Murmansk or Molotov - Which is the best credit farmer?

[_x_Acheron_x_]

Topic.

[Takru]

Depends

 

[anonym_XGuN6pHmfiJ9]

In general I would say Molotov.

[beercrazy]

Molotov

 

[xXx_Blogis_xXx]

I do like molotov better , bot he and ap can do good

 

[Mr_Tingle]

Kutuzov

 

[Kenliero]

Neither one is the best. Tirpitz/Kutuzov is.

[Ferry_25]

Mur is a bit less situation depending than Mol. Mol has, I cannot even say armor cause that would be a joke, the premium paint as main citadel protection. But it's an extreme fun ship to play. Mur has a bit better protection. My point: Mol is more "extreme" Simply put: you'll have very good or very bad games. Reflecting creditwise.

[piet11111]

Molotov imo as its easier to hurt higher tier opponents due to its excellent guns.

[Smeggo]

Both always end in T5-7 matches. 

 

[Cosseria]

Since the last patch and the exclusion of T V ships from lower tier battles, Murmansk has become nearly useless. It's always bottom tier. However both are fragile ships that would make the OP open a thread about "What's the sheet you just sold me WG" in a matter of minutes after the first battle.

[D7v]

Murmansk was the best ship in wows history pre nerf now I d say Molotov I wish I could replace my Murm for it now

[Slavniy]

The higher tier farms more credits.

[GuzLightyear]

Molotov has a high skill ceiling. If you do well, you will do really well. But you can also do really bad as it's difficult to master.

Murmansk with the actual MM sucks. So i'd go with the Molotov.

[P4RDUS]

It is hard to get good games with a Murmansk which means less credit income. T4-T5 American cruiser are just terrible, including Murmansk, which is basically an Omaha.

 

Get Molotov. I would say wait for discount. Surely we will see a Molotov Discount again.

[Ferry_25]

Both always end in T5-7 matches. 

 

Wow! Where do I have to sign for that?! In my case it's 99,9% in T7-8 matches (Mur-Mol resp)....

[Spellfire40]

Molotov imo as its easier to hurt higher tier opponents due to its excellent guns.

 

​Wich is easyly remedyed by using HE,-). Main Point is Murmask has less range 14.8 vs 15.5. The arc feels nicer at Molotov but then ist T6 not t5 On the downside Molo is a Kirow Hull ist less agile but nearly the size of a BB. wich dictates how you can play her. Your right on the gun in one aspect thogh. They rock with AP and you can angle decently thanks to the modern turet layout compared to the WW1 style Murmansk layout.

[D7v]

wait for Gremyaschy xD

[AmazingBeaver]

Molotov gets high tier games and is always number 1 target because it's an easy kill, even when you're staying behind everyone else, all the BB's are still trying to get pot shots at you and you have hard time evading all the shots because of your BB like maneuverability. I like Murmansk tho, great nimble ship with excellent AP and HE.

[Kenliero]

wait for Gremyaschy xD

 

[Spellfire40]

 

 

​Well dont be unfair you might get one if your the worlds best wiki writer and use that skill on the wows wiki ,-)

[Venom_Too]

Basicly every Premium Ship. (I would say everything T5 +)

So just pick One for your personal Style.

 

With some Exceptions... Mikasa i think, won't be a good Money Farmer or ?

[Panzerblitz]

Both are good ships, but for different reasons.

 

Molotov is a very vulnerable glass cannon, which gets you lots and lots of citadel hits when a cruiser presents itself.

 

Murmansk is a long range harasser and fire starter, that will constantly gnaw at a BBs hp pool, while the BB can do little about it.

[aboomination]

Murmansk is a long range harasser and fire starter, that will constantly gnaw at a BBs hp pool, while the BB can do little about it.

 

The AFT nerf would like to have a word with you.

[Panzerblitz]

 

The AFT nerf would like to have a word with you.

 

It still has good enough range for it's tier.