Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Spithas

Tier 6 & 7 Matchmaker

31 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[3X]
Players
887 posts
12,804 battles

Last 1.5 months the Matchmaker for Tier 6 and Tier 7 is simply horrendous.

 

My Tier 6 ships end up 70% of the time in Tier 8 Matches. Same applies for the Tier 7 (though for those ships its less of a problem).

The weird part is that the queue is full of T6 ships often over 50 ships in queue. Yet the MM will have me wait 40 secs to 1.5 mins then dump me in a T8 match.

I always play a good number of matches per day so this isn't the case of "bad luck" or too small sample size. This also happens regardless of me being in division or not.

In general if i play 10 matches in T6 ships 1 will be Top tier, 2 will be Middle tier while the rest will find me bottom tier. Anyone else experiencing this?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[3X]
Players
887 posts
12,804 battles

How do you know they are Tier VI?

Game does not tell you that.

 

The breakdown of the ships per class you see in the queue list are only ships of the Tier you have selected.

 

I you had ever played T9 or T10 you would have easily realized this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[3X]
Players
887 posts
12,804 battles

The game tells you what ships are in range.

 

That's the number on the upper right part.

 

If you sum the number of CVs , BBs, CAs and DDs from the breakdown you will see that this number is less than what's listed in the upper right part.

 

As i said before play some Tier 9 and 10 battles you will be in queue with 5 ships in total yet the ships in range will be much more and you will get into a match with 24 ships. That's because the numbers you see over the classes are ONLY ships at the tier of the ship you have selected.

 

The only exception being Divisions. If someone queues up with different tier ships in his division those will all be listed as highest possible tier and will appear in the breakdown of the classes in the queue.

 

Are you done being obstinate now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[1378]
Players
460 posts
3,784 battles

The only reason I can give you is the ARP quest line that people are grinding this days. Since they need to be completed in a Tier 7+ ship, there will be more players playing Tier 7+ than normal. Also, the influx of Tirpitz buyers will give you more Tier 8 opponents.

 

Edit: don't feed the troll, it's not worth your time or energy.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[3X]
Players
887 posts
12,804 battles

The only reason I can give you is the ARP quest line that people are grinding this days. Since they need to be completed in a Tier 7+ ship, there will be more players playing Tier 7+ than normal. Also, the influx of Tirpitz buyers will give you more Tier 8 opponents.

 

Edit: don't feed the troll, it's not worth your time or energy.

 

I initially had the same thoughts. However seeing the queue having more than enough Tier 6 ships made me wonder... Though i have to admitt the number of BBs at T6 were always low so it might be the Tirpitz spam pulling me up.
Edited by Spithas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
5,358 posts
25,531 battles

The only reason I can give you is the ARP quest line that people are grinding this days. Since they need to be completed in a Tier 7+ ship, there will be more players playing Tier 7+ than normal. Also, the influx of Tirpitz buyers will give you more Tier 8 opponents.

 

Edit: don't feed the troll, it's not worth your time or energy.

 

Ninjered! 

 

MM douse seem a bit scewed last patch!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
7,146 posts
31,549 battles

Hi all,

 

In my "Colorado" (Tier VII) I constantly find myself in Tier IX / VIII games (games where I am top tiered ship are very very rare)...

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
5,358 posts
25,531 battles

 

I initially had the same thoughts. However seeing the queue having more than enough Tier 6 ships made me wonder... Though i have to admitt the number of BBs at T6 were always low so it might be the Tirpitz spam pulling me up.

Not sure you are correct with you view on knowing the tier!!!!! 

 

But if there are 100 Tier 6 in que as you say it more than enough for match but if at same time there are 3000 Tier 7 and 8! Well you will get a lot of tier 8 games.  I for one have not been playing much tier 6. so have not seen your issue.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[1378]
Players
460 posts
3,784 battles

Hi all,

 

In my "Colorado" (Tier VII) I constantly find myself in Tier IX / VIII games (games where I am top tiered ship are very very rare)...

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

 

Funny, I have the same feeling. However, the last couple of days I am beginning to get more Tier 5-7 games in my 'Rado. I still suck in it, of course. :fishpalm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
5,358 posts
25,531 battles

 

Funny, I have the same feeling. However, the last couple of days I am beginning to get more Tier 5-7 games in my 'Rado. I still suck in it, of course. :fishpalm:

 

Kind of supports the theory of ARP missions then as more people are finishing them! Expect it to get worse again next week. Last week of mission panic will set in on those that have not finished it! or determination on those that did not try thinking it to hard but realised they are quit close to the goals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[3X]
Players
887 posts
12,804 battles

This is in the patch notes for 5.4.3: (Don't know how it relates to the situation i have described in the OP)

 

  • Single cruiser match making has been enabled for mid-Tier, queue waiting time decreased

     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,059 posts
7,793 battles

This is in the patch notes for 5.4.3: (Don't know how it relates to the situation i have described in the OP)

 

  • Single cruiser match making has been enabled for mid-Tier, queue waiting time decreased

     

     

 

Almost had a single-cruiser game as my  last game in Aoba. There was a Fuso on our side in addition to the cruisers in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,780 posts
17,292 battles

Tier 7-8 battleships are the most popular class on the EU server followed by Tier 5-7 cruisers.

