KPtja Players 273 posts 2,478 battles Report post #726 Posted July 30, 2016 They'll never put an effort into making new turrets, the triple turrets are here to stay. I don't complain about it being over or underpowered, WHat grinds my gears is they don't use the hull as its supposed to historically. Tripple turrest are german made from german plans. So basically you whining over nothing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CHATS] Webley_Mark WoWs Wiki Team 12,258 posts 9,770 battles Report post #727 Posted July 30, 2016 Glorious Germang shells. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PONYD] GrossadmiralThrawn Players 4,995 posts 4,960 battles Report post #728 Posted July 30, 2016 Tripple turrest are german made from german plans. So basically you whining over nothing. german plans for russian request Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[JUNK] Affeks [JUNK] Beta Tester 1,934 posts 8,416 battles Report post #729 Posted July 30, 2016 Tripple turrest are german made from german plans. So basically you whining over nothing. I complained about the triples being on a hull designed for duals... derp more please Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KMS_Tirpitz Players 303 posts 1,634 battles Report post #730 Posted July 30, 2016 German ships in WoWS are a joke, I wouldn't keep any expectations if I were u guys. Meanwhile Russian cruisers are as powerfull as battleships, and their destroyers are duking it out with cruisers. *sigh* just *sigh* 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KPtja Players 273 posts 2,478 battles Report post #731 Posted July 30, 2016 german plans for russian request And you have the proof where? I have asked at least once before. In other words are you making that claim up in your pretty little head? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KPtja Players 273 posts 2,478 battles Report post #732 Posted July 30, 2016 (edited) I complained about the triples being on a hull designed for duals... derp more please What in the world we are actually talking about? There is no historical hull for Grosse Kurfurst so how is even remotely possible to make a claim that hull was designed for duals? As nobody has ever designed such hull. (Except wargaming) You are totally lost. Edited July 30, 2016 by KPtja Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ROGUE] LeeQuid Players 111 posts 21,702 battles Report post #733 Posted July 30, 2016 German ships in WoWS are a joke, I wouldn't keep any expectations if I were u guys. Meanwhile Russian cruisers are as powerfull as battleships, and their destroyers are duking it out with cruisers. *sigh* just *sigh* cry more Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[JUNK] Affeks [JUNK] Beta Tester 1,934 posts 8,416 battles Report post #734 Posted July 30, 2016 What in the world we are actually talking about? There is no historical hull for Grosse Kurfurst so how is even remotely possible to make a claim that hull was designed for duals? As nobody has ever designed such hull. (Except wargaming) You are totally lost. You just contradicted yourself and proved my point, good job! cry more ^very constructive reply Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CHATS] Webley_Mark WoWs Wiki Team 12,258 posts 9,770 battles Report post #735 Posted July 30, 2016 Such constructive. Wow. Very useful. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KPtja Players 273 posts 2,478 battles Report post #736 Posted July 30, 2016 You just contradicted yourself and proved my point, good job! Öö, what? You made up argument that t10 hull is designed for duals and I am the one contradicting? Only reasonable thing for me left is to add you on ignore list. I can not discuss with such irrational crap. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ST-EU] Trainspite Supertester, Players, Sailing Hamster 1,920 posts 4,621 battles Report post #737 Posted July 30, 2016 German ships in WoWS are a joke, I wouldn't keep any expectations if I were u guys. Meanwhile Russian cruisers are as powerfull as battleships, and their destroyers are duking it out with cruisers. *sigh* just *sigh* I disagree, though I can't say anything. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BuccaneerBill Players 513 posts 11,276 battles Report post #738 Posted July 30, 2016 They'll never put an effort into making new turrets, the triple turrets are here to stay. I don't complain about it being over or underpowered, WHat grinds my gears is they don't use the hull as its supposed to historically. Least the Konig Albert should be historical! About the only one I'm interested in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[FO] Todger_Fairmile Players 494 posts 17,557 battles Report post #739 Posted July 30, 2016 Least the Konig Albert should be historical! About the only one I'm interested in. If they'll get around to selling it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #740 Posted July 30, 2016 Konig armour is very good, cannot citadel it with 14 inches gun :v. German BBs from tier 3 to tier 7 are very good (best combination of firepower and armour) Tier 8 is meh. Tier 9 and tier 10 are underwhelming :v. So I think that this line is for seal clubbers :v. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NameChangingIsToExpensiv Players 260 posts 3,757 battles Report post #741 Posted July 30, 2016 (edited) Konig armour is very good, cannot citadel it with 14 inches gun :v. German BBs from tier 3 to tier 7 are very good (best combination of firepower and armour) Tier 8 is meh. Tier 9 and tier 10 are underwhelming :v. So I think that this line is for seal clubbers :v. How can the Bismarck be meh? Its a Tirpitz without Torpedos, better Secondaries and AA. Dunno about Dispersion. When i think how often i use my torps(not that often) and still do 100k+ dmg it should be decent. Edited July 30, 2016 by SCFighterr Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #742 Posted July 30, 2016 (edited) How can the Bismarck be meh? Its a Tirpitz without Torpedos, better Secondaries and AA. Dunno about Dispersion. When i think how often i use my torps(not that often) and still do 100k+ dmg it should be decent. Bismarck vs Tirpitz is like New York vs Texas. Bismarck has worse firing angle and no torps. They silent-buffed Tirpitz in the latest patches. Edited July 30, 2016 by Darth_Glorious Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #743 Posted July 30, 2016 Bismarck vs Tirpitz is like New York vs Texas. Bismarck has worse firing angle and no torps. They silent-buffed Tirpitz in the latest patches. how can Bismarck have worse firing angles it is nearly the same ship Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #744 Posted July 30, 2016 how can Bismarck have worse firing angles it is nearly the same ship New York and Texas are the same too, but... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NameChangingIsToExpensiv Players 260 posts 3,757 battles Report post #745 Posted July 30, 2016 (edited) New York and Texas are the same too, but... I think Texas doesnt have a life boat in the middle which blocks the firing angles for the NY. Maybe for Bismarck some AA guns are blocking better firing angles, like it used to be on the Hipper? Edited July 30, 2016 by SCFighterr Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #746 Posted July 30, 2016 (edited) I think Texas doesnt have a life boat in the middle which blocks the firing angles for the NY. Maybe for Bismarck some AA guns are blocking better firing angles, like it used to be on the Hipper? 3rd turret : Bismarck 40 degrees Tirpitz 35 degrees 4th turret : Bismarck 35 degrees Tirpitz 35 degrees (silent buffed, 40 degrees in old patches) Edited July 30, 2016 by Darth_Glorious Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NameChangingIsToExpensiv Players 260 posts 3,757 battles Report post #747 Posted July 30, 2016 3rd turret : Bismarck 40 degrees Tirpitz 35 degrees 4th turret : Bismarck 35 degrees Tirpitz 35 degrees (silent buffed, 40 degrees in old patches) Dont think it was a silent buff on the Tirpitz, in 0.5.8(not quite sure) it was stated, that they improved the firing angles for the tirpitz. But either way, doesnt seem that bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #748 Posted July 30, 2016 Dont think it was a silent buff on the Tirpitz, in 0.5.8(not quite sure) it was stated, that they improved the firing angles for the tirpitz. But either way, doesnt seem that bad. yes it was in the patch notes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth_Glorious Beta Tester 2,464 posts Report post #749 Posted July 31, 2016 From Chinese Q&A with Sergey Vorobyev - German BBs are basically completed, they will be released soon. - Devs begun working on Chinese ships tech tree.( ETA : last haft of 2017). SURPRISE ? - There will be 4 vs 4 and 1 vs 1 mode for E-sports. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[1DSF] Carnivore81 Moderator, In AlfaTesters 3,523 posts 9,588 battles Report post #750 Posted July 31, 2016 From Chinese Q&A with Sergey Vorobyev - German BBs are basically completed, they will be released soon. - Devs begun working on Chinese ships tech tree.( ETA : last haft of 2017). SURPRISE ? - There will be 4 vs 4 and 1 vs 1 mode for E-sports. 1 vs 1 . Is useless too much RNG involved esp on BB . @ Bismarck. Always sayd that secondary are nearly useless . Even fully skilled. As long Bismarck will Not get better Dispersion she will always suck against Tirpitz. AA is nearly no Balance faktor. As long Hightier CV are so rare. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
