Change ARP Kirishima Mission, Ship Torpedo -> Every Torpedo

[Generalisator]

Hello,

 

since we have the last ARP missions, I have a small request:

 

Can we change the restriction for the Kirishima Mission of 200 SHIP! Torpedo hits to 200 torpedo hits?

From 200 hits for DD/CA/BB to CV/DD/CA/BB?

Even the mission description only mentions torpedoes. At least the German one.

 

WG is normally very correct about these descriptions. Like in the old: Daily Missions-days.

"500 Free XP for 3 Ship-Topedo hits in one match."

 

Is this possible? at least for the last month.

 

We handful CV players would really appreciate it.

[deadly_if_swallowed]

/signed.

The only ship I use for torpedo hits on a consistent basis is Scharnhorst... It takes ages to gather 200 torp hits, especially while playing T8+ to hunt Russian ships.

[Chopchopchop]

CV players do get missing out for all torpedo missions. 

[IceyJones]

getting 200 torp hits in a DD is WORK!

 

getting 200 torp hits in a CV is a one handed holiday

 

what you guys think this mission is meant to be, to get a FREE T8 SHIP?

 

a holiday?

 

but they could change the mission:

"deal (200 * average 10k damage per torp) 2 million HP damage with torpedoes"

then it would be comparable.....while CVs would still have it more easy to reach this, as one cannot dodge CV drops if done properly.

thus torp hitrate of a CV is MUCH higher than the one in a DD

[Generalisator]

[]

 

what you guys think this mission is meant to be, to get a FREE T8 SHIP?

[]

PLS, read the manual:

http://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:ARP_Kirishima

 

And only because it is work: It is nothing like the old ARP-Missions. That's good.

But torpedo hits is a unicum. It denies a whole class.

 

The 2.000.000 Damage is done in 10 good T10 matches.

[IceyJones]

 

 

The 2.000.000 Damage is done in 10 good T10 matches.

 

lol......so you think a T10 DD makes 200k damage only with torps every match?

 

HAHAHA

 

come back when you know what you talk about

[Generalisator]

 

lol......so you think a T10 DD makes 200k damage only with torps every match?

 

HAHAHA

 

come back when you know what you talk about

 

For a BB, that is no problem. (T10, T6 20 rounds.)

A CV has really hard to fight to get near the 200k.

A CA can do 100k in a T6+ game.

 

The 500 Secondary hits, well, some Kurfürst did that in under 10 rounds.

[Nechrom]

I'll have that mission done way before the Nachi-mission anyway.

Been stuck at 12/20 Russian ships for about a week now.

[IceyJones]

 

For a BB, that is no problem. (T10, T6 20 rounds.)

A CV has really hard to fight to get near the 200k.

A CA can do 100k in a T6+ game.

 

The 500 Secondary hits, well, some Kurfürst did that in under 10 rounds.

 

we talk about TORP DAMAGE!

not general damage

 

read, UNDERSTAND, answer......

 

pls

[Generalisator]

 

we talk about TORP DAMAGE!

not general damage

 

read, UNDERSTAND, answer......

 

pls

 

Well, stay topic than?

 

I'll have that mission done way before the Nachi-mission anyway.

Been stuck at 12/20 Russian ships for about a week now.

 

Well, there are NACHI Helper Threads for that.

http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/66993-food-for-nachi/

In the old ARS NOVA threads is even more about that.

[IceyJones]

 

Well, stay topic than?

 

 

 

who switched to general damage?

you or me?

 

you

 

so dont tell me to stay on topic, when YOU deviate from it

[Generalisator]

 

who switched to general damage?

you or me?

 

you

 

so dont tell me to stay on topic, when YOU deviate from it

 

It is about overall difficulty of Missions.

And that mission is quite hard.

2.000.000 Damage should be possible in 2 Months for all ships @ T8(+). Don't know all meta for all ships.

[Edit: Mission is starting with T8.]

[ThetaDelta]

Why should they " re-work" a mission just for the Main-CV players ?  

 

They don´t give a damn about People not playing BBs having to grind Secondary hits with CAs ... they dont care about ppl not having a Tier 8 to farm Wins for Takao or Kills for Nachi .... 

 

So what makes you think a CV should get the mission changed for his sake? 

