Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
simonmd

How is anyone supposed to get past T6-7 at the moment?

28 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
801 posts
1,673 battles

Is it just me or are the high tiers very understaffed right now? I ask because I have a couple of T6 ships and one T7 and pretty much 9 out of 10 battles i'm the bottom tier in a T8 or T9 match! This is not only frustrating but how on earth am I supposed to progress? My Colorado, is totally stock and I cant earn the XP to upgrade it because i'm being torn to bits by T9 ships every time! 

 

Its clear to me why this is happening, lower tier ships like myself are being used to fill the gaps in the MM but surely in a reasonable world, I could expect to be a top tier ship and have a fighting chance once in a while? Basically, I feel like i've hit a roadblock progression wise and the only way I can see past it it to BUY my way up with accumulated XP from other ships. Not something i'm in a position to do.

Edited by simonmd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POP]
Players
188 posts
6,393 battles

I feel I'm getting just the typical distribution of bottom/mid/top tiers. Incidentally playing Colorado as well.

Edited by makhot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
801 posts
1,673 battles

Maybe i've been unlucky, but I'm not exaggerating. I can only hope it evens out in my favour soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester, In AlfaTesters
1,449 posts
7,711 battles

i think that most t6-7 are in ranked, that's why

 

This. Play Tier7 just before Ranked starts. Otherwise its not fun at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
5,342 posts
2,957 battles

wait for season to be over until then use lower tiers ships to make money or our premiums

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,473 posts

i think that most t6-7 are in ranked, that's why

 

It makes absolutely no difference, the MM will put you in against higher tier ships regardless of whether ranked is active or not.

I have said the same as the OP for a long time; there should never be a 2 tier difference. often i take out a ship and end up fighting ships 2 tiers above, now if you take out a DD you have a reasonable chance of having a decent game, but if you are in a cruiser or BB you are stuffed unless you spend the game hiding behind an island, a ship 2 tiers above will hammer you with shells long before you get your ship in range.

 Why would someone take out a T5 ship and want to play against T7 ships, if i wanted to take part in T7 battles i would use a T7 ship, but then you get matched with T9, you just can't win with the MM.

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TEAM_]
Players
1,367 posts
11,386 battles

I have notice this too, think many players are in ranked, others on holiday enjoying something they call "RL". Not sure what that is supposed to be. :unsure:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
294 posts
5,673 battles

 

 

 

 Why would someone take out a T5 ship and want to play against T7 ships, if i wanted to take part in T7 battles i would use a T7 ship, but then you get matched with T9, you just can't win with the MM.

 

 

Yes you can. Play tier 10. :trollface:

 

I agree that a 2 tier difference should not be necessary to quickly find games at peak times. Should be allowed only late at night when few people are searching.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WKY16]
Players
23 posts

Is it just me or are the high tiers very understaffed right now? I ask because I have a couple of T6 ships and one T7 and pretty much 9 out of 10 battles i'm the bottom tier in a T8 or T9 match! This is not only frustrating but how on earth am I supposed to progress? My Colorado, is totally stock and I cant earn the XP to upgrade it because i'm being torn to bits by T9 ships every time! 

 

Its clear to me why this is happening, lower tier ships like myself are being used to fill the gaps in the MM but surely in a reasonable world, I could expect to be a top tier ship and have a fighting chance once in a while? Basically, I feel like i've hit a roadblock progression wise and the only way I can see past it it to BUY my way up with accumulated XP from other ships. Not something i'm in a position to do.

 

i think that that the problem is about your gameplay

you see, you can not play the colorado like the other us bb, its more like a close rage bb

you have a really bad dispersion and speed 

so you must not go with a fleet that is under 3 ships

 

it does not matter if you are the lowest tire in the game , if you keep bow on and go with other ships and tank you will make some progress

 

 

the colorado has low speed and a bad dispersion if you play it like a sniper you will die with no damage done in the game and you will not get any xp for it 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[IRQ]
Players
2,930 posts
7,510 battles

What's the problem? If you're a T6 ship facing T6-T8 ships, you'll get more experience than if you face T4-T6 ships. Some of my best Myoko (T7) games have been in T9 matches. I got my stock Fuso (T6) up to decent upgrades (second hull) primarily in T8 matches, and stock Japanese BBs suck compared to their upgraded versions.

