[EW_YK] Barkyro Players 439 posts 13,829 battles Report post #1 Posted September 9, 2015 http://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/cbt/patch-alert-0411/ This seems to correct some bugs but nothing major. Opinions? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rafparis Beta Tester 872 posts 4,381 battles Report post #2 Posted September 9, 2015 like i said: "Fixed the battle experience numeration in the “Summary” tab: the number now includes all available modifiers (premium account, first win of the day, battle actions, etc.)." Why, for god's sake, would you include all this multipliers displaying your average XP? So a player can pretend to be good because he have premium + flags, and his stats seems higher? I want to see my base XP, so i can compare to other players, that don't use premium, or flags. (i have premium acount) 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
havaduck ∞ Players 2,989 posts 11,824 battles Report post #3 Posted September 9, 2015 (edited) damn I would like some more detailed info: Fixed an error which caused damage to not be registered properly, after the superstructure and stern of USS Iowa have been destroyed. yeah, but did you also correct the overall hp? I read its a rediciously low amount .... Fixed an error on Myoko that lead to incorrect damage being received when the citadel was hit. corrected from what to where ....... its like receiving a computer support question titled: doesnt work ... Fixed an error that lead to spotting aircraft being able to attack squadrons (We made the pilot aware of such inappropriate behaviour and he promised to never ever do it again). damn! what this game needed ..... a CV buff. Now those things are even more useless .... (at least give the option to have the fighter instead then!) Decreased the horizontal angle during a ship´s turn. but ... but ... but I really like to bellyrub my opponents citadell when they do that. Fixed invisible obstacles on "New Dawn" map. Fixed incorrect spawn points on "Strait" map. finally, I hope those "bastards islands" are gone forever! €: The development team is constantly at work, updating and fixing the game based on your stellar feedback. I think we are being offended?! Edited September 9, 2015 by havaduck Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POP] YukiEiriKun [POP] Beta Tester 1,500 posts 5,749 battles Report post #4 Posted September 9, 2015 (edited) Started to read this, was happy:Fixed the battle experience numeration in the “Summary” tab: Then read the rest and was unhappy: the number now includes all available modifiers (premium account, first win of the day, battle actions, etc.). Then raged at the comments. Edited September 9, 2015 by YukiEiriKun 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DtXpwnz Beta Tester 1,160 posts 377 battles Report post #5 Posted September 9, 2015 like i said: Why, for god's sake, would you include all this multipliers displaying your average XP? So a player can pretend to be good because he have premium + flags, and his stats seems higher? I want to see my base XP, so i can compare to other players, that don't use premium, or flags. (i have premium acount) In next patch they are going to replace K/D ratio with ratio between biscuits eaten and global warming. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
captain_sam Beta Tester 133 posts 1,484 battles Report post #6 Posted September 9, 2015 Hum I keep scrolling down the page but I can t see the fix about infinite loops of TBs and DBs, and figthers barrage multiple bugs. Maybe my screen is too small. Can you see it guys? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BAZI] allufewig Beta Tester 2,912 posts 15,294 battles Report post #7 Posted September 9, 2015 like i said: Why, for god's sake, would you include all this multipliers displaying your average XP? So a player can pretend to be good because he have premium + flags, and his stats seems higher? I want to see my base XP, so i can compare to other players, that don't use premium, or flags. (i have premium acount) To obfuscate skill and make comparisons impossible. No one should feel bad and leave the game, I guess. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DDLS] Naskoni Players 674 posts 1,234 battles Report post #8 Posted September 9, 2015 "Inactive players now get disconnected after 1 hour of inactivity in the Port." I wonder what impact that will have on player numbers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OMPG] Hauptbahnhof Beta Tester 1,198 posts 5,570 battles Report post #9 Posted September 9, 2015 Fixed an error that lead to spotting aircraft being able to attack squadrons (We made the pilot aware of such inappropriate behaviour and he promised to never ever do it again). damn! what this game needed ..... a CV buff. Now those things are even more useless .... (at least give the option to have the fighter instead then!) You have the option to have a floatplane fighter instead... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
inAbag Beta Tester 221 posts 676 battles Report post #10 Posted September 9, 2015 Fixed an error that lead to reload time of the "Defensive AA Fire 2" consumable being the same as the reload time of the "Defensive AA Fire 1" consumable on Yubari Glorious! So now my single use Defensive Fire charge will recharge quicker with the premium version! Wargaming trolling at its finest Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POP] YukiEiriKun [POP] Beta Tester 1,500 posts 5,749 battles Report post #11 Posted September 9, 2015 Why, for god's sake, would you include all this multipliers displaying your average XP? So a player can pretend to be good because he have premium + flags, and his stats seems higher? I want to see my base XP, so i can compare to other players, that don't use premium, or flags. (i have premium acount) To obfuscate skill and make comparisons impossible. No one should feel bad and leave the game, I guess. Move against XVM / WN stats / efficiency? If the API does not hold base XP values, then WN8 like efficiency calculating comes more difficult? (I have no idea how that thing works) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
