anonym_MfZ6T7iwWpUC Players 1,139 posts Report post #51 Posted July 14, 2016 Damit, it looks mighty fine. Just sell it too me, already. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #52 Posted July 14, 2016 did you noticed that they use the exact same wave pattern for the 3 ships? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KubusSc7 Beta Tester 180 posts 9,596 battles Report post #53 Posted July 15, 2016 I mean that the Tirp may still stand as the best German BB once all are released. If I had to build a BB that wasn't "too" op it probably wouldn't be too far from what the Tirp is now. The way it plays is a joy to anyone who plays BB. German engineering. ^^ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
creamgravy Players 2,780 posts 17,292 battles Report post #54 Posted July 15, 2016 It's interesting to see the different lengths, maybe we should add a few more tier 7 capital ships to the render? Can't find a good pic of Strasbourg, it's a bit shorter than Nelson. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PONYD] GrossadmiralThrawn Players 4,995 posts 4,960 battles Report post #55 Posted July 15, 2016 It's interesting to see the different lengths, maybe we should add a few more tier 7 capital ships to the render? Can't find a good pic of Strasbourg, it's a bit shorter than Nelson. your hood is missing something important... a fire fountain also 2 british ships?... than please... add Ersatz-Yorck for Germany... since they will most likely also get their BC line... not only the royal navy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BuccaneerBill Players 513 posts 11,276 battles Report post #56 Posted July 15, 2016 your hood is missing something important... a fire fountain ......... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TEPES] VeteranGamer84 Players 1,314 posts 52,321 battles Report post #57 Posted July 15, 2016 Any idea how will the Scharnhorst differ from the Tirpitz? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[GMT] Phlogistoned Players 779 posts Report post #58 Posted July 15, 2016 Less HP. Lower calibre guns.Same type of torps, but only 3 per side instead of 4. Shotgun-style dispersion (they're saving the lasers for the RU navy). Similar armor. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Diminios Players 324 posts 3,103 battles Report post #59 Posted July 15, 2016 Don't forget 1 tier lower, so not much chance of encountering tier 10 stuff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #60 Posted July 15, 2016 Don't forget 1 tier lower, so not much chance of encountering tier 10 stuff. I guess there will be plenty of Scharn Tirp/Hipper divisions so they will see tier 10 that way Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[_SDT_] Sandwhichishere [_SDT_] Beta Tester 21 posts 4,950 battles Report post #61 Posted July 18, 2016 can you upload the replay? Sorry, I don't have a replay, but the Scharnhorst had 3 turrets each containing 3 guns on unknown calibre, 2 forward, 1 aft. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #62 Posted July 18, 2016 (edited) Deutsche Präzision Edited July 18, 2016 by Darth_Glorious Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Diminios Players 324 posts 3,103 battles Report post #63 Posted July 18, 2016 So... 1 hit, out of 9 shells fired, at 8.2km? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[GMT] Phlogistoned Players 779 posts Report post #64 Posted July 18, 2016 Looks like it, yes. Also looking more and more like a no-buy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Diminios Players 324 posts 3,103 battles Report post #65 Posted July 18, 2016 (edited) Looks like it, yes. Also looking more and more like a no-buy. Which sucks. I was looking forward to it. I can't wait for the reviews from EU/NA community contributors, maybe it'll be changed slightly by then. Edited July 18, 2016 by Diminios Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PONYD] GrossadmiralThrawn Players 4,995 posts 4,960 battles Report post #66 Posted July 18, 2016 WG should just put the Sigma to 2... same as the NC... then it should work well... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #67 Posted July 18, 2016 (edited) WG should just put the Sigma to 2... same as the NC... then it should work well... On chinese server, they buffed sigma value to 2 and reduced max dispersion at 19.9 km from 260 m to 250 m. New review of Sharnhorst on Chinese server (vs Fuso and New Mexico) http://wows.duowan.com/1607/332769649618.html Edited July 18, 2016 by Darth_Glorious Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NameChangingIsToExpensiv Players 260 posts 3,757 battles Report post #68 Posted July 18, 2016 On chinese server, they buffed sigma value to 2 and reduced max dispersion at 19.9 km from 260 m to 250 m. New review of Sharnhorst on Chinese server (vs Fuso and New Mexico) http://wows.duowan.com/1607/332769649618.html I would prefer 1.8 with 200m dispersion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PONYD] GrossadmiralThrawn Players 4,995 posts 4,960 battles Report post #69 Posted July 18, 2016 On chinese server, they buffed sigma value to 2 and reduced max dispersion at 19.9 km from 260 m to 250 m. New review of Sharnhorst on Chinese server (vs Fuso and New Mexico) http://wows.duowan.com/1607/332769649618.html sounds 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #70 Posted July 18, 2016 I would prefer 1.8 with 200m dispersion. Yeah, the current accuracy is a joke, I don't know how it can be cruiser killer with that kind of prebuffed Colorado accuracy.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #71 Posted July 18, 2016 this thing will suck with that kind of "accuracy" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[GMT] Phlogistoned Players 779 posts Report post #72 Posted July 18, 2016 Which sucks. I was looking forward to it. Same here. This stunt also messes with the built-up expectation that smaller guns mean more accuracy. Also, they're digging a hole for themselves for when they introduce the older, less accurate version, of the same gun on the Graf Spee. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-G-GD] Vassago_Eurynome Beta Tester 90 posts 8,500 battles Report post #73 Posted July 18, 2016 Its WG, do u realy think they care about that hole u are talking about? Me and my friends dont expect much out of the german BB line tbh. After what they did with the russian cruisers it is pretty clear from where the wind blows and that it blows the same way as in WoT: 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LEGIO] LadyJess Players 154 posts Report post #74 Posted July 18, 2016 Will take one to GO please .. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NameChangingIsToExpensiv Players 260 posts 3,757 battles Report post #75 Posted July 18, 2016 Latest Q&A's (18 July). Source 1. I read your comments about the 283 vs 380 mm Gneisenau discussion. For me, it seems you're saying that 155 mm Mogami is an unplayable trashcan and thus 283 mm Scharnhorst will also be an unplayable trashcan. Just make 155 mm Mogami a premium ship so she can at least make some profits. Why wouldn't you equip both Scharnhorst and Gneisenau with 283 mm guns but give Scharhorst 1.5X defensive fire for 20-30 seconds. She would thus sill be different and players would buy her. All in all, I'm less and less willing to buy Scharnhorst. Are we stuck in a battle without alternatives ? A. ... I will also add that you should not make premature conclusions regarding the effectiveness of ships that are still being tested. For now and from what the tests have shown, Scharnhorst is too performant and it's unlikely it will be released in her current state. We will slightly tweak her and test her once more. Too performant lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
