Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
xPraetoriaNx

So, new Carrier MM failed already?

69 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
271 posts
3,399 battles

People don't think and dont know, they expect software to solve hardware problems in this case you can make match making as good as you want but when there isnt players the program can not generate humans

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
75 posts
1,133 battles

I really don't understand this then. When I want to play my Tipritz, I'm often in queue for 1,5-3 minutes (record is 4,5). Yet other times the MM just goes "ah well, [edited]it" and places people in matches where they don't belong? Like with the carrier above, or when there are tier X ships in an otherwise tier VIII battle, and only on one side...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KAI]
Alpha Tester
171 posts
4,243 battles

Let me quote patch notes for you.

 Implemented a “mirror balance” for aircraft carriers in terms of their number and tier in almost all cases (except for extremely rare occasions when the waiting time in queue is longer than the maximum time allowed).

 

There will be occasions where the match up wouldn't be balanced, especially on higher tiers when not many players are on-line, but those should be relatively rare.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
18 posts

Besides, i have the Hakuryu and the Shokaku can quite easly sink Essex, unless ofcourse has fighter deck, which makes the Essex more or less useless. Atleast both teams got 2 CV's 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[FIFO]
[FIFO]
Beta Tester
2,451 posts
7,514 battles

As mentioned 3k players is not giving much for the MM to work with.  However I was under the impression that it would not mismatch - it should throw people out rather than do that after they have said it won't

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[DAMNO]
Beta Tester
857 posts
12,319 battles

So far perfect balance up to tier 7 even with the low amount of players right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
273 posts
2,478 battles

Not much to say...

 

No fail. It was announced that balancing has timeout (words long were used) after which balancing goes as it used.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[1UP]
Alpha Tester, Players
676 posts
922 battles

Not much to say...

 

When it's early in the morning and matchmaking is struggling to make teams, you *should* know it starts to drop certain criteria in order make matches. It's dropped 2 of those things for your match. 

  • Firstly it's only 8 on 8
  • Secondly it's not been able to match the carriers per tier.

As someone with over 18,000 battles in World of Tanks, I'd have thought you'd understand the core basics of how our matchmaking system works.

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SOFI]
Beta Tester
229 posts
13,259 battles

 

.....

As someone with over 18,000 battles in World of Tanks, I'd have thought you'd understand the core basics of how our matchmaking system works.

 

See Ectar, for some Guys understanding has nothing to do with the need to post stuff on Boards and look like whiney little girls ... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Beta Tester
2,657 posts
25,762 battles

 

When it's early in the morning and matchmaking is struggling to make teams, you *should* know it starts to drop certain criteria in order make matches. It's dropped 2 of those things for your match.

  • Firstly it's only 8 on 8
  • Secondly it's not been able to match the carriers per tier.

As someone with over 18,000 battles in World of Tanks, I'd have thought you'd understand the core basics of how our matchmaking system works.

 

As someone with nearly 30k battles in WoT I understand that your matchmaking system is not working. :P:P:P

 

@OP: There is a start-up tip stating something along those lines for a reason => If waiting time is too long try another tier/ship!

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SKIDZ]
Players
1,030 posts
[edited]
Edited by GASOVER
This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. An official notification has also been sent. GASOVER
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weekend Tester
916 posts
1,191 battles

[edited] 

 

Ofc. Let's just punish players for their dedication to the game, so that they are not able to play their ships because reasons....
Edited by GASOVER
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SOCKS]
Players
790 posts
5,620 battles

 

When it's early in the morning and matchmaking is struggling to make teams, you *should* know it starts to drop certain criteria in order make matches.

 

With all due respect, Ectar, this is not a correct policy. Just because one dude wants to play his big stick ship with low player counts it doesn't mean his wish should ruin the fun of the upcoming battle for the other 23 players. The dude with the un-matchmakeable ship should wait in the queue until a proper game for him appears, and if he doesn't want to wait, he always can play some other ship.

 

In other words, it shouldn't be the thousands normal players being told "you're screwed because there are low numbers in the server", but the dozens players with big ships being told "you don't get games too quickly because there are low numbers in the server".

 

An individual's fun<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<the other 23 players' fun. Your whole MM-related policy, imo, is just plain wrong.

Edited by RAMJB
  • Cool 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SKIDZ]
Players
1,030 posts

 

With all due respect, Ectar, this is not a correct policy. Just because one dude wants to play his big stick ship with low player counts it doesn't mean his wish should ruin the fun of the upcoming battle for the other 23 players. The dude with the un-matchmakeable ship should wait in the queue until a proper game for him appears, and if he doesn't want to wait, he always can play some other ship.

 

In other words, it shouldn't be the thousands normal players being told "you're screwed because there are low numbers in the server", but the dozens players with big ships being told "you don't get games too quickly because there are low numbers in the server".

 

An individual's fun<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<the other 23 players' fun. Your whole MM-related policy, imo, is just plain wrong.

 

 

With all due respect, Ectar, this is not a correct policy. Just because one dude wants to play his big stick ship with low player counts it doesn't mean his wish should ruin the fun of the upcoming battle for the other 23 players. The dude with the un-matchmakeable ship should wait in the queue until a proper game for him appears, and if he doesn't want to wait, he always can play some other ship.

 

In other words, it shouldn't be the thousands normal players being told "you're screwed because there are low numbers in the server", but the dozens players with big ships being told "you don't get games too quickly because there are low numbers in the server".

 

An individual's fun<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<the other 23 players' fun. Your whole MM-related policy, imo, is just plain wrong.

+1 agreed play another ship 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
44 posts
35,962 battles

I really don't understand this then. When I want to play my Tipritz, I'm often in queue for 1,5-3 minutes (record is 4,5). Yet other times the MM just goes "ah well, [edited]it" and places people in matches where they don't belong? Like with the carrier above, or when there are tier X ships in an otherwise tier VIII battle, and only on one side...

 

i dont undestand why to many player (kid or not )  in any case always cry.

try to play the game if you like, or change your game a lot like Tetris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
75 posts
1,133 battles

Was about to say the same thing as RAMJB.

I understand the 8v8, as it was indeed at 9 in the morning on a weekday, but if your ship is "too high tier", you should be alerted by the matchmaker. Sure the picture in my first post is just a slight problem, but look at these... What's the excuse here? So "as someone with over 18000 battles in World of Tanks", i understand that the matchmaker in World of Warships is kinda buggy still. I mean, what the hell, if I, in my Tirpitz often suffer from 3 min long queues, because of the flood of Tirpitzes, why can't "too high tier" players be told to sod off and either wait a bit more or play different ships?

By the logic we see in these two images, Tirpitzes should be put into tier battles witch were indented to house tier V-VI ships. "Oh sorry, so many Tipritzes in the queue, I can't place them in tier VIII battles, so here you go, one side gets 2-3 of them so they can rape your tier V [edited]."

(Needless to say, in both cases the group with tier X ships won, by a lot.)

World of Warships-09-02-2015 12-46-53.jpg

World of Warships-08-31-2015 21-39-57.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
44 posts
35,962 battles

Was about to say the same thing as RAMJB.

 

I understand the 8v8, as it was indeed at 9 in the morning on a weekday, but if your ship is "too high tier", you should be alerted by the matchmaker. Sure the picture in my first post is just a slight problem, but look at these... What's the excuse here? So "as someone with over 18000 battles in World of Tanks", i understand that the matchmaker in World of Warships is kinda buggy still. I mean, what the hell, if I, in my Tirpitz often suffer from 3 min long queues, because of the flood of Tirpitzes, why can't "too high tier" players be told to sod off and either wait a bit more or play different ships?

By the logic we see in these two images, Tirpitzes should be put into tier battles witch were indented to house tier V-VI ships. "Oh sorry, so many Tipritzes in the queue, I can't place them in tier VIII battles, so here you go, one side gets 2-3 of them so they can rape your tier V [edited]."

 

(Needless to say, in both cases the group with tier X ships won, by a lot.)

 

I am sorry, your logic is not very logical
What do you want to get this game ......
example: I play only levels X you think I should only play an hour a day & if whenever you want?
Why you do not hurry to do high or stop direct you to play?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
75 posts
1,133 battles

 

I am sorry, your logic is not very logical
What do you want to get this game ......
example: I play only levels X you think I should only play an hour a day & if whenever you want?
Why you do not hurry to do high or stop direct you to play?

 

So you say I'm not logical, yet you claim that putting you, as a tier X guy, up against a team which has only tier VII and VIII is completely justified and okay to do so? lol...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,603 posts
7,488 battles

If it was your only goal to be the first one to open a whine and cry Thread about unfair MM after patch 4.1, it was actually brilliant to go into matches on patch morning with a low server population in a Tier 8 BB.

 

 

If it was not your goal from the beginning to do this, it was just plain retarded to go into queue with a Tier 8 BB and just shows that you have not understood what the Matchmaker does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Beta Tester
2,657 posts
25,762 battles

 

I am sorry, your logic is not very logical

What do you want to get this game ......

example: I play only levels X you think I should only play an hour a day & if whenever you want?

Why you do not hurry to do high or stop direct you to play?

 

Because the journey is the reward?

Because tier X is not where the fun is?

Because tier X does not yield much silver?

etc.

 

And yes, if you are the only one wanting to plays tier X all day long than you should only be able to play if enough other high tier players are available, even if this means only one battle / hour.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
75 posts
1,133 battles

If it was your only goal to be the first one to open a whine and cry Thread about unfair MM after patch 4.1, it was actually brilliant to go into matches on patch morning with a low server population in a Tier 8 BB.

 

 

If it was not your goal from the beginning to do this, it was just plain retarded to go into queue with a Tier 8 BB and just shows that you have not understood what the Matchmaker does.

 

You realize that on 2 out of my 3 posted screenshots (including the one in the first post) I'm in a Myoko, not in a tier 8 battleship? And yet you call me retarded, priceless.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×