Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
SkybuckFlying

Playing with [edited] on low tier is kinda annoying.

26 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
1,246 posts
31,660 battles

[edited]

Edited by BigBadVuk
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content.
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TACHA]
Players
1,870 posts
22,641 battles

How do you define a noob? Would you use win rate or average XP gained in Random battles? Surely the point is that less accomplished players tend to learn from the better ones? I make a point of always staying in a battle if killed and look to see how the better players manage their ships. Looking at my stats, I am improving (though not today!!!)

I would still consider myself distinctly average though!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HORN]
Players
374 posts

Learning to tier up and grind and how to handle new ships.Whole point of the game isn't it.Everyone has to start somewhere.Noobs should be welcomed not frowned upon.Hell i play like a noob at times but still enjoy the game.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,064 posts
4,944 battles

I guess each of us has his own parameters to define a noob. I personally define a noob a player who has just stated in another thread that while firing he tunnelvisions so much that he can't even check the speed indicator to known if he's fully stopped, and wished there was a button to automatically stop the ship (pressing 4 times the S key is too demanding, I guess). Or maybe that was my troll definition, I can't remember.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
406 posts
6,632 battles

This is ironical isn't? ...... please someone say it's irony.

 

I can just quote myself from his other thread.

 

Read the text, wrote something, checked the signature, deleted my text.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

This is ironical isn't? ...... please someone say it's irony.

 

Yes it is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
2,543 posts
16,031 battles

While we are at it, we should group everyone with comparable average exp per game together as well.

 

With only 20k players? Maybe it can work if RU, NA and EU were fusioned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,182 posts

While we are at it, we should group everyone with comparable average exp per game together as well.

 

I wouldn't mind seeing a few replays of that.

 

Just for the lol factor alone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
92 posts
4,805 battles

 

With only 20k players? Maybe it can work if RU, NA and EU were fusioned.

 

I was being sarcastic and commenting on the rather low average exp of the OP for calling other people "n00bs".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,999 posts
6,434 battles

The OP might have a tiny little point, if there weren't so many players at tier 9 that play like they just downloaded the game 10 minutes ago for the first time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-SBG-]
Players
38,559 posts
19,178 battles

Hello,

 

Playing with noobs on low tier when trying to level new ships up is kinda annoying.

 

My suggestion is to take into account the tiers of other ships for existing players and use that to put them into the same teams and such.

 

So keep noobs among noobs mostly... slight variation is ok... but not too much.

 

Sometimes games feel like total noobs in team... quite annoying at times.

 

Perhaps match maker (mm) already does this... but perhaps not ! ;)

 

So example:

 

A tier 9 player trying to level up a tier 5 ship should be put into teams and enemy team with also players of tier 9 trying to level up their tier 5 ship as well.

 

Bye,

  Skybuck.

 

Seeing how some Tier IX are playing, I do not see much difference to the lower tiers.

And looking at you, I doubt that the lower tiers play worse than you.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
596 posts
7,522 battles

[edited]

 

tumblr_mbjyntMeNE1rroa7eo1_400.gif
Edited by BigBadVuk
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[FRSO]
Weekend Tester
350 posts
2,432 battles

... or he is just incredibly proud of his rank 5.

That might lend credence to what somebody said of ranked battles: progress there is not skill-dependent, but grind-dependent...

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Players
5,763 posts
16,940 battles

The OP is proof that ranked battles are about time invested and not about skill.

Playing with noobs @ rank 10+ is kinda annoying.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×