SparvieroVV Players 684 posts 73 battles Report post #8026 Posted December 1, 2017 WG gave Akizuki panasiatica destroyers instead. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CHEFT] DFens_666 Players 13,162 posts 11,029 battles Report post #8027 Posted December 1, 2017 10 minutes ago, Verdius said: Year of CVs Also we now have this AA BB monstrosity but WG still can't be arsed to give the AA destroyer Akizuki def AA. Brilliant balancing when the class CVs are supposed to be a hard counter for now get a hard counter against that. Oh and of course it has hydro because DDs are also supposed to counter BBs. Yep, just watched it too. THis game is doing down the drain FAST. Thats my opinion, if anyone doesnt like it, idc... I think 1 year from now we have BBs without citadels shooting with 4sec reload... DD-BB anyone? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TORAZ] El2aZeR Beta Tester 15,786 posts 26,801 battles Report post #8028 Posted December 1, 2017 I see nothing wrong with this. After all, you can't have BB overpopulation when everyone is playing BBs. Utterly genius from WG if you ask me. I guess the idiots who demand equal match influence for every class are finally getting their wish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SICK] Exocet6951 Weekend Tester 5,151 posts 11,809 battles Report post #8029 Posted December 1, 2017 2 minutes ago, El2aZeR said: I see nothing wrong with this. After all, you can't have BB overpopulation when everyone is playing BBs. Utterly genius from WG if you ask me. I guess the idiots who demand equal match influence for every class are finally getting their wish. "All ships are equal, but some (battle)ships are more equal than others." -WG balance and marketing department Anyway, when do I get a turboheal, 50 knot top speed, triple the armor and half the concealment range on my Martel? You know, to influence a match as equally as an NC. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POMF] Verdius Beta Tester 1,989 posts 4,247 battles Report post #8030 Posted December 2, 2017 YEAR OF CV @Sub_Octavian How does this fit into making CV play more enjoyable? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[MPT] AkosJaccik Players 920 posts 11,177 battles Report post #8031 Posted December 2, 2017 You know... submarines sound less and less retarded with each patch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SICK] Exocet6951 Weekend Tester 5,151 posts 11,809 battles Report post #8032 Posted December 2, 2017 3 minutes ago, AkosJaccik said: You know... submarines sound less and less retarded with each patch. I thought the same with guided missiles. Hated the idea at first, but now it almost sounds reasonable Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostRiderMax123 ∞ Players 769 posts 3,782 battles Report post #8033 Posted December 2, 2017 21 minutes ago, Exocet6951 said: I thought the same with guided missiles. Hated the idea at first, but now it almost sounds reasonable please no everyone will sit at the back spamming missiles. I do think that the DoY needs looking at again :/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POPPY] Chaos_Umbra [POPPY] Players 1,662 posts 20,300 battles Report post #8034 Posted December 3, 2017 1 hour ago, GhostRider_24 said: I do think that the DoY needs looking at again :/ More people would probably buy it if it was tier 8 with the fully upgraded hull cause the KGV got gimped to tier 7, rather than giving it all the Cruiser consumables. Luckily they didn't give it Radar as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TORAZ] El2aZeR Beta Tester 15,786 posts 26,801 battles Report post #8035 Posted December 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, Chaos_Umbra said: Luckily they didn't give it Radar as well. Oi, don't give them any ideas. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #8036 Posted December 3, 2017 Look like Duke of York is a testbed for future battlecruisers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TOXIC] Kartoffelmos Alpha Tester 2,237 posts 8,884 battles Report post #8037 Posted December 3, 2017 Except the future battlecruisers will probably be matched up against regular cruisers... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BLOBS] Spellfire40 Beta Tester 5,330 posts 13,776 battles Report post #8038 Posted December 3, 2017 15 minutes ago, Kartoffelmos said: Except the future battlecruisers will probably be matched up against regular cruisers... Duke takes a BB slot not a nice thing if she gets mirrored by a real KGV.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POMF] Verdius Beta Tester 1,989 posts 4,247 battles Report post #8039 Posted December 3, 2017 1 hour ago, El2aZeR said: Oi, don't give them any ideas. The original idea was to give Conqueror radar as well. WG should give KGV smoke and radar to compensate for the removal of Belfast No but seriously why are we getting DoY? We already have Hood and Nelson as T7 RN BB prems and the only thing DoY adds is more Def AA BBs which the near entire playerbase is against and is only there to annoy the already least popular class by being strong against the supposed main BB counter. And even the BBabies don't like her because she doesn't have heal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Capra76 Players 5,001 posts 7,787 battles Report post #8040 Posted December 3, 2017 3 hours ago, Spellfire40 said: Duke takes a BB slot not a nice thing if she gets mirrored by a real KGV.. I think DoY gets cruiser (30 second) fire duration and cruiser DCP cooldown so the lack of heal is not the end of the world. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[H_FAN] Gnirf Players 3,293 posts 67,343 battles Report post #8041 Posted December 3, 2017 I agree with the BBflooding but a ship like DoY is for me more a collectors item. Will it make a player play more Battleship games. For me personally I may throw freexp or in campaign but if I play the ship it is instead of another Battleship. I play a distribution of DDs, BBs and Cruisers and any of these latest arrivals GC f.e. which I have has rather made me replace games with other battleships. If we disregard new lines and their effect, I think that the BBs can not be so many more in game proportionally. DoYs lack of heal makes her rather unattractive IMO, you may play her a game from time to time. I have KGV Prem camo so the XP does not matter and I am flooding in credits. It is probably a sales thing, but after the RN BBs I am surprised that the next French line are BBs and not the DDs. Most minor/panEuropean are also cruisers and DDs only so it would be good to have BBs in reserve but ofc we have BC and split branches also. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DREAD] 1MajorKoenig Players 13,110 posts 7,885 battles Report post #8042 Posted December 3, 2017 7 hours ago, Darth_Glorious said: Look like Duke of York is a testbed for future battlecruisers Is that speculation on your end it did WG indicate such intentions? I mean it could very well be though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #8043 Posted December 3, 2017 56 minutes ago, 1MajorKoenig said: Is that speculation on your end it did WG indicate such intentions? I mean it could very well be though It is my speculation based on WG history of new ideas testing with prem/reward ships : DD with hydro : Lo Yang --> Ger DDs DD with radar : Black --> PA DDs CL with smoke : Flint+Kutuzov --> RN CLs BB with DFAA : Hood --> short lived RN BB versions + Duke of York BB without heal but with CA specs: Duke of York --> ? 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SICK] Exocet6951 Weekend Tester 5,151 posts 11,809 battles Report post #8044 Posted December 3, 2017 9 minutes ago, Darth_Glorious said: It is my speculation based on WG history of new ideas testing with prem/reward ships : DD with hydro : Lo Yang --> Ger DDs DD with radar : Black --> PA DDs CL with smoke : Flint+Kutuzov --> RN CLs BB with DFAA : Hood --> short lived RN BB versions + Duke of York BB without heal but with CA specs: Duke of York --> ? Ishizuchi with a focus on HE --> RN BBs Can't wait for a BB based on the Kaga, with tons of plane at its disposal 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DREAD] 1MajorKoenig Players 13,110 posts 7,885 battles Report post #8045 Posted December 3, 2017 12 minutes ago, Exocet6951 said: Ishizuchi with a focus on HE --> RN BBs Can't wait for a BB based on the Kaga, with tons of plane at its disposal Which shows that the "testbed" approach has certain limitations. A single T4 HE Battlecruiser is perfectly fine whereas a line of cloakable non-citadel braindead HE BBs is breaking the game. So either WG cannot oversee the implications of a widespread use of certain traits or they have a very strange idea where their game should go. Back to DoY: I find the thought interesting that she might be a test BC. Is the matchmaking thingy still in the plans, meaning that the ship counts as a CA when bottom tier? That might have some interesting implications on high tier games if BCs will be the same? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NWP] Gojuadorai Players 2,832 posts 21,712 battles Report post #8046 Posted December 3, 2017 1 hour ago, Darth_Glorious said: BB without heal but with CA specs: Duke of York --> ? it might be they finaly decided to do a BB / Battlecruiser split (which they said they wont do) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
creamgravy Players 2,780 posts 17,292 battles Report post #8047 Posted December 3, 2017 WG already think KGV, Lion and Conq are Battlecruisers. Ishizuchi uses normal RN faction HE shells like Warspite, the 25 second reload buff made her a crazy HE spammer. RN BBs are retarded due to the buffed alpha and pen combo. 2 hours ago, 1MajorKoenig said: Is the matchmaking thingy still in the plans, meaning that the ship counts as a CA when bottom tier? A low tier BB taking up a higher tier cruiser slot happens all the time in T8-10. Spoiler 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PietroMaximoffTR Players 64 posts 5,712 battles Report post #8048 Posted December 3, 2017 3 hours ago, Darth_Glorious said: It is my speculation based on WG history of new ideas testing with prem/reward ships : DD with hydro : Lo Yang --> Ger DDs DD with radar : Black --> PA DDs CL with smoke : Flint+Kutuzov --> RN CLs BB with DFAA : Hood --> short lived RN BB versions + Duke of York BB without heal but with CA specs: Duke of York --> ? This so true. Duke of York -->French BB's??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[H_FAN] Gnirf Players 3,293 posts 67,343 battles Report post #8049 Posted December 3, 2017 3 hours ago, Darth_Glorious said: It is my speculation based on WG history of new ideas testing with prem/reward ships : DD with hydro : Lo Yang --> Ger DDs DD with radar : Black --> PA DDs CL with smoke : Flint+Kutuzov --> RN CLs BB with DFAA : Hood --> short lived RN BB versions + Duke of York BB without heal but with CA specs: Duke of York --> ? I sort of like your deduction and I would also add that since the early BCs were rather (esp RN) rather poorly armoured they might be easier to fit in at lower tiers without heal if you keep the original ships at T3/4 with poor AA.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BLOBS] Spellfire40 Beta Tester 5,330 posts 13,776 battles Report post #8050 Posted December 3, 2017 8 hours ago, Capra76 said: I think DoY gets cruiser (30 second) fire duration and cruiser DCP cooldown so the lack of heal is not the end of the world. The damagecontroll is the Icon yes but certainly is BB,,, you think she would pull the same weight in a game than a KGV that has Repair Party? You basically gets a superheavy cruiser on one Team. With 3 of them on one side you basically reduces the efectiv Hp of one side significantly to get 2 more no fly zones and useless sonar.....wich makes your chances to win less likely. While the Shorter damagecontroll means you not automaticaly get burned to death your weakkness vs HE pens dosent Change. And we are not even get into why would you take a Atlanta for AA when you can have this Monster. giving cruiser Jobs to a BB is not a good Thing, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites