Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
RepSrb

R.I.P. JAP CV

28 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[SERBS]
Players
653 posts
25,073 battles

And the apropriate farewell song:

Ill mis you good buddy.

Edited by repsrb
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester
2,385 posts
10,008 battles

CVs and thier torp. bombers dropping torpedoes 400meters from your ship... I would not say a word if they would nerf all cvs 200% more even that I have Hiryu myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
5,342 posts
2,957 battles

If we can get CV players and BB players to play high tier DDs maybe they can whine like this to make WG buff them.... EUREKA EUREKA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DAMNO]
Beta Tester
857 posts
12,319 battles

And the apropriate farewell song:

Ill mis you good buddy.

 

What happened, they got deleted?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PORT]
Beta Tester
333 posts
6,438 battles

As Gabriel Angelos once said:

"It is human nature to seek culpability in the time of tragedy.

It is a sign of strength to cry out against fate rather than to bow one's head and succumb.

Inevitably many shall fault the hands of the hammer that fell the CVs - Ordo Wargamingus

But the balance team merely performs the duty of it's office.

To further fear them is redundant. To hate them - heretical.

Those more sensible will place responsibility in those who forced the hands of the patch crew.

With some fortune they may foster this hatred into purpose and further rule their own fate by investing in the CV support role."

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BW-UK]
Players
850 posts

OP, your posts are the worst I have ever seen, and I've been a member of various game forums for 4 years now. This thread will probably be closed, and I hope you stop posting soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
209 posts
8,622 battles

Those more sensible will place responsibility in those who forced the hands of the patch crew.

The muppets who complained about Carriers being overpowered because of some stupid statistics and the fact they got torped and died.

 

Still, they didn't have to do it did they. Nobody was going to stop playing over it, but now who knows.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
5,342 posts
2,957 battles

The muppets who complained about Carriers being overpowered because of some stupid statistics and the fact they got torped and died.

 

Still, they didn't have to do it did they. Nobody was going to stop playing over it, but now who knows.

 

Biased CV captain your name is added to my list. I have a couple biased BB captains on my list too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
29 posts

OMG the USN fanboys are screaming at a IJPN cv captain again....thing is guys the op`s right in what he says. IJPN cv`s are not that good anymore. USN CV`s get better squadron sizes, better torpedo drops, better fighter groups blah blah. The only advantage the IJPN cv got was a small amount of extra planes and an extra squadron albeit smaller than the USN ones so the tiny advantage that they had was negated instantly. OH and the USN cv planes get a constant weapons upgrade for every tier, the IJPN cv`s didn`t. They got completely a**e f**ed just beacause of the extra small squadron.

So fanboys, stop shouting down us IJPN cv captains. You won, you've now got the easy cv`s to play...noobs !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
48 posts
2,424 battles

 

Biased CV captain your name is added to my list. I have a couple biased BB captains on my list too. 

 

am i on your list? :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
6,753 posts
7,907 battles

 

...since this is the same old thread with a different title I'll just re-post that here too:

 

Japanese CVs tier 4 - 8 and all CVs tier 9 & 10 were OP before the patch.

 

Proven by the "old" Asia-stats:

Spoiler

 

 

Proven by: http://warshipstats.com:

Spoiler

 

 

 

 

Proven by individual player stats, for example my stats:

Hosho - 105 Gefechte [battles], 68% Siege [winrate], 68.000 Schaden pro Spiel [damage per battle];

 

Zuiho - 130 Gefechte, 65% Siege, 91.000 Schaden pro Spiel; (strike setup)

 

Ryujo - 117 Gefechte, 72% Siege, 90.000 Schaden pro Spiel; (strike setup)

 

Hiryu - 90 Gefechte, 59% Siege, 78.000 Schaden pro Spiel; (viel mit Jäger-setup gespielt, deswegen der "geringe" Schaden pro Runde - played much with fighter setup, that's why the damage per battle is so "low")

 

Shokaku - 74 Gefechte, 61% Siege, 123.000 Schaden pro Spiel; (strike setup)

 

shokaku-yoswksu.jpg

 

 

And finally proven by WG's CV-Nerfs in the latest patch, if there hadn't been anything OP about those CVs they wouldn't have nerfed them, pretty simple.

 

So now they overnerfed them a bit?

 

Then WG will buff them again, no matter what we write here in the EU forums.

