Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #826 Posted August 1, 2016 why does the Bayern have so many different ranges? also I like buffs to my Tirpitz Because hull B added 1km range. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PONYD] GrossadmiralThrawn Players 4,995 posts 4,960 battles Report post #827 Posted August 1, 2016 Iowa ~ 270 metres ... 270 | 10,5 = x | 14,5 ... 222 / 10,5 * 14,5 = 372,86 ~ 373 metres i can see the torp spammers see licking their lips Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #828 Posted August 1, 2016 i can see the torp spammers see licking their lips That's why they reduced CV tier 8+ to 1 for each team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KubusSc7 Beta Tester 180 posts 9,596 battles Report post #829 Posted August 1, 2016 (edited) From this point on it's not a german design anymore. The guns are TINY compared to the size of the ship. If at least the HP would reflect the size, but nothing does. It doesnt add up. It's a Great Frankenstein. The HP should be buffed, massively. To represent the size of a ship. And then for such a big ship there were NO plans for such tiny guns. If such a big ship would have been build, it would have 480mm guns. But nothing should have bigger guns than Yamato, WG said long ago. So reduce the fricking size of that thing. It will be like the Yorck all over again. The weakest of the whole line. But this time the weakest link will be the TOP OF THE LINE at Tier 10. I mean wtf? I was onboard with the hp...as long as the armor would relfect that. Which it apparently does NOT from the reviews I read about meetings in battles. I was onboard with the Tripletrrets...even tho they were only from russian archives and no mention on any site dedicated with the H-class ships, ever before. But I am NOT on board with making it that big without #1 the necessary HP; #2 the necessary guns; #3 the necessary armor to survive. Edited August 1, 2016 by KubusSc7 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PONYD] GrossadmiralThrawn Players 4,995 posts 4,960 battles Report post #830 Posted August 1, 2016 That's why they reduced CV tier 8+ to 1 for each team. actually i was mostly refering to Shimakaze and so on... the long range DDs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #831 Posted August 1, 2016 actually i was mostly refering to Shimakaze and so on... the long range DDs WG : that's why you will use vigilance perk :V Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
byronicasian Players 391 posts Report post #832 Posted August 1, 2016 Just a view things ... the Großer Kurfürst ... well played Wargaming. Nice to sea how open you shows that you try to muck the Germans up ... Seriosly, a 305 metres long ship who have a displacement from ~ 80000 tons (after Wargaming stats) and then just 88000HP? 9200 HP less then the Yamato? The most worse joke i ever have seen ... Simple math ... Yamato = 72809 tons = 97200 HP ... Großer Kurfürst = 80058 tons = x x = 97200 / 72809 * 80058 = 106877,4 ~ 106900 HP !!! .............................................................................................................................. Next point, the gun range ... seriosly, why should guns with the bigger maximal shooting range and at least equal good if not better range finders have less firing range then the Bismarck? Where is there the logic? http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_15-52_skc34.php http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_16-52_skc34.htm 38cm SK C/34 L/52 = 36520 metres max range = 21,2 / 21,4km ingame (Bismarck/Tirpitz)40,6cm C/34 L/52 = 36800 metres max range 36520 |21,2 to 36800 | x ... 21,2 / 36520 * 36800 = 21,3636520 | 21,4 to 36800 | x ... 21,4 / 36520 * 36800 = 21,56--> 40,6cm C/34 L/52 = 21,4 to 21,6km ingame !!! Is there a CV perspective pic? Taking screens via normal view is ridiculously distorted. See how you can actually make a Kuma look about the same length as a Kongo by playing w. camera perspective. http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/89564-yamato-is-puny/page__st__20__pid__2182887#entry2182887 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CORN] x_Hasso_von_Manteuffel_x Beta Tester 4,544 posts 3,694 battles Report post #833 Posted August 1, 2016 (edited) Is there a CV perspective pic? Taking screens via normal view is ridiculously distorted. See how you can actually make a Kuma look about the same length as a Kongo by playing w. camera perspective. http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/89564-yamato-is-puny/page__st__20__pid__2182887#entry2182887 Any question about the size of the Großer Kurfürst? Edited August 1, 2016 by DeadMemories Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
byronicasian Players 391 posts Report post #834 Posted August 1, 2016 From time to time i have the feeling that Wargaming scale the Yamato smaler in compare to the other ships ... that the Großer Kurfürst is 305 metres long based on the folowing pic who shows the Großer Kurfürst directly side by side withe a Norh Carolina (in real ~ 222 metres) I measured the folowing: North Carolina ~ 10,5cm at the pic in original size and Großer Kurfürst ~ 14,5cm at the pic in original size 222 | 10,5 = x | 14,5 ... 222 / 10,5 * 14,5 = 306,57 ~ 305 metres But i note at this moment that the pic name say Iowa ... hmmm ... then i have to calculate new ... Iowa ~ 270 metres ... 270 | 10,5 = x | 14,5 ... 222 / 10,5 * 14,5 = 372,86 ~ 373 metres I do think that is a N.Carolina, based off the Chinese. I think whoever named the screenshot didn't know the difference (or Chinese). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CORN] x_Hasso_von_Manteuffel_x Beta Tester 4,544 posts 3,694 battles Report post #835 Posted August 1, 2016 I do think that is a N.Carolina, based off the Chinese. I think whoever named the screenshot didn't know the difference (or Chinese). I think the same ... and so this count: 222 | 10,5 = x | 14,5 ... 222 / 10,5 * 14,5 = 306,57 ~ 305 metres Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #836 Posted August 1, 2016 why does the Bayern have so many different ranges? also I like buffs to my Tirpitz They silent-buffed Tirpitz acc in 0.5.8.1. So Bismarck/Gneisenau acc will be the same as Tirpitz now.