Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
anonym_cnA9Iz8hh6uh

Broken game

44 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
44 posts

What's a point to play cruisers if enemy BB can destroy you with one salvo even when you not able to shoot so far back?

 

Armored Warfare is now open beta. WG got last money from me since their games are broken and frustrating to play.

 

btw, trolls feel free to spew here....

Edited by anonym_cnA9Iz8hh6uh
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[_IRN_]
Players
202 posts
5,009 battles

So this one is BB is op? :)

 

nailed it :-)

 

 

As for u'r post kitten_killer, the points is that cruisers should not show the broadside to battleships. It's part of the skill needed to use them

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
66 posts
2,266 battles

What's a point to play cruisers if enemy BB can destroy you with one salvo even when you not able to shoot so far back?

 

Armored Warfare is now open beta. WG got last money from me since their games are broken and frustrating to play.

 

btw, trolls feel free to spew here....

 

Can I have your stuff?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,447 posts
14,711 battles

What's a point to play cruisers if enemy BB can destroy you with one salvo even when you not able to shoot so far back?

 

Armored Warfare is now open beta. WG got last money from me since their games are broken and frustrating to play.

 

btw, trolls feel free to spew here....

 

Because that's game mechanics and it should be this way. Simple as that. Just don't show broadside and don't expose yourself. You are an auxiliary, play this way. This is not WoT, without the rest of the fleet you are nothing.

I can tell you tales from CBT times, when Clevelands were able to burn up battleships for fun, Omahas could torp their way through entire battöeship divisions....I'm glad it's over. And I'm playing cruisers a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
241 posts
1,258 battles

 

It would appear so, time to wait for BBV :popcorn:

 

if there adding the Ise with her reconstruction, that would be amazing :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,447 posts
14,711 battles

 

muhahaha. Nice theory kid. Normaly ships crusing one direction against each other all the time, sure kid ...

 

Same style like on WOT one shot arty annoying mechanic

Angle your ship. Even when broadsiding, you don't have to show him the full lenght of the ship. Find the most extreme angle to bring all you turrets to use and don't be afraid to run away and search for cover. That easy. Look at you stats, look at my stats. Seems to work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
66 posts
2,266 battles

 

muhahaha. Nice theory kid. Normaly ships crusing one direction against each other all the time, sure kid ...

 

Same style like on WOT one shot arty annoying mechanic

 

What do the cool kids say it these days? 

 

QQ more nub?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,447 posts
14,711 battles

 

I know how to play. also on map where is no cover. I'm not playing the game for stats, but for fun.

 

Fun is far away ... Also another what i can remember - If first salvo destroy (totally and not reparable) on one of your two turrets on beginning of battle. That's nice..

 

Well...crap happens. Otherwise, the game would be extremly predictable and very, very boring and repetetive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,868 posts
5,014 battles

 

Enjoy your comments trolls. i still wondering what kind of person can put comments like this and what do you get from it. Paid by WG?? Or you the hidden "internet" hero? lol

 

What if I`m hidden internet hero troll payed by WG? :B

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,868 posts
5,014 battles

 

True. Like woT which will die now just because of this kind of frustrating mechanic.

 

See you in armored Warfare

 

http://aw.my.com/us/news/general/introducing-open-beta

 

Are you hidden internet troll hero payed by Gajin? :coin:

Edited by KptStrzyga

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ST-EU]
Supertester
3,404 posts
35,711 battles

@OP - It appears you do not do so well with cruisers so maybe instead of throwing a 'hissy fit' and starting a complaint thread, you would have been better off addressing your shortfalls and working on your battle strategies playing CA's. 

 

I know how to play. also on map where is no cover. I'm not playing the game for stats, but for fun.

 

Fun is far away ... Also another what i can remember - If first salvo destroy (totally and not reparable) on one of your two turrets on beginning of battle. That's nice..

 

You know how to play but just not that well. I certainly do not play for stats either, whatever comes my way I accept it but to fail with some of the best ships in the game (Murmansk for example) you need to look at yourself first before beating up on the game.

 

Another game will not necessarily mean you will do better there either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,447 posts
14,711 battles

 

Sorry for not being unicum. And you actualy saing that RNG generated by the game isnt fault of the game? Dont understand.

 

Every game uses RNG. Gajin for example is just showing it in a more interesting way.

Armored Warfare isn't free of faults either, but I think you will realize that. Don't slam the door on your way out. 

I think the reason you are leaving is exactly the fact you can't accept you arent unicum or even above average in this game. YOu are dead average, someone has to be. Either you accept that and have fun, or try to get better by seriously investing time in some guides. If not, well, try your luck on greener shores. Just don't be surprised if you find that landmass covered in ice, like the wikings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
223 posts
4,848 battles

@ OP - don't worry, I'm sure you'll find something broken in AW too, as it isn't a game that has the good old "win button", it's even more difficult than WoT/WoWS, since (for example) you have several types of armour (like reactive armour, and so on), each one behaves in a different way, and you really need to know what type of armour you're fighting against to penetrate, just to mention one thing. if you fail in WoT/WoWS, and you think that AW will be any different, well, think again, mate..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Players
2,478 posts
11,195 battles

 

I know how to play. also on map where is no cover. I'm not playing the game for stats, but for fun.

 

Fun is far away ... Also another what i can remember - If first salvo destroy (totally and not reparable) on one of your two turrets on beginning of battle. That's nice..

 

I am so having a dejavu from the earlier today... Didn't we just go through this all day today? "I know how to play. I'm not playing the game for stats, but for fun."

 

What do you think guys.... what if we bring these 2 people together, and make them fight each other instead? Saves us a lot of trouble...

 

Okeeey... I am so totally doing this... OP, go here, read this one..... battle it out with Humbug_1 he is your opponent in the red corner. Go get him tiger:  http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/32024-battleships-death-trap/

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester
1,677 posts
20,280 battles

I think that OP gave a very valuable feedback :trollface:

 

Basically, based on some comments we can see here on forums, we have the situation where CVs are OP, BBs are OP, CAs are OP and DDs are OP. :D

This seems to be the best proof that classes are generally well balanced :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
307 posts
23,583 battles

 

I am so having a dejavu from the earlier today... Didn't we just go through this all day today? "I know how to play. I'm not playing the game for stats, but for fun."

 

What do you think guys.... what if we bring these 2 people together, and make them fight each other instead? Saves us a lot of trouble...

 

Okeeey... I am so totally doing this... OP, go here, read this one..... battle it out with Humbug_1 he is your opponent in the red corner. Go get him tiger:  http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/32024-battleships-death-trap/

 

+1 and i'm also getting my popcorn also haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
360 posts

 

Just what does Armored Warfare have to do with World of Warships?  

 

 

 

 

Nothing, but exhibitionists will find the way to practice their stuff through special snowflake topics:)

Edited by Doolio

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Players
5,763 posts
16,940 battles

 56060977.jpg

 

muhahaha. Nice theory kid. Normaly ships crusing one direction against each other all the time, sure kid ...

 
Completely true - at tier 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
41 posts
352 battles

 

Because that's game mechanics and it should be this way. Simple as that. Just don't show broadside and don't expose yourself. You are an auxiliary, play this way. This is not WoT, without the rest of the fleet you are nothing.

I can tell you tales from CBT times, when Clevelands were able to burn up battleships for fun, Omahas could torp their way through entire battöeship divisions....I'm glad it's over. And I'm playing cruisers a lot.

 

You are asking to play like lemmings but the you still losing the battle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×