would be nice to have more aircraft carriers to game

[julmatar]

like French, british, chinese, russian aircraft carriers it would be really nice to get more variations of cv not allways shokaku

 

[dasCKD]

The only other nation with enough actual carriers to justify a line are the Brits, and quite frankly considering how much they nerfed the historical performance of the aircraft of the USN and IJN for introduction into the game I very much doubt that the British carriers would even be playable when they're introduced if WG will have anything resembling the war period performance. Besides, the USN and IJN both have enough carriers to split a line if necessary and the fact that the USN line past the Indy and Saipan sucks at everything but killing battleships who have yet to hear about the WASD hack when the Shokaku is not paying attention is what is causing the Shokaku dominance, not the lack of carriers.

[Shirakami_Kon]

You want to make the BBabies mad, don't you?

[GenerallKrizmuz]

no thx

[Lin3]

Oh yes, I really enjoy being in the middle of a grid or torps from some cross-dropping CV git.

Let's have more of them!

[julmatar]

more people should get interested about cv gameplay there is so long que's atm new cv would be healthy and i dont whine about cvs if im playing as bb you can take AFT and Manual AA skilss and dont need worry about planes... and most high tier cv players are decent and for that people who sailing 1 direction is super easy to kill make turns and make speed changes Cv's is not that op i'm just bad shoot with bb

[Shagulon]

People might learn how to play against them again instead of running to the forums and screaming for nerfs...

[Humboldt_]

Just no.

[RenamedUser_92906789]

IF more carriers are brought into game, then the AA needs BUFF (that what happened in RL).

[Sub_Eleven]

IF more carriers are brought into game, then the AA needs BUFF (that what happened in RL).

 

You mean like wargaming has been been doing already in a steady pace the last couple of patches? Dunno bout you, but I'm certainly not enjoying the world of battlesboats meta. If anything they need to reduce the ammount of AA and improve the CV play interface to make it more appealing for more people. Latest xp nerfs for carriers is just making things worse then they already were.

[dasCKD]

IF more carriers are brought into game, then the AA needs BUFF (that what happened in RL).

 

What happened in real life was the carriers dominated the seas and annihilated everything from a hundred kilometers away whilst WW2 era AA guns tried and mostly failed to stop ship after ship from sinking. The last thing we need is realism, because at that point no one would play anything but destroyers and carriers.

[Kameho]

did people here even read the OP first post? Or just replying to the topic title? jeezes, only the first poster actually got the gist of what OP meant.

 

He bloody asked for more nation CV's not more CV's om a game.

 

[Fino_93]

Cv situation of the nation that you have requested:

-french: they had one cv plus one more aquired from the british after the war, i think that we will see the second one as a reskin of the british cv in the tree.

-british: they are the only one nation with enough cv for a line, i doubt that wg want to have only two nations with CV, so they'll probably come in the future.

-russian and chinese: had they any cv in that period? i don't think so.

 

 

If you are interested in other Cv for variety reasons, the only others new cv that we would see, are a new line of jap Cvs converted from cruisers/battlecruisers/BB, it has been announced long time ago but we don't know nothing more about this line; then probably some others american cv in a split or new line and maybe a premium graf zeppelin, aquila and/or sparviero... 

[Vistulus]

-british: they are the only one nation with enough cv for a line, i doubt that wg want to have only two nations with CV, so they'll probably come in the future, far distant future and will be pre-nerfed to the point of uselessness.

 

Corrected to reflect WG's behaviour.

[Fino_93]

 

Corrected to reflect WG's behaviour.

 

 

And BB captains will claim they are too op.

[Spellfire40]

did people here even read the OP first post? Or just replying to the topic title? jeezes, only the first poster actually got the gist of what OP meant.

 

He bloody asked for more nation CV's not more CV's om a game.

 

 

​There will be no new nations or prem CV till the UI/gameplay  revamp is done and thats not sceduled before mid next year. And after that we will have to see if the few CV Player that Play now still will when the Change happped.

[Syrchalis]

 

​There will be no new nations or prem CV till the UI/gameplay  revamp is done and thats not sceduled before mid next year. And after that we will have to see if the few CV Player that Play now still will when the Change happped.

 

One must be really masochistic to play CV right now.

 

I enjoy playing BBs and laughing at CVs when they do a whopping 5000 damage while losing all their planes and having to wait for 4 min for another attack, while I do four times that damage on a 30sec cooldown.

[julmatar]

and for example when i play as saipan people says its op but when i do play with hiryu or ranger agaist saipan i most likely win it and imo saipan will show better only cause most saipan players are at least decent cv players.

[Spellfire40]

 

One must be really masochistic to play CV right now.

 

I enjoy playing BBs and laughing at CVs when they do a whopping 5000 damage while losing all their planes and having to wait for 4 min for another attack, while I do four times that damage on a 30sec cooldown.

 

​Well i watched after a died a Saipan drop on a Colerado....1 Hit and the damage didnt really moved the bar. Add to that that air droped Torps have a lousy flooding Chance.......But what im more concerned is that WG revamp the CVs so that is "apeals" to more Players making then either total rng or so easy to use that the damage has to be even lower to compensate and killing off the few dedicated CV Players that are around atm. WG has a history when you think about ealy CV nerfs, IJN DDs and such.

[Zerstoeroer]

 

​Well i watched after a died a Saipan drop on a Colerado....1 Hit and the damage didnt really moved the bar. Add to that that air droped Torps have a lousy flooding Chance.......But what im more concerned is that WG revamp the CVs so that is "apeals" to more Players making then either total rng or so easy to use that the damage has to be even lower to compensate and killing off the few dedicated CV Players that are around atm. WG has a history when you think about ealy CV nerfs, IJN DDs and such.

 

Or - god forbid - they could make them into a class that takes actual skill and does not magically have the power to sink any ship the player wishes.

As they are now, the less CVs there are the better.

[aboomination]

Lol they can't even balance two CV lines 

 

[T_H_0_R]

RN CVs would be more than welcome. Yes please.

[Spellfire40]

 

Or - god forbid - they could make them into a class that takes actual skill and does not magically have the power to sink any ship the player wishes.

As they are now, the less CVs there are the better.

 

​Actually Baring the sealclubing at t4/5 you Need skill and you see Really fast if one side has skill and one dont.

Thogh that info is probably wasted on a mainly BB Player like you.

[aboomination]

 Or - god forbid - they could make them into a class that takes actual skill and does not magically have the power to sink any ship the player wishes.

As they are now, the less CVs there are the better.

 

Ship classes - ordered by skill ceiling (imo)

 

• CV (highest)
• DD/some cruisers
• Cruisers
• BB

 

[dasCKD]

 

Or - god forbid - they could make them into a class that takes actual skill and does not magically have the power to sink any ship the player wishes.

As they are now, the less CVs there are the better.

 

This lack of skill when playing CVs is in fact the reason why there is basically no difference between the win rates and average damage of the best and the worst carrier players as skill plays no part in the CV class.

 

Wait...