[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #1 Posted October 14, 2016 since we dont have a high tier japanese battleship premium here are a few examples (they are all paper though) first we have the Tosa this was to be one of the most powerful battleships of its time but due to the WNT it was used for armor tests and the aircraft carrier Kaga was also a Tosa-class Battleship Armaments 10x41cm guns in a A B X Y Z arrangement (same as Amagi) 20x14cm guns in casemates it would need an Amagi like refit Armor a little better than Nagato Speed 25.5kts (same as Nagato) it is basicly a Battleship version of the Amagi Next one Hiraga's design for a Kongo replacement it followes a design principle of cramping all armaments in a small space to maximize armor thickness Armamets 10x41cm guns in 2 double and 2 triple turrets in a Pensacola like arrengement 16x15.2cm guns in 8 casemate mounts and 4 double turrets 8 x12.7cm AA guns in 4 dual mounts Armor Belt ranging from 300-350mm Speed 26.5kts Last one Fujimoto's design for a Kongo replacement it is basicly a scaled down Yamato Armaments 9x41cm guns in 3 triple turrets 12x15.2cm guns in 5 double turrets 8x12.7cm AA guns in 4 dual mounts Armor ??? Speed ??? the giant shield was there to protect the 2 secondary turrets from the blast when firing the main guns 8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vanhal Alpha Tester 5,609 posts 5,569 battles Report post #2 Posted October 14, 2016 I would rather see IJN BB remade into BB and BC (or "slow" and "fast" if anyone prefer) lines. Tosa would be ideal on the tier VIII of the slow line, with Amagi switched to fast one. Both of the others looks good though, especially the Hiraga project. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #3 Posted October 15, 2016 the uniqueness of the Hiraga project could make for a good premium ship we might see Tosa and the Fujimoto project in a second branch maybe I also think you could buff the Fujimoto project with the Izumos longer 41cm guns to fit tier 9 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SmartassNoob Players 723 posts 5,774 battles Report post #4 Posted October 15, 2016 Funny that the Fujimoto was suppose to have a shield there. I want an upgraded late https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ise-class_battleship It should be able to launch like 10 automated fighters. Each with its own cool-down timer. And it should be tier 7. Also how about the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_battleship_Mutsu ? 4 turrets with 2 410mm guns each. I'm pretty sure this would work, if it's the 1943 version and no higher than tier 7. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #5 Posted October 15, 2016 Also how about the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_battleship_Mutsu ? 4 turrets with 2 410mm guns each. I'm pretty sure this would work, if it's the 1943 version and no higher than tier 7. you basicly got that with Nagato and I dont really want clones 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
anonym_i2RxUTEMphjW Players 894 posts Report post #6 Posted October 15, 2016 (edited) Not tier 8, but how about the potential ultimate p2w, A-150 on tier 10 :> ? Edited October 15, 2016 by anonym_i2RxUTEMphjW Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #7 Posted October 15, 2016 Not tier 8, but how about the potential ultimate p2w, A-150 on tier 10 :> ? not gonna happen Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SmartassNoob Players 723 posts 5,774 battles Report post #8 Posted October 15, 2016 The A-150, just like the H44 would have to be tier 12. That's how much more armor and firepower they'd have over the current tier 10. Also, I'm actually pretty sure that the current german tier 10 BB would have to be tier 11, if it worked as well as "designed" in reality. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
anonym_i2RxUTEMphjW Players 894 posts Report post #9 Posted October 15, 2016 And all this just makes me quite sure that one day we'll see it in the game. Not soon, but closer to the end of it's lifeline when they'll try to find any new ways to get money. H44 was insanity and it would be like trying to get something like Ratte in WoT, while A-150 could be cut to Maus size comparison (it's hull size was to be closer to H41), using the earlier 480mm guns instead of 510mm as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #10 Posted October 15, 2016 (edited) The A-150, just like the H44 would have to be tier 12. That's how much more armor and firepower they'd have over the current tier 10. Also, I'm actually pretty sure that the current german tier 10 BB would have to be tier 11, if it worked as well as "designed" in reality. well the GK is a H42 hull with triple turrets from "russian archives" so if you would fit the 480mm double turrets on this ship it might work btw. they said there is not enough information on the 480s thats why they havent implemented them maybe I can build a working model of the Hiraga design in "From the Depths" and post some screens here Edited October 15, 2016 by Kaseko Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nightdare Players 97 posts 710 battles Report post #11 Posted October 15, 2016 Well, the Tosa class would be a true design, since it actually got built (though not finished in its intended role) and being a 'larger Nagato' could make a premium tier VIII BB Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[H_FAN] Gnirf Players 3,293 posts 67,343 battles Report post #12 Posted October 16, 2016 Well I have answered on similar topics but in the early 20´s Hiraga did many designs incl. 13 class 8-18 inch C.a 47000 tons 30 kts variants included 12-16 (6x2), other w quads 2x2 in front 2x4 back, 14-16 inch, 1x2, 1x4 in front 2x4 back and 16-16, 4x4. Battlecruiser variants w 6-18 etc so the designs were prolific. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vanhal Alpha Tester 5,609 posts 5,569 battles Report post #13 Posted October 16, 2016 I want an upgraded late https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ise-class_battleship It should be able to launch like 10 automated fighters. Each with its own cool-down timer. And it should be tier 7. Considering how much trouble they have with Tone, i doubt we will see it soon, or even SoonTM We could have Ise as premium, but considering it's basically Fuso, it would be boring. Also how about the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_battleship_Mutsu ? 4 turrets with 2 410mm guns each. I'm pretty sure this would work, if it's the 1943 version and no higher than tier 7. BOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRIIIIINGGGGGGGGG. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ST-EU] Trainspite Supertester, Players, Sailing Hamster 1,920 posts 4,621 battles Report post #14 Posted October 16, 2016 Also how about the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_battleship_Mutsu ? 4 turrets with 2 410mm guns each. I'm pretty sure this would work, if it's the 1943 version and no higher than tier 7. Basically Mutsu would just be a premium Nagato B hull. I'll hedge my bets on Yamashiro (6), Haruna (6) or Ise (6). Most likely Haruna I feel. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #15 Posted October 16, 2016 Basically Mutsu would just be a premium Nagato B hull. I'll hedge my bets on Yamashiro (6), Haruna (6) or Ise (6). Most likely Haruna I feel. you mean Haruna with dem Texas like AA refit? it would still be tier 5 tho Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VC381 Players 2,928 posts 6,549 battles Report post #16 Posted October 17, 2016 Tosa would be my pick, the other designs look very weird and their power level is possibly closer to Izumo than Amagi since I think they're taken from the same set of studies. There's also the Kii class, which is superficially similar to Amagi but is a fast BB that is an evolution/fusion of both Tosa and Amagi. That would be somewhat boring but could be balanced around a less modernised aesthetic than Amagi. What I would love to see is the B-65 "super cruiser" but I doubt she's T8 material given how WG have handled similar ships (Dunkerque and Scharnhorst). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ST-EU] Trainspite Supertester, Players, Sailing Hamster 1,920 posts 4,621 battles Report post #17 Posted October 17, 2016 you mean Haruna with dem Texas like AA refit? it would still be tier 5 tho I doubt it, given small stat buffs, Kongo Haruna in her 1945 form would work at tier 6. Less firepower than Fuso, but more precise and more flexible due to her speed. I'll put Tosa, Kii and No13 at the head of a IJN BC tree. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #18 Posted October 19, 2016 I doubt it, given small stat buffs, Kongo Haruna in her 1945 form would work at tier 6. Less firepower than Fuso, but more precise and more flexible due to her speed. I'll put Tosa, Kii and No13 at the head of a IJN BC tree. Tosa is not a BC though I'll switch it with Amagi then Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ST-EU] Trainspite Supertester, Players, Sailing Hamster 1,920 posts 4,621 battles Report post #19 Posted October 19, 2016 (edited) Tosa is not a BC though I'll switch it with Amagi then Derp. I was thinking of new ships, you are quite right. This is what I am thinking. BB BC III Kawachi B-41 'Shiomi' IV A-51 'Buzen' B-40 'Myogi' V A-57 'Etchu' Kongo VI Fuso B-59? 'Shari' VII Nagato B-62? 