Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Dodgeball54

Mutsuki worse than Minekaze

49 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
3 posts
1,481 battles

 Japanse Mutsuki tier VI DD, is worse than it's predecessor in every way. This makes me very sad, first I play 3 days too unlock next tier ship, then find out it is not as good as tier V.

How can this be? Shouldn't ships get better higher up the tiers?

I don't know what to do....should i grind like 200 games with a very weak ship? or just buy back minekaze and have fun at the game....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
372 posts
820 battles

correct.

 

But the Hatsuhara and Fubuki are great!

 

Also NEVER sell your Minekaze. Play it when your Mutsuki is sunk, and you need some fun!

Edited by VonVolks
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MIMI]
Beta Tester
1,338 posts
8,356 battles

Well, it is as you have said. It is bad. I would even say its horrible. Just keep the Minekaze and keep grinding the Mutsuki if your really wanna go up the ranks. Because I personally think that you will have the most fun playing the Minekaze.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RONIN]
Beta Tester
6,377 posts
36,578 battles

Tier 6, 7 and 9 JP DDs are bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
347 posts
686 battles

 Japanse Mutsuki tier VI DD, is worse than it's predecessor in every way. This makes me very sad, first I play 3 days too unlock next tier ship, then find out it is not as good as tier V.

How can this be? Shouldn't ships get better higher up the tiers?

I don't know what to do....should i grind like 200 games with a very weak ship? or just buy back minekaze and have fun at the game....

 

The mutsuki isnt bad..........it is .........If you dont like it, you will be dissapointed by all the next ships.

Its main advantages over the Minekaze are its higher damage torps , harder to evade torps (triple launchers) ,.

All the rest isnt........better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
790 posts
1,808 battles

Someone is starting to realise something important.. Now let's just hope there are more of you to come

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[RONIN]
Beta Tester
6,377 posts
36,578 battles

Why is it worse? (not there yet)

 

So you can free exp it with gold.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
372 posts
820 battles

Only Mutsuki isnt that good. Ignore the haters. The Hatsuhara and Fubuki are really fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
347 posts
686 battles

Why is it worse? (not there yet)

 

Mutsuki is bad because :

1)It is slower then the minekaze

2)It is less manouverable then the minekaze

3)The torps reload slower then on the minekaze

4)It is spotted from 6.1 instead of 5.9

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
49 posts
5,026 battles

 

Mutsuki is bad because :

1)It is slower then the minekaze

2)It is less manouverable then the minekaze

3)The torps reload slower then on the minekaze

4)It is spotted from 6.1 instead of 5.9

 Awwww fck....guess i need to play it more ninja Island Style then....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[UNICS]
Beta Tester
4,870 posts
10,112 battles

After the Minekaze the only thing getting better on the IJN DDs are the torpedoes. The actual ships sometimes get worse. I like the 127mm guns though starting with the Hatsuharu, if I can get them facing the right direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
347 posts
686 battles

After the Minekaze the only thing getting better on the IJN DDs are the torpedoes. The actual ships sometimes get worse. I like the 127mm guns though starting with the Hatsuharu, if I can get them facing the right direction.

 

(Shimakaze has 80 000 hp engine)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[UNICS]
Beta Tester
4,870 posts
10,112 battles

 

(Shimakaze has 80 000 hp engine)

 

But the actual speed upgrade is marginal at best, compared to the Minekaze that is. The Shimakaze is the only IJN DD that is a definite upgrade from the previous DDs.

 

I actually enjoyed sailing the Fubuki and Kagero, but it's not a fun progression line when almost nothing gets better for >500k XP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ST-EU]
Supertest Coordinator, Alpha Tester
1,807 posts
13,100 battles

Mutsuki is bad because :

1)It is slower then the minekaze

*snip*

4)It is spotted from 6.1 instead of 5.9

 

To 1: I don't understand why they needed to nerf the 39.6kn top speed she had in the CBT.

It might be a ballancing decision but it is one I don't understand given the advantages of Minekaze.

To 4: Mutsuki has the same detectability as Minekaze of 5.9km. The one with 6.1km is the t4 Isokaze.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PRAVD]
Weekend Tester
3,802 posts
8,478 battles

Also NEVER sell your Minekaze. Play it when your Mutsuki is sunk, and you need some fun!

I'd suggest Isokaze better since she has better turrets. Don't underestimate those guns you can even kill USN DDs if ambushed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PRAVD]
Weekend Tester
3,802 posts
8,478 battles

 

The mutsuki isnt bad..........it is .........If you dont like it, you will be dissapointed by all the next ships.

Its main advantages over the Minekaze are its higher damage torps , harder to evade torps (triple launchers) ,.

All the rest isnt........better.

 

for elite torps2k more damage but with double the reloadand only 2 kts speed difference, hardly better. As for stock torps it is completely worse in each aspect except 200 more damage. I have no idea why a 610mm torp is that worse than a 533mm!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,999 posts
6,434 battles

Mutsuki really feels like a huge step backwards. The Hatsuharu and the Kagero.... some people say they are bad, others think they are quite ok. I'd call them both "acquired tastes". Had good successes in both in the CBT, but not in the beginning, it took me quite a few frustrating games until I started to figure them out somewhat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PRAVD]
Weekend Tester
3,802 posts
8,478 battles

Mutsuki really feels like a huge step backwards. The Hatsuharu and the Kagero.... some people say they are bad, others think they are quite ok. I'd call them both "acquired tastes". Had good successes in both in the CBT, but not in the beginning, it took me quite a few frustrating games until I started to figure them out somewhat.

 

Hatsuharu suffers mainly because of the change of playstyle from the previous ships. Suddenly you are less maneuverable and less stealthy; getting closer to enemy is much more risky. Her armament improve over the previous ships her torps however not so much because you still have 6 of them that reloads more than a minute and good-but-not-fantastic speed. Kagerou is the other way around. She can be more stealthy that Fubuki and has better torps (although reload slower) but her guns are much to be desired since you get the same guns that turn slower, making this ship a one-purpose-only glass cannon that either work greatly or terribly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
372 posts
820 battles

Yeah I have to say I didn't get the Kagero having the same guns but worse of the Fubuki...

 

I never got to the Kagero "Long Lance" torps tho

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
3,801 posts
10,499 battles

One of the most important statistics for a DD is detection range and torp reload speed (dps). We took Minekazes into tier X battles and they killed some tier X ships at times.

 

The amounts of torps per volley is not as important as torp density is (chance of passing through in between). It helps, but experienced players can easily evade your torps from ranges over 4.5km.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PRAVD]
Weekend Tester
3,802 posts
8,478 battles

Yeah I have to say I didn't get the Kagero having the same guns but worse of the Fubuki...

 

I never got to the Kagero "Long Lance" torps tho

 

Well historically they were worse elevation wise. It is something I only learned recently too. That's why Kagerou guns are not DB guns (making is even worse) but did those turrets turn slower than Fubuki's? I got the idea that there isn't information about turning speed difference between the two, so WG must used it as balancing stats!

Maybe They should just introduce Yuugumo class and Kagerou can be a tier 8 in the second line? at least they will get DB guns that will turn as fast as Shimakaze's and Fubuki's guns! Nothing else is different!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KLLCV]
Beta Tester
508 posts
5,264 battles

Well, in CBT the Mutsuki was beyond awfull, and by the sounds of it, it hasnt changed at all. 

 

Free exp seems the way to go imo, or at least use it on this ship to partially push u to the Hatsuhara. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
53 posts
1,875 battles

Wich torps we should use on Minekaze since second tier torps are alot slower?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×