 

Everyone knows by now running only BBs/CAs/DDs/CVs  will eventually bite you in the **** when it coms to Missions , but this time WG atleast gave us enough Time to adjust our Line Ups . If you choose to stick with only CV´s  tough for you buddy . They will not change the Missions again. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Generalisator]

Only whom who never tries will never win.

And the "complete rework", is exchanging an "and" with "not".

Which is, even for programming, less than 10 secs.

[IceyJones]

 

It is about overall difficulty of Missions.

And that mission is quite hard.

2.000.000 Damage should be possible in 2 Months for all ships @ T8(+). Don't know all meta for all ships.

[Edit: Mission is starting with T8.]

 

rofl....2 million damage for a T8+ mission is too easy!

i do that in 20 matches.

 

hitting 200 torps is a total different story in T8+ (hydro, and better players in general)

 

so you still ask to open a "backdoor" into the mission to avoid the grind of 200 torp hits by

enabling CV torps as viable

 

thx....no

 

when i imagine every CV scrub enters high tier matches with an atago with 16 torps on board

i´m forced to remember the times, where teamkills from atagos happened EVERY match

 

no thanks

 

either they learn how to torp before they get this ship, or they leave it alone

and how you learn? by playing ships with torps!

 

 

[Generalisator]

O, it is soooo easy to play CV???

Why is there not every match a CV?

And ques of 100 CV to 10BBs 5 CAs and 1 DD?

 

Bollocks. For CVs it is not uncommon to wait more than 5 Minutes for one match.

[ilhilh]

It would be nice if it was CV torps too - getting 25 or so per game in the Taiho would soon get it done!

 

I've pretty given up on this mission as I don't particularly want to spend games chasing torp hits.  I was ok pushing it up until I finished my Fletcher grind.  I will keep playing my Fletcher, Gearing and Ibuki and if it looks like I am getting close by mid December I might actually focus on it specifically.

[Generalisator]

Well, I'm pushing my ISOKAZE to T5 over 6. Well, a hell of a grind.

[IceyJones]

O, it is soooo easy to play CV???

Why is there not every match a CV?

And ques of 100 CV to 10BBs 5 CAs and 1 DD?

 

Bollocks. For CVs it is not uncommon to wait more than 5 Minutes for one match.

 

because CVs :

- are boring for the most players

- payout is low (actual eco-system)

- are not the iWin-Button anymore like they were in the past, where we had 2 CVs EVERY match (even in T10), because of that

 

 

 

 

[deadly_if_swallowed]

Boring for most players? Are they that good at micromanaging 5+ squads that gameplay gets boring?

I struggle with CVs because they are exhausting

[ThetaDelta]

It doesn´t matter if they are fun,boring,easy or hard to play. 

 

 Conway and Sehales allready posted that they dontplan to change the ARP Missions in any way or form.  So You better use your time getting a DD of the needed Tier and farm these Torp hits. 

[Generalisator]

Post those pls.

 

__________________

@IceyJones

And even with 2 Cvs, per Team, there was no cap, so only 2?

WOW, I have matches: 1 CV, 1 DD and rest BB.

 

You, with 0 CV games, looking back, and find conclusion for things that are not even close to reality due patches and changes.

[IceyJones]

Boring for most players? Are they that good at micromanaging 5+ squads that gameplay gets boring?

I struggle with CVs because they are exhausting

 

if they are "good" at it is not of interest. but i think looking at a map with icons, clicking here, clicking there might be boring in comparison, yes

playing the other classes is like playing a shooter. playing CV is like playing comand and conquer

it might be a nice addition for SOME players, but the majority is here for the "im IN the battle" part

i guess

[IceyJones]

Post those pls.

 

__________________

@IceyJones

And even with 2 Cvs, per Team, there was no cap, so only 2?

WOW, I have matches: 1 CV, 1 DD and rest BB.

 

You, with 0 CV games, looking back, and find conclusion for things that are not even close to reality due patches and changes.

 

they were limited to 2 from start!

for reasons

they even reduced the cap to 1 at higher tiers

for reasons

 

and just because i dont play CV does not mean, that i cannot judge them. i play against and with them every day and know, what a good player is capable to do with them!

and who tells you, that i have not played them in closed beta?

 

i did play them in CBT. first on an alternative account, then 2 more matches on my actual account and decided then, that CVs are (for me) totally boring and not engaging.

[Generalisator]

Yes, play them, show us how easy they are to master.

 

2 matches, with an alternative account. That smell, that smelly smell.