'Kisokoma' VIII Tosa Amagi IX A-140J2 'Izumo' Kii X Yamato No.13 'Shimosa' 'Izumi' I don't know much about the Amagi preliminaries B-59 and B-62, so I have just placed them there on guesswork. Also I gave the other designs names because I like names. Edited October 20, 2016 by Trainspite Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] piritskenyer Players, Players, Sailing Hamster 3,462 posts 5,363 battles Report post #20 Posted October 19, 2016 (edited) since we dont have a high tier japanese battleship premium here are a few examples (they are all paper though) first we have the Tosa this was to be one of the most powerful battleships of its time but due to the WNT it was used for armor tests and the aircraft carrier Kaga was also a Tosa-class Battleship Armaments 10x41cm guns in a A B X Y Z arrangement (same as Amagi) 20x14cm guns in casemates it would need an Amagi like refit Armor a little better than Nagato Speed 25.5kts (same as Nagato) it is basicly a Battleship version of the Amagi Next one Hiraga's design for a Kongo replacement it followes a design principle of cramping all armaments in a small space to maximize armor thickness Armamets 10x41cm guns in 2 double and 2 triple turrets in a Pensacola like arrengement 16x15.2cm guns in 8 casemate mounts and 4 double turrets 8 x12.7cm AA guns in 4 dual mounts Armor Belt ranging from 300-350mm Speed 26.5kts Last one Fujimoto's design for a Kongo replacement it is basicly a scaled down Yamato Armaments 9x41cm guns in 3 triple turrets 12x15.2cm guns in 5 double turrets 8x12.7cm AA guns in 4 dual mounts Armor ??? Speed ??? the giant shield was there to protect the 2 secondary turrets from the blast when firing the main guns I like all three but the two I like most are n°s 2 and 3, due to their unusual layouts for their particular lines. Sure, n°2 is like a baby Nagato, but she'd be pretttty short and possibly well armoured, while n°3 would offer an "IJN NC" which would be a completely different ship to what there already is in the line. Edited October 19, 2016 by piritskenyer Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #21 Posted October 19, 2016 I like all three but the two I like most are n°s 2 and 3, due to their unusual layouts for their particular lines. Sure, n°2 is like a baby Nagato, but she'd be pretttty short and possibly well armoured, while n°3 would offer an "IJN NC" which would be a completely different ship to what there already is in the line. the n°2 would be more like armored Pensacola BB version Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] piritskenyer Players, Players, Sailing Hamster 3,462 posts 5,363 battles Report post #22 Posted October 19, 2016 the n°2 would be more like armored Pensacola BB version In that case, throw it at me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CLADS] olmedreca Players 226 posts 5,719 battles Report post #23 Posted October 20, 2016 Derp. I was thinking of new ships, you are quite right. This is what I am thinking. BB BC III Kawachi B-41 'Shiomi' IV A-51 'Buzen' B-40 'Myogi' V A-57 'Etchu' Kongo VI Fuso B-59? 'Shari' VII Nagato B-62? 'Kisokoma' VIII Tosa Amagi IX A-140J2 'Izumo' Kii X Yamato No.13 'Shimosa' 'Izumi' I don't know much about the Amagi preliminaries B-59 and B-62, so I have just placed them there on guesswork. Also I gave the other designs names because I like names. I don't really like the idea of full lines that are over 50% paper. Also I am not sure that No.13 would cut it at T10. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #24 Posted October 20, 2016 I don't really like the idea of full lines that are over 50% paper. Also I am not sure that No.13 would cut it at T10. If you would have to use that much paper I would rather use sub branches starting at tier 6 with Ise Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ST-EU] Trainspite Supertester, Players, Sailing Hamster 1,920 posts 4,621 battles Report post #25 Posted October 21, 2016 I don't really like the idea of full lines that are over 50% paper. Also I am not sure that No.13 would cut it at T10. Well, certain lines are going to have to. I mean, paper lines will probably happen when the game reaches the point that WoT has, when most of the conceivable lines have been added. Even then, some of the more well known lines are going to go over 50% designs/paper. Looking at the French and Italian BBs here. France would have 4/8 (Normandie, Lyon, Alsace, Super-Alsace) and Italy 5/8 (Tier 3 Cuniberti Design, Tier 6 Caracciolo (even though she was launched) Tier 7 Pre-Littorio, and the Tier 9 and 10). No.13 should be fine-ish. And then you have the preliminary designs for her, which include 10 and 12 18" guns. If that wasn't enough. If you would have to use that much paper I would rather use sub branches starting at tier 6 with Ise In all honesty, Ise could end up a premium, since a prospective BB branch would also be entirely paper bar the Ise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites