Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Budslayer

tired 2 tier up

27 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[D-V-L]
Players
39 posts
57,416 battles

getting tired of playing most of the the time against MM 2 tier up. if i end up in i game if there 2 tier up to bad for the rest i go port.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TCLS]
Players
243 posts
33,378 battles

Confirmation bias ftw , look it up , i guess that is your problem. Start writing down the battle tier for all of your future matches and when you come to a statistically relevant number you will see how math is adding up. (unless you are playing 5-6 tier cause they have a special MM)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,314 posts
52,321 battles

Two tier difference is an issue ( Especially in high tiers ) and people are making a mistake in making it look simple. I'm okay with 1 tier difference, but not two.

Edited by ABED1984

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
371 posts
8,020 battles

Well lets face it if u control face +2 mm then it should be like a walk in a park when u are top tier

Edited by Brkdelta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
4,528 posts

Looking at the ships you play mostly:

Minekaze: 714 battles, Phoenix: 610 battles...

So yeah, you play lower tiers a lot, thus you will face +2 and -2 (although your safe in your phoenix). But if all you want to do is sealclub in your minekaze, don't complain here about +2 MM. With that amount of battles you should know how to handle that ship ( and have a 15 points captain ).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester, Players
5,335 posts
35,510 battles

and btw tell me , when u top tier how about other players that is low tier in that game ? should they complain that u top tier ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[FOCO]
Alpha Tester
110 posts
2,972 battles

I suspect the problem may be between the chair and the keyboard. Usually when I see people complain about the match making it tends to be people who haven't got a clue what they're doing, even though they've played enough matches that they should.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-OOF-]
Beta Tester
2,598 posts
12,758 battles

Two tier difference is an issue ( Especially in high tiers ) and people are making a mistake in making it look simple. I'm okay with 1 tier difference, but not two.

 

But if you compare it to WoT it's really not an issue. +-2 MM in this is good I feel, since even as bottom tier you are never truly useless. Hell this game worked when the MM was +3, thanks to how the game works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MIMI]
Beta Tester
1,133 posts
5,975 battles

Even though the OP is a jerk for just quitting, especially when he is a Minekaze which really has no problem with tier7 battles, there definitely is a problem with the MM at tier5, maybe related to battleships. Grinding my divisionmates König yesterday, we did 13 battles, and 11 of them were tier 7. And we weren't even two BBs, I was in a DD most of the time. Actually in the combination Gremlin/König we got 9/9 tier7s, in the combination Texas/König we got 2/2, and only when I took the Kamikaze did we get one tier 5 match and one tier6 match. And before that I did three solo battles in my König to finish it, and they were all tier7 as well. And this is just the most extreme day I noticed and actually documented, in the past week it also felt like we got 70% tier7 matches with tier5 ships. I know this is a consequence of WG easing tier3 and tier4 MM, but if they do something like that they really need to see to it that some other tier doesn't get crapped on afterwards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
255 posts
13,157 battles

If you play T5 a lot, which I do, you will indeed get up tiered a lot. One thing to bear in mind is, often, only a few ships will be top tier so it's no where near as bad as it looks. I have no problem with the way the MM has changed to protect T3 &T4 ships as it means I don't have to suffer pangs of guilt over possible seal clubbing.

 

Also, if you are in a DD, especially a Minekaze, there is simply no excuse for moaning about being bottom tier. Honey Badger Minekaze don't care!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,314 posts
52,321 battles

 

But if you compare it to WoT it's really not an issue. +-2 MM in this is good I feel, since even as bottom tier you are never truly useless. Hell this game worked when the MM was +3, thanks to how the game works.

 

I don't like making comparisons and from what I read in the chat I always find players crying being a bottom tier and I really know their feeling. For example, I saw T6 CVs fighting in a T8 battle and their planes were really pathetic. My Amagi which isn't that of a big deal in AA tear T6 CV planes apart, And the same thing happens to Cruisers. I was sailing in my Izumo while a desperate Shchors were trying to burn my ship but of course he was wise enough to run away from battle. The 2 difference really hurts CVs and CAs more than any other classes.
Edited by ABED1984

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

getting tired of playing most of the the time against MM 2 tier up. if i end up in i game if there 2 tier up to bad for the rest i go port.

 

Get banned quickly plox.

 

/thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester
1,677 posts
20,271 battles

Pathetic OP...

If you are so upset with +-2 MM, go play your premiums (or mid tier cruisers) with preferential MM.

Or did you just come here to troll an be flamed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
5,609 posts
5,569 battles

 

Are you mostly playing tier 5? Just curious!

 

It's very bad today with every battle +2 and all those Hiryus and skillzord Saipans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

 

It's very bad today with every battle +2 and all those Hiryus and skillzord Saipans.

 

Yet, we don't exit to port forum and create whine topics left right and center telling everyone we don't like it and therefore are allowed/entitled to exit battles right away :hiding:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
42 posts
2,204 battles

I wouldnt quit a match, but today has been fucked up. All 3 matches in my König was Tier 7, 2 of them I was the ONLY non tier 7, not easy grinding a ship when it's like this.

And for all the people now checking my stat, yes I have played for some time, and no, I am not primarely a BB captain. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-OOF-]
Beta Tester
2,598 posts
12,758 battles

 

I don't like making comparisons and from what I read in the chat I always find players crying being a bottom tier and I really know their feeling. For example, I saw T6 CVs fighting in a T8 battle and their planes were really pathetic. My Amagi which isn't that of a big deal in AA tear T6 CV planes apart, And the same thing happens to Cruisers. I was sailing in my Izumo while a desperate Shchors were trying to burn my ship but of course he was wise enough to run away from battle. The 2 difference really hurts CVs and CAs more than any other classes.

 

And from what I have seen the same people that complain about being bottom tier are the same players that will still find things to complain about when top tier (to many DD/BB/CL, CV unbalanced, I'm stock etc etc)

 

The only ship class I can agree on is tier 6 and possibly tier 7 CV's. Tier 6 CV's are almost helpless vs tier 8 AA.  But cruisers? Not really IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
5,609 posts
5,569 battles

 

Yet, we don't exit to port forum and create whine topics left right and center telling everyone we don't like it and therefore are allowed/entitled to exit battles right away :hiding:

 

 

 

Well, no. Crap mm for tier 5 is ongoing problem and the CV event will pass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,467 posts
22,114 battles

Confirmation bias ftw , look it up , i guess that is your problem. Start writing down the battle tier for all of your future matches and when you come to a statistically relevant number you will see how math is adding up. (unless you are playing 5-6 tier cause they have a special MM)

 

Not just bias. There is a real difference on tier 5, and he plays tier 5 :hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

 

Well, no. Crap mm for tier 5 is ongoing problem and the CV event will pass.

 

 

Not just bias. There is a real difference on tier 5, and he plays tier 5 :hiding:

 

Guess it's a good time to play tier 7's, or it feels like it. I guess WG EU will not publish tier population and player retention rate's but I am quite curious to the effect off the changes to make low tiers more accessible to new players, to what extend have they worked and what 'side-effects' have been there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
5,609 posts
5,569 battles

 what 'side-effects' have been there?

 

I know two new players which got few 5-6 ships before the MM change. They unsurprisingly stopped playing at all. Small sample, but still. The whack in the head at tier 5 is much stronger to them than before, because before it wasn't uptiering all the time.

 

On a plus, the horrible tier 3+2 MM disappeared. I do think the answer would be to had +2MM all across the board back, but at the same time:

1. Lessen the differences between the lower tiers, for example tier 3 is way more inferior to 4 than tier 9 is to 10.

2. Maybe give some modifier to MM to equalize the amount of uptiering and downtiering per player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×