Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Sadstories

AIM bot or not?

30 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[-R-S-]
Players
84 posts
19,498 battles

...

 

[edited]

Edited by RogDodgeUK
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to forum rules violation. RogDodgeUK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[1378]
Players
460 posts
3,784 battles

Atago has a plane on board. Fighter or spotter, it doesn't matter. When that plane is airborne it will spot things at a different rate than ships. So, it is more than possible his plane spotted you.

 

Spotting plane is a bit of a misnomer in WoWs, since what it does is extend the range of the main battery. But both the fighter and spotter plane spot enemy ships like planes from a CV would.

 

No cheating, just game mechanics and good shooting (and luck, because RNG is always there).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertest Coordinator, Modder
1,365 posts
13,372 battles

Aimbots are not possible in WoWs. The only thing that they coul use would be an aim assist and this is useless when you start moving left or right...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BW-UK]
Beta Tester
814 posts
27,533 battles

His plane spotted you (made you visible to him on the map), and he was experienced enough to lead and hit you even though you were behind an island. Not aimbot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SEMI]
Players
55 posts

Cruisers have higher arc shells then most bbs which is why he can shoot you and you can't shoot him, although poor positioning also comes into place, if he is much closer to the mountain then you are its very hard to get a shell over an island then have it immediately drop on the target

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTTX]
[TTTX]
Players
4,608 posts
8,139 battles

sad story... the next clueless aimbot accusation... with naming&shaming on the forums too... could you go any lower? *sigh*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,999 posts
6,434 battles

When you have the target selected and his guns have a sufficient high arc then it's entirely possible because the gunners know you didn't mean to shoot at the rock wall but over it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[1378]
Players
460 posts
3,784 battles

Still, no aimbot, and game mechanics working as intended.

 

Could I suggest you edit your starting post to remove the name of the perfectly legit-playing player instead of trying to shame him (or her) here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HFHH]
Players
28 posts
3,505 battles

as already mentioned, shot arcs are different for different ships, just because you can't shoot him, it doesn't mean he can't shoot you

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-R-S-]
Players
84 posts
19,498 battles

sad story... the next clueless aimbot accusation... with naming&shaming on the forums too... could you go any lower? *sigh*

 

...
Edited by Sadstories

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[1378]
Players
460 posts
3,784 battles

You are missing the point. It's not because we say it's not true that it's true, it's just how this game works. Not to sound snotty, but learn how different ships can have different shell arcs and how spotting really works. It will make you a better player:medal:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,168 posts
9,822 battles

Whatever. If you all say it's not it must be true.

 

So if we all say it's an aimbot then it's not? You will go far in life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
720 posts
9,732 battles

It's this guys first foray onto the forum and it's a pathetic aimbot post! Even worse, he names and shames an innocent party because he doesn't understand the game mechanics!!!

Nothing to see here folks. One of the mods will lock this waste of space post soon.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NIKE]
Beta Tester
3,412 posts
7,888 battles

Even if he didn't have the plane, if you were spotted by someone else then it's not too hard to judge lead over a mountain - you can see where they are since the icon shows through the mountain, so you can judge height. The angle you can't see, but you can see the rough angle from the minimap enough to make an informed guesstimate. The speed you also can't see as you can't see the smoke stack, but since everyone seems to sail at full speed anyway you can assume it's probably full.

With that you can shoot in at least vaguely the right place. It's easier to hit BB since they're a lot bigger, and less likely to turn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-R-S-]
Players
84 posts
19,498 battles

 

So if we all say it's an aimbot then it's not? You will go far in life.

 

If you all say it's not an aim bot then it must be true (it's not an aim bot).
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-R-S-]
Players
84 posts
19,498 battles

Even if he didn't have the plane, if you were spotted by someone else then it's not too hard to judge lead over a mountain - you can see where they are since the icon shows through the mountain, so you can judge height. The angle you can't see, but you can see the rough angle from the minimap enough to make an informed guesstimate. The speed you also can't see as you can't see the smoke stack, but since everyone seems to sail at full speed anyway you can assume it's probably full.

With that you can shoot in at least vaguely the right place. It's easier to hit BB since they're a lot bigger, and less likely to turn

 

I know and I do that behind small islands, calculating the same things. Did't knew you can do it behind ones you have no clue what's on the other side, I was turning before I got mad don't worry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-R-S-]
Players
84 posts
19,498 battles

It's this guys first foray onto the forum and it's a pathetic aimbot post! Even worse, he names and shames an innocent party because he doesn't understand the game mechanics!!!

Nothing to see here folks. One of the mods will lock this waste of space post soon.

 

 

Maybe they can also delete your comment, it's useless. Wanna get attention go somewhere else. I was asking a question and wanted answers. Name was given maybe someone from the staff can check if his profile accuracy rates changed drastically in the past weeks. If I was looking for hackers that would have been the first thing I would look for, big diferences in player stats during playing time, since you can't check sth else
Edited by Sadstories

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-R-S-]
Players
84 posts
19,498 battles

 

Must be aim bot + wall hack, don't let them fool you! ;)

 

:teethhappy:

 

[edited]

Edited by RogDodgeUK
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to forum rules violation. RogDodgeUK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,168 posts
9,822 battles

Whatever. If you all say it's not it must be true.

 

You are missing the point. It's not because we say it's not true that it's true, it's just how this game works. Not to sound snotty, but learn how different ships can have different shell arcs and how spotting really works. It will make you a better player:medal:

 

 

So if we all say it's an aimbot then it's not? You will go far in life.

 

 

Must be aim bot + wall hack, don't let them fool you! ;)

 

To be fair, the OP expressed himself kinda badly in the top quote, and he apparently said the opposite of what he wanted to say:

 

If you all say it's not an aim bot than it must be true (it's not an aim bot).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
6,753 posts
7,907 battles

To be fair, the OP expressed himself kinda badly in the top quote, and he apparently said the opposite of what he wanted to say:

 

View PostSadstories, on 14 March 2016 - 02:36 PM, said:

If you all say it's not an aim bot than it must be true (it's not an aim bot).

 

Ah okay, misunderstod that, sry for the joke. ;)

 

Here's an older video, showing that you don't need Line of sight to hit a target behind an island:

 

 

:honoring:

Edited by Trigger_Happy_Dad
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
720 posts
9,732 battles

 

Maybe they can also delete your comment, it's useless. Wanna get attention go somewhere else. I was asking a question and wanted answers. Name was given maybe someone from the staff can check if his profile accuracy rates changed drastically in the past weeks. If I was looking for hackers that would have been the first thing I would look for, big diferences in player stats during playing time, since you can't check sth else

 

So you get your panties in a bunch when someone points out your failures, but it's ok for you to name and shame an innocent player.

Now you want this players profile checked out on your assumption that it's not possible for someone to improve his gameplay or hit rate 'in a few weeks'. 

If you check my stats you will see that they are improving and will continue to improve now that I have the correct aimbot spectacles.

Either way, naming and shaming is a direct contravention of forum rules no matter what you suspect.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×