Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Darth_Glorious

USS Missouri + KMS DDs + KMS Graf Spee preliminary stats (5.15 ST)

219 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Tester
2,464 posts

Missouri (you need 800.000 FREEDOM Xp to unlock)

 

j5xx8o.jpg

 

Graff Spee (torps 8 km, 65 kt).  Ap 8400 dmg (compared to 7600 of Sharnhorst)

ff2udi.jpg

 

Tier 10 Z-52 (torps 10,5 km, 69 kt, 1,4 km detection, 90s reload). Best AA in the game for DD. (170 DPS with ~100 DPS at 5 km). Has Sonar (4 km torp + 5,9 km ship, 122s active). Smoke

 

6fozsk.jpg

 

Tier 9 Z-46 (torps 10 km, 67 kt, 1,4 km detection, 90s reload). Has Sonar (3,9 km torp + 5,7 km ship, 120s active)

 

2uj7ek5.jpg

 

Tier 8 Z-23 (torp 9,5 km, 66 kt, 1,4 km detection,  90s reload). Has Sonar (3,8 km torp + 5,6 km ship, 118s active)

 

nx2o9g.jpg

 

Tier 7 Leberecht Maass (torp 8,5 km, 65 kt, 1,3 km detection,  90s reload). Has Sonar (3,8 km torp + 5,4 km ship, 116s active)

 

2myqn0i.jpg

 

Tier 6 Ernst Gaede (torp 8 km, 65 kt, 1,3 km detection,  90s reload). Has Sonar (3,7 km torp + 5,3 km ship, 114s active)

 

20sausi.jpg

 

Tier 5 T-22 (torp 7,5 km, 62 kt, 1,3 km detection,  68s reload). No Sonar.

 

v7sha8.jpg

 

Tier 4 V-170 (torp 7 km, 54 kt, 1 km detection, 21-42s reload ). No Sonar.

 

23j3im9.jpg

 

Tier 3 G-101 (torp 7 km, 52 kt, 1 km detection, 16-32s reload). No Sonar.

 

6zskna.jpg

 

 

Tier 2 V-25 (torp 6km, 49 kt, 0,9 km detection, 16-32s reload). No Sonar.

2zsny3r.jpg

 

Edited by Darth_Glorious
  • Cool 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORAZ]
Beta Tester
15,786 posts
26,801 battles

So apparently Missouri has:

- stock Iowa rudder shift (25 seconds lol)

- slightly better mid range AA, but worse short range AA than Iowa

- lower speed than Iowa

- 700 HP less than Iowa

 

Why would anyone bother to get it? Especially if that hilarious price tag turns out to be true?

 

And ofc we needed another *edited* line with good AA in this game, so high tier CVs won't be able to do ANYTHING other than scout and shoot down planes in the future. Really WG?

Edited by El2aZeR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,464 posts

So apparently Missouri has:

- stock Iowa rudder shift (25 seconds lol)

- slightly better mid range AA, but worse short range AA

- lower speed than Iowa

- 700 HP less than Iowa

 

Why would anyone bother to get it? Especially if that hilarious price tag turns out to be true?

 

And ofc we needed another *edited* line with good AA in this game, so high tier CVs won't be able to do ANYTHING other than scout and shoot down planes in the future. Really WG?

 

It has better rudder shift time than top hull of Iowa (25,33 vs 25,43). The value you see is not yet normalized

Edited by Darth_Glorious
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
6,008 posts
7,043 battles

So pure Missouri is some 100 euro. Damn those ships costs!

 

And the main idea about GE DDs - midrange torps but with sonar and good AA. Yo-Lang with US AA. I like that.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,464 posts

So pure Missouri is some 100 euro. Damn those ships costs!

 

And the main idea about GE DDs - midrange torps but with sonar and good AA. Yo-Lang with US AA. I like that.

 

and fast reload torps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,046 posts
8,508 battles

So apparently Missouri has:

- stock Iowa rudder shift (25 seconds lol)

- slightly better mid range AA, but worse short range AA than Iowa

- lower speed than Iowa

- 700 HP less than Iowa

 

Why would anyone bother to get it? Especially if that hilarious price tag turns out to be true?

 

And ofc we needed another *edited* line with good AA in this game, so high tier CVs won't be able to do ANYTHING other than scout and shoot down planes in the future. Really WG?

 

It's not like this AA will destroy entire squadrons... They just have the best AA of all DDs but no defensive fire. You can't park your squad for 5 minutes over them but flying over them shouldn't bother you that much. 

 

For the Missouri , yeah you are right. Already got the premium camo for the Iowa, no need to spent 800k free XP on a worse one. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[3X]
Players
241 posts
10,459 battles

Could you post more detailed info on the GE Tier 10 and Tier 8 DDs?

AA Dps? (no dual Purpose guns on tier 8?)

Torpedo dmg?

HE fire chance?

 

Smoke Values / duration and reload time and active time?

 

(Planning ahead for my 18p cpt :playing:)

Edited by Yoshi_EU

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,464 posts

Could you post more detailed info on the GE Tier 10 and Tier 8 DDs?

AA Dps?

Torpedo dmg?

HE fire chance?

