wow, new WOWs record :)

[TakeOff13]

my personal best:
2 days of playing, 24 battles, 5 diferent ships... result: not only one single battle win by my team... all lost...

For those guys who still belive WG is only about your skill or team work: KEEP DREAMING ABOUT

good look with that ;)

[Yorkie_GBR]

I hate to be that guy who looks at your stats and think you could improve your own gameplay to increase your chances of winning. 

 

 

/edit the rest is/was.... cba now 

[TakeOff13]

I hate to be that guy who looks at your stats and think you could improve your own gameplay to increase your chances of winning. 

 

Don't look at my stats it's irellevant, i din't played with this account/user... i played with my girl friend user ;)

[Prozacx]

Because somehow playing with a another account made you so much better at game. The logic is water proof.

[Ascender]

And you are the only consistent thing in all those 24 battles. I don't recall ever even getting 10 defeats/draws in a row. Stats are relevant, even if you are only partially responsible you haven't improved them much if at all. 38% on a Cleveland is just disgusting.

[bismark121]

Because somehow playing with a another account made you so much better at game. The logic is water proof. about a water proof as an old man's ball bag

 

[TakeOff13]

And you are the only consistent thing in all those 24 battles. I don't recall ever even getting 10 defeats/draws in a row. Stats are relevant, even if you are only partially responsible you haven't improved them much if at all. 38% on a Cleveland is just disgusting.

 

Did u see my second post?

 

KEEP DREAMING "BELIVERS"

[Doolio]

There's only one constant in those 24 battles. Guess what is it.

 

 

[Zogash85]

 

Did u see my second post?

 

KEEP DREAMING "BELIVERS"

 

Irrelevant. If you suck for that many games (seriously... 23k avg. damage, 0.57 avg kills after nearly a thousand games?!) on one account, there is no reason whatsoever to believe that you'd do any better on another account. The problem isn't the game, the problem isn't the teams you're getting. It's you. You are the only constant in all your games.

 

EDIT: Dammit, I spoiled Doolio's riddle. Sorry 'bout that, ol' chap!

[Boevebeest]

Don't look at my stats it's irellevant, i din't played with this account/user... i played with my girl friend user ;)

 

And when you play on her account you magically become a better player?

So you only suck on your own account?

That's a bit weird don't you think?

 

you are not a good player, improve yourself or learn to live with your limitations, don't make up stupid excuses when others are telling a inconvenient truth.

[TakeOff13]

There's only one constant in those 24 battles. Guess what is it.

 

 

 

Oh yesss, all 24 teams lost becouse of me.... damn, din't know i'm so evil noob

 

I'm only one from 12 players... all others 11 players idiots nobbs too? Think again, your logic is patethic... ;)

 

[TakeOff13]

 

you are not a good player, improve yourself or learn to live with your limitations, don't make up stupid excuses when others are telling a inconvenient truth.

 

Ofcourse, this game is reserved only for aces like you... Damn, only aces here

[Boevebeest]

 

Ofcourse, this game is reserved only for aces like you... Damn, only aces here

 

I'm not a very good player.

I know and acknowledge that.

 

But unlike you I try to improve myself by learning and listening to other players.

 

You come cry on the forum, blame others for your own short coming and when called out you make up ridicules excuses because it is to hard to see that you are yourself part of your loosing problem.

But keep fooling yourself as much as you need to wake up each morning, your not fooling any body else.

[Doolio]

 

Oh yesss, all 24 teams lost becouse of me.... damn, din't know i'm so evil noob

 

I'm only one from 12 players... all others 11 players idiots nobbs too? Think again, your logic is patethic... ;)

 

It's not "my logic", it's logic. And maths.

 

Other players were probably noobs, solid players, average players, some probably were afk, others had lag, some maybe ten of them were really, really awesome etc. There was 250+ of them.

Same goes for the other team. Only constant was you. How's that "my logic"? Is that not true?

 

What does the "I'm only one out of 12 players" mean? I mean, sure, we know it's not 1v1. Let's see what competition has similar number of players - football? 11v11, close enough. And what happens when one player is extremely bad or tired or is just trolling around? You want to say that the enemy team does not benefit from that? That they aren't at an advantage? Just because he is "one of 11"? It's not 1 000 000 vs 1 000 000. It's just 12 vs 12. One player is enough. Especially if playing with an important ship or a top tier and such. I am not saying ALL matches were lost because of you, of course. But I'd take a wild guess and assume that in some breaking situations were you would have pushed the match in your team's favor by doing A, you did B and thus contributed majorly to the loss.

Which is nothing to be embarrassed about, I am first to say that I am bad at the game and I am still learning. But going the "la la la" way instead of trying to improve and assess the situation, that's not the right thing to do. Nobody will benefit from that, neither you, nor your future teammates.

And while I don't expect you to back off here in forums, try to think about it - and don't tell anyone you thought about it if ego games are important to you. But nothing good comes from non-constructive observation bias, based on feelings and frustration, instead of reason. Regardless of your answer or lack of it, I do hope you come to a reasonable conclusion with yourself.

 

And while such losing streak CAN happen even if you aren't the one constantly pushing the battle towards the loss, the chances are slim. Your own argument works against you, it's baffling you don't see that.

[Nechrom]

Clustering.

[cherry2blost]

@OP awww man I musta had you in my enemy teams the last few days.... cheers for the uptick in my win rate... please keep playing!

[EsaTuunanen]

Don't look at my stats it's irellevant, i din't played with this account/user... i played with my girl friend user ;)

Ah, wanting to make her stats look bad too?

You better hope she won't notice and keelhaul you or put you walk the plank.

 

I'm only one from 12 players... all others 11 players idiots nobbs too? Think again, your logic is patethic... ;)

With your low average damage you're negating efforts of two above average players from your team.

Which makes it hard for teams to perform even averagely unless team's "quality" is well above average.

[mtm78]

my personal best:

2 days of playing, 24 battles, 5 diferent ships... result: not only one single battle win by my team... all lost...

For those guys who still belive WG is only about your skill or team work: KEEP DREAMING ABOUT

good look with that ;)

 

Only bad players will use this as excuse, are you such a baddie?

[Exocet6951]

OP went from "WG wants me to lose" to "you're all haters" in one single post.

 

Well done.

This is genuine awe.

[Barlion1]

Because somehow playing with a another account made you so much better at game. The logic is water proof.

 

It's a team game. If your teams suck your stats will suffer. But for you, F logic I guess.

[Bullymaster76]

Don't look at my stats it's irellevant, i din't played with this account/user... i played with my girl friend user ;)

 

Which is account sharing and against rules, which brings me to the next, when you play with a different account than also post with this account or does it have even worse stats...sorry but you are trolling nothing more nothing less!

[beercrazy]

 

It's a team game. If your teams suck your stats will suffer. But for you, F logic I guess.

 

I must be the luckiest man alive then to have a 58% win rate and have over 1000 battles

infact with this logic you have I need to do the lottery and win that as well

[Hummus]

2 days of playing, 24 battles, 5 diferent ships... result: not only one single battle win by my team... all lost...

For those guys who still belive WG is only about your skill or team work: KEEP DREAMING ABOUT

 

But if winning is not about skill or teamwork .......  Then what is ?

 

Because I put a lot of effort into skill and teamwork, and my Cleveland wins 55% of the games .... where yours only wins 38% of the games. (BTW that really is a disgustingly low win rate. In WoT you get that win rate by going AFK)

 

It's a team game. If your teams suck your stats will suffer. But for you, F logic I guess.

 

And at ranges like 200 games played you are right. When you get to about 1000 games played everybody has had about the same amount of crap teams ...... But you can still see who are the really good players, and who are not. Nobody is going to get a 80% or 90% win rate, because its a team game .... but 38% means you are about as usefull as an AFK ship.

Please read up on how statistics work.

 

 

[Namuras]

 

But if winning is not about skill or teamwork .......  Then what is ?

 

Because I put a lot of effort into skill and teamwork, and my Cleveland wins 55% of the games .... where yours only wins 38% of the games. (BTW that really is a disgustingly low win rate. In WoT you get that win rate by going AFK)

 

 

And at ranges like 200 games played you are right. When you get to about 1000 games played everybody has had about the same amount of crap teams ...... But you can still see who are the really good players, and who are not. Nobody is going to get a 80% or 90% win rate, because its a team game .... but 38% means you are about as usefull as an AFK ship.

Please read up on how statistics work.

 

 

 

80% - 90 % W/R is usually only present on those who "rushed" CVs in platoons after CBT... not saying they are bad players, just that their stats are slightly inflated due to that... 

[WWladCZ]

Yes WG has specialy assigned a team of people to monitor your and ensure you lose. This is probably a variation of League of Legends soloque syndrome... I can't win becuase Riot is keeping me down.