Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
tw53

How come EVERYONE else gets consumables but CVs?.....not fair

39 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Tester
405 posts

How come EVERYONE else gets consumables but CVs?.....not fair is it

how about it WG.....

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SERBS]
Players
653 posts
25,073 battles

and you have shells , unlimited ap and he shells, thats your consumable....

good point op , i think CVs should get AA immunity for 30 sec consumable, great idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
170 posts
847 battles

and you have shells , unlimited ap and he shells, thats your consumable....

good point op , i think CVs should get AA immunity for 30 sec consumable, great idea.

 

how about a smoke like dd´s ? I mean every1 got 2 cons. so CVs deserve atleast 3... smoke AA and a turbo ?! That would be nice mh ?

 

Serious... you can shot other ships w/o risking your hp .... it would be same when i would make a thread for dd´s and i wanted more hp ^^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PLG]
Beta Tester
277 posts
611 battles

"Planes are your consumable" is not a valid argument. Is everyone forgetting that CVs are the only ship in World of Warships that are essentially unarmed?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,989 posts
11,824 battles

Make manual drop  a consumable 1 charge, 2 with superintendent - else its auto.  :trollface:

 

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
144 posts
4,554 battles

"Planes are your consumable" is not a valid argument. Is everyone forgetting that CVs are the only ship in World of Warships that are essentially unarmed?

 

Also the only ship that gets to hurt ships while staying out of harms way, and for some reason CV captains see it as their birthright to put at least one torpedo into any spotted ship on the map. Did I mention that this is while essentially staying out of the actual game? 
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
405 posts

"Planes are your consumable" is not a valid argument. Is everyone forgetting that CVs are the only ship in World of Warships that are essentially unarmed?

Planes are unlike shells LIMITED(totally right)...    maybe the BBs self heal would be nice!

Edited by tw53

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LO1]
Alpha Tester
1,552 posts
8,268 battles

"Planes are your consumable" is not a valid argument. Is everyone forgetting that CVs are the only ship in World of Warships that are essentially unarmed?

 

Tell that to the DD that have been killed by 2ndry fire!
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
170 posts
847 battles

"Planes are your consumable" is not a valid argument. Is everyone forgetting that CVs are the only ship in World of Warships that are essentially unarmed?

 

Are your forgetting that you can deal damage and spot the enemy w/o losing health ?

 

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
273 posts
4,109 battles

It would make sense to give them the AA boost ability as their primary enemy is being attacked by enemy planes and they are supposed to have high AA themselves. My destroyer has that ability and it barely has two aa guns to rub together, let alone the 95 AA rating my CV supposedly has.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
405 posts

 

Tell that to the DD that have been killed by 2ndry fire!

 

then he is a DUMB DD driver......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
310 posts
8,360 battles

I will exchange my consumables for ability to destroy CV while being at no risk to taking damage from it.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Beta Tester
4,811 posts
13,808 battles

 

Also the only ship that gets to hurt ships while staying out of harms way, and for some reason CV captains see it as their birthright to put at least one torpedo into any spotted ship on the map. Did I mention that this is while essentially staying out of the actual game? 

 

So much endless cluelessness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Beta Tester
4,811 posts
13,808 battles

 

Oh, really now? Clueless how? Oh, that's right, you just won't take the argument. 

 

When you make one, I'll come address it. Mere childish attitude because you're suffering from Dunning-Kruger is not worth that sort of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
5,342 posts
2,957 battles

Battleships except tirpitz dont have torpedoes. CVs have it DDs have it CAs have it. Do you think they should riot and ask for torpedoes? Destroyers dont have much health so i suggest DDs to have 60k health at tier 10. Sounds locigal? No? Its same with your idea. It doesnt sound logical and there is no reason to bring it in game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,401 posts
3,820 battles

CVs are map clickers, they dont deserve anything, so dont play them...

 

BBs are map clickers too. And they only have to click once every 30 seconds.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
310 posts
8,360 battles

 

BBs are map clickers too. And they only have to click once every 30 seconds.

 

Interested in knowing how I can click a map on a BB. Please tell me more senpai. I'm dying to know, since I seem to miss so much because I can't just click map and kill enemy like CV can!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Beta Tester
4,811 posts
13,808 battles

 

Interested in knowing how I can click a map on a BB. Please tell me more senpai. I'm dying to know, since I seem to miss so much because I can't just click map and kill enemy like CV can!

 

BB mafia gameplay:

 

Aim. Give lead. Fire. Erase enemies. Gloat when you do well, and laugh when you do 50k damage in a salvo. Cry bitter tears when something dares to hurt you back, or when you can't win domination battles by sitting 20km from the cap zone (as eminently proven by the posts already popping up today).

 

Then spend pend more time on the forums demanding nerfs to anything that can hurt you, asking for "realism" whenever it would suit your bias and ignoring it when it doesn't, use statistics when it suits you, ignore the same statistics when it doesn't. Hypocrisy isn't a problem, it's the solution.

 

It's "balanced" that CAs get sunk by 1-2 citadels from 5km+ beyond their own max range where they cannot fight back. It's "imbalanced" when a CV can fire at you from beyond your range, even if it's far easier to avoid planes that BB AP.

 

It's "balanced" that you can kill CAs in a single salvo (or two if you're unlucky) but it's "imbalanced" that if a CA can keep firing at you for 2-3 minutes then you might actually sink.

 

It's "balanced" when your secondaries can kill and cripple DDs with no skill based effort from you but it's "imbalanced" that torps cab be fired from beyond your vision and that takes 30-60 seconds to reach you where a small adjustment to course will put them off target, and that does especially low damage to you and that you can easily survive and that have far lower ROF than your guns.

 

BB mafia in a nutshell; it's far more efficient to whine on the forums than to improve your gameplay.

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
144 posts
4,554 battles

 

When you make one, I'll come address it. Mere childish attitude because you're suffering from Dunning-Kruger is not worth that sort of time.

 

My problem with carriers in general is that you're basically the sadistic kid with a magnifying glass frying ants. My problem with people who sail carriers is that they expect me to be completely fine with them parking in the corner to play an RTS game and polluting my gaming experience in the process. That sort of game play is for carebears too afraid of accepting that to inflict damage, you must accept a certain risk of receiving damage. I am not the one with the childish attitude here. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×