[MAASS] th3freakie Beta Tester 420 posts 7,746 battles Report post #1 Posted February 2, 2016 That god-awful naming. USS Des Moines? Why would anyone slog through 10 tiers to sail anything named after this urban embodiment of boredom? USS Baltimore? Yeah, let that flag of crippling racial tension run high and proud! USS Montana? Sure, nothing screams Overwhelming Naval Power like the 3rd US state in beer microbreweries per capita, with all of it's 1 million people and cattle-farming dominant economy. But let's not forget the USS Essex, named after another ship called Essex, which in turn got it's name from a sleepy suburbia of Boston, which in turn gets it's name from a county in an entirely different country, which in it's own turn got the name from a Kingdom that disappeared over 1000 years ago. What's that you say? The destroyers are named after cool people at least? Sure, let's look at those. USS Gearing, named after 3 guys with navy careers that would be perfectly ordinary if it wasn't for the statistic anomaly of each generation living less than the previous. USS Wickles. Wickles. USS Mahan, named after a navy man who didn't like the sea and whose ships had a tendency to crash into moving and stationary objects. Let's face it, WG, the USN tech line needs a complete revision in named. Also, this makes it all the more urgent to bring forward the introduction of Royal Navy ships. After so many games with the USS Beach Resort Pensacola, I'd kill for some HMS Invincible, HMS Queen Elizabeth or HMS Revenge. Heck, at this point I'd be pretty happy with the HMS Hermione: (the above is mostly in jest) 12 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KptStrzyga Beta Tester 4,868 posts 5,014 battles Report post #2 Posted February 2, 2016 (edited) Well.. Russian names for ships are more working for imagination - Gnievnyj (eager to anger) Gremyashchy (thunderous). Japanese names are very beautyfull, they were naming destroyers after winds, battleships after gr8 generals, cruisers after mountains. Americans have no imagination or history so what can you do. We have to live with it. Edited February 2, 2016 by KptStrzyga Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BONUS] Hedgehog1963 [BONUS] Beta Tester 3,211 posts 14,951 battles Report post #3 Posted February 2, 2016 I agree. I've always found the historic names of the Royal Ravy to be far more interesting, except for the smaller ships of the USN. The Yanks love to name their ships - particularly carriers - after battles they won. If the Royal Navy did that we'd have a lot bigger navy which would include HMS We Burned The White House Down. 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NIKE] Xevious_Red Beta Tester 3,412 posts 7,888 battles Report post #4 Posted February 2, 2016 Navy did that we'd have a lot bigger navy which would include HMS We Burned The White House Down. I look forward to sailing the HMS Gun-beats-spear Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PRAVD] Takeda92 Weekend Tester 3,802 posts 8,478 battles Report post #5 Posted February 2, 2016 (edited) battleships after gr8 generals Battleships named after provinces, Except Fusou which is an old name for Japan. Kongou class does not count as a BB. Every nation name its biggest ships after something they are proud of. In her time frame, being named New York really means a lot. Edited February 2, 2016 by Takeda92 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TEA] ItachiZero Beta Tester 462 posts 11,979 battles Report post #6 Posted February 2, 2016 Battleships named after provinces, Except Fusou which is an old name for Japan. Kongou class does not count as a BB. Every nation name its biggest ships after something they are proud of. In her time frame, being named New York really means a lot. Kongo is a battleship but it was built as Battlecruiser in England. reconfig in japan to the Battleship-class I like. So BB but its nice to know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vortenus Players 123 posts 3,687 battles Report post #7 Posted February 2, 2016 Well, You got me at HMS Hermione. I'd sail that. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TEA] ItachiZero Beta Tester 462 posts 11,979 battles Report post #8 Posted February 2, 2016 That god-awful naming. USS Des Moines? Why would anyone slog through 10 tiers to sail anything named after this urban embodiment of boredom? USS Baltimore? Yeah, let that flag of crippling racial tension run high and proud! USS Montana? Sure, nothing screams Overwhelming Naval Power like the 3rd US state in beer microbreweries per capita, with all of it's 1 million people and cattle-farming dominant economy. But let's not forget the USS Essex, named after another ship called Essex, which in turn got it's name from a sleepy suburbia of Boston, which in turn gets it's name from a county in an entirely different country, which in it's own turn got the name from a Kingdom that disappeared over 1000 years ago. What's that you say? The destroyers are named after cool people at least? Sure, let's look at those. USS Gearing, named after 3 guys with navy careers that would be perfectly ordinary if it wasn't for the statistic anomaly of each generation living less than the previous. USS Wickles. Wickles. USS Mahan, named after a navy man who didn't like the sea and whose ships had a tendency to crash into moving and stationary objects. Let's face it, WG, the USN tech line needs a complete revision in named. Also, this makes it all the more urgent to bring forward the introduction of Royal Navy ships. After so many games with the USS Beach Resort Pensacola, I'd kill for some HMS Invincible, HMS Queen Elizabeth or HMS Revenge. Heck, at this point I'd be pretty happy with the HMS Hermione: (the above is mostly in jest) wow. go back in time and complain to the people in charge of naming Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PRAVD] Takeda92 Weekend Tester 3,802 posts 8,478 battles Report post #9 Posted February 2, 2016 Kongo is a battleship but it was built as Battlecruiser in England. reconfig in japan to the Battleship-class I like. So BB but its nice to know. Yeah, it became a BB but it wasn't built as one. There are also other deviation from the rules, like Kako (2nd Furutaka) named after a river like light cruisers, and Amagi and Katsuragi (2nd and 3rd Unryuu-class CVs) named after mountains. In fact, here's the name of all the ships and their meaning