Dai2 Beta Tester 347 posts 686 battles Report post #26 Posted November 11, 2015 hey all i can say that i am new in wargaming community, i ve been playing wows since only several months. So i do not really know how things work here. Are there any developers who are actively reading the forum and our feedbacks? As far as i can tell most players in community do not like bundles. Did wargaming ever said anything about that, any links? I used to play battlefield play4free before and developers were just ignoring us. Is wargaming kind of the same? Thn i do not want to be part of this game. It is so obvious that they are losing money by releasing bundles, there are a lot of people like me who want to buy the ship but not the bundles. I do not have that much time this week and paying for premium is just wasting money. M8, the devs are (mostly ) russian, I have never seen a dev on EU forums, (I said dev not WG staff) But they answer and speak to players on the ru forums. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HariSeldon WoWs Wiki Team, In AlfaTesters 1,993 posts Report post #27 Posted November 11, 2015 Broken game....fix? let's make a new bunddle and premium ship!! hell yeah! that's the way!! WG you are so geniuos!! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] T0byJug Quality Poster 5,358 posts 25,506 battles Report post #28 Posted November 11, 2015 (edited) First I am defiantly buying this ship I have walked her decks. So the idea of playing her appeals to me . Also stats look good! she should be a fun DD The Bundle would also be ok if there was more content in game for gold! Some stats There are 21 Prem ships in world of warships -5 Alpha + Beta reward ships +3 pay in to beta ships that WG promised would not be available again for at least 1 year. so 16 4 Available in game 1 (+4 that are available in game) Available in shop 6 Available as packages only (Tirpitz/Warspite/Fujin/Mikasa/Imperator and Blyskawica) as limmited time offers 5 available only with Events or buying with hardware (can not be bought from WG for Money/Doubloons) WG why out of 16 (21) Prem ships are there only 5 available for normal purchase? Edited November 11, 2015 by T0byJug 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[COSTS] Hanszeehock Alpha Tester 3,692 posts 5,959 battles Report post #29 Posted November 11, 2015 But it cant be used for captain training right? Depends if they release more Polish ships. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HariSeldon WoWs Wiki Team, In AlfaTesters 1,993 posts Report post #30 Posted November 11, 2015 To make you feel you have something special. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Johnny_Phate Beta Tester 108 posts 3,300 battles Report post #31 Posted November 11, 2015 (edited) Depends if they release more Polish ships. would buy if it was in RN tech tree... or any possibly "full" tech tree Edited November 11, 2015 by Johnny_Phate Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CAIN] Jethro_Grey Players 5,207 posts 25,668 battles Report post #32 Posted November 11, 2015 But it cant be used for captain training right? It can be used to train Captains, but since there are no Polish non-Premium ships yet, you can train only the one that comes with it. Basically what happened with the Tirpitz - people played a lot of games in her and had a trained Captain when the German Cruiserline arrived. Same thing with Warspite, folks who bought it will most likely have a well trained Captain when the Royal Navy ships get released. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LO1] Tugnut Alpha Tester 1,552 posts 8,125 battles Report post #33 Posted November 11, 2015 It can be used to train Captains, but since there are no Polish non-Premium ships yet, you can train only the one that comes with it. Basically what happened with the Tirpitz - people played a lot of games in her and had a trained Captain when the German Cruiserline arrived. Same thing with Warspite, folks who bought it will most likely have a well trained Captain when the Royal Navy ships get released. Thats if they do have a Polish line in the end! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TTTX] Tyrendian89 [TTTX] Players 4,608 posts 8,139 battles Report post #34 Posted November 11, 2015 Not having played her, how does she hold up against Kiev and Mahan? Just stat wise she seems to be in an awkward middle ground... puts out less and weaker shells than either (but hopefully at a shallower angle than the USN?), speed is right in the middle as are HP, Torps seem maybe equal to Mahan (less numbers and range but more damage, kind of a tosser depending on situation) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[LO1] Tugnut Alpha Tester 1,552 posts 8,125 battles Report post #35 Posted November 11, 2015 Not having played her, how does she hold up against Kiev and Mahan? Just stat wise she seems to be in an awkward middle ground... puts out less and weaker shells than either (but hopefully at a shallower angle than the USN?), speed is right in the middle as are HP, Torps seem maybe equal to Mahan (less numbers and range but more damage, kind of a tosser depending on situation) my first game i found my self vs a Mahann funny anouth.... i won with the 7 guns quite fast firing low angle of fire took a lot of HP fast... but cant say 100% that it would be that easy all the time as for all i know the mahann player could be a poor DD player! its a gun ship 12k range on the guns and even though not the best turn and speed what it does have is more than anouth to play it well. I also saked the captain it came with and got a 3 point cap to start with as that makes a lot of diffrence... all so decked the upgrades out... went for the engine