Blue_Bug Players 1,428 posts 7,991 battles Report post #1 Posted September 25, 2015 (edited) I expect the video to appear on the EU website soon, but for the ones that don't want to wait : http://worldofwarships.asia/en/news/common/soviet-destroyers-tree/ With all the stats of the branch. Edited September 25, 2015 by Leluk06 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[EW_YK] Barkyro Players 439 posts 13,829 battles Report post #2 Posted September 25, 2015 Ok so it only goes up to T5 then??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,178 battles Report post #3 Posted September 25, 2015 No, you have to click under the Tier V DD to see the rest. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baldfish Beta Tester 22 posts Report post #4 Posted September 25, 2015 As expected from that propaganda video they will be superior to all other nations Destroyers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dirlettia Beta Tester 60 posts 706 battles Report post #5 Posted September 25, 2015 So the russian DD's are: Fastest of their kind Toughest of their kind Hardest hitting of their kind I guess this means the advertising for new nations will be 'Buy these ships they are naff compared to the russians'. How exactly are these balanced compared to other nations, for example do the torps only have a range of 3.5km? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
caldark Alpha Tester 333 posts 1,473 battles Report post #6 Posted September 25, 2015 (edited) Oh well no reason to go with anything else.. I mean why would you when the russian DDs are the following. Fastest Toughest Hardest hitting.. No point going anything else.. Edited September 25, 2015 by caldark Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harada_Taro Weekend Tester 109 posts 836 battles Report post #7 Posted September 25, 2015 I dunno why but I suspect and expect them heavily overpowered... while I have no doubt the german cruiser will be heavily underpowered. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bismark121 Beta Tester 312 posts 4,176 battles Report post #8 Posted September 25, 2015 well I have heard from somewhere that the guns have a worse trajectory than the Cleveland (it's either the t5 or t4 maybe) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OUH] General_Kunde Players 406 posts 6,614 battles Report post #9 Posted September 25, 2015 I dunno why but I suspect and expect them heavily overpowered... while I have no doubt the german cruiser will be heavily underpowered. You can bet on that! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Foofight Beta Tester 82 posts 12,977 battles Report post #10 Posted September 25, 2015 Their torps have very low score on the list, so will be nice to see the stats Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[VMEF] Wischmob_von_Eimer Beta Tester 1,292 posts 10,023 battles Report post #11 Posted September 25, 2015 well I have heard from somewhere that the guns have a worse trajectory than the Cleveland (it's either the t5 or t4 maybe) Trajectories dont matter, when spamming HE. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[AMOK] Donar79 Players 1,968 posts 9,010 battles Report post #12 Posted September 25, 2015 WG Headquarter: a: "Should we show the teaser also on EU Server?" b: "Nah.. [edited]the EU Community" 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vulgarny Sailing Hamster 1,546 posts 3,274 battles Report post #13 Posted September 25, 2015 Lets wait for test weekend but still it feels like: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bismark121 Beta Tester 312 posts 4,176 battles Report post #14 Posted September 25, 2015 Trajectories dont matter, when spamming HE. it kinda does when firing from range Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fnord_disc Beta Tester 2,119 posts 5,245 battles Report post #15 Posted September 25, 2015 The concealment values are all significantly lower than American ships, and concealment is key for destroyers. Based on these not very meaningful numbers, I think they are very difficult to play. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MATREKUS Players 377 posts 4,311 battles Report post #16 Posted September 25, 2015 (edited) hehehe Edited September 25, 2015 by Tvrdi1976 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PRAVD] Takeda92 Weekend Tester 3,802 posts 8,478 battles Report post #17 Posted September 25, 2015 The tier 9 have better torpedo stats than Kagerou... Yup... totally balanced ships! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PAD] uocat Community Contributor 165 posts 24,814 battles Report post #18 Posted September 25, 2015 T10 Soviet dd Concealment index: 77 Compared to Gearing: 85 Interesting Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fnord_disc Beta Tester 2,119 posts 5,245 battles Report post #19 Posted September 25, 2015 The tier 9 have better torpedo stats than Kagerou... Yup... totally balanced ships! Japanese DDs are terrible, but I wouldn't trust those numbers. Having a ton of bad torpedoes leads to a high score, but if the range is much shorter than the detection range you won't be able to find them all that useful. The numbers are only useful for things like concealment or survivability where they're relatively objective. I'd be much more interested in seeing the actual stats of the different weapon systems and of the hull. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vulgarny Sailing Hamster 1,546 posts 3,274 battles Report post #20 Posted September 25, 2015 Gearing got like 7,1 km bare? Btw numbers means really nothing........ Compare arty number on Iowa and Montana. I would think that 25% more number of guns on main caliber would change arty value Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SBS Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters 2,556 posts 1,924 battles Report post #21 Posted September 25, 2015 I am not sure what to think of this. Those numbers can give a peak at what they might be like, but I am reserving my judgement untill after I see their stats. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Userext Beta Tester 5,342 posts 2,957 battles Report post #22 Posted September 25, 2015 The tier 9 have better torpedo stats than Kagerou... Yup... totally balanced ships! wtf? 32 tier9 and 23 tier 10?Gearing got like 7,1 km bare? gearing has 7.6km base consealment Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PRAVD] Takeda92 Weekend Tester 3,802 posts 8,478 battles Report post #23 Posted September 25, 2015 Japanese DDs are terrible, but I wouldn't trust those numbers. Having a ton of bad torpedoes leads to a high score, but if the range is much shorter than the detection range you won't be able to find them all that useful. The numbers are only useful for things like concealment or survivability where they're relatively objective. I'd be much more interested in seeing the actual stats of the different weapon systems and of the hull. Because Japanese with their long ranges and high detection are useful at all! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Userext Beta Tester 5,342 posts 2,957 battles Report post #24 Posted September 25, 2015 Guys dont get stuck on ratings In a world where gearing and shimakaze has same gun ratings i doubt those ratings will give us much information Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AnuSuaraj Alpha Tester 665 posts 10,194 battles Report post #25 Posted September 25, 2015 Honestly, the concealment stats on Russian DDs suck hard. I really have a feeling that they will suck balls. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