havaduck ∞ Players 2,989 posts 11,824 battles Report post #12 Posted September 9, 2015 (edited) You have the option to have a floatplane fighter instead... great, hand me my float-fighter over then: My adress: Myogi building, Kongo road, Fuso district. (in short, no they are stuck with the useless spotter plane artillery plane, because I would like it to fly around, searching and spoting crap instead of just circling and [edited]up my aim) .... and I agree .... they are slaving hard away at the stats to make them even more useless. Edited September 9, 2015 by havaduck 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BAZI] allufewig Beta Tester 2,912 posts 15,294 battles Report post #13 Posted September 9, 2015 Move against XVM / WN stats / efficiency? If the API does not hold base XP values, then WN8 like efficiency calculating comes more difficult? (I have no idea how that thing works) Unlikely. None of the well known ratings from WoT (Eff, WN-X, xTR) has ever used XP as a part of its formula. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[EW_YK] Barkyro Players 439 posts 13,829 battles Report post #14 Posted September 9, 2015 Basically besides 2 bugs I don't see any useful and relevant changes at all on this patch but at least we get those. I would have been nice to have the planes for CV's fixed and why on earth did they stop the Spotter from fighting back I don't know since it was the most useful feature on it if they did that well give us the option to have fighters instead of those useless pieces of scrap metal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OUH] General_Kunde Players 406 posts 6,632 battles Report post #15 Posted September 9, 2015 Silent BB accuracy nerf incoming! (This patch just came too fast) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[R-D] Last_Rites Players 209 posts 8,622 battles Report post #16 Posted September 9, 2015 This patch at least didn't break anything like last patch, but they didn't fix anything they broke in the last patch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
captain_sam Beta Tester 133 posts 1,484 battles Report post #17 Posted September 9, 2015 This patch at least didn't break anything like last patch, but they didn't fix anything they broke in the last patch. Slow down, have you at least tried it? who knows what bugs are waiting around the corner... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NIKE] Xevious_Red Beta Tester 3,412 posts 7,888 battles Report post #18 Posted September 9, 2015 The xp seems a bit stupid. I remember when the US battleships came out, and it was a x4 weekend. Played one game in the wyoming (won) and the stats page proudly informed me my average exp for the wyoming was (literally) over 9000. This information isn't really any use to anyone: people that like to compare their stats to others won't find this info any good, and people that use their own stats to see where they can improve won't have any use for it either. The yubari AA reload is of some use if you have the superintendent skill since at least then you have 2 charges Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sharana Alpha Tester 2,271 posts 1,040 battles Report post #19 Posted September 9, 2015 (edited) havaduck, on 09 September 2015 - 10:36 AM, said: Fixed an error that lead to spotting aircraft being able to attack squadrons (We made the pilot aware of such inappropriate behaviour and he promised to never ever do it again). damn! what this game needed ..... a CV buff. Now those things are even more useless .... (at least give the option to have the fighter instead then!) Fixing [edited] and very annoying bug. You either have spotter or fighter, not both where you gain range and they still panic bombers. Don't know why it took them 2 months to fix it and some even take if for granted ... lol. Edited September 9, 2015 by BigBadVuk This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[EW_YK] Barkyro Players 439 posts 13,829 battles Report post #20 Posted September 9, 2015 (edited) Sharana: http://www.combinedfleet.com/ijna/f1m.htm http://www.combinedfleet.com/ijna/e7k.htm http://www.combinedfleet.com/ijna/e8n.htm http://www.combinedfleet.com/ijna/e16a.htm They have the means to disrupt the TB's and DB's. But I would easily accept this "fix" if they give me the option to pick between fighter and spotter. Edited September 9, 2015 by Barkyro Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sharana Alpha Tester 2,271 posts 1,040 battles Report post #21 Posted September 9, 2015 They had that option on PT1, but left if to cruisers only and high tier BBs, low tier BBs with spotter. It's called balance - the lower tier CVs are not so powerful as the higher tiers for you to need pocket fighter. Not to mention that low tier BBs are smaller targets and more manoeuvrable to avoid bombers. Also it was never working as intended for the spotters to panic bombers, they were there just for the range, the rest was bug that took over 2 months to be fixed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
havaduck ∞ Players 2,989 posts 11,824 battles Report post #22 Posted September 9, 2015 Sharana: But I would easily accept this "fix" if they give me the option to pick between fighter and spotter. THAT! I coulnd care less about the god forsaking artillery plane, but I dont get to choose, so in the event of incomming I launched it, hoped for the best and ENDURED the artillery-view. (dont forget the Arado on the Bismarck, pretty decent too and there was: >>>> Two notable operations were the capture of HMS Seal, and the repeated interception of RAF Armstrong-Whitworth Whitley bombers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arado_Ar_196) ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DtXpwnz Beta Tester 1,160 posts 377 battles Report post #23 Posted September 9, 2015 ffs guys... I was abusing that spotter plane in my Kongo yesterday and poor Zuiho/Langley players had absolutely no chance to score any hits on me. It's BS and well known bug since that PT before wipe and it took them this long to fix it... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[EW_YK] Barkyro Players 439 posts 13,829 battles Report post #24 Posted September 9, 2015 Not to mention that low tier BBs are smaller targets and more manoeuvrable to avoid bombers. Tell that to Fuso and New York I still think I should be given the option to choose. But the fighters could be as fragile as the spotters and not retain the durability of the CA fighters. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[EW_YK] Barkyro Players 439 posts 13,829 battles Report post #25 Posted September 9, 2015 (edited) You were abusing it because they did not take it out. It takes less than 2 seconds for fighters to down it and the rear gunners also down it easily. Edit* I will stop here with the spotter discussion since I dont want this to turn into another 20+ pages long thread for a nothing back and forth. As I said in my opinion ok but give me the choice. Any other thoughts on bug fixes except for this and the average ex"fix" Edited September 9, 2015 by Barkyro Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
