wow thats impressive

[Cluid]

I am very fortunate to be running a very high end system and a 40" 4K monitor, I just messed around with the settings and managed to run the game at 3840 x 2160 with everything turned up and no lag, my god how sweet does this game look at those resolutions, its stunning.....

[MaxxyNL]

[XbodzioXplX]

 

I'm just curious. Does the minimap and other UI elements are big enough that he can see them without problem? 

There were tons of topics about that.

[OldGrandad]

 

I'm just curious. Does the minimap and other UI elements are big enough that he can see them without problem? 

There were tons of topics about that.

 

I am not in the OP's realm of 'look at what I have' but with my lowly 32" running at 2560 x 1440, the players panel is tiny as well as the minimap (compared to screen acreage), that is why I run customised players panel and minimap as you can then upscale it to match. Must look tiny on the OP's screen.........

[waxx25]

Back in June I bought a 70" TV (Yes I am American blah blah) and I played ships on it for a bit.......was amazing, ran smoothly on max settings but was a bit much for me especially when a Montana was more than a meter in length in port.

[Shaka_D]

Back in June I bought a 70" TV (Yes I am American blah blah) and I played ships on it for a bit.......was amazing, ran smoothly on max settings but was a bit much for me especially when a Montana was more than a meter in length in port.

Typical yank.....70" screen, 1" weener. Surpised you didn't get irradiated that close to the screen . Seriously though, how far did you have to sit for it to be playable?

[RedlineRailgunningRemmel]

Back in June I bought a 70" TV (Yes I am American blah blah) and I played ships on it for a bit.......was amazing, ran smoothly on max settings but was a bit much for me especially when a Montana was more than a meter in length in port.

 

I play the game sometimes on a 110" screen using a JVC projector for eye candy and 7.1.4 speaker setup being upmixed so ceiling speakers actually work when aircraft fly over my ship. Runs fine but there is a bit of input lag sadly.

[SV_Kompresor]

I have a projector, I tried playing at 2X2 meters on my wall (I don't really remember with which resolution).....I decided it was too big so I went back to my screen

[Martinborgen]

I play on a laptop

[Kenliero]

I play with 15" laptop while here in Thailand and chat windows and team lineups are massive. They dont scale to small monitor at all. BTW.  packetloss is massive too. lol

[Cluid]

sorry I didnt mean to make this a look what I have, it was just a general comment, if I pissed anyone off I certainly didnt mean too

[RenamedUser_92906789]

Would be interesting to see the difference live. Im playin on 24" monitor 1080p and it looks good enough (compared to the crap 15" laptop I used to play on).

[Hedgehog1963]

I am very fortunate to be running a very high end system and a 40" 4K monitor, I just messed around with the settings and managed to run the game at 3840 x 2160 with everything turned up and no lag, my god how sweet does this game look at those resolutions, its stunning.....

 

Screenshot plz.

[CptMinia]

I find the 27" 1440p dual monitor setup the sweet spot. I see why people might try play on 40"+ screens but after a couple hours I'd probably revert back... 

[mtm78]

I got pain in the neck from playing on my TV, granted I had to put it very close since my desk/table isn't that big...

 

So now I play on a 22' 1680 monitor  

[Kenliero]

sorry I didnt mean to make this a look what I have, it was just a general comment, if I pissed anyone off I certainly didnt mean too

 

quite the contrary. I think it is good to discuss things, like scaling in UI. WG could improve these things

[The_Fear_Of_All_Sums]

I am very fortunate to be running a very high end system and a 40" 4K monitor, I just messed around with the settings and managed to run the game at 3840 x 2160 with everything turned up and no lag, my god how sweet does this game look at those resolutions, its stunning.....

 

 

quite the contrary. I think it is good to discuss things, like scaling in UI. WG could improve these things

 

True.

OP... Could you help others who may want to build a system like yours to run it in a similar fashion? 

 

Download CPU-Z, run the validating tool and call it 'ForWOWSforum'.
The website will open and you can copy and paste the URL here. 

Then people who need assistance building a supercomputer can copy your config 

 http://www.cpuid.com...u-z_1.78-en.exe

[MudMonkey]

Just saw the Headline. Haven't read what OP is writing about, but it must be about me and my stunning performances. So, yeah. I know, right? Thanks for you appreciation, OP.

 

 

 

[Cluid]

http://valid.x86.fr/wv0tt8

[Cluid]

http://valid.x86.fr/wv0tt8

[cherry2blost]

PC =

 

 

Monitor =

 

[The_Fear_Of_All_Sums]

I am very fortunate to be running a very high end system.

 

It may not happen on here mate, because it's only a casual gaming forum.

But I'd delete that claim to save embarrassment. 

 

 

[cherry2blost]

http://valid.x86.fr/wv0tt8

 

Nah not a great OC that one dude.... 9590 is easy specced for 5 to 5.2Ghtz......

 

http://valid.x86.fr/63618f

 

or

 

http://valid.x86.fr/qcstas

[Mandyxx]

Back in June I bought a 70" TV (Yes I am American blah blah) and I played ships on it for a bit.......was amazing, ran smoothly on max settings but was a bit much for me especially when a Montana was more than a meter in length in port.

 

I am happy to see that my friends are rich

[The_Fear_Of_All_Sums]

Nah not a great OC that one dude.... 9590 is easy specced for 5 to 5.2Ghtz......

 

Yet it still gets eaten alive by a stock i5 4690k at stock (which is cheaper). 

 

The FX range are a budget way into computing (I've two in my lan room BTW), but they are NOT high end 'can run NASA' computers.