 

They have ther RU.forums and their statistics, WG EU has only a few guys who have too much to work to be able to sort through this mess called EU forums to collect all feedback, filter and translate it.....so we just have to wait anyway.

 

 

Ok so it's time to dump some stats in this thread:

 

Ship popularity on EU server since CBT

Cruisers - 45.3%

Battleships - 28.9%

Destroyers - 19%

Carriers - 6.8%

 

CV players are the minority here, atm there's no more easy slaughter for japanese CVs, so what?

 

Have some fun with DDs (*), CAs and BBs then. ;)

 

Perfect opportunity to level BBs atm, many US CVs ingame atm which are busy fighting each other with fighters. ;)

 

(*)

[DDs tier VI+ were already difficult in CBT, got nerfed when OBT started and just got nerfed again, no thx. ;) ]

 

 

;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SPUDS]
Players
625 posts
14,644 battles

The muppets who complained about Carriers being overpowered because of some stupid statistics and the fact they got torped and died.

 

Still, they didn't have to do it did they. Nobody was going to stop playing over it, but now who knows.

 

Yeah! Bloody muppets! Bloody numbers! Bloody everything! Give me my, only from YOUR POV OP, IJN CV back! Now! Now! NOW!

Or I swear I will quit and uninstall this game! I swear it! :izmena:

 

LOLMAO :bajan:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
29 posts

WOW! This really is a forum where people are not allowed to air their views without being humiliated and ridiculed by others! Instead of intelligent and reasonable answers almost everyone here resorts to childish and nerdy videos and sarcastic and overly aggressive answers. What a bunch of morons most of you are!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
5,342 posts
2,957 battles

WOW! This really is a forum where people are not allowed to air their views without being humiliated and ridiculed by others! Instead of intelligent and reasonable answers almost everyone here resorts to childish and nerdy videos and sarcastic and overly aggressive answers. What a bunch of morons most of you are!

 

Mosto f us know eachother from other threads. So you know. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ST-EU]
Supertest Coordinator, Alpha Tester
1,807 posts
13,100 battles

WOW! This really is a forum where people are not allowed to air their views without being humiliated and ridiculed by others! Instead of intelligent and reasonable answers almost everyone here resorts to childish and nerdy videos and sarcastic and overly aggressive answers. What a bunch of morons most of you are!

 

Or it's just a forum where people get sick of reading about the same topic in a dozen different threads each day. :sceptic:

 

On topic: I totally agree with the TO.70k+ average damage at t4, 80k+ at t5 and 100k+ at t6 as the good players were able to acchieve with their IJN CVs is totally ballanced and not OP at all. Nerfing the IJN CVs is a personal attack against all of us CV skippers.* :izmena:

(yes, that was sarkasm)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertester
1,046 posts
4,551 battles

WOW! This really is a forum where people are not allowed to air their views without being humiliated and ridiculed by others! Instead of intelligent and reasonable answers almost everyone here resorts to childish and nerdy videos and sarcastic and overly aggressive answers. What a bunch of morons most of you are!

 

You must be new to the forums mate.As Userext said,we pretty much know each other here from the sea salt we have endured from Closed Beta test times.

 

This particular thread is subject to a bunch of butthurt CV players who got their precious statpadding jewels nerfed to the ground and then come here to voice their frustration and try to convince the rest 90% of the playerbase that their "Rising Sun Jewels" were not Op at all (despite all the statistics showing otherwise)

 

I dont know about you but i personaly have zero tolerance to BS and thats what this particular portion of people is saying.Thats the main reason me and the rest of the players are trolling them.

 

You will get respected to this community as long as you have something logical and down to earth to say and not pure BS about "Why you nerfed me etc...

 

We discussed this subject again and again today and there are people that still think that WG did a mistake and they will roll the patch back. :D

 

There is a difference between voicing your opinion with correct evaluation and voicing it recklessly without actual facts.

 

Just because someone is not in touch with reality and lives in his own "IJN CV are balanced " world,im not forced to explain to him where he is wrong and neither the rest of the community is,especially when this is already,as i said,discussed.

 

It may sound harsh mate but forums are just an extension of real life.Just when someone will not hear you if you talk nonsense in real life,none will hear you here either...

 

Have a nice evening:honoring:

Edited by Mister_Greek
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×