http://www.combinedfleet.com/ijnnames.htm 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vortenus Players 123 posts 3,687 battles Report post #10 Posted February 2, 2016 wow. go back in time and complain to the people in charge of naming Whats that sticking out Your behind? Oh, its a stick. Looks like after so many cry-threads even a joke one is taken seriously. Sad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LilJumpa Beta Tester 4,603 posts 7,488 battles Report post #11 Posted February 2, 2016 (edited) wow. go back in time and complain to the people in charge of naming You should recalibrate that long thing made out of wood in your back door. Damn... those ninjas Edited February 2, 2016 by LilJumpa 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mtm78 Alpha Tester 19,378 posts 6,105 battles Report post #12 Posted February 2, 2016 Well, You got me at HMS Hermione. I'd sail that. Me 2, me 2... I'd consider it an everlasting maiden voyage Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TEA] ItachiZero Beta Tester 462 posts 11,979 battles Report post #13 Posted February 2, 2016 Whats that sticking out Your behind? Oh, its a stick. Looks like after so many cry-threads even a joke one is taken seriously. Sad. well wasnt serious. You should recalibrate that long thing made out of wood in your back door. Damn... those ninjas hahaha well could. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SLOTH] txtspeak Players 3,041 posts 5,653 battles Report post #14 Posted February 2, 2016 eh. its not just the USN that does this. lets see murmansk... named after a place in russia called murmansk (*)_(*) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EsaTuunanen Beta Tester 3,552 posts 8,863 battles Report post #15 Posted February 2, 2016 That god-awful naming. You think renaming would make them perform on par with ships of other nations? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[THROW] Takru Supertester, Players, Sailing Hamster, Privateer 3,851 posts 23,972 battles Report post #16 Posted February 2, 2016 You guys have no idea how lucky you are... Don't look too closely at the German Tech tree.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
praetor_jax Beta Tester 1,266 posts 4,216 battles Report post #17 Posted February 2, 2016 Well i guess its still better than calling a ship invincible or indefeatigable... tempting fate up to eleven 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kurbain Players 1,976 posts 2,773 battles Report post #18 Posted February 2, 2016 Well i guess its still better than calling a ship invincible or indefeatigable... tempting fate up to eleven Maybe, but better to tempt fate than end up with names like Habakkuk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LilJumpa Beta Tester 4,603 posts 7,488 battles Report post #19 Posted February 2, 2016 (edited) I agree. I've always found the historic names of the Royal Ravy to be far more interesting, except for the smaller ships of the USN. The Yanks love to name their ships - particularly carriers - after battles they won. If the Royal Navy did that we'd have a lot bigger navy which would include HMS We Burned The White House Down. Well the Brits are not always the best at naming Ships: HMS Buttercup: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Buttercup and the mighty ANL Explorer https://www.fleetmon.com/vessels/anl-explorer_8506098_575186/ Edited February 2, 2016 by LilJumpa 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cosseria Players 1,064 posts 4,944 battles Report post #20 Posted February 2, 2016 I like USN naming conventions. It's just that after almost 200 cruisers and 60 battleships, they were short on cities and states so they had to make do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tubit101 Players 1,189 posts 4,745 battles Report post #21 Posted February 2, 2016 A few names from the Gloriana battleship class in Warhammer 40K: Invincible Reason (Dark Angels Legion) Swordstorm (White Scars Legion) Hrafnkel (Space Wolves Legion) Red Tear (Blood Angels Legion) Fist of Iron (Iron Hands Legion) Macragge's Honour (Ultramarines Legion) Flamewrought (Salamanders Legion) Shadow of the Emperor (Raven Guard Legion) Pride of the Emperor (Emperor's Children Legion) Iron Blood (Iron Warriors Legion) Nightfall (Night Lords Legion) Conqueror (World Eaters Legion) Endurance (Death Guard Legion) Photep (Thousand Sons Legion) Vengeful Spirit (Sons of Horus Legion) Fidelitas Lex (Word Bearers Legion) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
_x_Acheron_x_ Players 484 posts 6,096 battles Report post #22 Posted February 2, 2016 Considering that pretty much every place in the US goes with a ship, it's inevitable that some places you don't like are going to be used. As much as I like the RN, you cant avoid the pathetic name that is HMS Rodney. You can't beat HMS Emperor Of India though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SonofaSailor Players 133 posts Report post #23 Posted February 2, 2016 Let's face it, WG, the USN tech line needs a complete revision in named. Also, this makes it all the more urgent to bring forward the introduction of Royal Navy ships. After so many games with the USS Beach Resort Pensacola, I'd kill for some HMS Invincible, HMS Queen Elizabeth or HMS Revenge. Heck, at this point I'd be pretty happy with the HMS Hermione: (the above is mostly in jest) I'd be pretty happy with Hermione, too! ... er, hang on. This isn't that kind of thread, is it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
_x_Acheron_x_ Players 484 posts 6,096 battles Report post #24 Posted February 2, 2016 Me 2, me 2... I'd consider it an everlasting maiden voyage I noticed the player base today was below 20,000 when I was on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tubit101 Players 1,189 posts 4,745 battles Report post #25 Posted February 2, 2016 (edited) Well the Brits are not always the best at naming Ships: HMS Buttercup: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Buttercup and the mighty ANL Explorer https://www.fleetmon.com/vessels/anl-explorer_8506098_575186/ (From Wikipedia): In December 1944, she (Buttercup) was loaned to the Royal Norwegian Navy, who purchased her in 1946 and renamed her Nordkyn. In 1969 she became a civilian whaler, named Thoris. At least her name was fixed eventually Edited February 2, 2016 by Tubit101 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites