[PMI] Juanx Players 2,564 posts 9,352 battles Report post #1 Posted November 6, 2015 I was not expecting that change, nor saw it on patchnotes. Good job with the detailing on the ships!!, just wish we had complete freedom to enjoy the visuals in port, not bound to those camera angles. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[IDEAL] Pastaiolo Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester 669 posts 2,513 battles Report post #2 Posted November 6, 2015 In details, what are you talking about? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CAIN] Jethro_Grey Players 5,207 posts 25,733 battles Report post #3 Posted November 6, 2015 Screnshots? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rafparis Beta Tester 872 posts 4,381 battles Report post #4 Posted November 6, 2015 i think they have done something with the shaders and AA (i'm at highest quality), so the ships don't "gold blink" as they have, the AA seems a little better for the ship form, but still awfull pixel reilings and ropes. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PMI] Juanx Players 2,564 posts 9,352 battles Report post #5 Posted November 6, 2015 They added further details to the ships, liferafts, rangefinders and so on, they just look so much better. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OILUP] WhiskeyWolf Beta Tester 1,491 posts 11,683 battles Report post #6 Posted November 6, 2015 The graphics are still poor compare to their direct competitor. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[IDEAL] Pastaiolo Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester 669 posts 2,513 battles Report post #7 Posted November 6, 2015 I don't know, i always saw life rafts and other smaller details, same for AA and secondaries moving and range finders too (if you checked the right option). Are you sure you are running WoWS at the same level of detail you were before the patch? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
__Katniss__ Players 790 posts 2,278 battles Report post #8 Posted November 6, 2015 Graphic looks really nice after your turn off that useless FXAA and use own settings via Nvidia control panel. It eats 20-25% of GPU power but GTX 970 can handle it like nothing with max sett. and game is not blury and laggy like with FXAA. http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/20445-sli-workaround/page__pid__516088#entry516088 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BEUN] OverPenokio Beta Tester 181 posts 13,048 battles Report post #9 Posted November 6, 2015 The ships do look more crisp. And, like rafparis said. They tweaked the sahders and texures with it I think. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PMI] Juanx Players 2,564 posts 9,352 battles Report post #10 Posted November 6, 2015 I don't know, i always saw life rafts and other smaller details, same for AA and secondaries moving and range finders too (if you checked the right option). Are you sure you are running WoWS at the same level of detail you were before the patch? Yes, nothing changed, just more stuff on the boats themselves, more rafts and rangefinders on the turrets of the fully researched wyoming, as an example. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
daki Weekend Tester 1,677 posts 20,290 battles Report post #11 Posted November 6, 2015 The graphics are still poor compare to their direct competitor. And the "direct" competitor of WoWs is? 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NED] piet11111 Players 2,225 posts 8,827 battles Report post #12 Posted November 6, 2015 And the "direct" competitor of WoWs is? If i had to guess. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mtm78 Alpha Tester 19,378 posts 6,105 battles Report post #13 Posted November 6, 2015 Steel Ocean guys, he's talking about Steal Ocean ( I think... ). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chippy_lw Players 92 posts 2,158 battles Report post #14 Posted November 6, 2015 I like the new patch. I see very little to whinge about. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marouss Players 29 posts 2,330 battles Report post #15 Posted November 6, 2015 Hello all,for example,there are new details on New Mexico Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
anonym_V7A9ocbepLD9 Players 74 posts Report post #16 Posted November 6, 2015 (edited) The graphics are still poor compare to their direct competitor. Yeah, and in addition the todays new major update to Dagor 4.0 out there is just mind blowing. Edited November 6, 2015 by anonym_V7A9ocbepLD9 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OILUP] WhiskeyWolf Beta Tester 1,491 posts 11,683 battles Report post #17 Posted November 6, 2015 ^This guy gets it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #18 Posted November 6, 2015 the Yamatos guns look more round ...do Nagato and Amagi have Range Finders on their Turrets now ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Full_HP_Satsuma_at_J5 Players 165 posts 32,799 battles Report post #19 Posted November 6, 2015 New graphics? Can't confirm. Yes, there are some new details on the ships, but that's it. For example just take a look at this screenshot I took today. For some reason the graphics seem to be even worse than before the patch imo. I am playing with "Very High" settings, 2560x1440 resolution. The New Mex right in front of me, which is going at full speed, looks like it is standing still, because there is no awhirled water displayed, not even at that range. Then the textures of the islands a few kilometers ahead. They look like they took them from a Playstation 2 game. And I have the feeling, that they somehow changed the details of moving ships and water in the distance. Sometimes they look like they are floating above the water, because there are no shadows or awhirled water from the stern. I had some trouble to hit targets, which were more than 14 km away, because of these issues. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
daki Weekend Tester 1,677 posts 20,290 battles Report post #20 Posted November 6, 2015 ^This guy gets it. So you consider a game which none of us has seen so far and frankly may or may not be launched at all, as a direct competitor? I would say that you are jumping ahead of yourself a bit here. Only once the game footage is available can we have a discussion on that topic. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PMI] Juanx Players 2,564 posts 9,352 battles Report post #21 Posted November 6, 2015 the Yamatos guns look more round ...do Nagato and Amagi have Range Finders on their Turrets now ? My wyoming sprouted rangefinders on the 2 and 5 turrets, few of them. Also checked the non-upgraded hull and has other versions on the turrets, but still more than before. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
simonmd Players 801 posts 1,673 battles Report post #22 Posted November 6, 2015 (edited) Is it just my imagination or have certain details been removed as well? Specifically, I'm sure the Cleveland had items similar to those shown on the New Mexico on the tops of it's turrets, now they are bare. I remember them because I was going to ask what they were but when I went to take a SS, they were gone! Edited November 6, 2015 by simonmd Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] Comrad_StaIin Beta Tester 4,594 posts 20,080 battles Report post #23 Posted November 6, 2015 there is also no smoke at long ranges Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SPUDS] True_Winterfeld [SPUDS] Players 625 posts 14,644 battles Report post #24 Posted November 6, 2015 Daki, dont, the none logic is strong in this one! On the other hand, I would have welcomed a direct competitor to WOWs but there is nowhere one to be sean anywhere. I like this game and looking forward for future changes for the better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PMI] Juanx Players 2,564 posts 9,352 battles Report post #25 Posted November 6, 2015 Is it just my imagination or have certain details been removed as well? Specifically, I'm sure the Cleveland had items similar to those shown on the New Mexico on the tops of it's turrets, now they are bare. I remember them because I was going to ask what they were but when I went to take a SS, they were gone! Could very well be, sadly... Its WG afterall. Not seeing any of the other issues commented around here, will have a session later so we will see. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
