Venom_Too ∞ Players 5,189 posts 7,044 battles Report post #26 Posted November 3, 2016 In sight of the ship only. You get a minmal worser (No Camo) Atago for free, so YES it is OK the High Requirements. In sight of server. Yes it is unfair for EU, but i don't really care. p.s.: And don't come with the Argument... but it has not the Boni of the Premium ships. Won't change the fact that the Takao is the same good Ship as the Atago only with the Drawback you can't put Camo on. So she will perform nearly as good as the Atago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[AXIS] svadilfari Players 725 posts 19,379 battles Report post #27 Posted November 3, 2016 doesnt bother me personally. good excuse to grind some T10s. besides, the takao isn´t that big of a reward, it´s not a premium after all. i´ll grind it on the side, it´s 2 months after all. i´d much prefer another kamikaze style mission with a decent tier 6 or 7 premium as a reward Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[B5] Kimosabe_X Alpha Tester 2,846 posts 7,972 battles Report post #28 Posted November 3, 2016 Voted for "not Ok", Tier VIII should have been enough... not to mention what went off on the other servers... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RenamedUser_92906789 Players 5,828 posts Report post #29 Posted November 3, 2016 I understand why unicum players who have several t9/10 ships vote for yes ... they want an unique reward (such as Flint) to show their skill. With making it a T9+ mission not so many players will have it ... so some1 with Takao on EU servers would mean he is a really good player. But i find that a bit selfish. Personally I have been denied the ship just because rules are different on EU. If I was on NA I could compete for the ship ... therefore this is not fair in any case. Why doesnt WG allow then just the users who have premium to compete for this ... sorry but its the same feeling. I have an option to throw some gold and unlock three T9 ships and upgrade them right away to compete ... but I am not gonna do it. Just keep the damn ship. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TORPZ] Grimhardt Players 1,241 posts 9,682 battles Report post #30 Posted November 3, 2016 just BS Got since two day my highest Tier-Ship - Bismarck and how the hell shall i get so fast to a Tier-IX. And the Price is a Tier-VIII Ship. Thats BS -.- Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fenivan Beta Tester 64 posts 11,926 battles Report post #31 Posted November 3, 2016 MrConway, on 01 November 2016 - 03:04 PM, said: I'll make sure to get you guys an official answer on this tomorrow, its a public holiday in France so most people are out of the office. What to expect from WG EU when they have not fulfilled their promise? november 1 and now 3rd^^ When they treat you like a trash over and over again and you keep playing, doing same things. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
anonym_XGuN6pHmfiJ9 Players 460 posts Report post #32 Posted November 3, 2016 I wanted the Takao. But the tier 9 demand has solved that problem. Only have tier 8 ships at the moment. So no Takao for me but it isn't a big deal for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[KILIS] Hardrider2010 [KILIS] Beta Tester 1,675 posts 21,101 battles Report post #33 Posted November 3, 2016 My vote: NO! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TOXIC] eliastion Players 4,795 posts 12,260 battles Report post #34 Posted November 3, 2016 I understand why unicum players who have several t9/10 ships vote for yes ... they want an unique reward (such as Flint) to show their skill. With making it a T9+ mission not so many players will have it ... so some1 with Takao on EU servers would mean he is a really good player. (...) Really? It's 50 wins. The mission is really easy to complete in 2 months. The only thing you need is a t9 ship - and getting that is only a matter of grind. To the point where you could just afk some 150 missions in t9 and probably complete the mission just like that. You know what WOULD be a skill-based mission to give people something to maybe brag about a little bit? Imagine a 7+ tier requirement (to exclude the low tiers but not the general populace) and a goal of, say, 30 victories while being among top 3 ships experience-wise (Random only). Unicums would do it pretty quickly. Decent-ish players would suffer through the grind to get these precious high-xp victories. Potatoes wouldn't really stand a chance... And it could be completed in your favourite ships of reasonably wide 7-10 tier spread! Just having a t9+ ship to complete the mission simply isn't an achievement - while it limits the mission to veterans of the game, it's still something achieved through pure grind. Skill makes it faster but is hardly necessary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RenamedUser_92906789 Players 5,828 posts Report post #35 Posted November 3, 2016 (edited) Really? It's 50 wins. The mission is really easy to complete in 2 months. The only thing you need is a t9 ship - and getting that is only a matter of grind. To the point where you could just afk some 150 missions in t9 and probably complete the mission just like that. You know what WOULD be a skill-based mission to give people something to maybe brag about a little bit? Imagine a 7+ tier requirement (to exclude the low tiers but not the general populace) and a goal of, say, 30 victories while being among top 3 ships experience-wise (Random only). Unicums would do it pretty quickly. Decent-ish players would suffer through the grind to get these precious high-xp victories. Potatoes wouldn't really stand a chance... And it could be completed in your favourite ships of reasonably wide 7-10 tier spread! Just having a t9+ ship to complete the mission simply isn't an achievement - while it limits the mission to veterans of the game, it's still something achieved through pure grind. Skill makes it faster but is hardly necessary. You misunderstood me. I know exactly how to complete the mission. I was just giving the facts as I see who voted for YES Lets say there are 1000 players. Out of this 1000 only 100 have T9 and T10. Out of this 100 lets say 50 will complete the mission. So you have 5% of veteran (skilled) players having the ship. If a player made it to T9/10 without skill ... than its magic Although I have seen people throwing money to WG unlocking several ships within few days in tech tree. But those are rare. EDIT: And yes, i think 50 wins isnt that harder than 100k base xp. What pisses me off is that I cant compete because I dont have a T9 ship. But I do have several T8. I just never grinded one line only, and I have a life/kids/family/wife/job ... so I cant play more than 3,4 games per day. Edited November 3, 2016 by nambr9 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[JUNK] SomeoneYouKnow2 Beta Tester 301 posts 13,581 battles Report post #36 Posted November 3, 2016 I vote yes. Less noobs getting this ship is good. I don't care about NA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Egoleter ∞ Players 4,046 posts Report post #37 Posted November 3, 2016 I vote yes. Less noobs getting this ship is good. I don't care about NA Would you still vote "yes" if wargamings goal is to get more "noobs" into your precious high tier games? 