_Y36_N_M_3_UFZ0_B_X6.jpg

 

And personally I'd have placed in the same line as Nelson, M2 and N3 rather than after the Lion 1944.

Edited by Chipmunk_of_Vengeance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
74 posts

Holy moly, you're right - need to put Lion under the microscope!

 

KGV/Nelson unending debate is part of it.

 

I'm not sure on Conqueror, reckon she's either UP or gimmick-cruiser-line 2.0. Kinda hoped cruisers would be the gimmick limit.

 

Lion looks decent, her citadel is nice and snugly packed underwater. The newly buffed Iowa Montana wish theres were so nice.

 

As for KGV... all I can say is this;

 

 1c37e842d87e1bbe12a46c1fa5c46c8d_zpsdqoz

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[110]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters, Weekend Tester
4,379 posts

 

Lion looks decent, her citadel is nice and snugly packed underwater. The newly buffed Iowa Montana wish theres were so nice.

 

As for KGV... all I can say is this;

 

 1c37e842d87e1bbe12a46c1fa5c46c8d_zpsdqoz

 

 

Just Wargaming screwing up again, they need to split both guns and have the 15" guns in 3x3 set up rather than the unrealistic 2x4 and 1x2 set up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
74 posts

 

Just Wargaming screwing up again, they need to split both guns and have the 15" guns in 3x3 set up rather than the unrealistic 2x4 and 1x2 set up.

 

As of now, there is no gun upgrade. There's just what's essentially a 4-2-4 setup of 15" guns that are labeled as 14" guns 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×