 

Just one example, my first battle with Fuso wasn't very long, but I nuked two cruisers, which is more than earning my own place. You just need to play after the ships' strengths and avoid the weaknesses. New ships means you have to relearn those details.

Edited by AnotherDuck
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,401 posts
3,820 battles

WG has implemented a system a while back so you don't face higher tiers constantly. If you're the lowest of the 3 tiers in battle for a few games you will be the top after that. This was done exactly for this reason - because it's frustrating to play against much better ships all the time.

 

You can still wreck them, as my 170k damage game in Arizona versus T8 ships showed (and many other games anyone here could post you from their adventures as lowest tier).

 

Unfortunately there isn't really an upside. When you're matched against better players in other games, you learn a ton. When you're bottom tier in a wargaming title? Well, players aren't better and you just have a worse ship. But well, that's WG Design.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
720 posts
9,732 battles

Is it just me or are the high tiers very understaffed right now? I ask because I have a couple of T6 ships and one T7 and pretty much 9 out of 10 battles i'm the bottom tier in a T8 or T9 match! This is not only frustrating but how on earth am I supposed to progress? My Colorado, is totally stock and I cant earn the XP to upgrade it because i'm being torn to bits by T9 ships every time! 

 

Its clear to me why this is happening, lower tier ships like myself are being used to fill the gaps in the MM but surely in a reasonable world, I could expect to be a top tier ship and have a fighting chance once in a while? Basically, I feel like i've hit a roadblock progression wise and the only way I can see past it it to BUY my way up with accumulated XP from other ships. Not something i'm in a position to do.

 

Did you use free xp to help unlock your Colorado?

If you did, you have just learned a valuable lesson. Free xp is for upgrades, never use it to unlock a new ship.

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,133 posts
20,992 battles

Grinded the Colorado last week, but upgraded it with free xp. Didn´t experience anything different in MM, sometimes top tier, sometimes bottom and midtier.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

 

It makes absolutely no difference, the MM will put you in against higher tier ships regardless of whether ranked is active or not.

I have said the same as the OP for a long time; there should never be a 2 tier difference. often i take out a ship and end up fighting ships 2 tiers above, now if you take out a DD you have a reasonable chance of having a decent game, but if you are in a cruiser or BB you are stuffed unless you spend the game hiding behind an island, a ship 2 tiers above will hammer you with shells long before you get your ship in range.

 Why would someone take out a T5 ship and want to play against T7 ships, if i wanted to take part in T7 battles i would use a T7 ship, but then you get matched with T9, you just can't win with the MM.

 

 

QQ much?

 

+-2 MM is fine. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ALONE]
Modder
2,485 posts
15,343 battles

What's the problem? If you're a T6 ship facing T6-T8 ships, you'll get more experience than if you face T4-T6 ships. Some of my best Myoko (T7) games have been in T9 matches. I got my stock Fuso (T6) up to decent upgrades (second hull) primarily in T8 matches, and stock Japanese BBs suck compared to their upgraded versions.

 

Just one example, my first battle with Fuso wasn't very long, but I nuked two cruisers, which is more than earning my own place. You just need to play after the ships' strengths and avoid the weaknesses. New ships means you have to relearn those details.

 

The higher XP may be true, still you cannot make a use of it often because you die before you make damage - especially if you are a cruiser.

It has it's reasons why all these 10k-XP-battlereports only come from battles of ships that are highest-tiers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[IRQ]
Players
2,930 posts
7,510 battles

Did you use free xp to help unlock your Colorado?

If you did, you have just learned a valuable lesson. Free xp is for upgrades, never use it to unlock a new ship.

 

I actually used free xp to unlock Fuso after Myogi. Mostly because I had more free experience than money (relative to what I needed, which is still the case), so not having to buy Kongo and upgrades at all was a good benefit. And I already had a Kongo with a cool black paintjob with glowing purple designs. Coolest looking ship in the game, IMO.

 

The higher XP may be true, still you cannot make a use of it often because you die before you make damage - especially if you are a cruiser.

It has it's reasons why all these 10k-XP-battlereports only come from battles of ships that are highest-tiers.

 

Exceptional games aren't the same as acceptable games. Sure, it's easier to do well if you're top tier, but it's not essential. To do well, you play well, and that's much more important than being top tier.

 

Also, amount of xp is kind of useless for comparison unless you look at base xp. What bonuses you have varies a lot. The same game that gives you 10k xp can give you 2k xp the next day. And you don't need a top tier ship to get 2k base xp. If you're just running a stock ship with a captain in retraining, getting 1k-1.5k base xp is perfectly fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

 

The higher XP may be true, still you cannot make a use of it often because you die before you make damage - especially if you are a cruiser.

It has it's reasons why all these 10k-XP-battlereports only come from battles of ships that are highest-tiers.

 

Adapt your playstyle to the team rosters, even -2 CA can kill enemy DD or CA ( with support ), and burn BB's. Don't be the 'front' guy, don't pay attention to those who seem to think that -2 ships are to be used as 'scouts' for the rest ( even though you will be in trouble if your team is full off stupids which all snipe at their max range, as -2 you will lack range to be effective in those engagements ). 

 

There is absolutely nothing wrong with +-2. infact it adds tactical depth to the game, it pays off to have situational awareness more if there are different 'threat levels' in play. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[IRQ]
Players
2,930 posts
7,510 battles

Adapt your playstyle to the team rosters, even -2 CA can kill enemy DD or CA ( with support ), and burn BB's. Don't be the 'front' guy, don't pay attention to those who seem to think that -2 ships are to be used as 'scouts' for the rest ( even though you will be in trouble if your team is full off stupids which all snipe at their max range, as -2 you will lack range to be effective in those engagements ). 

 

There is absolutely nothing wrong with +-2. infact it adds tactical depth to the game, it pays off to have situational awareness more if there are different 'threat levels' in play. 

 

One thing you can do in a cruiser is to play AA support, especially if you have a USN cruiser. It doesn't give a whole lot of experience, but it helps the team.

 

If you spot an adventurous DD going for your carrier, flanking your BBs, or going for your cap when all other ships have gone on the offense, go hunt that down so the rest of your team can keep shooting at other targets more suited for their guns. You never want to force a BB to start shooting at a DD. Sure, they can still do a lot of damage, but it's not the most effective use of their firepower, and it can hurt their positioning and angling if they need to hunt something down in a different direction.

 

Point is, there are always situations you can go into where the tiers don't really matter as much as being in the right place at the right time. I had one game (Myoko, T9 match) where after I took a few potshots at distant destroyers, I spotted a carrier snipe team, so I went back to our carrier and spent almost the entire game there shooting planes. Or rather, just being present so they didn't dare go for the kill, which locked up the enemy carrier the entire time and making sure ours could still focus on attack. Later in the game, our team had pushed into their cap, while the enemies had pushed into ours, so I went on a short suicide run into our cap to reset as many ships as possible. That was enough to let our team cap first and win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ALONE]
Modder
2,485 posts
15,343 battles

These battles, where everybody wants to be in the second line... :hiding:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,625 posts
14,901 battles

These battles, where everybody wants to be in the second line... :hiding:

 

Well ideally everyone should be at some point in the second line. That's how battles are won - don't let the enemy focus fire on a single ship. So you start out on the front line with your toughest ships and when they start getting on low health the back line should move up to start tanking dmg (even though they are less tanky).

 

The biggest stomp matches I've been in is where one team can't finish off their opponents so at the end the winning team has a bunch of ships on less than 30% hp but very little outright losses.

 

mtm is totally right in the sense that weaker ships can still contribute a lot. A fire set by a Nurnberg hurts just as much as one set by a Zao. But you cannot in any circumstance be on the front line initially in a Nurnberg. Once things calm down a bit and some BBs are on fire so they are less likely to snipe you, then you can push up a bit for example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CXIV]
Players
519 posts
3,718 battles

Don't worry you've just been unlucky :)

 

Sometimes MM wreck you, getting you mostly bottom tier and that's quite frustrating, but it doesn't last forever and on the long go it's pretty balanced. However I agree that they should set the MM to +1/-1. Would easily solve this problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Players
2,478 posts
11,195 battles

It's actually funny to hear someone complain T7 matchmaking... T7 gets one of the best matchmakings in the game. just wait until you get to T8 and realize that every time you play at late hours, you will always end up in T10 games.

T7 ship and T9 games are SO much easier than T8 ship and T10 games, specially for cruisers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×