 

There's quite a good chance a tier 6 ship will end up in a tier 8 game.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
346 posts
8,861 battles

cant remember the last time i was top tier in my Myoko, and its the same in the Hipper, i always end up in a T9/10 Match.

it may have to do with forcing more experienced player into higher tier to let the potato's have their fun at mid tiers, but thats my hypothesis 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
261 posts
3,504 battles

Fun fact, I can play with my T VI NM at around midnight GMT+1 and get a TV-VI match without much delay. If I play at around 7-8 p.m. I get T VI-VIII fairly often.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,938 posts
23,206 battles

 

I am seeing something similar.

 

Patch 0.5.3 nerfed cruisers quite strongly (which many people feel needed to be done -> a separate discussion). I have been collecting data on my games in tier 4-6 cruisers since the patch in order to see the effects of the nerfs on my performance.

 

There is an interesting pattern. The matchmaking seems to be different for cruisers where I was doing LESS than average damage before 0.5.3, compared to cruisers where I was doing MORE than average damage.

 

Pre 0.5.3 performance  Top tier % Mid tier % Bottom tier %
Less than average 39 25 36
More than average 25 19 56

 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[3X]
Players
887 posts
12,804 battles

I am seeing something similar.

 

Patch 0.5.3 nerfed cruisers quite strongly (which many people feel needed to be done -> a separate discussion). I have been collecting data on my games in tier 4-6 cruisers since the patch in order to see the effects of the nerfs on my performance.

 

There is an interesting pattern. The matchmaking seems to be different for cruisers where I was doing LESS than average damage before 0.5.3, compared to cruisers where I was doing MORE than average damage.

 

Pre 0.5.3 performance  Top tier % Mid tier % Bottom tier %
Less than average 39 25 36
More than average 25 19 56

 

 

I hate conspiracy theories as much as any logical person but basically if this is right we are being punished for playing well... 

 

What is the sample size for these numbers? 

 

The interesting part is that my T6 MM very rought numbers match yours... only 30% as top tier. I am curious if this is a side effect of the anti seal clubbing mechanic they introduced to the Matchmaker some time ago...

Edited by Spithas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,938 posts
23,206 battles

 

I hate conspiracy theories as much as any logical person but basically if this is right we are being punished for playing well... 

 

What is the sample size for these numbers?

 

219 games (if I include the games in new Russian cruisers) . I did not include the Russians in the posted stats - but THEY FULLY CONFORM TO THE QUOTED PATTERN.

e.g I got my record kills in one Budyonyy game, and my record damage in another Budyonny game. My games in this ship have been  Top Tier(10),  Mid Tier(2),  Bottom Tier(16).

After making a very good start in Budyonny, I was bottom tier in 12 of the last 17 games in her - mostly tier 8 games.

 

This matchmaking has been driving me nuts lately. I am not good enough to cope with being bottom tier any more than my "fair share".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[3X]
Players
887 posts
12,804 battles

 

219 games (if I include the games in new Russian cruisers) . I did not include the Russians in the posted stats - but THEY FULLY CONFORM TO THE QUOTED PATTERN.

e.g I got my record kills in one Budyonyy game, and my record damage in another Budyonny game. My games in this ship have been  Top Tier(10),  Mid Tier(2),  Bottom Tier(16).

After making a very good start in Budyonny, I was bottom tier in 12 of the last 17 games in her - mostly tier 8 games.

 

This matchmaking has been driving me nuts lately. I am not good enough to cope with being bottom tier any more than my "fair share".

 

That is a very solid sample size. It is exactly the same for me.

 

I noticed it because it just happened i grinded Cleveland - Nurnberg - Budyoni all at the same time.

 

And it's not a matter of skill mate, Tier 6 Cruisers simply cannot carry as much in Tier 8 games no matter how good one is.

 

If this is intentionally done so by Wargaming it's really bad play on their part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
464 posts

personally i've been messing around on NA and i encountered T8/T9 battleships more than T6-T7 battleships when i grinded T6/T7 battleships

 

thought it was because of NA's low population but it seems to be an issue here as well so WG is definitely doing something with mm

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
790 posts
2,278 battles

MM works fine, you just need to use all his functionalities.

This is good example. 3x tier 9 or 3x tier 7 in div have much better MM, than solo or 2x in div. I played Baltimore in 3x div and from 30 games I had 1-2 times tier 10 game. When I tried to play solo or 2x div always tier 10 match. 

I prefer the only one 100% working solution. Play tier 10 :trollface:

Btw. i think tier 6 shouldnt be in game with lot of tier 8 ships and same for tier 8 in tier 10 games. Its better for players who prefer to play tier 10 cause of tier 8 are mostly just free dmg for them. I like it this way but its painful to grind any new ships because of that... WG knows how to make players angry more than anyone else :trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×