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fnord_disc Beta Tester 2,119 posts 5,245 battles Report post #837 Posted August 1, 2016 I do think that is a N.Carolina, based off the Chinese. I think whoever named the screenshot didn't know the difference (or Chinese). It is North Carolina. The writing says 北卡罗来纳级. Also re:those dispersions. I've said it before, but that dispersion is roughly the same as American ships and couple with the better sigma at most tiers, they will be slight more accurate. The accuracy on German ships will definitely not be as horrible as some people think, just not very good either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NED] piet11111 Players 2,225 posts 8,827 battles Report post #838 Posted August 1, 2016 Any chance i am overly optimistic that wargaming lowered the hp of the greater bratwurst because its going to have monstrously strong armor ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BM] TommyScaletta Players 72 posts 9,803 battles Report post #839 Posted August 1, 2016 It has 381mm main belt armor without turtleback...so the armor isn't that strong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PONYD] GrossadmiralThrawn Players 4,995 posts 4,960 battles Report post #840 Posted August 1, 2016 It has 381mm main belt armor without turtleback...so the armor isn't that strong. out of what reason whatsoever... all H-classes afaik would have received even stronger turtlebacks then the Bismarck... ingame meanwhile the Friedrich gets a aweaker one and the kurfürst.... well... you just said it... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #841 Posted August 1, 2016 (edited) It is North Carolina. The writing says 北卡罗来纳级. Also re:those dispersions. I've said it before, but that dispersion is roughly the same as American ships and couple with the better sigma at most tiers, they will be slight more accurate. The accuracy on German ships will definitely not be as horrible as some people think, just not very good either. The accuracy of German BB is good up to tier 8. After that, it's a totally shotgun-like one. Edited August 1, 2016 by Darth_Glorious Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PONYD] GrossadmiralThrawn Players 4,995 posts 4,960 battles Report post #842 Posted August 1, 2016 slowly but surely this becomes my opinion about Tier IX and X 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #843 Posted August 1, 2016 (edited) Any chance i am overly optimistic that wargaming lowered the hp of the greater bratwurst because its going to have monstrously strong armor ? - Hull armour : very good, very hard to citadel. - Turret / barbette armour : weak for tier 10 (380 mm max) so you don't want to close range too much because you will be doomed if enemy BB can hit your guns...And unlike other tier 10 BBs, they need only 2 shots to each turret to shut it down forever. Edited August 1, 2016 by Darth_Glorious Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PONYD] GrossadmiralThrawn Players 4,995 posts 4,960 battles Report post #844 Posted August 1, 2016 - Turret / barbette armour : weak for tier 10 (380 mm max) so you don't want to close range too much because you will be doomed if enemy BB can hit your guns...And they need only 2 shots to each turret to shut it down forever. Recently at wargaming: "how can we make a Ship good for brawling?" "make it's turret armour crapso it wont be able to use them to long and it has to ram!" "Good idea"... if takin the fire for teammates would atleast be rewarded (and no... Dreadnought and Fireproof ARE NOT rewards... they are nice to have... BUT NOT that kind of reward that would actually let you jump into the line of fire because oyu have to survive to get em... (and even then: if you didnt gete hit oftenenough e.g. after being nearly dead and then repaired you didnt get hit anymore) you wont get dreadnought...) AND they dont do anythign for the repair costs that go crazy in high tier (and imho contribute to the whole long range sniping and camping) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vanhal Alpha Tester 5,609 posts 5,569 battles Report post #845 Posted August 1, 2016 Just like Warspite: "How do we make Warspite brawling BB?" "Lets make its turrets so slow, that it can't track anything at short range " WG have really weird ideas of brawling. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #846 Posted August 1, 2016 (edited) Recently at wargaming: "how can we make a Ship good for brawling?" "make it's turret armour crapso it wont be able to use them to long and it has to ram!" "Good idea"... if takin the fire for teammates would atleast be rewarded (and no... Dreadnought and Fireproof ARE NOT rewards... they are nice to have... BUT NOT that kind of reward that would actually let you jump into the line of fire because oyu have to survive to get em... (and even then: if you didnt gete hit oftenenough e.g. after being nearly dead and then repaired you didnt get hit anymore) you wont get dreadnought...) AND they dont do anythign for the repair costs that go crazy in high tier (and imho contribute to the whole long range sniping and camping) Even Tirpitz can lolpen GK turrets too... Edited August 1, 2016 by Darth_Glorious Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #847 Posted August 1, 2016 (edited) After turret buffs, Dunkerque turrets are strong now, very hard to knock them out. Edited August 1, 2016 by Darth_Glorious Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Diminios Players 324 posts 3,103 battles Report post #848 Posted August 1, 2016 After turret buffs, Dunkerque turrets are strong now, very hard to knock them out. And its armor (from the front, not broadside, obviously)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #849 Posted August 1, 2016 (edited) And its armor (from the front, not broadside, obviously)? Yeah, front armour is good now. Edited August 1, 2016 by Darth_Glorious Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NameChangingIsToExpensiv Players 260 posts 3,757 battles Report post #850 Posted August 1, 2016 Scharnhorst and Dunkerque were given to CC. So they will be released soon. This time actually soon, not WG soon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites