Any news on when the skillships will be nerfed? (CVs)

[DtXpwnz]

 

Yep, but in Wot, medium tank is what requires the most skill to be played effectively, this is not the case with CVs. Thus failed game design.

 

Medium tanks don't require most skill...

And I find CVs most challenging class to play in WoWs.

[Vulgarny]

understanding is not required, only obedience

[ironhammer500]

ROFL.. these ideas of players who don't understand CVs. Please do that, yes please... all BBs will be constantly on fire, while I will torp all CAs and DDs and it will even mostly eliminate threat of CA panic button.

 

What else will they need to change to balance CVs? Reduce plane HP might be a good one for early tiers but later T8+ the planes start getting destroyed easier..Buff AA? people seem really against buffing up AA...idk why its terrible. Nerf plane tops would be better since they deal almost 75%  damage of a DDs torp yet the torps would of have been a lot smaller... DDs are the prime torp boats why should CVs be able to deal more damage then a DD?

[Iron_Gekko]

 

As someone said if it requires a whole team to work together to counter 1 player, something is fundamentally wrong with that class. Reduce CV damage but lets planes rearm in like 5 secs.

 

No, in most cases 2... just like most other classes, it requires more then one CA to properly kill a BB and it requires more then a BB to kill a DD. The amount of people working together increases the success.

 

If not I think you should just call out the WG design team in an email and tell them they suck at making games.

[specialkha]

Medium tanks don't require most skill...

And I find CVs most challenging class to play in WoWs.

 

Yeah, Hellcat/KV1s and Type 59 do .

 

Like you would know what skill is.

[ironhammer500]

 

No, in most cases 2... just like most other classes, it requires more then one CA to properly kill a BB and it requires more then a BB to kill a DD. The amount of people working together increases the success.

 

If not I think you should just call out the WG design team in an email and tell them they suck at making games.

 

You have played higher tier games right when u get waves of planes...the way AA works only 1 squad is shot at...so CV players group 3-4 waves and simply mass bomb a target even a CA with decent AA gets hit.

[DtXpwnz]

 

 

Like you would know what skill is.

oh yeah, that's why my highest WN8 tanks are everyone's favourite statpadder high tier mediums... Oh wait.

 

 

 

 

[specialkha]

oh yeah, that's why my highest WN8 tanks are everyone's favourite statpadder high tier mediums... Oh wait.

 

 

 

 

 

Not a single T8+. Gj And the Su85b (which is OP, but since it is russian and less play than the kv1s, WG won't nerf it).

 

So again, you do not know what skill is. Statpadder.

[Broevaharo]

Some nice @$@$ waving here 

 

[DtXpwnz]

Why would I play high tiers? Because playing T8+ tanks is fun? oh wait... the most unbalanced tiers ruled by mediums, full of ridiculous tanks like deathstar, much fun to play.

 

And your fail stats in mediums (including Batchat) say all

 

edit: 4 games in SU85B to get to another tier... much statpadding.

[22cm]

Thats why Iowa is only BB that can carry games better even then carrier. Its got all pros of CA but no cons and also is awesome AA platform

 

Not at all, not better then carrier:

Tier 9 US BB Iowa averages: WR - 46.12%, damage - 68k, XP - 1755

Tier 9 JP CV Taiho averages: WR -46,98%, damage - 78k, XP - 2395.

[specialkha]

Why would I play high tiers? Because playing T8+ tanks is fun? oh wait... the most unbalanced tiers ruled by mediums, full of ridiculous tanks like deathstar, much fun to play.

 

And your fail stats in mediums (including Batchat) say all

 

Because T8+ is where there are the most skilled players? Must be fun to farm tomatoes.

[DtXpwnz]

Hak 20-22 sec Midway i would guess around 35-40 sec. Thats why you can power cap vs USA carrier but not vs IJN

 

36s for Midway's TB when using all upgrades for -servicing time. Something around 38-39 for DBs

[Vulgarny]

 

Not at all, not better then carrier:

Tier 9 US BB Iowa averages: WR - 46.12%, damage - 68k, XP - 1755

Tier 9 JP CV Taiho averages: WR -46,98%, damage - 78k, XP - 2395.

 

Child, monkey with machine gun is still monkey, but give that machine gun to cold stone killer...............

[22cm]

 

Child, monkey with machine gun is still monkey, but give that machine gun to cold stone killer...............

 

As always, when you show them stats, they show you nothing in return...

 

Also, could you improve your English a bit? Or should I I understand from here you are a stone killer?! Please, have mercy on poor stones.

[Vulgarny]

Well you show that Iowa got same win ratio as OP no skill I can kill all with my left thumb Taiho so what other proof you want?

 

And yes I should wrote not cold stone killer but stone cold killer but if you dont know what that means maybe your English , Denglish or Angrlish need improvement.

[22cm]

Well you show that Iowa got same win ratio as OP no skill I can kill all with my left thumb Taiho so what other proof you want?

 

And yes I should wrote not cold stone killer but stone cold killer but if you dont know what that means maybe your English , Denglish or Angrlish need improvement.

 

How is it the same? Even WR is higher for Taiho, almost 1%, not to mention the rest of the stats. In WoWs 1% is a big difference because of all the draws.

 

[Vulgarny]

You lack the basic knowledge how xp is calculated in WoWS to understand why CV can and will have more xp per battle then other ships

[22cm]

Thats why Iowa is only BB that can carry games better even then carrier.

 

Let me quote you again. All JP carriers have higher WR than Iowa, even the tier 4 Hosho. So all of them carry games better than Iowa.

[22cm]

You lack the basic knowledge how xp is calculated in WoWS to understand why CV can and will have more xp per battle then other ships

 

Your math is lacking. They have all the stats (WR, damage, XP, credits) better than the other ships.

[airmac1]

 

Let me quote you again. All JP carriers have higher WR than Iowa, even the tier 4 Hosho. So all of them carry games better than Iowa.

 

And since the CVs are being nerfed, guess the iowa will be the next ship to get nerfed. Great going on that one

 

[22cm]

 

And since the CVs are being nerfed, guess the iowa will be the next ship to get nerfed. Great going on that one

 

 

Iowa is a single ship, while in the BB class you also have Kawachi, Myogi, Colorado, etc, which are bad ships and underperforming, and other BBs who have an average performance.

 

But all the CV class is overperforming as a whole. Even the bad CVs like Langley or Bogue have an average performance on their tier.

 

[Vulgarny]

Nope, what CV can do is smother the path for other ships in your team to win battle. You can spot that pesky DD near your BBs, or spot cap so others can reset, finish that almost dead ship in domination to tip the balance.of battle.

Yes, very good CV player can wreck havoc in enemy team if they are incompetent. Maybe some day you will have high tier CV and also Iowa then ray  of understanding will hit your head.

[Vulgarny]

 

Your math is lacking. They have all the stats (WR, damage, XP, credits) better than the other ships.

 

As I said you just simply dont understand mechanics and lack xp and knowledge of high tiers gameplay of various classes. XP and credits are connected and tied to each other. Damage was explained over and over again why is bigger on CVs then other ships. WR is something way more then pure dmg you do in battles.

[22cm]

Nope, what CV can do is smother the path for other ships in your team to win battle. You can spot that pesky DD near your BBs, or spot cap so others can reset, finish that almost dead ship in domination to tip the balance.of battle.

Yes, very good CV player can wreck havoc in enemy team if they are incompetent. Maybe some day you will have high tier CV and also Iowa then ray  of understanding will hit your head.

 

I think the ray of understanding never hit your head, you have no arguments, all the existent stats show CVs are OP.