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RenamedUser_92906789 Players 5,828 posts Report post #38 Posted November 3, 2016 I vote yes. Less noobs getting this ship is good. I don't care about NA See this I was talking about. Purple players think like this ... like its that huge difference if they made it T8 (since the ship is T8). Even if T8 you could still compete. I get thrown so many times into T10 game in my T8 ... i wouldnt complain ... I would have a chance at least. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ALA] Bismarck_chan Players 392 posts 5,321 battles Report post #39 Posted November 3, 2016 Voted no, because I would prefer parity between regions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
feechbone Alpha Tester 83 posts 222 battles Report post #40 Posted November 3, 2016 t10 only for the win...no? nobody? awww Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ALA] Bismarck_chan Players 392 posts 5,321 battles Report post #41 Posted November 3, 2016 (edited) I vote yes. Less noobs getting this ship is good. I don't care about NA Well, this way you are gonna have dolts like me at T9 instead of T8. Edited November 3, 2016 by Bismarck_chan Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[72] mikelight1805 [72] Beta Tester 453 posts 14,842 battles Report post #42 Posted November 3, 2016 I may have misunderstood something i read a while back, but i am sure that each server region is able to independently decide the parameters of their events? EU can do what they want, NA can do what they want SEA can do as they please. I don't think WG has never stated it has a policy on server uniformity? i am happy to be corrected on this of course! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Panocek Players 13,176 posts 13,617 battles Report post #43 Posted November 3, 2016 I may have misunderstood something i read a while back, but i am sure that each server region is able to independently decide the parameters of their events? EU can do what they want, NA can do what they want SEA can do as they please. I don't think WG has never stated it has a policy on server uniformity? i am happy to be corrected on this of course! Only thing WG stated were something along the "events catered to the region specifics" lines. Its no secret EU became main source of cash to milk after Russian economy basically collapsed and WG is throwing everything to get anything from there. And nothing promotes income like "I need to get higher tier than Umikaze to get my waifu" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Egoleter ∞ Players 4,046 posts Report post #44 Posted November 3, 2016 I may have misunderstood something i read a while back, but i am sure that each server region is able to independently decide the parameters of their events? EU can do what they want, NA can do what they want SEA can do as they please. I don't think WG has never stated it has a policy on server uniformity? i am happy to be corrected on this of course! They can do whatever they want, it still doesn't make it right to discriminate one community over the others. And this mission is contradicting their previous statements that those missions are created catering to their specific audience. They want to force us into a specific behavior. And like good dogs plenty of players here happily jump through those hoops for a little treat, while right next to them the other dogs get the same for simply being able to sit. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[72] mikelight1805 [72] Beta Tester 453 posts 14,842 battles Report post #45 Posted November 3, 2016 Right and wrong are a personal moral stand point, and i am not here for an argument. I don't see it as right, i don't see it as wrong, i see it as marketing exercise in baiting more money out of premium time and doubloon sales I am just glad i don't have to grind 100000 base XP Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[10TH] JAnCOz Players 43 posts 11,458 battles Report post #46 Posted November 3, 2016 100000 base xp is easier to make... you can be rewarded with more than 1k base exp even if you lose. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tubit101 Players 1,189 posts 4,745 battles Report post #47 Posted November 3, 2016 Right and wrong are a personal moral stand point, and i am not here for an argument. I don't see it as right, i don't see it as wrong, i see it as marketing exercise in baiting more money out of premium time and doubloon sales I am just glad i don't have to grind 100000 base XP What's your point? If you're neutral about all this, then why are you commenting? Just curious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EnterpriseNL Players 33 posts Report post #48 Posted November 3, 2016 Yeah, to high requirement, its the same as the ARP Ashigara mission, tier 7 ship, but you can only get it with tier 8+ ships 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[RALLY] HMS_Antelope Players 309 posts 8,128 battles Report post #49 Posted November 3, 2016 The way WG work the different regions means they operate as independent companies. The EU have chosen the path for us and we either get on with it or not. Yes I am happy the T8 will be hard to achieve as the Atago is a great ship and should be difficult to get, I also wouldn't want a lot of inexperienced players around T8-10 as it upsets the higher tier populations. I think they have been very generous of late with the container system and the Halloween special so why we complain about everything is beyond me. They are all ships we don't have to buy, the people who spend more time in game will benefit from these offers which is correct in my opinion. They could have set T8 as the level but we would have had a lot of complaints about that. I am all for keeping WG honest but honestly at the moment they are doing a better job, we got the calendar out just on time so lets give them some credit. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[72] mikelight1805 [72] Beta Tester 453 posts 14,842 battles Report post #50 Posted November 3, 2016 What's your point? If you're neutral about all this, then why are you commenting? Just curious. whats my point on the morality? or the mission requirements? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
