[WRATH] OptimusBeard Players 44 posts 13,601 battles Report post #1 Posted December 25, 2015 (edited) Hi, I'm playing the USS Colorado since 3 days or so.. the dispersion is as bad as a blind man playing paintball. Is the it really that bad or do I have bad luck with the dispersion system this far? Greets Edited December 25, 2015 by CanonChris Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IamTroublemaker Beta Tester 2,287 posts 11,047 battles Report post #2 Posted December 25, 2015 Well, the dispersion is bad if you are staying at max distance and sniping (almost always bad for a BB). But yeah, overall it has bad dispersion and that is a trait of all US BBs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RichardNixon Players 340 posts 134 battles Report post #3 Posted December 25, 2015 If you're using the A hull then the dispersion is exactly the same as most other US BBs (ie. kinda bad), and better than the New Mexico or the Wyomings. It just feels worse because you have fewer guns and the combat ranges are typically longer. The Colorado B & C hulls actually have slightly more accurate guns than any other US BB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BLOBS] StuntMan0369 Beta Tester 923 posts 4,848 battles Report post #4 Posted December 25, 2015 Ahhh, good old Colorado... Yes, it does feel inaccurate, simply because you're firing 8 projectiles a salvo instead of 12 as was the New Mexico. I personally prefer triple turret guns, but that's my superstitiousness getting to me, there shouldn't really be much difference, it just feels it. RichardNixon above me pretty much nailed it. Colorado has enough problems with it's low Health pool, but getting the North Carolina after the grind is worth it. Trust me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BabyAdmiral Beta Tester 473 posts 3,725 battles Report post #5 Posted December 26, 2015 Hmh. Strange. I always felt that the Colorado had the most accurate guns of any of my US BBs. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WRATH] OptimusBeard Players 44 posts 13,601 battles Report post #6 Posted December 26, 2015 (edited) If you're using the A hull then the dispersion is exactly the same as most other US BBs (ie. kinda bad), and better than the New Mexico or the Wyomings. It just feels worse because you have fewer guns and the combat ranges are typically longer. The Colorado B & C hulls actually have slightly more accurate guns than any other US BB. That's great to know, I'm only 5k away grom the B hull Edited December 26, 2015 by CanonChris Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gekkehenkie50 Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters 675 posts 5,845 battles Report post #7 Posted July 11, 2016 Im at the C hull and cant hit ANYTHING. Broadside Iowa, nope, Lexington, na ah. Nothing, now you might say that my aim is off, but I have no problems in accurate ships (Aoba, Omaha, dds). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BBMM] Panzerblitz Alpha Tester 411 posts 11,156 battles Report post #8 Posted July 11, 2016 You can't really compare cruiser and DD guns to BB ballistics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LEGIO] tomkrist Players 147 posts 12,346 battles Report post #9 Posted July 11, 2016 (edited) Let me ask: What distance are you shooting from? Max distance? If you get your Colorado inside 10-12 km, the gun works perfectly. Its on thatdistance you need to get to have fully use of this ship. It has decent armour and by angling it you should own a Nagato on that distance. Go in with some cruisers and voila , its a deadly ship. But because it is slow you need to plan good. Never go in alone. Edited July 11, 2016 by tomkrist Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fiery_Kathy Beta Tester 1,022 posts 3,947 battles Report post #10 Posted July 11, 2016 Colorado dispersion and penetration are a lot better than the Nagato's Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fnord_disc Beta Tester 2,119 posts 5,245 battles Report post #11 Posted July 11, 2016 Colorado dispersion and penetration are a lot better than the Nagato's No they aren't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BOTS] deadly_if_swallowed Players 1,678 posts 13,867 battles Report post #12 Posted July 11, 2016 GenrMcAuliffe1, on 11 July 2016 - 01:35 PM, said: Colorado dispersion and penetration are a lot better than the Nagato'sNo they aren't. I feel the same as McAuliffe. Colorado feels a lot more accurate to me since lots of patches now. I do admit that you have to aim her differently though. I think you have to aim USN guns higher above the enemy waterline than with IJN BBs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fiery_Kathy Beta Tester 1,022 posts 3,947 battles Report post #13 Posted July 11, 2016 No they aren't. Armour: Colorado > Nagato Gun Pen: Colorado > Nagato Gun Accuracy:Colorado > Nagato AA: Colorado > Nagato Turn Rate: Colorado > Nagato Speed: Colorado < NagatoSecondaries: Colorado < Nagato Range: Colorado < Nagato Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fnord_disc Beta Tester 2,119 posts 5,245 battles Report post #14 Posted July 11, 2016 (edited) Gun Pen: Colorado > Nagato Gun Accuracy:Colorado > Nagato No, Nagato's guns are more accurate in both dimensions above 10km and they have (very slightly) more penetration. They also have 25% more normalization. I think you have to aim USN guns higher abover the enemy waterline than with IJN BBs. Hmm, at long range, yes, because Colorado's shells are lighter and the velocity lower and they fall at a steeper angle onto the hit zones. Edited July 11, 2016 by fnord_disc Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fiery_Kathy Beta Tester 1,022 posts 3,947 battles Report post #15 Posted July 11, 2016 (edited) I would rather be in a Colorado vs 2 Nagatos instead of a in a Nagato vs 1 Colorado Edited July 11, 2016 by GenrMcAuliffe1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fnord_disc Beta Tester 2,119 posts 5,245 battles Report post #16 Posted July 11, 2016 (edited) I would rather be in a Colorado vs 2 Nagatos instead of a in a Nagato vs 1 Colorado If you play the Colorado better, that's fine. It has a lot going for it over the Nagato, but the dispersion isn't part of it. If you don't believe me, go to the port view and divide the listed horizontal dispersion by the range to get dispersion/meter distance and you'll see that Nagato has lower dispersion = better accuracy. The sigma is the same, but it's a scalar for the dispersion, so it's still better. Edited July 11, 2016 by fnord_disc Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fiery_Kathy Beta Tester 1,022 posts 3,947 battles Report post #17 Posted July 11, 2016 If you play the Colorado better, that's fine. It has a lot going for it over the Nagato, but the dispersion isn't part of it. If you don't believe me, go to the port view and divide the listed horizontal dispersion by the range to get dispersion/meter distance and you'll see that Nagato has lower dispersion = better accuracy. The sigma is the same, but it's a scalar for the dispersion, so it's still better. If you look at stats, yes, if you play it, it's a completely different story. I've played both the nagato and the Colorado and the CO's dispersion feels a lot better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BruceForce Players 294 posts 5,673 battles Report post #18 Posted July 11, 2016 I always thought the Colorado dispersion was a huge improvement over what previous US BBs had. Here's an example of shooting some small ships on mid and low range with pretty low dispersion (full disclosure, it's my video, don't click if you don't want to): Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
robihr Players 3,168 posts 9,352 battles Report post #19 Posted July 11, 2016 colorado has great accuracy. it either hits citadel or it doesnt hit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GrumpyWorm Alpha Tester 3,274 posts 832 battles Report post #20 Posted July 12, 2016 Moved Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DinkyToy_AW Players 236 posts 4,462 battles Report post #21 Posted July 12, 2016 (edited) My colorado is able to miss a broadside not moving kongo +/- 10km of the dispersion...To say it simple have seen it manny times my back guns salvo drops infront and front salvo drops behind the enemy ship believe me, you will look at your screen and look like this for a wile.Yes it can hit hard but lately i feel i have to much dispersion and rng against me, really anoying... Edited July 12, 2016 by DinkyToy_AW Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POP] makhot Players 188 posts 6,393 battles Report post #22 Posted July 13, 2016 i feel i have to much dispersion and rng against me So just a another usual day piloting a battleship.. Luckily there are those days too when each shell seems to reach citadel and you get over 150k damage rounds. I'm almost done with my Colorado grind and she seems to be performing well as usual. The thing with BBs is that you land so few shells per match, that your subjective feeling of the misses often greatly exaggerates the unlucky shots. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BabyAdmiral Beta Tester 473 posts 3,725 battles Report post #23 Posted July 13, 2016 I'm almost done with my Colorado grind Then you're pretty much done with the enjoyable part of the US battleship tree The North Carolina is an awful ship, and a disappointment if you think that entering the WW2 era of US battleships will be a better experience. The North Carolina shoots like a sawed-off shotgun. Impossible to reliably hit anything. I hope you have enjoyed your time with the Colorado, because alongside New Mexico, it's by far the best ship in the US line (not that I ever got to try out Iowa and Montanta, but rumours has it that they play similarly to North Carolina). 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[THESO] SV_Kompresor Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters 5,868 posts Report post #24 Posted July 13, 2016 Then you're pretty much done with the enjoyable part of the US battleship tree The North Carolina is an awful ship, and a disappointment if you think that entering the WW2 era of US battleships will be a better experience. The North Carolina shoots like a sawed-off shotgun. Impossible to reliably hit anything. I hope you have enjoyed your time with the Colorado, because alongside New Mexico, it's by far the best ship in the US line (not that I ever got to try out Iowa and Montanta, but rumours has it that they play similarly to North Carolina). Guess your NC was made in china....because my NC is the best US battleship by far (with colorado being the second)....it has a decent dispersion and OP anti air Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BOTS] deadly_if_swallowed Players 1,678 posts 13,867 battles Report post #25 Posted July 13, 2016 NC is a decent ship after the accuracy "buff". Still a huge dispersion on paper but it when using all 3 turrets something will hit eventually. AP shells pack a punch. Before the accuracy buff I considered stopping the grind and focus on other ships instead. NC just felt unplayable for me back then. Now I enjoy Iowa but she is very situational due to her length. I dislike excessive bowtanking but use her speed to push up. Unfortunately, pushing towards the enemy will quickly isolate you from your fleet as cruisers will kite the other direction, showing only their stern to the enemy. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites