Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Kokos78

Can you point me to a player with great stats

84 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Tester
93 posts
4,662 battles

I seem to be quite high up in my battleships on avg damage :o

And my zao aswell

Edited by Error509

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

I know some people with terrible stats, just lost two games because TWO 40 and 41% wr players cut me off so I couldn't angle my cruiser to avoid being broadsided by a battleship. TWICE! in a row. And twice they got ~40% win rate! BAH, WG gives leagues  now plox!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
3,801 posts
10,499 battles

I got accused of lighting up a Gremy who followed my Minekaze. Blamed my AA for being on (it was off, turned it on after being discovered to chase it off while I popped smoke, then turned it off again, the guy sailed straight into an enemy Nicholas and Furutaka, but had already used his torps due to spamming them blindly. Obviously I killed the Nicholas and Furutaka later in two single strikes... But he kept ranting at me for being a loser who makes him and other teams lose, asked him how big the chances were of me looking up his stats and finding a 45% winrate player. Did. And guess what: 45.18%.

 

 

Only noobish thing I've done was grind the Nagato to 37K while forgetting I still had to purchase the 22K C-hull... >.<" That added AA would have been lovely in some matches!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
533 posts
2,226 battles

 

Jealous person in denial is jealous in denial.

 

 

 

Keep believing that start nerd.  If I was a jealous person I would check your stats.  However I've never looked at them and don't care. Fact is they are meaningless. N if I was a beta player or alpha I would expect to be ahead of the curve. As it is playing games against more experienced players I can more often than not win. So no. Not jelous or caring about stats. Just got in before the start banner kids arrived. Sorry it upset you. I'm sure loads of people are impressed by your pixel ship stats though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertest Coordinator
6,337 posts
4,395 battles

I'm up to 62% win rate... In battleships. 44% in cruisers. I really struggle to do damage in Cleveland but Fuso is up to 51k damage average. All my BBs damage are increasing.

 

Mostly because I am copying Aerron's style of play in his battleship videos. I now go for the best targets first, usually side on cruisers - for the tasty citadels :D

 

I'll let others finish off the scraps, if they survive. Then il take on BBs.

 

And you know what that tactic whittled down the team numbers and it's getting me wins. And I'm perfecting the "hold off an entire flank in one battleship" play, firing and angling to BBs while smashing cruisers who come near.

 

BBs are much fun! Cruisers... Ehhh. I can't hit destroyers for toffee and I'm either too far away or too close to battleships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
3,801 posts
10,499 battles

Keep believing that start nerd.  If I was a jealous person I would check your stats.  However I've never looked at them and don't care. Fact is they are meaningless. N if I was a beta player or alpha I would expect to be ahead of the curve. As it is playing games against more experienced players I can more often than not win. So no. Not jelous or caring about stats. Just got in before the start banner kids arrived. Sorry it upset you. I'm sure loads of people are impressed by your pixel ship stats though.

For someone who isn't jealous and doesn't care you spend a lot of time insulting and trivialising people who do better than you and go out of your way to dismiss their results as being a sign of their current capacity with respect to others...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
188 posts
7,505 battles

 

Wrong

Last one shows numbers of games in each class which is relevant to interpret the stats ;)

 

No it's not. Most people just care about pure numbers (win rate, averages). I'm not saying that this is good - thats the way it is :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertest Coordinator
6,337 posts
4,395 battles

 

No it's not. Most people just care about pure numbers (win rate, averages). I'm not saying that this is good - thats the way it is :)

 

And thus utterly misleading. Look at my stats. I am not the same in cruisers as BBs. Someone might be awesome with CVs but suck in destroyers but if you only look at overall stats you'd never know. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

 

No it's not. Most people just care about pure numbers (win rate, averages). I'm not saying that this is good - thats the way it is :)

 

 

And thus utterly misleading. Look at my stats. I am not the same in cruisers as BBs. Someone might be awesome with CVs but suck in destroyers but if you only look at overall stats you'd never know. 

 

This. And that if someone has 20k higher avg damage while playing the same tier ships as me WITHOUT playing carriers, I will think he's doing something better then me. But if a significant number of his games are done in a carrier, then I won't consider his higher then mine average damage that surprising.

 

Just saying, a leaderbord with just avg damage or win rate says almost nothing while a leaderboard with class distribution already says a lot more. 

 

Both sites have merit, both methods are alright on their own, it's my personal preference to use the one over the other, nothing more nothing less :honoring:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
62 posts
506 battles

Stats may be fun to watch at, hell i enjoy watching stats and graphs and all that.

But they don't tell you the whole story.

 

2 people with the same ship, one does 40k damage and the other does 20k damage, who's the best?

Well if that 40k person did 40k damage to a BB that didn't even die, and the 20k person picked off 3 half dead DDs that could have wreaked havoc, who did the best job?

 

Off course this is situational, but it's a situation the game isn't programmed to take into account when it comes to stats and rewards.

I usually have a more defensive play style with my cruisers, i often go back to base or cap zones to hunt that pesky DD or intercept ships going for our carriers (someone has to).

It doesn't get me boatloads of damage or exp, but at least i did what my ship was built to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
12 posts

Lol im going to let you all hate me now....I have a 62% win rate. But mainly down to the Hashidate. 72% wr in this lovely boat. 600+ games with almost half in the Hashidate. The thing to remember though is that as much as you can be playing against inexperienced players you are also playing with them and have to do a lot of carrying. I invite anyone who wants to stat pad and seal club to message me and we can win together. I can feel the rage and I don't care. 

Edited by _Goaty_

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertest Coordinator
6,337 posts
4,395 battles

Getting a win rate that high in a Hashidate is impressive given the amount of new players you will have on your team. You love that ship?? Kind of makes me want to go try it again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
3,801 posts
10,499 battles

Getting a win rate that high in a Hashidate is impressive given the amount of new players you will have on your team. You love that ship?? Kind of makes me want to go try it again

 

Why? You've got way more ability to carry if your opposition is worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CASTS]
Alpha Tester
85 posts
4,542 battles

Lol i found out i am number one in damage and kill to death ratio in the new mexico

Also 2nd in damage with minekaze.

But i don´t think this site show the entire server stats? Only those who registered?

 

Edited by ZuupermaN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertest Coordinator
6,337 posts
4,395 battles

 

Why? You've got way more ability to carry if your opposition is worse.

 

Agree, but I would have thought that particular ship has limited ability to carry. I have an aurora and that ship is useless at carrying!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

 

Agree, but I would have thought that particular ship has limited ability to carry. I have an aurora and that ship is useless at carrying!

 

Should get a Diana for tier II... or an Umi :trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KRAKN]
Beta Tester
90 posts
12,376 battles

 

Should get a Diana for tier II... or an Umi :trollface:

 

Hey matey long time no see on forums. Long vacations?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
19,378 posts
6,105 battles

 

Hey matey long time no see on forums. Long vacations?

Ahoy matey, don't recall you from the forums but I do remember meeting a Greek DD captain in game a couple of times and I think that was you :honoring:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
3,801 posts
10,499 battles

Agree, but I would have thought that particular ship has limited ability to carry. I have an aurora and that ship is useless at carrying!

 

Even an Albany can carry. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertest Coordinator
6,337 posts
4,395 battles

Well as an update I now have:

WR 51%

K/d 1.91

Damage 36k

 

Tier 5.3

 

All of these are on the up. I'm most pleased that damage and survival are up. Less bothered about win rate. I've watched videos and even my cruiser play has improved.

 

So overall a good player I think will have "solid" stats throughout...

 

I wish we could have some global averages by ship/class/tier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
228 posts
3,227 battles

 

Pre-4.1. I've barely touched/played the Hakuryu because I do not enjoy it and I specifically played Hiryu AND Shokaku with the 2-2-2 setup back in the day. If you scale that down to the Ryujo then my Fuso is outperforming carriers and my Amagi is performing just as well damage-wise... and my Mogami beats the Shokaku outright. So, point proven I guess, carriers OP? :)

 

Your friend must not be a very good player because up to and including tier 8 I have had very few problems from carriers, especially in the department of being unable to take proper evasive action. Situational awareness and anticipation (and a degree of triangulation) go a very long way in fighting off carriers. So I guess it takes playing a carrier to beat a carrier?

situational awareness when you are zerged by 2 to 3 torp squads following by same amount of bomber squads... there is no Jumping in this gae to evade three torp launch from left right and front, following by bombs with multi fire, ending game in a moments as there is no way to repair/heal trough that no matter what and even if you manage to stay alive with 1-3k max health, hes back with more in few minutes :)  Carriers req the least skill in this game to do 100k+ dmg every game no matter what CV players will tell me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,023 posts

situational awareness when you are zerged by 2 to 3 torp squads following by same amount of bomber squads... there is no Jumping in this gae to evade three torp launch from left right and front, following by bombs with multi fire, ending game in a moments as there is no way to repair/heal trough that no matter what and even if you manage to stay alive with 1-3k max health, hes back with more in few minutes :)  Carriers req the least skill in this game to do 100k+ dmg every game no matter what CV players will tell me.

 

 

Full ack! That's so true if you play against people with zero skill on low tiers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×