Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
lezantas26

Is there any point to low tier BB?

29 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Tester
360 posts
2,492 battles

long range you dont hit crap, medium range you are burning all the time AND you cant hit crap, low range you get torped to death AND you cant hit crap (if you manage to shoot anything with such turret traverse in the first place..)

 

i am trying to grind out of the wyoming, and i dont get any enjoyment out of it. is this kind of gameplay what new players should experience, is it supposed to suck them into the game?

 

i am not a BB fanboy, not even a BB player, most my games are in JPN cruisers, just find that low tiers are "DD or go home"

Edited by lezantas26

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Players
5,763 posts
16,940 battles

Spend 150€ and get yourself a balanced I.N. - now you can enjoy low tier BB gameplay with accurate guns!

Edited by aboomination
  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[2DQT]
Players
8,241 posts

WG I'm sorry but the Nikolai is stupid, utterly stupid.

 

I acquired one recently and its basically like having a hack. It's a middle finger up to all the poor/unfortunate/non Russians.

 

It's by far the most broken ship in the game and stinks of an illogical Russian bias.

 

Lets go through its bad points first:

 

Has awful AA

 

Is slow (only as slow as USN BB however).

 

Reload is alittle slow as are the shell flight times.

 

Now the plus points:

 

It's armour is insane for a T4 ship, when angled it doesn't seem to care about enemy BBs. That is if they can even hit you as they have derp dispersion.

 

The guns are the worst (most op) thing about her. 12 guns that have fantasy penetration values vs other BB. Playing casually you can hit other BB for 10k+ every salvo. It has excellent dispersion, like a higher tier BB.

 

The position of the guns is crazy also, you can almost always get 9 guns on target (forget about the rear one, you seldom need another 3 op AP rounds). The way they are set out is essentially like a Dunkerque with a little blind spot in the middle that a little forward planning can easily overcome.

 

The Matchmaking... Before I understand she  could see T6 ships. Now she sees a maximum of T5. Essentially you click BATTLE! and you immediately know you will be the top dog BB in every single game. You will out gun and out tank every other ship you might face.

 

The opposition, T3 and T4 ships have no chance against you.Their dispersion, guns and armour suck and are just big floating bags of XP. T5 has a chance atleast.

 

I do play quite a bit of BB and Nikolai is simply obscene. 

 

It's essentially an Arizona and Dunkerque mated together and knocked down two tiers.

 

Shame on WG for even making this thing, but I will continue to use it from time to time to massage my fragile ego :trollface:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertest Coordinator
6,337 posts
4,395 battles

110k in Ishizuchi. Confederate. High caliber...

 

Well there is a point to *that* one anyway. Much easier to farm those awards than higher tier games. Where people are good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[2DQT]
Players
8,241 posts

110k in Ishizuchi. Confederate. High caliber...

 

Well there is a point to *that* one anyway. Much easier to farm those awards than higher tier games. Where people are good.

 

True, it isnt a bad ship. Funny to fire troll everyone with a high level IJN CA captain with DE.

 

Until Nikolai shows up that is...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DREAD]
Players
13,110 posts
7,885 battles

@OP: yes there is.

 

1) for ppl who like the ships. It's the era when BB vs BB fights did happen. WW2 was the age of air war in fact. Also the mist beautiful battleships and Battlecruisers are from thus era.

 

2) learn BB gameplay and learn not to snipe ffs! Low tier BB matches are brawling slug fests. Boy, these high tier camper idiots suck! Or worse the "REVERSE-PADDLISTS".... *scary soundeffect*

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Players
5,763 posts
16,940 battles

110k in Ishizuchi. Confederate. High caliber...

 

Well there is a point to *that* one anyway. Much easier to farm those awards than higher tier games. Where people are good.

 

Ishi doesn't allow for "true bb gameplay", tho.

 

View Post1MajorKoenig, on 25 December 2016 - 04:20 PM, said:

It's the era when BB vs BB fights did happen.

 

And the tier where cruisers and DD dominate (not saying this is a bad thing, BB are popular regardless.

 

 learn BB gameplay and learn not to snipe ffs!

 

Wyoming will miss at any range.

 

Edited by aboomination

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles

Take Nassau, Kaiser, Wyoming or any of the premiums (except Mikasa) and have fun. Kawachi, South Carolina and Myogi are an aquired taste, but not bad.

 

 

 Player Average for Ships [ at 2016/12/10 ]

               
Nation Class Tier Name Win Damage Kills/Battle Survival   Players Battles
SN CA 3 Aurora 43.79 17.019 0.48 19.96   12 170
KM CA 3 Kolberg 47.05 14.626 0.52 20.79   968 14.097
JP CA 3 Tenryu 47.34 17.072 0.63 21.41   673 9.817
RN CA 3 Caledon 47.46 15.648 0.59 20.82   1.033 15.208
US BB 3 South Carolina 48.35 21.144 0.67 35.29   1.540 23.139
RN DD 3 Campbeltown 48.38 19.833 0.76 21.11   184 2.974
US DD 3 Wickes 48.69 14.129 0.64 15.10   639 9.317
JP DD 3 Wakatake 48.73 15.200 0.60 22.15   479 6.396
JP BB 3 Kawachi 48.76 20.974 0.71 34.90   800 11.850
SN DD 3 Derzki 48.78 12.931 0.59 15.28   376 5.922
US CA 3 St. Louis 50.94 21.035 0.74 29.42   1.338 20.618
SN CA 3 Bogatyr 51.15 22.385 0.74 29.98   451 6.706
KM BB 3 Nassau 51.70 29.663 1.08 41.17   1.969 30.071
KM BB 3 Koenig Albert 58.68 39.338 1.38 45.30   19 426

 

 

Player Average for Ships [ at 2016/12/10 ]        
Nation Class Tier Name Win Damage Kills/Battle Survival
JP BB 4 Myogi 47.31 23.026 0.54 34.88
KM CA 4 Karlsruhe 48.05 15.580 0.47 18.06
RN CA 4 Danae 48.08 17.130 0.60 17.36
US BB 4 Wyoming 48.64 27.655 0.69 34.90
US CV 4 Langley 48.73 28.668 0.61 44.36
SN DD 4 Izyaslav 48.91 16.278 0.60 16.63
US CA 4 Phoenix 48.92 18.497 0.50 18.02
KM BB 4 Kaiser 49.16 34.108 0.88 40.08
JP CA 4 Kuma 49.38 19.844 0.59 18.63
JP DD 4 Isokaze 49.51 20.681 0.71 23.54
SN CA 4 Svietlana 50.04 21.076 0.62 20.73
US DD 4 Clemson 50.70 19.402 0.76 17.06
JP CV 4 Hosho 50.97 38.632 0.87 55.30

 

http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/68793-why-low-tier-battleships-must-suck/page__p__1493255#entry1493255

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,828 posts

long range you dont hit crap, medium range you are burning all the time AND you cant hit crap, low range you get torped to death AND you cant hit crap (if you manage to shoot anything with such turret traverse in the first place..)

 

i am trying to grind out of the wyoming, and i dont get any enjoyment out of it. is this kind of gameplay what new players should experience, is it supposed to suck them into the game?

 

i am not a BB fanboy, not even a BB player, most my games are in JPN cruisers, just find that low tiers are "DD or go home"

 

Now for some serious answer....

 

Yes, current release of KM DD line makes low tier BBs hard to play. 

You have either not to play (grind) low tier BBs and rather focus on countering current DD infestation (your prefered DD killers of any tier).

 

As regarding to Wyoming ... its a decend ship. Sure its slow, but when you hit you will do massive damage. Its not as trash as some might say ... i like it a lot, I am not afraid of facing a DD (just turn away and use your two turrets to delete him). The only pain are CVs if you get focused by them, because of the slow speed and lack of AA. Fires are not that much of an issue ... pack premium consumables and invest in standard BB skills (survivability, high alert, super indendent, vigilance) and completely ignore T4 and T5 captain skills. Oh one more thing... always try to get a cruiser to join you if you are not divisioning.

 

In conclusion ... Wyoming is a great ship, I like it far better then Myogi or Kaizer. Plus its a T4 MM. Its one of the low tier ships I kept and an still playing it now and then (mostly with some division mate preferable Yubari :D ).

Edited by nambr9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,381 posts
6,643 battles

long range you dont hit crap, medium range you are burning all the time AND you cant hit crap, low range you get torped to death AND you cant hit crap (if you manage to shoot anything with such turret traverse in the first place..)

 

i am trying to grind out of the wyoming, and i dont get any enjoyment out of it. is this kind of gameplay what new players should experience, is it supposed to suck them into the game?

 

i am not a BB fanboy, not even a BB player, most my games are in JPN cruisers, just find that low tiers are "DD or go home"

 

If youre not a BB player but cruiser, then you wont find much joy in playing that class not even on higher tiers.

Wyoming is a very good ship for his tier and good damage dealer with 6 main batterys. Next in line is New York. Now, that is much less joyable ship then Wyo.

After are coming better ships, New Mexico, Colorado, and ofc, N. Carolina as very popular BB in general.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,828 posts

 

If youre not a BB player but cruiser, then you wont find much joy in playing that class not even on higher tiers.

Wyoming is a very good ship for his tier and good damage dealer with 6 main batterys. Next in line is New York. Now, that is much less joyable ship then Wyo.

After are coming better ships, New Mexico, Colorado, and ofc, N. Carolina as very popular BB in general.

 

I agree. New York is the only BB in USN line that I actually sold :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,828 posts

I have and Texas who is the same class as NY only upgraded, and is better then NY a bit.

 

And with better AA :) Texas is what NY should be in regular line, but unfortunately NY is only a minor improvement of the Wyoming with far worse MM.
Edited by nambr9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
5,828 posts

From my experience I found NY downgrade comparing to Wyoming. Did less damage.

 

Eeerm no ...

That is just RNG and worse MM :honoring:

 

Main battery: (Wyoming:NY)

305 mm/50 Mk7 356 mm/45 Mk2

 

Dispersion: (Wyoming:NY)

169.00 - 1.54% 201.00 - 1.42%

 

Gun rotation is the same, and NY has 3 secs longer reload time.

Edited by nambr9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
665 posts
7,033 battles

 

Because those ships WERE crappy in real life compared to their 1930/40s counterparts.

 

No radar, barely any AA, crappy torpedo protection, poor speed and manouverability, poor fire control, crappy deck armor. Those ships were made at a time when other BBs were really the only thing they had to fear, but in game they face planes with bombs and torpedoes, Destroyers with torpedoes, agile fire spitting CLs etc. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
360 posts
2,492 battles

 

If youre not a BB player but cruiser, then you wont find much joy in playing that class not even on higher tiers.

Wyoming is a very good ship for his tier and good damage dealer with 6 main batterys. Next in line is New York. Now, that is much less joyable ship then Wyo.

After are coming better ships, New Mexico, Colorado, and ofc, N. Carolina as very popular BB in general.

 

i play some BB too, its my second most played class because i need way more games to grind them, DD is the class i am best at and i grinded some mid tiers easily so its my less played class :teethhappy:

 

anyway, today is not a very good today in wows for me so i am not sure i can conclude anything, but the t5 games i played as wyoming were better. i was able to perform well, able to citadel, not get torped instantly. the only difference was that there were not 10 DD in each team, unlike t3 :sceptic:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
16 posts
8,332 battles

u can always try to learn to play

cruisers have low range - why not do your job?

nevermind the armor japanese dont have

upgrades

scout plane

And i guess u rly dont want those high tier ships, so quit now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
360 posts
2,492 battles

u can always try to learn to play

cruisers have low range - why not do your job?

nevermind the armor japanese dont have

upgrades

scout plane

And i guess u rly dont want those high tier ships, so quit now.

 

wut?:amazed:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[D_R_M]
Players
911 posts
18,566 battles

 

Now the plus points:

 

 

You forgot the very small superstructure! So it is a very difficult to ship to set on fire or damage with a british CL as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[2DQT]
Players
8,241 posts

Is it just me that's never had trouble defeating nikolais in kongos at all?

 

 Then their pilots must be doing it wrong.

 

Nikolai is the Lord and Master of low tier BB! 

 

You forgot the very small superstructure! So it is a very difficult to ship to set on fire or damage with a british CL as well. 

 

 Yes, true. Flame retardant facility built in too... Laugh as the underpowered short fuse AP plink off the side of the hull.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,624 posts
12,776 battles

WG I'm sorry but the Nikolai is stupid, utterly stupid.

 

I acquired one recently and its basically like having a hack. It's a middle finger up to all the poor/unfortunate/non Russians.

 

It's by far the most broken ship in the game and stinks of an illogical Russian bias.

 

Lets go through its bad points first:

 

Has awful AA

 

Is slow (only as slow as USN BB however).

 

Reload is alittle slow as are the shell flight times.

 

Now the plus points:

 

It's armour is insane for a T4 ship, when angled it doesn't seem to care about enemy BBs. That is if they can even hit you as they have derp dispersion.

 

The guns are the worst (most op) thing about her. 12 guns that have fantasy penetration values vs other BB. Playing casually you can hit other BB for 10k+ every salvo. It has excellent dispersion, like a higher tier BB.

 

The position of the guns is crazy also, you can almost always get 9 guns on target (forget about the rear one, you seldom need another 3 op AP rounds). The way they are set out is essentially like a Dunkerque with a little blind spot in the middle that a little forward planning can easily overcome.

 

The Matchmaking... Before I understand she  could see T6 ships. Now she sees a maximum of T5. Essentially you click BATTLE! and you immediately know you will be the top dog BB in every single game. You will out gun and out tank every other ship you might face.

 

The opposition, T3 and T4 ships have no chance against you.Their dispersion, guns and armour suck and are just big floating bags of XP. T5 has a chance atleast.

 

I do play quite a bit of BB and Nikolai is simply obscene. 

 

It's essentially an Arizona and Dunkerque mated together and knocked down two tiers.

 

Shame on WG for even making this thing, but I will continue to use it from time to time to massage my fragile ego :trollface:

 

 

Well, it could be worse. Just slap a 15 point captain in it with CE so everything that detects you it's well within your range. :trollface: Make yourself feel genuinely bad with that max sealclubbing. :teethhappy: Add Vigilance on top of that and the only thing that could remotely worry you a bit it's a Kamikaze or Fujin.
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[2DQT]
Players
8,241 posts

 

Well, it could be worse. Just slap a 15 point captain in it with CE so everything that detects you it's well within your range. :trollface: Make yourself feel genuinely bad with that max sealclubbing. :teethhappy:

 

 Hopefully I'll never play that much of her to get to CE! Shame on you if you do that :D
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×