 

Tier 10

128 mm L/45 Drh LC/41 ( 3 x 2 128 mm ) : 45 DPS (5 km)

55 mm L/77 Gerät 58 ( 3 x 1 55 mm ) : 52 DPS (5 km)

37 mm Flak LM/42 ( 7 x 2 37 mm ) : 72 DPS (3,5 km)

 

Torpedo damage 14455

 

HE fire chance 7 %, Ap dmg 3000, HE dmg 1500, 830 m/s

 

Tier 8 :

 

37 mm Flak LM/42 ( 4 x 2 37 mm ) : 41 DPS (3,5 km)

20 mm Flakvierling 38 ( 4 x 4 20 mm ) : 24 DPS (2,0 km)

20 mm Flakzwilling 38 ( 2 x 2 20 mm ) : 8 DPS (2,0 km)

 

Torpedo damage 14455

 

HE fire cahnce 12%, Ap dmg 3700, HE dmg 2200, 835 m/s

 

 

Edited by Darth_Glorious
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4,154 posts
9,221 battles

 

 

Why would anyone bother to get it? Especially if that hilarious price tag turns out to be true?

 

 

 

 

It will sell like fresh bread

 

1. It is a BB

2. It is a premium BB

3. It is tier 9 BB !

4 . Most people don't care what they buy, as long it is big , has big guns and high tier it is worth buying

 


 

And reload on thoswe glorious german guns will be? tiers 7-10

Edited by KaraMon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CPC]
[CPC]
Quality Poster
2,545 posts
13,085 battles

So T8 german DD has 150 mm guns (so no BFT, no AFT), but T9 & T10 have 128 mm guns ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-TNT-]
Beta Tester
476 posts
9,012 battles

If German DDs can get smoke and hydro smae time why IJN cant get reload boster and moke same tme????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DREAD]
Players
13,110 posts
7,885 battles

The stats on the German DDs look good! Looking forward!

 

The low tier ones have a combination of double (turret) launchers and singles (fixed?). Any idea how that would work in the game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,739 posts
1,782 battles

So, that means only smoke for the T10 DD?

 

On the other hand, the torps seem to be rather good, even though they lack some damage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,780 posts
17,292 battles

If German DDs can get smoke and hydro smae time why IJN cant get reload boster and moke same tme????

 

The second line does.

 

So T8 german DD has 150 mm guns (so no BFT, no AFT), but T9 & T10 have 128 mm guns ?

 

The 128mm are modern dual purpose guns.

 

tier 10 has excellent AA

 

Yep.

 

Daring: ~260

Fletcher: 261 (556 for 30 seconds with defensive fire)

Z52: 294

Battle: ~315

 

(max dps values)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CR33D]
[CR33D]
Players
3,842 posts
38,926 battles

So seems that all KM dds can stealth torps just like IJN. Their torps were faster and had lower detection range than IJN but deal less damage and have shorter range, at least for some tiers. So they should be able to provide better hit ratio but with less damage than IJN ones.

 

These stats for KM DDs look promising, but I feel a little sorry for IJN dds. This line, at least mid and higher tier ships, already looks as better choice if you want a ship that can stealth torp and be able to use its guns. Comparing with US and RU dds in the gunboat role they seems good balanced with maybe somewhat worse HE but better AP. Not sure what turret traverse times and RoF of those 127mm/150mm/128mm guns will be but I guess that 127mm and 128mm will have a good RoF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[T-N-T]
Weekend Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
6,566 posts
15,994 battles

Is Graf spee designed as CA or BB? Also which consumable will have?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,464 posts

Is Graf spee designed as CA or BB? Also which consumable will have?

 

CA

it has 4 consumable slots :

1 : Dmg control party

2 : Sonar or Defensive fire

3 : Catapult fighter

4 : Repair party

 

So seems that all KM dds can stealth torps just like IJN. Their torps were faster and had lower detection range than IJN but deal less damage and have shorter range, at least for some tiers. So they should be able to provide better hit ratio but with less damage than IJN ones.

 

These stats for KM DDs look promising, but I feel a little sorry for IJN dds. This line, at least mid and higher tier ships, already looks as better choice if you want a ship that can stealth torp and be able to use its guns. Comparing with US and RU dds in the gunboat role they seems good balanced with maybe somewhat worse HE but better AP. Not sure what turret traverse times and RoF of those 127mm/150mm/128mm guns will be but I guess that 127mm and 128mm will have a good RoF.

 

Tier IX and X : 15 RPM, traverse speed 18 deg/s

Tier VIII : 9 RPM, traverse speed 8 deg/s

Tier VII : 15 RPM,  traverse speed 8 deg/s

Tier VI : 8 RPM for 150 mm, 11,7 RPM for 128 mm, traverse speed 8 deg/s

Tier II-V :  15 RPM,  traverse speed 10 deg/s

 

Edited by Darth_Glorious
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PRAVD]
Weekend Tester
3,802 posts
8,478 battles

So better guns than IJN and better functional torps than IJN at high and mid tiers (remember that Minekaze will lose its top torps and will have 57kts 10k damage torps, while the Germans get 7.5km at 62kts at tier 5, Mutsuki gets 6km at 64kts, lol).

 

And WG release yet another premium cruiser-killer at tier 6, that its weakness is against BBs, because cruisers are so OP and over-played while BBs are struggling at the moment, am I right?

 

More powercreep, who would have thought!

  • Cool 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×