module but first game in 2 vollys lost my steering twice lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ATRA] aquiles7389 Beta Tester 405 posts 12,322 battles Report post #36 Posted November 11, 2015 my first game i found my self vs a Mahann funny anouth.... i won with the 7 guns quite fast firing low angle of fire took a lot of HP fast... but cant say 100% that it would be that easy all the time as for all i know the mahann player could be a poor DD player! its a gun ship 12k range on the guns and even though not the best turn and speed what it does have is more than anouth to play it well. I also saked the captain it came with and got a 3 point cap to start with as that makes a lot of diffrence... all so decked the upgrades out... went for the engine module but first game in 2 vollys lost my steering twice lol Also got the cheap and reasonable bundle.After reading your reviews, I can't wait to try the HMS [edited]!!! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ST-EU] OldGrandad Supertester 3,404 posts 35,711 battles Report post #37 Posted November 11, 2015 First I am defiantly buying this ship I have walked her decks. So the idea of playing her appeals to me . Also stats look good! she should be a fun DD Not having played her, how does she hold up against Kiev and Mahan? Just stat wise she seems to be in an awkward middle ground... puts out less and weaker shells than either (but hopefully at a shallower angle than the USN?), speed is right in the middle as are HP, Torps seem maybe equal to Mahan (less numbers and range but more damage, kind of a tosser depending on situation) I was fortunate to sail her in testing and coming from a cruiser captain (soon to be a gunboat captain!) I loved every battle in her. At the time of testing, she was at tier 6, but obviously set at a tier too low and battle stats reflected that hence her being released at tier 7. Bottom line will be, when it comes up to the Mahan/Sims/Kiev will be the captain. Looking forward to taking her out again! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lethalbizzell Beta Tester 306 posts 4,903 battles Report post #38 Posted November 11, 2015 Also got the cheap and reasonable bundle.After reading your reviews, I can't wait to try the HMS [edited]!!! HMS what .... wait we can actually have another RN ship.... in the near not distant future ???? spill , here or TS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
robertsrevenge Players 75 posts 3,435 battles Report post #39 Posted November 11, 2015 at least their is a choice wg are starting to hear you , not for me this ship Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warlock07rox Beta Tester 358 posts Report post #40 Posted November 11, 2015 Typical another bloody useless package well that's another ship Wg can keep 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Armo1000 Alpha Tester 686 posts 650 battles Report post #41 Posted November 11, 2015 This is surely a step in the right direction. Its great that they give you a choice between a cheeper and more expensive one. And £21 is very reasonable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lethalbizzell Beta Tester 306 posts 4,903 battles Report post #42 Posted November 11, 2015 i fail to see how 21 pounds for a virtual game DD on tier 7 with added things we dont want, is reasonable.... This should be a tenner on its own without some crappy bundle. because most of us are studying or have jobs, and so cant waste our whole day playing on this game to use our precious premium time.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[ST-EU] OldGrandad Supertester 3,404 posts 35,711 battles Report post #43 Posted November 11, 2015 HMS what .... wait we can actually have another RN ship.... in the near not distant future ???? spill , here or TS Think he was relating to the fact she is a British built ship (built not far from where I live). Construction and design. In 1934, the British shipbuilder J. Samuel White won a competition to design and build large destroyers for the Polish Navy, beating a proposal from fellow British shipbuilder Swan Hunter. (A design by the French shipyard Ateliers et Chantiers de la Loire had been rejected in 1933). An order for two destroyers of the Grom class was placed on 29 March 1935. At the time of their construction, the Groms were amongst the fastest and most heavily armed destroyers to be built. Błyskawica was 114 metres (374 ft 0 in) long overall and 109 metres (357 ft 7 in) between perpendiculars, with a beam of 11.3 metres (37 ft 1 in) and a draught of 3.1 metres (10 ft 2 in). Displacement was 2,011 long tons (2,043 t) standard and 2,520 long tons (2,560 t) full load. Three 3-drum boilers fed steam to two sets of geared steam turbines which were rated at 54,500 shaft horsepower (40,600 kW), driving two propeller shafts to give a design speed of 39 knots (72 km/h; 45 mph). Main gun armament consisted of seven 120 mm (4.7 in) guns (50 calibre M34/36 guns supplied by Bofors of Sweden) in three twin and one single mounts, with an anti-aircraft armament of two twin Bofors 40 mm guns and eight 13.2 mm machine guns. Six 550 mm torpedo tubes were carried, compatible with the French torpedoes used by the preceding Wicher-class destroyers. Anti-submarine armament consisted of two depth charge chutes with 40 depth charges, while rails were fitted to permit up to 44 mines to be carried. The ship's crew consisted of 180 officers and men. Błyskawica, the second of the two destroyers, was laid down on 1 October 1935 at J. Samuel White's Cowes, Isle of Wight shipyard, and was launched on 1 October 1936. Sea trials were successful, with the ship exceeding the design speed of 39 knots. Błyskawica was commissioned on 1 October 1937 and decommissioned 1 May 1976. [courtesy of Wikipedia] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Armo1000 Alpha Tester 686 posts 650 battles Report post #44 Posted November 11, 2015 i fail to see how 21 pounds for a virtual game DD on tier 7 with added things we dont want, is reasonable.... This should be a tenner on its own without some crappy bundle. because most of us are studying or have jobs, and so cant waste our whole day playing on this game to use our precious premium time.... It should be but this is WG and compared to other bundles this is a very good price. And it is clearly a step in the right direction. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NAVOC] Niibler Players 723 posts Report post #45 Posted November 11, 2015 Would buy if the ship was sold alone, 30€ is a bit too much for me unfortunately. Seems a fun ship Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Armo1000 Alpha Tester 686 posts 650 battles Report post #46 Posted November 11, 2015 Think he was relating to the fact she is a British built ship (built not far from where I live). I was wondering about that. I wonder how much she will be like RN DDs and if this will be out first taste of them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lethalbizzell Beta Tester 306 posts 4,903 battles Report post #47 Posted November 11, 2015 (edited) Think he was relating to the fact she is a British built ship (built not far from where I live). Construction and design. In 1934, the British shipbuilder J. Samuel White won a competition to design and build large destroyers for the Polish Navy, beating a proposal from fellow British shipbuilder Swan Hunter. (A design by the French shipyard Ateliers et Chantiers de la Loire had been rejected in 1933). An order for two destroyers of the Grom class was placed on 29 March 1935. At the time of their construction, the Groms were amongst the fastest and most heavily armed destroyers to be built. Błyskawica was 114 metres (374 ft 0 in) long overall and 109 metres (357 ft 7 in) between perpendiculars, with a beam of 11.3 metres (37 ft 1 in) and a draught of 3.1 metres (10 ft 2 in). Displacement was 2,011 long tons (2,043 t) standard and 2,520 long tons (2,560 t) full load. Three 3-drum boilers fed steam to two sets of geared steam turbines which were rated at 54,500 shaft horsepower (40,600 kW), driving two propeller shafts to give a design speed of 39 knots (72 km/h; 45 mph). Main gun armament consisted of seven 120 mm (4.7 in) guns (50 calibre M34/36 guns supplied by Bofors of Sweden) in three twin and one single mounts, with an anti-aircraft armament of two twin Bofors 40 mm guns and eight 13.2 mm machine guns. Six 550 mm torpedo tubes were carried, compatible with the French torpedoes used by the preceding Wicher-class destroyers. Anti-submarine armament consisted of two depth charge chutes with 40 depth charges, while rails were fitted to permit up to 44 mines to be carried. The ship's crew consisted of 180 officers and men. Błyskawica, the second of the two destroyers, was laid down on 1 October 1935 at J. Samuel White's Cowes, Isle of Wight shipyard, and was launched on 1 October 1936. Sea trials were successful, with the ship exceeding the design speed of 39 knots. Błyskawica was commissioned on 1 October 1937 and decommissioned 1 May 1976. [courtesy of Wikipedia] Ahh got you, bugger for a moment i had hope of us having a premium cruiser before christmas... (HMS BELFAST) wishful thinking that is haha Edited November 11, 2015 by lethalbizzell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blue_Bug Players 1,428 posts 7,991 battles Report post #48 Posted November 11, 2015 In my opinion the main advantage of this vessel is her multiple fuctionality. You can play her : - As a DD Hunter - As a stealth DD - As a Gunboat - As an ambusher And all of the above within the same batle. Other advantages : - relative low reload time of torpedoes - Good guns - Good speed Disadvantages : - She suffers a bit from her rudder shift time - low number of torpedoes - relatieve long turning time of turrets. Stay away with her from RU- DD's Against the Maham and Benson it will depend on the player. With equel skilled players the Blys will win the batle. If the USN DD has a better skilled player it will be a hard batle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruditatem Weekend Tester, Players 202 posts Report post #49 Posted November 11, 2015 (edited) Nice ship, but rudder, rudder, rudder....and rudder.... Rudder shift time does not matter if you have always none... Edited November 11, 2015 by Motormike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CAIN] Jethro_Grey Players 5,207 posts 25,668 battles Report post #50 Posted November 11, 2015 In my opinion the main advantage of this vessel is her multiple fuctionality. You can play her : - As a DD Hunter - As a stealth DD - As a Gunboat - As an ambusher And all of the above within the same batle. Other advantages : - relative low reload time of torpedoes - Good guns - Good speed Disadvantages : - She suffers a bit from her rudder shift time - low number of torpedoes - relatieve long turning time of turrets. Stay away with her from RU- DD's Against the Maham and Benson it will depend on the player. With equel skilled players the Blys will win the batle. If the USN DD has a better skilled player it will be a hard batle. How does her Turret traverse time changes with the second Captainskill? I don't have her yet, gonna buy her this evening, so based on her stats and your statement, i'd say she's in line with the Russian DDs. Which leads me to a question: why do you think, she should stay away from her Russian counterparts? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites