[SHAUN] Snolle_bollekes Beta Tester 28 posts 600 battles Report post #1 Posted October 2, 2015 will world of warships implement nvidia's dagor engine 4.0? this comes from another game, but the effects could also be cool for world of warships. the water actually looks like water! wouldnt it be cool if this could be implemented in world fo warships? 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[VMEF] Wischmob_von_Eimer Beta Tester 1,292 posts 10,023 battles Report post #2 Posted October 2, 2015 Do you have any idea what an engine is? 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SHAUN] Snolle_bollekes Beta Tester 28 posts 600 battles Report post #3 Posted October 2, 2015 (edited) Do you have any idea what an engine is? i get -1 from you because of a suggestion..? they use the physx of nvidia. i think they use that together with the engine. cant wargaming use hte physx engine of nvidia together with bigworld to achieve this level of water detail? Edited October 2, 2015 by sollitdude Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[VMEF] Wischmob_von_Eimer Beta Tester 1,292 posts 10,023 battles Report post #4 Posted October 2, 2015 If they could, dont you think they would? Just saying.... And yes, stupid questions or suggestions get a -1 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
solidos1 Players 2 posts Report post #5 Posted October 2, 2015 (edited) If they could, dont you think they would? Just saying.... And yes, stupid questions or suggestions get a -1 i think the idea is great, but to -1 someone for a suggestion...i give you a -1 just for being such a forum troller. you probably got more forum posts than battles, haha. dont worry about machoists like eimer sollit, i think its a great suggestion, but not practicle. as machoist eimer says, they would have done it already. it would require an entire engine change to use the nvidia physix. Edited October 2, 2015 by solidos1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[VMEF] Wischmob_von_Eimer Beta Tester 1,292 posts 10,023 battles Report post #6 Posted October 2, 2015 (edited) Aw, that hurt right in the feels T.T Oh, btw, ou probably got more forum posts than battles, haha. solidos1 Registriert: 29.05.2015 Sie können die Gefechtsstatistiken des Spielers sehen, sobald der Spieler sein erstes Gefecht gespielt hat. Edited October 2, 2015 by Wischmob_von_Eimer Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[JUNK] SomeoneYouKnow2 Beta Tester 301 posts 13,581 battles Report post #7 Posted October 2, 2015 God I hope they never tack on any GameWorks crap into this game! I want the game to be vendor agnostic. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
solidos1 Players 2 posts Report post #8 Posted October 2, 2015 Aw, that hurt right in the feels T.T Oh, btw, solidos1 Registriert: 29.05.2015 Sie können die Gefechtsstatistiken des Spielers sehen, sobald der Spieler sein erstes Gefecht gespielt hat. i know, i dont got any battles im glad really. a game filled with artillery, i would be going crazy. plus, armored warfare went open beta yesterday so im too busy playing that anyway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mtm78 Alpha Tester 19,378 posts 6,105 battles Report post #9 Posted October 2, 2015 It's like a big SCREW YOU to any AMD gpu users here ( I am one of them ). Gameworks should die, quickly. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
delaci76 Beta Tester 654 posts Report post #10 Posted October 2, 2015 (edited) Yep the game is crying out for more effects re the sea at least. It's almost like playing on a lake or the calmest day in the med p.s great if this gets applied to any title/s soon. Bit of a shame for AMD peeps but buy better in future.....(and yeah there should be something like this for both AMD/Nvidia). Edited October 2, 2015 by delaci76 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[VMEF] Wischmob_von_Eimer Beta Tester 1,292 posts 10,023 battles Report post #11 Posted October 2, 2015 i know, i dont got any battles im glad really. a game filled with artillery, i would be going crazy. plus, armored warfare went open beta yesterday so im too busy playing that anyway. So... let me get this straight: - you dont care about WoWs, yet you post in this forum - you dont even like ships, yet you post in this forum - you try to insult someone by claiming he has less battles than posts (in a game that went live 2 weeks ago) yet you dont even have a single game And you call others "Trolls"? Damn, I love the Internet <3 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mtm78 Alpha Tester 19,378 posts 6,105 battles Report post #12 Posted October 2, 2015 So... let me get this straight: - you dont care about WoWs, yet you post in this forum - you dont even like ships, yet you post in this forum - you try to insult someone by claiming he has less battles than posts (in a game that went live 2 weeks ago) yet you dont even have a single game And you call others "Trolls"? Damn, I love the Internet <3 Son, you just learned your first and most valuable life lesson ( well, right after that other one I'll teach you about, about wearing rubber clothing in some situations ) The moment I saw: no battles, and 2 posts, and then the content, it was no longer worth replying to Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
delaci76 Beta Tester 654 posts Report post #13 Posted October 2, 2015 (edited) Actually whether the OP has two posts or not is irrelevant really what is, is the origanal idea. And it isnt bad per say nor do I think it's trolling. Ok it does have a bit of well "look at Gaiijin and sucks to have amd" but both of those arent necessarily wrong per say either. Depending on what your opinion is...there are some things war thunder does well and yes you can argue physx/gameworks would improve a title. Mafia2 with physx was a joy...sad though only one game I liked with physx. (gameworks just another spin off...same thing no?). Others titles it has been more of a fps killer/gimmick. p.s amd did the same thing with Mantle. (again gimmicky). Edited October 2, 2015 by delaci76 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brainfear1 Beta Tester 241 posts 1,258 battles Report post #14 Posted October 2, 2015 Yep the game is crying out for more effects re the sea at least. It's almost like playing on a lake or the calmest day in the med p.s great if this gets applied to any title/s soon. Bit of a shame for AMD peeps but buy better in future.....(and yeah there should be something like this for both AMD/Nvidia). hate to mention it that nvidia isn't that superior anymore Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mtm78 Alpha Tester 19,378 posts 6,105 battles Report post #15 Posted October 2, 2015 (edited) Mantle was not a closed system, AMD has worked a lot with Intel on implementing a lot of it with DX12. Gameworks is a totally closed system, and games which utilize it are not allowed to optimise for AMD. Notice a difference? edit: ps I absolutely loved Mirrors Edge when I had an nvidia card, it was utterly amazing! But the point isn't about what the addition can do ( limited to one gpu vendor, with degraded performance on other vendor's hardware ), it's about the ecosystem Nvidia tries to push with Gameworks. Edited October 2, 2015 by mtm78 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[MIM] scousersuk Players 284 posts 18,476 battles Report post #16 Posted October 2, 2015 You will slowly learn man if you post anything in these forum the forum warriors will rush to your post just to slam your idea and try to make you feel like you are brain less the first response you get shows it all just don't post valid things on here because there are users who sit on here more than in the game and just want to always argue and make others seem stupid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mtm78 Alpha Tester 19,378 posts 6,105 battles Report post #17 Posted October 2, 2015 You will slowly learn man if you post anything in these forum the forum warriors will rush to your post just to slam your idea and try to make you feel like you are brain less the first response you get shows it all just don't post valid things on here because there are users who sit on here more than in the game and just want to always argue and make others seem stupid He was shot down because it's a> promoting a ecosystem which should die out quickly b> screwing everyone who doesn't have an nvidia card. Nothing you said has any truth in it, and as such it has no value. I guess you're trying to make something close to a self fulfilling prophecy in your statement, applied back on itself? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OUH] General_Kunde Players 406 posts 6,632 battles Report post #18 Posted October 2, 2015 They can neither implement proper AntiAliasing nor Multicore-Support, and u ask for something like that! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[EIC] Astral_Eclipse Beta Tester 59 posts 9,285 battles Report post #19 Posted October 2, 2015 (edited) They can neither implement proper AntiAliasing nor Multicore-Support, and u ask for something like that! It's because the Big world engine that World of ... games use is a old as crap (2002), even in the current version WG is using it is still extremly limited, can't run multiturret support or use more then one core of the CPU. Edited October 2, 2015 by Astral_Eclipse Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[RN] indycar Alpha Tester 921 posts Report post #20 Posted October 2, 2015 (edited) and when will games start to be optimized for the AMD users ? ohhh and M$ winblows ? if wows would run on linux without emulator id go back to linux Edited October 2, 2015 by indycar Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OUH] General_Kunde Players 406 posts 6,632 battles Report post #21 Posted October 2, 2015 (edited) It's because the Big world engine that World of ... games use is a old as crap (2002), even in the current version WG is using it is still extremly limited, can't run multiturret support or use more then one core of the CPU. CryEngine was initially released in 2004...Check out Star Citizen today.. BigWorld could - I assume - deliver more and better, but they just don't put money/effort in it. Edited October 2, 2015 by General_Kunde Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mag_338 Players 5 posts 74 battles Report post #22 Posted October 3, 2015 CryEngine was initially released in 2004...Check out Star Citizen today.. BigWorld could - I assume - deliver more and better, but they just don't put money/effort in it. Unlikey, BigWorld was never that popular and WG essentially rented the engine from them. A few years ago they bought out BigWorld, which was a huge mistake considering they could have used...well pretty much any engine and future proofed their game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Panocek Players 13,176 posts 13,617 battles Report post #23 Posted October 3, 2015 IIRC the thing with Bugworld engine is its network and serverside performance, not how kawaii it can looks on end user computers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
delaci76 Beta Tester 654 posts Report post #24 Posted October 3, 2015 (edited) hate to mention it that nvidia isn't that superior anymore And wait that's because you own an AMD card? Yeah right..... I have owned both over the yrs and will continue to buy nvidia which I believe releases superior products in terms of perf/cooling/drivers. Yes they are more expensive. Until that changes I wont buy an AMD card...and yes I consider them when buying a new card just as much as I do an nvidia one. So cut the crap you aint gonna fool me. Not to say you cant have fun on an amd card but I can count driver issues with nvidia on one hand and with Amd it's prob double that.. p.s fifa16 just recently had vsync issues to name an example. cant be more current than that can i? oh and just on this page recently two complaints from peeps with amd...coincidence.. Edited October 3, 2015 by delaci76 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mtm78 Alpha Tester 19,378 posts 6,105 battles Report post #25 Posted October 3, 2015 I buy AMD because I like supporting good engineering over good marketing. The only plus for Nvidia is in the amount of resources they've piled on software/drivers. This might sound good, but Nvidia is a real opponent of open source software and standards, and have been caught more than once with 'foul play' when considering their position on the market. If you only care for price/performance, I would probably now buy Nvidia because of the running costs ( nvidia has done really good with power consumption ). But if you care about anything like supporting open software development and 'fair play', you should stay clear of anything Nvidia if possible. Ofc, just my and I can fully understand people who choose with their wallet only. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
