[COMFY] ImperialAdmiral [COMFY] Players 1,649 posts 9,828 battles Report post #1 Posted July 23, 2016 Littorio class - Principal Technical Characteristics* Displacement (tonnes): standard 41,650, light load 44,050, full load 46,215 (Roma) Dimensions (metres): overall lenght 238.8 (Roma); waterline 232.4; between perpendiculars 234.5 overall width 32.9; waterline 32.4 average draught under full load 10.5; under light load 9.8 Machinery: Eight Yarrow boilers with angled water tubes, with superheating Four Belluzzo geared turbine groups, simple reduction Four three-bladed propellers; three rudders, one main and two auxiliary output at normal speed at full power = 133,000 hp output developed during trials: 139,561 hp (Littorio), 134,616 hp (Veneto) Speed: maximum 29 at full load (trials Littorio 31.2 at 41,782 tonnes; Veneto 31.4 at 41,900 tonnes) Range (miles/at knots): 4,580/16; 3,920/20; 1,770/30 with 4,000 tonnes of fuel Armour (mm): maximum vertical, at waterline 350 (composite 70 + 280); maximum horizontal 207; tower 260; main gun turrets 380-350; medium calibre turrets 280-150 Underwater protection: Pugliese "absorbing cylinder" system Armament (mm) Nine 381/50 guns in triple turrets Twelve 152/55 guns in four triple turrets Four 120/40 guns for illumination rounds in single shielded mounts Twelve 90/50 anti-aircraft guns in stabilised single turrets Twenty 37/54 guns in eight twin mounts and four single mounts Twenty 20/65 guns in ten twin mounts (from 1942: Roma twenty-eight in fourteen mounts) One traversing catapult, at the stern, and three aircraft (three Ro 43 floatplanes; from the end of 1942: two or one Ro 43 and one or two Re 2000 GA fighters) Radar: Type EC 3/ter "Gufo" (Roma, one from June 1943) Crew: normal complement 1,866 (comprising 92 officers, 122 warrant officers, 12 civilians, 134 petty officers, 1,506 seamen) *Technical data based on the book: The Littorio Class: Italy's Last and Largest Battleships 1937-1948 by Erminio Bagnasco and Augusto de Toro 8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deamon93 Sailing Hamster 3,124 posts 1,275 battles Report post #2 Posted July 23, 2016 That may happen considering WG proved time and time again the fact that they'll happily implement premium clones(ie ships from the same class present in the standard line at the same tier). With this said we shall see Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Historynerd Beta Tester 4,249 posts 848 battles Report post #3 Posted July 23, 2016 I sure wouldn't be averse to see it. However, it seems to me that she's too similar to her sisters of the Littorio-class (which we can presume will be the Tier VIII BB of the regular Italian tree), to be considered as a premium. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[COMFY] ImperialAdmiral [COMFY] Players 1,649 posts 9,828 battles Report post #4 Posted July 23, 2016 However, it seems to me that she's too similar to her sisters of the Littorio-class (which we can presume will be the Tier VIII BB of the regular Italian tree), to be considered as a premium. Yet still she differs from her sisters. Mainly thanks to the different tower design. So in the times of Premium clones that would be a progress. Plus out of the three I like her camo scheme the most. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Historynerd Beta Tester 4,249 posts 848 battles Report post #5 Posted July 23, 2016 Yet still she differs from her sisters. Mainly thanks to the different tower design. So in the times of Premium clones that would be a progress. Plus out of the three I like her camo scheme the most. In terms of armament, protection and mobility any difference that she has is at most minimal. Eye candy alone isn't enough, in my opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ST-EU] Trainspite Supertester, Players, Sailing Hamster 1,920 posts 4,621 battles Report post #6 Posted July 23, 2016 I sure wouldn't be averse to see it. However, it seems to me that she's too similar to her sisters of the Littorio-class (which we can presume will be the Tier VIII BB of the regular Italian tree), to be considered as a premium. *Looks at Marblehead and Murmansk. And Kamikaze R and Fujin. Since Roma is arguably the more well known of the 3, if she makes money, I guess WG would put her in, since she doesn't interfere in a tech tree. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deamon93 Sailing Hamster 3,124 posts 1,275 battles Report post #7 Posted July 23, 2016 *Looks at Marblehead and Murmansk. And Kamikaze R and Fujin. Since Roma is arguably the more well known of the 3, if she makes money, I guess WG would put her in, since she doesn't interfere in a tech tree. There are many more clones than those, still I think the best comparison would be Bismarck/Tirpitz since they would be tier VIIIs just like Littorio/Roma(or whatever one of the three would be the premium). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Historynerd Beta Tester 4,249 posts 848 battles Report post #8 Posted July 23, 2016 There are many more clones than those, still I think the best comparison would be Bismarck/Tirpitz since they would be tier VIIIs just like Littorio/Roma(or whatever one of the three would be the premium). But Tirpitz has torpedoes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POMF] Pekoe_Darjeeling Weekend Tester 2,385 posts 10,008 battles Report post #9 Posted July 23, 2016 I'm not going to buy any more premium ships. I would rather see her as standard. I guess she will end up as a premium tho because money. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Unintentional_submarine [SPUDS] Beta Tester 4,052 posts 8,765 battles Report post #10 Posted July 23, 2016 (edited) Where was this on the ship? Based on the proximity and angle of the portholes on either side it looks like the very bow or stern of the ship, but since I can't see the base of the superstructure very well, it could possible be there? Edited July 23, 2016 by Unintentional_submarine Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TES6L] Hawker_gb Players 283 posts 14,329 battles Report post #11 Posted July 23, 2016 *Looks at Marblehead and Murmansk. And Kamikaze R and Fujin. Since Roma is arguably the more well known of the 3, if she makes money, I guess WG would put her in, since she doesn't interfere in a tech tree. Vitttorio Veneto is mosta famous of 3. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deamon93 Sailing Hamster 3,124 posts 1,275 battles Report post #12 Posted July 23, 2016 But Tirpitz has torpedoes. True but we shall see the other differences as well(torpedoes, while cool, aren't exactly the main damage dealers of a BB to begin with). I'm not going to buy any more premium ships. I would rather see her as standard. I guess she will end up as a premium tho because money. I'm sure the class will be standard so no worries there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ST-EU] Trainspite Supertester, Players, Sailing Hamster 1,920 posts 4,621 battles Report post #13 Posted July 23, 2016 Vitttorio Veneto is mosta famous of 3. Debatable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TES6L] Hawker_gb Players 283 posts 14,329 battles Report post #14 Posted July 23, 2016 (edited) Debatable. Roma is famous only because of Fritz X. Vittorio Veneto actually fight against other ships. Edited July 23, 2016 by Hawker_gb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deamon93 Sailing Hamster 3,124 posts 1,275 battles Report post #15 Posted July 23, 2016 Vitttorio Veneto is mosta famous of 3. As said by Trainspite is debatable: between the three RN Roma is the most famous due to her fate and not her combat record. Between the older twins(ie RN Littorio and RN Vittorio Veneto) they are fairly equal since they have comparable combat record, the only edge VV may have is the fact outside Italy people keep on naming the class as Vittorio Veneto-class instead of Littorio-class because reasons(same goes for the Caio Duilio-class named over and over again after her sister RN Andrea Doria). 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TES6L] Hawker_gb Players 283 posts 14,329 battles Report post #16 Posted July 23, 2016 (edited) As said by Trainspite is debatable: between the three RN Roma is the most famous due to her fate and not her combat record. Between the older twins(ie RN Littorio and RN Vittorio Veneto) they are fairly equal since they have comparable combat record, the only edge VV may have is the fact outside Italy people keep on naming the class as Vittorio Veneto-class instead of Littorio-class because reasons(same goes for the Caio Duilio-class named over and over again after her sister RN Andrea Doria). Littorio have furthest straddle salvo of any ship in era. (Scharnhorst hold record for longest shot with naval gun). Vittorio Veneto see some good fights. Roma is known only because Fritz X. Still,Litorrio class is probably best looking battleships. Sadly they broken up after war because dispute between allies. Edited July 23, 2016 by Hawker_gb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[COMFY] ImperialAdmiral [COMFY] Players 1,649 posts 9,828 battles Report post #17 Posted July 23, 2016 Where was this on the ship? Based on the proximity and angle of the portholes on either side it looks like the very bow or stern of the ship, but since I can't see the base of the superstructure very well, it could possible be there? Was checking the longitudinal section on the centerline schemes and it seems that board room and other rooms for senior officers were placed on the extreme stern. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Widar_Thule Players 322 posts Report post #18 Posted July 23, 2016 (edited) I prefer Roma, but Vittorio Veneto is fine too. I have seen more than enough of the Japanese and USA battleships in WOWS as it is. It is high time that ships like Hood, Roma/Vittorio Veneto, Richelieu/Jean Bart are added. Edited July 23, 2016 by Widar_Thule Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[COMFY] ImperialAdmiral [COMFY] Players 1,649 posts 9,828 battles Report post #19 Posted July 23, 2016 I would like to see Vittorio Veneto as a part of the main tech tree. Mostly because she saw combat. And which one is more famous? As it was said, that's debatable. For some it can be even Littorio/Italia. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Historynerd Beta Tester 4,249 posts 848 battles Report post #20 Posted July 23, 2016 True but we shall see the other differences as well(torpedoes, while cool, aren't exactly the main damage dealers of a BB to begin with). Perhaps I'm just stubborn, but regardless of the damage they can deal, they sure give some variety. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deamon93 Sailing Hamster 3,124 posts 1,275 battles Report post #21 Posted July 23, 2016 Perhaps I'm just stubborn, but regardless of the damage they can deal, they sure give some variety. I'm of the same advice but we shall see, too early to say Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #22 Posted July 23, 2016 That may happen considering WG proved time and time again the fact that they'll happily implement premium clones(ie ships from the same class present in the standard line at the same tier). With this said we shall see wasnt the Roma the most modern of the Littorios? also had some differences like Tirpitz and Bismarck (iirc they had a differnt bow shape)so they are not exactly clones also Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BabyAdmiral Beta Tester 473 posts 3,725 battles Report post #23 Posted July 23, 2016 Yes, I would like to see it, and yes, I would most certainly buy it if we see it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BabyAdmiral Beta Tester 473 posts 3,725 battles Report post #24 Posted July 23, 2016 I'm not going to buy any more premium ships. I would rather see her as standard. I'm at the other end of the spectrum. I have grinded four standard trees now: IJN BBs, US BBs, IJN cruisers and Soviet cruisers. For me, that feels like enough grinding. I hope for more premiums from now on, as it is less likely that I will be grinding many more trees. I'd like to try out German, British, Italian and French ships too though, so I keep my fingers crossed for a good amount of premiums from said nations. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deamon93 Sailing Hamster 3,124 posts 1,275 battles Report post #25 Posted July 23, 2016 wasnt the Roma the most modern of the Littorios? also had some differences like Tirpitz and Bismarck (iirc they had a differnt bow shape)so they are not exactly clones also She was but the differences were minor. Minor enough that, paint scheme aside(all three had distinct paint schemes making them easy to recognize), you would need a sharp eye to say which is which. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites