Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Deamon93

Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"

15,890 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[T-N-T]
Players
4,019 posts
23,935 battles
2 hours ago, ApolloF117 said:

why would it have if it never got fitted with pedos? if i change that stupid sites info icon from torpedo to tomahawk missile, the AA weapons to Phalanx CIWS , you will ask the same question?

if the ship was fitted with actuall torpedo launchers , then it will get it, just like every other ship in the game so far, except the underwater launchers

 

Whoa whoa, calm down. I considered the site trustworthy, if you can edit it, it obviously isn't. I don't give a damn about US CA/CLs (so no clue whether any Buffalo ever even existed). Don't intend to play them.

 

Doesn't change the fact the blogs are very fishy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,474 posts
10,052 battles
4 minutes ago, Leo_Apollo11 said:

Hi all,

 

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

Are people actually using this? Is it actually useful now? I mean, the sole thing I thought would be an improvement was to have it off by default, so new people don't need to search the settings to turn it off. Also, they seemingly changed sounds for ship collisions, so... I dunno, I feel like they should be busy with other things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[T-N-T]
Players
4,019 posts
23,935 battles

Oh, and now they confirmed themselves the stats reeased for US CA/CLs were very much fubar, they didn't yet rebalance them for the correct tiers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BONUS]
Beta Tester
1,866 posts
1 hour ago, Leo_Apollo11 said:

Hi all,

 

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"


Still won't use it. Probably still the most useless feature in the game. No matter how much they 'improve' it, I will never use the ramming assist :Smile_trollface: 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
104 posts
3,921 battles
Quote

qeS0g9E.jpg

Just posted over on the Devblog

 

 

Okay. I'm curious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,474 posts
10,052 battles
1 minute ago, Major_Damage225 said:

Experiment huh, looks like a floating radar station to me, mabe a new operation being worked on :cap_book:

Either that or they are getting ready for 1st of April.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,875 posts
7,295 battles
1 minute ago, Riselotte said:

Either that or they are getting ready for 1st of April.

Perhaps, but going from the past april 1st's, space battles, battleboats i doubt it, again u never know with wg, im still betting on a new op, or a secret rusky premium with prism pulse guns :Smile_veryhappy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
203 posts
4,569 battles
1 hour ago, Perrinu said:

Just posted over on the Devblog

 

 

Okay. I'm curious.

Hmm, does not look promising for my DD stealth play... :Smile_amazed:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[T-N-T]
Players
4,019 posts
23,935 battles

It's most likely a radar station you can hook onto your ship, perma spotting anything around. It'll probably slow down your ship though, which is no matter for camping BBs. :Smile_trollface:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BYOB]
Players
7,047 posts
32,314 battles

The S_O post from the Russian forum shows that WG is really frustrated by the CVs in the game. It will be interesting to see how they will tackle this. It also makes the removal of the premium CVs understandable.

 

The MM changes are great, seeing as they decided to tackle class balance. Maybe we will be saved from seeing battles in which one side has all the radar cruisers...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XODUS]
Players
799 posts
4,868 battles
27 minutes ago, Origin47 said:

Maybe it's something for the 1st of april.

oh definitely
the only thing more vulnerable than that thing to a high explosive shell would a fully loaded LST (R)

LCT%28R%29_459.png

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[O-P-C]
Beta Tester
81 posts
3,266 battles
7 minutes ago, JaiFoh said:

oh definitely
the only thing more vulnerable than that thing to a high explosive shell would a fully loaded LST (R)

LCT%28R%29_459.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POND]
Players
559 posts
7,130 battles

The new Moskva camo looks super cool! 

 

Also the CV rework... I am so curious about it, all we get is tease... I get why, but man is it hard... Especially when you specialise in CVs...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JUNK]
[JUNK]
Beta Tester
1,934 posts
8,416 battles
21 hours ago, Toivia said:

Oh, and now they confirmed themselves the stats reeased for US CA/CLs were very much fubar, they didn't yet rebalance them for the correct tiers.

I think they knew all along, its just the typical community to overreact and think that the dev blog is the game portal somehow....

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester, In AlfaTesters
618 posts
10,023 battles

I don't get the Moskva camo reference.

Where does inspiration come from ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PANEU]
Beta Tester
1,975 posts
13,875 battles

I dont even like the Moskva that much but god damn, that camo is sexy, i might buy it.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[T-N-T]
Weekend Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
6,566 posts
16,011 battles
22 hours ago, Perrinu said:

Just posted over on the Devblog

 

 

Okay. I'm curious.

 

Umm, I'm only one who sees the dolphins with the torpedos on their back?  :fish_haloween:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,025 posts
13,785 battles

That Moskva camo:

Damn, I want it now.

 

MM:

"Improving the balance of nations and classes in order to significantly reduce situations like 2x Khaba vs 2x Shima "

Maybe nerf that God OP Khaba and give some love to IJN DDs?

" +/- 2 matchmaking is currently not being revised. "

IMHO +-2 matchmaking is totally fine just some ships have bad chances which could be fixed...

You know how to fix MM? Make it count the goddamn radars!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORAZ]
Beta Tester
15,786 posts
26,801 battles

Here's to hoping that the new Moskva camo is an indication of the space battle mode coming back. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
13,176 posts
13,617 battles
2 hours ago, Sigimundus said:

 

Umm, I'm only one who sees the dolphins with the torpedos on their back?  :fish_haloween:

Guided torpedoes WG edition

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×