Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Rem3mberMe

Why has Tirpitz destroyed the current meta?

57 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[UNICS]
Beta Tester
4,870 posts
10,112 battles

 

Tirpitz is a brandnew and very popular ship. If they would have released a premium Hood or a premium Arizona u would see too many of them.

other new premiums / trees / nations will follow and than the amount of Tirpitzes will sink

 

and before there have been too many cruisers

 

and why are too many cruisers ok, but too many battleships arent ? too many BBs can wipe out CAs, too many CAs can whipe out DDs. Whats better ? nothing

 

The game is designed to have more cruisers per battle than other ship classes.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
580 posts
1,135 battles

I'm letting mine sit rusting in the port, at least until we get a proper playerbase at those tiers.

 

As it did in real life...\

 

Also, what is wrong with the Atago?

Edited by Andreevson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester
1,244 posts

 

As it did in real life...\

 

Also, what is wrong with the Atago?

 

Nothing wrong with the Atago, just that since I don't enjoy the Myoko I don't feel like it's worth wasting my hard earned cash on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
580 posts
1,135 battles

 

Nothing wrong with the Atago, just that since I don't enjoy the Myoko I don't feel like it's worth wasting my hard earned cash on it.

 

Dem Torp angles tho...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[IDEAL]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester
669 posts
2,513 battles

Give it time. The same happened on World of Tanks when popular premium tanks entered the battle.

 

After some weeks people started going back to the usual ships.

If, however, the devs see the Tirpitz overperforming i am sure they will act on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Players
2,478 posts
11,184 battles

Nerf Tirpitz, or buff everything else.... that will decrease them :D

 

EDIT: I think biggest problem is that people fail to citadel hit them...

Edited by Kenliero

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
445 posts
1,310 battles

I do not think the number of Tirpitz will sink anytime soon. Blame the broken economy. Simply nothing earns so many credits as Tirpitz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
542 posts
3,394 battles

at tier 8 the teams are almost all battleships (its pretty regular to see 8 or more battleships on each team!!) about 3-4 Derpiz + regular battleships on each team.

 

cruisers T7-8 are mostly unplayable at the moment. because of the lack of cruiser targets (you know, other cruisers and destroyers). nobody plays destroyers at higher tiers (lets face it) and against battleship heavy teams you get very little damage done as a cruiser (=low XP & low credits). even on winning games you struggle to just break even and not go to negative numbers. 

 

it sucks... i like playing cruisers the most, but i put my Mogami on strike! untill the battleship spam resolves...

cya in T5 battles with my Omaha!

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,693 posts
4,658 battles

cruisers T7-8 are mostly unplayable at the moment. because of the lack of cruiser targets (you know, other cruisers and destroyers). nobody plays destroyers at higher tiers (lets face it) and against battleship heavy teams you get very little damage done as a cruiser (=low XP & low credits). even on winning games you struggle to just break even and not go to negative numbers. 

 

it sucks... i like playing cruisers the most, but i put my Mogami on strike! untill the battleship spam resolves...

cya in T5 battles with my Omaha!

Don't forget the tirpitz has been described as a dedicated cruiser killer, which folds against 'real' battleships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
273 posts
2,478 battles

 

The game is designed to have more cruisers per battle than other ship classes.

 

do you jave facts to back this up or is this just your imagination? Seems to me that games can end up victory, defeat and draw no matter what amount of cruisers there were in battle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
289 posts
11,865 battles

Who is the natural predator for the Tirpitz? 

 

The 2 classes who are least represented in game......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[UNICS]
Beta Tester
4,870 posts
10,112 battles

 

do you jave facts to back this up or is this just your imagination? Seems to me that games can end up victory, defeat and draw no matter what amount of cruisers there were in battle.

 

Of course you don't need a certain amount of cruisers, but battles tend to go in very strange directions if there are an overabundance of other ship classes instead. Too many BBs and the battles have a tendency to be longer and the risk of draws higher. Too many DDs and I think you can imagine the issue of fighting a mostly invisible fleet. CV hard limits are already in place because they were even worse at messing up the battle when you got too many.

The cruiser is the equalizer, it's decent at everything and master of nothing.

As for "facts", I'm mostly going by how the MM puts together battles during optimal condition when it can pick basically any ship it wants and there are no special circumstances like after a new premium ship sale.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
445 posts
1,310 battles

That is exactly the point. Cruisers are most versatile ships and your team can adjust the strategy when they are present. Now the tier VIII battles are one sided only BB shooter. I am not pointing finger at Tirpitz. I am just saying that the tier VIII premium ships have ruined the diversity in battles. Until there will be new German cruiser line, there is no reason to drive cruisers in these BB only battles. You need some cannon fodder too to enjoy the game, being one in every single battle is not my cup of tea. At least it helped me to decide grinding Yamato and Montana first. 

Edited by Rem3mberMe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
27 posts
1,923 battles

It just feels like Tirpitz does not have a real equal/counter at the moment in WoW, and I am speaking as someone who has one. The whole paper/scissor/stone thing just doesn't apply to them.

The combination of good range yet relatively poor accuracy and dispersion at that range leads to many just playing linebacker, hoping for some poor CA who felt like a change/is grinding a line to give them a juicy citadel (I'm looking at IJN esp Atago here). If non appears, the armour means they can duel other BBs at range and probably be able to outstay their opponent. The DD meta at T7 means that in open water the Tirpitz is safe.

Trying to use an Atlanta or Pensacola atm is just miserable unless you have an empathetic team and I have given up grinding both IJN and USN CA lines at T8 and T7 respectively, for this reason.

There is a Counter.... Its small,.... Not like a fly but like a hornet and it Stings very hard. The Name is Cleveland and 2 Tiers higher its the Mogami. The Tirpitz Burns like a matchstick. You can evade torpedoes, its hard to get citadels on her, but seh burns

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,401 posts
3,820 battles

but seh burns

 

Like every other BB.

 

Real weakness is her slow rudder shift time, length and weak AA. Food for carriers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
142 posts
1,131 battles

I seem to be on a different server than you lot,,, i stoped seeing half of each team consisting of tirpitz few days after it was released,,, And it is no way OP,,, Its fantastic against cruisers and not bad against BB's but it's guns are not as good as the Amagis or north carolina's, All it has is HP, rate of fire (only 5 more seconds than the others) And less damage potential per salvo,,,, Also its AA is only half decent and secondaries are OK,,, So its pretty Average. The thing that sets it apart from the others is that its a brawler,,, and even now there seem to be alot of players that seem to forget about those 8 (4 on each side) tubes of death,,,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
377 posts
8,256 battles

I seem to be on a different server than you lot,,, i stoped seeing half of each team consisting of tirpitz few days after it was released,,, And it is no way OP,,, Its fantastic against cruisers and not bad against BB's but it's guns are not as good as the Amagis or north carolina's, All it has is HP, rate of fire (only 5 more seconds than the others) And less damage potential per salvo,,,, Also its AA is only half decent and secondaries are OK,,, So its pretty Average. The thing that sets it apart from the others is that its a brawler,,, and even now there seem to be alot of players that seem to forget about those 8 (4 on each side) tubes of death,,,

 

Mostly right......weak horizontal armour food for Top C.V DD players....guns are potent...shredded Amagi with 1 salvo, 2 citadel hits....it lasted a few seconds after that......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
509 posts

Anyway, even before the Tirpitz, very few CA (Tier VI and above) players were willing to fulfill the role of WoT medium tanks.

 

They were/are too scared by DD torps and BB long range guns. They should be more daring. Only Omaha and Murmansk players make games fun and interesting.

 

Cleveland, Aoba (and Tiers above)  players are too cautious.

 

Now, with the Tirpitz just behind enemy CA, the situatiion is even worst.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[F_D]
Alpha Tester
1,194 posts
6,192 battles

I don't know when you play, but during the evening hours I usually get battles with max 4 BBs per side. Okay, at least half of that are Tirpitzes (myself included) but still, I don't see these "all Tirpitz" battles any more than just after her release.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
112 posts
311 battles

 

Same here. I gave up grinding Mogami and I focus on both BB lines now.

 

I already gave up CV's, so I will ran out of ship classes if I give up CA's as well :ohmy: 

 

wait for 17 when they will add tirpitz again on sale  , i even think to buy one , if u cant kill them join them :D

 

Well if that is true, I will consider to buy it this time, because now I'm closer to T8 BB in real life too...  :playing:

 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertester
85 posts
15,274 battles

My guess is that it will change when the initial excitement wears off. It's like this in most games when something new is introduced. And it has already started, you don't see 8-10 Tirpitzes in each team anymore :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-AP-]
[-AP-]
Weekend Tester
1,000 posts
8,199 battles

Anyway, even before the Tirpitz, very few CA (Tier VI and above) players were willing to fulfill the role of WoT medium tanks.

It's because CAs in this game don't behave like mediums at all.

They have half the hp of a BB, 30-40% less range for +5-10 kn speed. You won't project force in a CA like you do in a med.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×